:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:兒科護理人員業務過失有責性之個案研究
書刊名:護理雜誌
作者:黃惠滿 引用關係孫凡軻
作者(外文):Huang, Hui-manSun, Fan-ko
出版日期:2014
卷期:61:2
頁次:頁63-73
主題關鍵詞:兒科護理人員業務過失有責性個案研究Pediatric nurseProfessional negligenceLiabilityCase study
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:213
  • 點閱點閱:156
背景:兒科護理人員業務過失責任判斷之議題缺乏研究探討。目的:(1)瞭解刑法上犯罪行為成立的審查條件;(2)呈現案例中兒科護理人員起訴事實的認定及爭議;(3)瞭解刑法上無責任即無處罰之原則;及(4)探討案例中護理人員未被科以刑罰之原因。方法:採文獻探討與個案研究法,解析臺灣高等法院高雄分院100年度重醫上更(一)字第1號刑事判決案例。結果:(1)犯罪行為成立的審查條件即所謂的構成要件、違法性、有責性;(2)本案護理人員被控其護理照護行為與嬰兒之溢奶窒息死亡間有因果關係,因業務過失致死被起訴,護理人員提出辯護、並說明已踐行護理照護之必要程序;(3)本案終因責任不可歸責於護理人員,而無罪定讞;及(4)高等法院及最高法院基於「無罪推定」原則,判本案護理人員無罪。結論:結果可協助兒科護理人員明瞭自身的角色與法律責任,及認識在法律訴訟案件中有責任始受處罰之原則。
Background: Liability attribution and professional negligence in pediatric nursing are topics that have been neglected in Taiwan. Purpose: (1) Identify the definitions of related criminal activities in accordance with domestic criminal law; (2) Elucidate the facts and the dispute in a current case involving a pediatric nurse; (3) Elucidate the principle of 'no punishment without law'; (4) Explore the reasons why the pediatric nurse in the current case received a verdict of 'not guilty'. Methods: A literature review and case study approach were used to analyze a sentence reconsideration of the first instance No. 1 (2011) issued by the Taiwan high court, Kaohsiung branch court. Results: The conditions for the scrutiny of criminal activity under Taiwan criminal law are statement of facts, illegality (justifiable cause), and liability (excuse). In this case, the pediatric nurse was accused of failing to prevent an infant from suffocation and of not discharging her obligations as a nurse. The pediatric nurse rebutted the charge of criminal negligence. The intervening behaviors of the pediatric nurse were found to be legal and not culpable. In this case, the High Court and Supreme Court made a final criminal judgment based on the presumption of innocence, and the pediatric nurse was pronounced innocent of the charge. Conclusion: This article intends to assist pediatric nurses understand their liabilities under Taiwan's criminal law. Pediatric nurses should gain a better understanding of the nature of liability for professional negligence in order to clarify how actions that may be illegal do not necessarily make nurses culpable.
期刊論文
1.柯耀程(20021100)。行為刑法。月旦法學教室,1,44-47。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃惠滿、廖娸鈞(20130800)。護理人員注意義務之個案研究。護理雜誌,60(4),76-85。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.林秋芬、黃仲毅、高靖秋、盧美秀(20130600)。臺灣護理人力短缺與留任措施。護理雜誌,60(3),88-93。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.張麗卿(20080600)。醫療糾紛鑑定與刑事責任認定--以戒毒致死案為例。月旦法學,157,71-101。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.張麗卿(2013)。刑法總則理論與運用。台北市:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Joint Commission International(2012)。Joint commission international accreditation standards for hospitals。Oakbrook Terrace, IL:The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations.。  new window
3.林孟皇(2010)。羈押魚肉。台北市:博雅。  延伸查詢new window
4.林鈺雄(2011)。新刑法總則。林鈺雄。  延伸查詢new window
5.柯耀程(20100000)。刑法構成要件解析。臺北:三民書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.陳聰富、陳彥元、楊哲銘、吳志正、王宗倫、邱玟惠(2012)。醫療法律。元照出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.林山田(2008)。刑法通論。林山田。  延伸查詢new window
8.Yin, Robert K.(2003)。Case Study Research: Design and Methods。Sage Publications。  new window
其他
1.中華民國護理師護士公會全國聯合會(2014)。護理人員統計,http://www.nurse.org.tw/DataSearch/Manpower.aspx。  延伸查詢new window
2.台北地方法院92年度自字第715號刑事判決。  延伸查詢new window
3.(20130611)。刑法,總統華總一義字第10200111611號令修正。  延伸查詢new window
4.高雄地方法院96年度醫訴字第2號刑事判決。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳清惠(2009)。護理倫理相關議題,http://www2.ntin.edu.tw/project/98%E6%95%99%E5%AD%B8%E5%93 %81%E8%B3%AA%E6%A1%88/1%E8%AD%B7%E7%90%86%E5%80%AB%E7%90%86%E8%AD%B0%E 9%A1%8C.pdf。  new window
6.最高法院69年度台上字第4047號刑事判決。  延伸查詢new window
7.最高法院89年度台上字第8075號刑事判決。  延伸查詢new window
8.最高法院92年度台上字第1940號判決。  延伸查詢new window
9.最高法院100年度台上字第1573號判決。  延伸查詢new window
10.最高法院101年度台上字第2699號判決。  延伸查詢new window
11.最高法院102年度台上字第3074號刑事判決。  延伸查詢new window
12.溫蘭魁(2013)。男嬰出生5天猝死醫院 母淚訴醫院疏失,http://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20131130002979-260402。  延伸查詢new window
13.臺灣高等法院92年度上訴字第592號刑事判決。  延伸查詢new window
14.臺灣高等法院101年度上更㈠字第240號刑事判決。  延伸查詢new window
15.臺灣高等法院高雄分院98年度醫上訴字第3號刑事判決。  延伸查詢new window
16.臺灣高等法院高雄分院100年度重醫上更㈠字第1號刑事判決。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE