大學實施教師教學諮詢專業發展策略之探討__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	大學實施教師教學諮詢專業發展策略之探討
書刊名：	教育研究與發展期刊
作者：	陳琦媛
作者(外文)：	Chen, Chi-yuan
出版日期：	2014
卷期：	10:1
頁次：	頁87-118
主題關鍵詞：	教學諮詢；高等教育；教學評鑑；Teaching consultation；Higher education；Teaching evaluation
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:1 共同引用:25 點閱:37

本研究旨在了解我國大學實施教學諮詢之現況，蒐集分析國內外大學執行教學諮詢之經驗，以提出我國未來發展教學諮詢此項教學專業發展策略之建議。為達此研究目的，本研究以文件分析法分析我國118所大學實施教學諮詢之現況，並訪談3位美國大學教學發展單位主管和4位國內大學參與教學諮詢之主管或教師。研究結果發現我國有52所（44％）大學實施有教學諮詢服務，各大學多遴選校內教學表現優異之資深優良教師兼任諮詢人員，諮詢過程偏重於經驗分享和講座研習。雖開放給所有教師使用，但多數大學規定教學評鑑不佳教師需義務性接受教學諮詢，導致教師為免被誤認為教學不力教師而鮮少主動參與。如何提升教師使用意願，並正向看待且接納教學諮詢為實施此項教學專業發展策略較大挑戰。基於上述結論本研究提出若干研究建議供我國發展教學諮詢專業發展策略之參考。

以文找文

The purpose of the study is to explore and understand the experience of implementing teaching consultation programs in higher education institutions in Taiwan. To achieve this aim, the websites of all 118 universities in Taiwan were searched and the documents related to teaching consultation were collected and analyzed. The directors of three centers of teaching development at universities in the United States and four faculties which are involved in teaching consultation at universities in Taiwan were interviewed. The results show that: fifty-two universities (44% of all universities studied) offered the consultation service for their teachers in Taiwan; and the teaching consultants in the university were selected from the faculty body. The consultants were all full-time professors, served as part-time teaching consultants, and were paid by the hour for the time they spent on consultation. The process of teaching consultation includes sharing experiences and attending speeches. The teaching consultation service is always combined with teaching evaluation. If teachers receive negative teaching evaluation results, they are required to use the teaching consultation service. This policy makes teachers reluctant to use the consultation service in case they might be misjudged by their peers as poor teachers. It is a challenge to increase teachers' willingness to use this service and have a more positive attitude about using consultation services. Based on the findings of this study, several suggestions are proposed on how to improve this service in universities in Taiwan.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Marsh, H. W.(2007)。Do university teachers become more effective with experience? A multilevel growth model of students' evaluations of teaching over 13 years。Journal of Educational Psychology，99(4)，775-790。
2.	林意雪(20090200)。三種大學教學諮詢模式的個案分析。教育資料與研究，86，81-110。延伸查詢
3.	張德勝(2007)。同濟團體教學諮詢方案對師培教師教學評鑑結果之影響。花蓮教育大學學報，24，1-22。延伸查詢
4.	Atkinson, D. J.、Bolt, S.(2010)。Using teaching observations to reflect upon and improve teaching Practice in higher education。Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning，10(3)，1-19。
5.	Cohen, P. A.(1980)。Effectiveness of student rating feedback for improving college instruction: a meta-analysis。Research in Higher Education，73(4)，321-341。
6.	Donnelly, R.(2007)。Perceived impact of Peer observation of teaching in higher education。International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education，19(2)，117-129。
7.	Dresel, M.、Rindermann, H.(2011)。Counseling university instructors based on student evaluations of their teaching effectiveness: A Multilevel Test of Its Effectiveness under Consideration of Bias and Unfairness Variables。Research in Higher Education，52(7)，717-737。
8.	Fetterley, J.(2005)。Teaching and "my work"。American Literary History，17(4)，741-752。
9.	Finelli, C.、Ott, M.、Gottfried, A. C.、Hershock, C.、O'neal, C.、Kaplan, M.(2008)。Utilizing instructional consultations to enhance the teaching performance of engineering faculty。Journal of engineering education，97(4)，397-411。
10.	Grady, M. L.、Yao. Y.(2006)。How do faculty make formative use of student evaluation feedback? : A multiple case study。Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education，18，107-126。
11.	Hampton, S. E.、Reiser, R. A.(2004)。Effects of a theory-based feedback and consultation process on instruction and learning in college classrooms。Research in Higher Education，45(5)，497-527。
12.	Hativa, N.(1998)。Lack of clarity in university teaching: A case study。Higher Education，36，353-381。
13.	Hativa, Nira、Barak, Rachel、Simhi, Etty(2001)。Exemplary university teachers: Knowledge and beliefs regarding effective teaching dimensions and strategies。The Journal of Higher Education，72(6)，699-729。
14.	Heppner, P. P.、Johnston, J. A.(1994)。Peer consultation: Faculty and students working together to improve teaching。Journal of Counseling and Development，72(5)，492-499。
15.	Keeley, J.、Smith, D.、Buskist, W.(2006)。The teacher behaviors checklist :Factor analysis of its utility for evaluating teaching。Teaching of Psychology，33(2)，84-91。
16.	Kerwin, M. A.(1999)。Instructional consultation in s statewide setting。New Directions for Teaching，79，29-38。
17.	Marsh, H. W.(1984)。The influence of student, course and instructor characteristics on evaluations of university teaching。American Educational Research Journal，17，219-237。
18.	Nasser, F.、Fresko, B.(2006)。Predicting student ratings: the relationship between actual student ratings and instructors' predictions。Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education，37(1)，1-18。
19.	Neunann, R.(2000)。Communication student evaluation of teaching results: rating Interpretation Guides (RIGs)。Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education，25(2)，121-134。
20.	Piccinin, S.(1999)。How individual consultation affects teaching。New Directions for Teaching，79，71-83。
21.	Smith, C.(2008)。Building effectiveness in teaching through targeted evaluation and response: connecting evaluation to teaching improvement in higher education。Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education，33(5)，517-533。
22.	李振清(20060900)。建立有效教學機制--教師發展是高等教育評鑑的核心議題。評鑑雙月刊，9(3)，9-12。延伸查詢
23.	張德勝(20041100)。大學校院「學生評鑑教師教學」與「教學諮詢方案」。教育研究月刊，127，63-73。延伸查詢
24.	Marsh, H. W.、Roche, L. A.(1997)。Making students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective: The central issues of validity, bias, and utility。American Psychologist，52(11)，1187-1197。
25.	Penny, A. R.、Coe, R.(2004)。Effectiveness of consultation on student ratings feedback: A meta-analysis。Review of Educational Research，74(2)，215-253。
26.	潘世尊(20101200)。學生評鑑成績未達標準教師之教學專業發展方案--一所私立科技大學的實踐之反思與改善。勤益人文社會學刊，2，183-219。延伸查詢
27.	張德勝、林玟秀(20081200)。Peer Consultation to Improve a Novice Teacher Educator's Instruction。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊，1(2)，59-76。延伸查詢
28.	Hicks, O.(1999)。A conceptual framework for instructional consultation。New Directions for Teaching and Learning，79，9-18。
29.	Knapper, C.、Piccinin, S.(1999)。Consulting about teaching: An overview。New Directions for Teaching and Learning，79，3-9。
30.	L'Hommedieu, R.、Menges, R. J.、Brinko, K. T.(1990)。Methodological explanations for the modest effects of feedback from student ratings。Journal of Educational Psychology，82(2)，232-241。
31.	Wilson, Robert C.(1986)。Improving faculty teaching: Effective use of student evaluations and consultants。Journal of Higher Education，57(2)，196-211。

會議論文
1.	Chen, C. Y.(2011)。The Application of Teaching Quality Improvement Strategies in Higher Education。Asia-Pacific Association for International Education 2011 Conference。Taipei。
2.	Havia, N.(1997)。Teaching in a research university: Professors' conceptions, practices, and disciplinary differences。The annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association。Chicago, IL。
3.	Menges, R.、Brinko, K. T.(198604)。Effects of student evaluation feedback: A meta-analysis of higher education research。The 1986 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association。San Francisco。

學位論文
1.	陳琦媛(2007)。我國公立大學教師教學評鑑之研究(博士論文)。國立政治大學。延伸查詢

圖書
1.	Sorcinelli, M. D.、Austin, A. E.、Eddy, P. L.、Beach, A. L.、史美瑤(2012)。開創教師發展新紀元：學習過去，了解當下。臺北市：高等教育。延伸查詢
2.	Gillespie, K. J.、Robertson, D. L.、Bergquist, W. H.、Gillespie, K. H.(2010)。A guide to faculty development。Jossey-Bass。
3.	Cook, C. E.、Kaplan, M.(2011)。Advancing the culture of teaching on campus: How a teaching center can make A difference。Sterling, VA：Stylus。
4.	Sorcinelli, M. D.、Austin, A. E.、Eddy, P. L.、Beach, A. L.(2006)。Creating the future offaculty development: Learning from the past, understanding the present。San Francison, CA：Jossey- Bass。
5.	Centra, John A.(1993)。Reflective faculty evaluation: Enhancing teaching faculty and determining faculty effectiveness。San Francisco：Jossey-Bass Publishers。

其他
1.	Academic Ranking of World Universities(2012)。Academic ranking of world universities-2012(United States)，http://www.shanghairanking.com/Country2012Main. jsp?param=United States。

圖書論文
1.	Brinko, K. T.(2012)。The interaction of teaching improvement。Practically speaking: A sourcebook for instructional consultants in higher education。Stillwater, Oklahoma：New Forums press。
2.	Kristensen, E.(2012)。Collecting information and analyzing teaching using video。Practically speaking: A sourcebook for instructional consultants in higher education。Stillwater, Oklahoma, OK：New Forums press。
3.	Lenze, L. F.(2012)。Collecting information using the small group instructional diagnosis (SGID)。Practically Speaking: A Sourcebook for Instructional Consultants in Higher Education。Stillwater, Oklahoma, OK：New Forums press。
4.	Lewis, K. G.(2012)。Collecting information using class observation。Practically speaking: A sourcebook for instructional consultants in higher education。Stillwater, Oklahoma, OK：New Forums press。
5.	Murray, H. G.(1985)。Classroom teaching behaviors related to college teaching effectiveness。Using research to improve teaching: New directions for teaching and kearning。San Francisco, CA：Jossey-Bass。
6.	Theall, M.、Franklin, J.(2012)。Collecting information using student ratings。Practically speaking: A sourcebook for instructional consultants in higher education。Stillwater, Oklahoma, OK：New Forums press。
7.	Tiberius, R.(2012)。Collecting information using small group methods。Practically speaking: A sourcebook for instructional consultants in higher education。Stillwater, Oklahoma, OK：New Forums press。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	國民小學實施課程標準時期教育領導研究趨勢之探究--應用文字探勘技術分析
2.	教學實踐研究對大學課室的鬆動與契機
3.	A Literature Review on the Student Evaluation of Teaching--An Examination of the Search, Experience, and Credence Qualities of SET
4.	大學教學優良教師之特質與評選指標的建議
5.	一所國立大學之教師教學評鑑多元化指標建構
6.	國內北部某大學教學評鑑問卷之研究
7.	從教與學學術研究的概念檢視我國大學對於教學的獎補助辦法
8.	大學教師評鑑制度之後設評鑑研究--以N科技大學為例
9.	我國大學教師人力資源管理實施現況、問題與解決策略
10.	大學通識教學評鑑的後設評鑑研究
11.	影響學生使用網路教學評鑑意願之研究--以國立臺灣科技大學為例
12.	學生評鑑教師教學影響因素之研究
13.	大學通識課程學生評鑑教師教學量表驗證與影響因素考驗
14.	國立屏東教育大學2009年校園滿意度之調查研究
15.	影響學生填答教學意見調查問卷的因素及其實施建議

1.	新自由主義下的高等教育治理－以「我國大學評鑑制度」為例
2.	科技大學教師專業背景、教師教學表現與學生學習成就之關聯：階層線性模式分析
3.	私立科技大學實施教師評鑑制度之個案研究
4.	以教師自我反思、同儕教室觀察與學生知覺提升中學科學教師教學專業發展之個案研究
5.	國中校長卓越領導、行動智慧與創新經營關係之研究
6.	獎勵大學教學卓越計畫成效評估—師生觀點之分析
7.	我國公立大學教師教學評鑑之研究
8.	後現代脈絡下國民中學校長課程領導與教師教學效能關係之研究

無相關書籍

無相關著作

1.	教師專業學習社群於我國高等教育實施現況之探討
2.	人才培訓計畫策略聯盟之分析—以勞委會職訓局中區人才培訓計畫為例
3.	[各國高等教育制度]愛爾蘭
4.	學校本位經營的理念與實務
5.	Taiwanese Version of the Work-Related Quality of Life Scale for Nurses: Translation and Validation
6.	二十一世紀全球國際學校的發展與挑戰
7.	大學生自身技術之研究：研究工具編製與類型建構
8.	多元入學制度下的教育機會均等：經由不同入學管道進入不同類型學校的大一學生家庭社經背景之研究
9.	大學生對旅遊目的地意象、旅遊意願之影響以香港迪士尼旅遊微電影「幸福的原點」為例
10.	從「以我為榮」到「證明自己」：華人文化脈絡下知覺不同父母期待之大學生的生涯因應組型初探研究
11.	「初」師表：實習教師的多元行政倫理反思之個案研究
12.	國小高年級學童課外閱讀自我決定動機之研究
13.	邁向十二年國教的生命教育：師資培育的教學與課程設計
14.	從增能觀點談大專校院身心障礙學生之輔導
15.	高等教育學用合一人才培育模式之國際經驗與啟示

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫