:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從清教徒倫理檢審墨家與資本主義精神
書刊名:漢語基督教學術論評
作者:張俊
作者(外文):Zhang, Jun
出版日期:2013
卷期:16
頁次:頁97-130
主題關鍵詞:墨家清教徒禁欲倫理經濟理性MohistPuritanAscetic ethicEconomyRationality
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:110
  • 點閱點閱:43
墨家倫理比任何其他諸子學派的倫理都接近清教徒倫理。墨家同清教徒一樣,都持某種入世的禁欲經濟倫理,肯定現實逐利與財富積累的正當性,強調勤懇工作和節儉的禁欲主義。甚至墨家還有類似基督教上帝信仰與博愛教義的「天志」信仰與「兼愛」倫理主張。但這些只能算作表面的相似性,墨家倫理與清教徒倫理其實存在本質差異。清教徒倫理以永生救贖為其信仰背景,通過「天職」觀念確立起塵世職業工作的救贖論意義,再把預定論造成的心理焦慮轉化為工作與禁欲的精神動力,對現實的社會實踐生活進行理性化的組織與規劃。其中尤其是對經濟活動的理性組織與安排,最終使自然財富轉變為不斷賺取利潤的商業資本。這種經濟理性主義是資本主義精神的核心。墨家沒有清教徒這種特殊的信仰文化,其主張力行、節用的禁欲經濟倫理,追求財富的積累,其實最大理想也不過是「滿足需求」,均富共用,實現,其所謂民富國安的現實政治訴求而已。這完全屬於韋伯所講的那種經濟傳統主義,並不存在無限追逐利潤的商業精神,因此與資本主義精神也不可能產生任何重要關聯。
Mohist ethic was closer to the Puritan ethic than any other ethic of Hundred Schools. In the same was as the Puritans, Mohists insisted on a form of worldly ascetic ethic in the field of economy. Both groups affirmed the legitimacy of pursuing benefits and collecting money, and highlighted the asceticism of hard work and frugality. As Christians, the Puritans believed in God and in the love command, while Mohists believed in the will of heaven and insisted the principle of loving each other as well. However, these similarities were merely superficial. There were qualitative differences between the Mohist ethic and that of the Puritans. Against the background of eternal salvation, the Puritan ethic founded the soteriological significance in the worldly works of career by the idea of Calling, and transformed the anxiety caused by predestination into the spiritual power of working and asceticism, which rationally organized and planned life practice in society. Above all, they believed that rationalized organization and planning of economic activities would finally transform natural wealth into capital that would continue to make a profit. This economic rationalism was the core of the capitalist spirit. Mohist beliefs did not own such a religious culture. They insisted rather on the ascetically economic ethic of hard work and frugality in order to meet social needs, sharing social wealth and fulfilling the political appeals in the real world. These were their highest ideals. The modem commercial spirit did not exist in the Mohist ethic. The Mohist ethic belonged to an economic traditionalism which could not generate any real commercial spirit, having nothing to do with the capital-motivated spirit.
期刊論文
1.劉剛、陳轉青(2008)。從『韋伯問題』看墨家當代價值如何可能。天府新論,3,28-32。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.張永義(2001)。墨子與中國文化。貴州人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Morgan, Edmund S.(1965)。Visible Saints: The History of a Puritan Idea。Ithaca:Cornell University Press。  new window
3.Mitchell, Robert M.(1979)。Calvin's and the Puritan's View of the Protestant Ethic。Washington, D.C.:University Press of America。  new window
4.Lessnoff, Michael H.(1994)。The Spirit of Capitalism and the Protestant Ethic: An Enquiry into the Weber Thesis。Aldershot:Edward Elgar Pub. Ltd。  new window
5.Coffey, John、Lim, Paul C. H.(2008)。The Cambridge Companion to Puritanism。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
6.Bremer, Francis J.(2009)。Puritanism: A Very Short Introduction。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
7.王裕安(2001)。墨子研究論叢。濟南:齊魯書社。  延伸查詢new window
8.方授楚(1937)。墨學源流。上海:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
9.馬克斯.韋伯、蘇國動等(2010)。新教倫理與資本主義精神。北京:社會科學文獻出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.馮成榮(1979)。墨子思想體系研究。臺北:文史哲出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.孫中原(199806)。墨子與現代文化。北京:中國廣播電視出版社。  延伸查詢new window
12.約翰.加爾文、錢曜誠等、孫毅、遊冠輝(2010)。基督教要義。北京:三聯書店。  延伸查詢new window
13.馬克斯.韋伯、王容芬(2002)。儒教與道教。北京:商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
14.斯蒂芬.卡爾伯格。《新教倫理與資本主義精神》導讀。新教倫理與資本主義精神。  延伸查詢new window
15.張知寒(1998)。墨子研究論叢(四)。濟南:齊魯書社。  延伸查詢new window
16.張知寒(1995)。墨子研究論叢(三)。濟南:山東大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
17.謝湘(1967)。墨子學說研究。香港:上海印書館。  延伸查詢new window
18.詹劍峰(2007)。墨子及墨家研究。武漢:華中師範大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
19.王桐齡(1992)。儒墨之異同。上海:上海書店。  延伸查詢new window
20.司馬遷(1959)。史記。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
21.Tawney, Richard H.(1926)。Religion and the Rise of Capitalism: A Historical Study。New York:Harcourt, Brace and Company。  new window
22.Luther, Martin、馬丁.路德著作翻譯小組(2003)。馬丁.路德文選。北京:中國社會科學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
23.梁啟超(1936)。子墨子學說。上海:中華書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.王冬珍(1989)。墨學新探。臺北:世界書局。  延伸查詢new window
25.任繼愈(1994)。墨子與墨家。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
26.譚宇權(1991)。墨子思想評論。臺北:文津出版社。  延伸查詢new window
27.邢兆良(1993)。墨子評傳。南京:南京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE