:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:天主教與佛教懺悔思想與實踐之比較初探
書刊名:新世紀宗教研究
作者:林淑理
作者(外文):Lin, Shu-li
出版日期:2014
卷期:12:3
頁次:頁75-102
主題關鍵詞:天主教佛教懺悔思想懺悔實踐比較研究CatholicismBuddhismThought of repentancePraxis of repentanceComparative study
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:17
  • 點閱點閱:32
本文主要比較天主教與佛教的懺悔思想與實踐。懺悔是行為主體對犯錯的罪惡意識的表達,是世界性宗教的共通特性之一。在宗教上的罪主要是違反戒律,可能是倫理上的惡或是信理的違背,不同宗教間有些共通性與獨特性。佛教與天主教有很不一樣的宇宙觀、神觀與戒律,會影響罪惡感的形成,進而影響懺悔思想與實踐。天主教的創世神觀,觸犯與懺悔的對象主要是天主,也只有祂有赦罪的權柄,透過教會的聖職人員,藉由懺悔聖事,罪人重新與天主、與教會和好。佛教認為世界是因緣而生,在達涅槃之前,生命不斷輪迴,因我執、法執,違背佛法、戒律,而產生煩惱與業障。為減輕業障,需及時懺悔,懺悔的對象從佛陀到諸佛,也因所守戒律、犯錯情況以及時空不同而有不同的懺悔作法。 兩個宗教間的共通性與獨特性也因比較而呈現。主要的共通點有:承襲原有宗教的部分觀念與作法,以戒律作為懺悔的重要依據,懺悔與修行的配合,從公開懺悔、私下懺悔到個人懺悔的趨勢,懺悔的行為廣泛存在各種宗教儀軌中,懷有希望與精進的宗教體驗,以及邁向超越或解脫,獲享永福的企盼等。主要的差異產生於赦罪權柄、重大過犯得赦方式是否唯一、懺悔儀式的通用性、告明要求與否、補贖或迴向、入華後懺悔方法的創新,以及生命體悟等方面。
The study is to compare the thought and praxis of repentance between Catholicism and Buddhism. Repentance, one of the areas common to world religions, is an expression of guilty consciousness of criminal subject. Religious sins occur mainly because of offending commandments or precepts, morally misbehaving or violating doctrines. There are similarity and uniqueness among religions. Catholicism and Buddhism have different concepts about universe, as well as God and precepts which affect the formation of sense of guilt and then affect the thought and praxis of repentance. For Catholicism, God is the Creator of the world, and He is the object penitents offend and show repentance to. And only God Himself can forgive penitents. Through the priests and the Sacrament of Repentance, penitents reconcile with God and the Church. For Buddhism, the world was formed through cause and condition, and the lives will be reincarnated. Because of self-attachment (ātma-grāha), Dharma-attachment or violating the precepts, there occur vexations and karma. To reduce karma, penitents need to repent in time. The penitents show repentance to Buddha or buddhas. According to the precepts obeyed and different situations, various repentant methods are performed. The similarity and uniqueness of repentance between the two religions are presented after comparison. The main similarities of repentant thought and praxis are as follows: parts of them are originated with the former religion, precepts are their important base, they match for spiritual exercise, there exists a trend of changes from public to private repentance in the historical development, there are practices in plural rituals, and religious experiences with hope and progress to gain eternal happiness. The main differences are the authority to forgive, one or plural ways to forgive great or mortal sins, the generality of repentant ritual, the necessity of confession, satisfaction or parināma, the innovation of repentant performance in China, and the insight of life.
期刊論文
1.姚衛群(200103)。佛教的「空」觀念及其在當代社會中的影響。普門學報,2,313-326。  延伸查詢new window
2.釋大睿(19980300)。中國佛教早期懺罪思想之形成與發展。中華佛學研究,2,313-337。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.和為貴(1971)。懺悔聖事的禮儀與方法。神學論集,9,381-419。  延伸查詢new window
4.楊麗芬(20090600)。懺悔的靈性意義:佛教觀點。新世紀宗教研究,7(4),207-228。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.鍾鳴旦(19931000)。罪、罪感與中國文化。神學論集,97,335-362。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.釋惟嚴(2009)。佛教懺悔思想的現代意義。第二屆世界佛教論壇。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.李家鳳(2009)。從宗教學看佛教的懺悔思想與實踐(碩士論文)。輔仁大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.白金銑(2008)。唐代禪宗懺悔思想研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.崔紹美(2005)。中國佛教懺悔思想之研究--以《慈悲道場水懺法》為中心(碩士論文)。中國文化大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.張培鋒(2004)。佛家禮儀。天津:天津人民。  延伸查詢new window
2.劉貴傑、李開濟(2002)。佛學概論。蘆洲:國立空中大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.詹德隆、許惠芳、趙淑華(1995)。與天主和好:談告解聖事。台北:光啟。  延伸查詢new window
4.釋聖嚴(1999)。正信的佛教。台北:法鼓文化。  延伸查詢new window
5.Roberti, Francesco、Palazzini, Pietro、Yannone, Henry J.(1962)。Dictionary of moral theology。Westminster:Newman Press。  new window
6.Lonergan, Bernard(1972)。Method in Theology。New York:London:Seabury Press:Herder and Herder:Darton, Longman & Todd。  new window
7.陳愛潔、韓大輝(1996)。天主教教理。台北:天主教教務協進會出版社:中國主教團。  延伸查詢new window
8.Ricoeur, Paul、翁紹軍(1992)。惡的象徵。桂冠圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
9.慈怡(198810)。佛光大辭典。高雄市:佛光出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.釋印順(1994)。華雨集。臺北:正聞出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.張運華(1998)。中國傳統佛教儀軌。臺北:立緒文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
12.聖嚴(1999)。戒律學綱要。法鼓文化。  延伸查詢new window
13.釋慧廣(1989)。懺悔的理論與方法。法喜出版社。  延伸查詢new window
14.佐藤達玄、釋見憨、鍾修三、歐先足、林正昭(1997)。戒律在中國佛教的發展。香光書鄉出版社。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.惠空法師。懺悔析義,http://www.fozang.org.tw/digest_1_1.htm。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.谷寒松(1998)。罪。神學辭典。台北:光啟。  延伸查詢new window
2.印順(2004)。懺悔業障。戒律學論集。新竹:正聞。  延伸查詢new window
3.谷寒松(2012)。和好聖事。神學辭典。台北:光啟。  延伸查詢new window
4.游祥洲(1990)。論中國佛教懺悔倫理的形成及其理念蕴涵。從傳統到現代佛教倫理與現代社會。台北:東大。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.釋聖嚴(1999)。居士的宗教生活。學佛知津。台北:法鼓文化。  延伸查詢new window
6.Latko, E. F.(2003)。Confession。New Catholic Encyclopedia。N.Y.:Gale。  new window
7.Dallen, J.(2003)。Sacrament of Penance。New Catholic Encyclopedia。N.Y.:Gale。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE