:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:多層面Rasch模式在數學實作評量的應用
書刊名:教育心理學報
作者:謝如山 引用關係謝名娟 引用關係
作者(外文):Hsieh, Ju-shanHsieh, Ming-chuan
出版日期:2013
卷期:45:1
頁次:頁1-16+18
主題關鍵詞:多層面Rasch模式評分者信度實作評量Many-facet RaschPerformance assessmentRater reliability
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:82
  • 點閱點閱:39
本研究採用多層面的Rasch分析,來評估學生在實作評量所具備的潛在能力。本研究所使用的測驗內容在測量學生對數學的數感及生活應用的數學能力,總共有四個考題,三百一十四位四到六年級的學童,與三位評分者參與本研究。結果顯示即使評分者接受訓練並依據規準來進行評分,不同評分者之間的嚴厲度也確實存在差異,透過多層面的Rasch模式分析,可以將評分嚴厲度加以考量,並能協助研究者,偵測評分者不合常規的評分現象,而數據中所呈現之標準化殘差值大致為隨機分布,顯示評分並無明顯的系統性誤差存在。由本研究結果可看出多層面Rasch模式在分析實作評量上相當有用,值得其他教育工作者參考。
The purpose of this study is to evaluate student's potential ability on mathematics ability using Many-facet Rasch Model. The test students took consisted of four ranking levels. Three hundred and fourteen elementary students, and three raters were participated in this study. The results show that even with training and delineating a standard for grading, there remained differences in grader severity among the raters. Many-facet Rasch analysis enabled calibration of grader severity for researchers to detect grader irregularities. Data showed that the standard residuals were randomly distributed, indicating that there were no obvious systematic errors. Overall, the study show Many-facet Rasch model can be quite a useful analytic tool in performance assessment.
期刊論文
1.Basturk, R.(2008)。Applying the many-facet Rasch model to evaluate powerpoint presentation performance in higher education。Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,33(4),431-444。  new window
2.Jurdak, M.、Zein, R. A.(1998)。The effect of journal writing on achievement in and attitudes toward mathematics。School Science & Mathematics,98(8),412-419。  new window
3.Lunz, M. E.、Stahl, J. A.(1990)。Judge consistency and severity across grading periods。Evaluation & the Health Professions,13,435-444。  new window
4.Lunz, M. E.、Wright, B. D.、Linacre, J. M.(1990)。Measuring the impact of judge seeerity on examination scores。Applied Measurement in Education,3,331-345。  new window
5.Smith, E. V.、Kulikowich, J. M.(2004)。An application of generalizability theory and many facet Rasch measurement using a complex problem solving skills assessment。Educational and Psychological Measurement,64(4),617-639。  new window
6.Shavelson, R. J.、Baxter, G. P.、Pine, J.(1992)。Performance assessment: Political rhetoric and measurement reality。Educational Researcher,21(4),22-27。  new window
7.張麗麗(20020600)。從分數的意義談實作評量效度的建立。教育研究,98,37-51。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Engelhard, G. Jr.(1992)。The measurement of writing ability with a many-faceted Rasch model。Applied Measurement in Education,5(3),171-191。  new window
9.王文中(20041200)。Rasch測量理論與其在教育和心理之應用。教育與心理研究,27(4),637-694。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.張新立、吳舜丞(20080400)。多層面Rasch模式於學術研討會論文評分之應用。測驗學刊,55(1),105-128。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.姚漢禱、姚偉哲(20080400)。Application of Many-Facet Rasch Model to Analyze the Skills of Elite Athletes in Double Trap。測驗學刊,55(1),89-103。new window  new window
12.Linacre, J. M.(1999)。Investigating Rating Scale Category Utility。Journal of Outcome Measurement,3,103-122。  new window
13.Tennant, A.、Pallant, J. F.(2006)。Unidimensionality matters! (A tale of two Smiths?)。Rasch Measurement Transactions,20(1),1048-1051。  new window
會議論文
1.藍珮君(2012)。以多面向Rasch測量模式分析TOCFL口語測驗評分者訓練效果。2010年國際學術硏討會--測驗及評量論文専輯。新北市:國家教育研究院。125-139。  延伸查詢new window
2.Lunz, M. E.、Wright, B. D.、Stahl, J. A.、Linacre, J. M.(1989)。Equating practical examinations。the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education。San Francisco, CA。  new window
3.Twing, J.、Williams, K. T.(1992)。An investigation of writing assessment using a many-faceted Rasch model。the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association。San Francisco, CA。  new window
學位論文
1.蔡正濱(2006)。國小數學科實作評量評分者一致性相關因素探討(碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.曾安如(2005)。國小二年級學童數學寫作活動、數學成就與數學態度之相關研究(碩士論文)。臺中師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
3.詹元智(2002)。國小數學科實作評量之效度探討(碩士論文)。屏東師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Linacre, J. M.(2006)。Winsteps: Rasch model statistical software。Chicago, IL:MESA。  new window
2.Linacre, J. M.(2006)。FACETS: Many-facet Rasch measurement computer program。Chicago, IL:MESA。  new window
3.de Ayala, R. J.(2009)。The theory and practice of item response theory。New York, NY:Guilford。  new window
4.Stiggins, Richard J.(1994)。Student-centered classroom assessment。New York, NY:Macmillan Publishing Company。  new window
5.Gardner, H.(1983)。Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences。NY:Random House。  new window
6.余民寧(2009)。試題反應理論(IRT)及其應用。心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.Linacre, J. M.(1989)。Many-facet Rasch measurement。Chicago:MESA Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE