:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:建設產業財務績效與風險值:奢侈稅前後比較
書刊名:住宅學報
作者:彭開琼 引用關係張佳雯 引用關係吳思函
作者(外文):Peng, Kai-chiungChang, Chia-wenWu, Ssu-han
出版日期:2015
卷期:24:2
頁次:頁55-71
主題關鍵詞:奢侈稅資料包絡分析法財務績效風險值麥氏指數Luxury taxData envelopment analysisFinancial performanceValue at riskMalmquist index
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:43
  • 點閱點閱:18
選取台灣上市櫃建設公司,以2010年7~12月與2011年7~12月為研究期間,選用麥氏指數探討奢侈稅對48家建設公司財務績效跨期表現,藉由股價風險值得出投資各公司股票每日最大損失情形後,整合財務績效與風險值進行討論。研究發現,奢侈稅實施後,建設公司財務績效退步者佔50%,股價風險值上升者佔87.5%,顯示奢侈稅影響投資人信心大於建設公司本身財務績效退步情形。將績效與風險值分為四個區塊,績效進步風險值下降的建設公司僅4家,績效進步風險值上升的建設公司共20家,績效衰退風險值上升的建設公司共22家,績效衰退風險值下降的建設公司共2家。
This paper investigates the overall performance of 48 listed construction industry companies in the TSE or OTC. We select data from June to December of both 2010 and 2011 to compare results, employ the data envelopment analysis of the Malmquist Index to assess each construction company's financial performance, and calculate the value at risk (VaR) of these companies by using the historical simulation method. This paper demonstrates that, after the implementation of the luxury tax, 50% of construction companies have regressed in financial performance, and 87.5% of construction companies have increased in VaR. This reveals that the positive impact of luxury tax on investor confidence exceeds regression of construction companies' financial performance. We classify the construction companies into four groups: four companies have improved in financial performance and declined in VaR; 20 companies have improved in financial performance and increased in VaR; 22 companies have regressed in financial performance and increased in VaR; and two companies have regressed in financial performance and declined in VaR.
期刊論文
1.江明珠、李政峰、欉清全(20110600)。臺灣不動產市場的下方風險--以臺灣四個縣市為例。住宅學報,20(1),1-23。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.吳濟華、何柏正、黃元璋(20080600)。臺灣地區營造業營運績效與經營策略。建築學報,64,25-48。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Linsmeier, Thomas J.、Pearson, Neil D.(2000)。Value at Risk。Financial Analysis Journal,56(2),47-67。  new window
4.Oates, W. E.(1969)。The Effect of Property Taxes and Local Public Spending on Property Values: An Empirical Study of Tax Capitalization and the Tiebout Hypothesis。Journal of Political Economy,77(6),957-971。  new window
5.彭開琼、張佳雯、高幸滿(20140900)。績效、風險與薪酬整合分析:以臺灣營建產業為例。建築學報,89,93-113。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Cebula, R. J.(1979)。A Survey of the Literature on the Migration Impact of State and Local Government Policies。Public Finance,34(1),69-84。  new window
7.Ellickson, B.(1971)。Jurisdiction Fragmentation and Residential Choice。American Economics Review,61(3),334-339。  new window
8.洪維廷、尚瑞國(20050900)。臺灣地區上市櫃建設公司純粹管理效率評估:四階段資料包絡分析法之應用。建築學報,53,1-20。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.魏文欽、郭宗諭(2012)。影響房價變動因素之系統動態模擬(兼論奢侈稅)。International Journal of Lisrel,5(1),31-49。  延伸查詢new window
10.Edel, Matthew、Sclar, Elliot(1974)。Taxes, Spending, and Property Values: Supply Adjustment in a Tiebout-Oates Model。Journal of Political Economy,82(5),941-954。  new window
11.Tullock, G.(1971)。Public Decisions as Public Goods。Journal of Political Economy,79,913-919。  new window
12.Xue, X.、Shen, Q.、Wang, Y.、Lu, J.(2008)。Measuring the productivity of the construction industry in China by using DEA-based malmquist productivity indices。Journal of Construction Engineering and Management,134(1),64-71。  new window
13.Färe, R.、Grosskopf, S.、Norris, M.、Zhang, Z.(1994)。Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency changes in industrialized countries。The American Economic Review,84(1),66-83。  new window
14.彭建文、吳森田、吳祥華(20071100)。不動產有效稅率對房價影響分析--以臺北市大同區與內湖區為例。臺灣土地研究,10(2),49-66。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Caves, Douglas W.、Christensen, Laurits R.、Diewert, W. Erwin(1982)。The Economic Theory of Index Numbers and the Measurement of Input, Output, and Productivity。Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society,50(6),1393-1414。  new window
學位論文
1.陳湋婷(2012)。奢侈稅對消費者購屋意圖之影響 - 以中南部地區為例(碩士論文)。國立成功大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳薏如(2012)。奢侈稅政策、房地產市場景氣、銀行房貸業務之影響—以A銀行為例(碩士論文)。淡江大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Jorion, Philippe(2000)。Value at Risk: The New Benchmark for Managing Financial Risk。Irvine:University of California。  new window
其他
1.內政部統計處(2012)。101年第48週內政統計通報,http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/news_content.aspx?sn=6938。  延伸查詢new window
2.台經社論(2009)。記取2008年金融海嘯的教訓,http://www.tier.org.tw/comment/tiermon200901.asp。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE