:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:跨國侵權行為損害賠償之準據法--適用範圍的幾項問題
書刊名:法學叢刊
作者:賴淳良
作者(外文):Lai, Chun-liang
出版日期:2016
卷期:61:2=242
頁次:頁71-96
主題關鍵詞:跨國侵權行為損害賠償賠償項目賠償數額程序問題事實問題Transnational tortRemedyHeads of damagesQuantification of damagesIssue of procedureIssue of fact
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:408
  • 點閱點閱:9
跨國侵權行為之準據法,是現代國際私法選法理論改革的重心。侵權行為之損害賠償,包含損害賠償之方法、項目、數額核定、各種減免賠償責任之規定或約定、法院裁量等等,均屬實務上常見之爭議問題。這些爭議問題是否均應適用臺灣涉外民事法律適用法第 25 條,有必要參酌各國法例,俾界定之。本文認為如果侵權行為損害賠償涉及賠償項目、賠償方法,非財產損害應否賠償,應適用侵權行為損害賠償選法規則。如果涉及賠償數額之認定,應由法院調查證據、認定實際損害,決定應賠償之金額。
The Applicable law of transnational tort is the gravity of reform of internationalprivatelaw theory. Remedy in tort, including measures, heads of damaged, quantification of damages, limitation or exclusion of liability, the discretion of judge, arecommonlycontroversialissues in practice. Whetherthesecontroversialissues should be defined to Section25 of the “Law Governing the Application of Laws to Civil Matters Involving Foreign Elements” of Taiwan or not? It could learn from practices and theories of other country. This paper argues thatthe remedy issues in transnational tort, such as measures, heads of damages, shall be categorized as the remedy of choice-of-law rules of tort. Whereas the quantification of damagesissues should be categorized as issue of fact. While it is a issue of fact, it should be up to the evidences rendered by plaintiff and defendant.
期刊論文
1.賴淳良(20090600)。跨國侵權行為之成立要件與損害賠償。中華國際法與超國界法評論,5(1),139-171。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.王志文(20091200)。羅馬第二規則評析--非契約之債法律適用之統一化。中華國際法與超國界法評論,5(2),201-263。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.賴淳良(20110100)。論跨國侵權行為成立要件之準據法--以行為地為連繫因素之探討。法令月刊,62(1),80-106。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.蔡華凱(2003)。涉外民事保全程式之基礎問題研究。月旦法學雜誌,214。  延伸查詢new window
5.Beamont, Paul、Zheng, Tang(2008)。Classification of Delictual Damages: Hardirings Wealands and the Rome II Regulation。EDIN. L. R.,12(1)。  new window
6.Weintraub, Russell J.(2007)。Choice of Law for Quantification of Damages: A Judgment of the House of Lords Makes a Bad Rule Worse。TEX. INT'L L. J.,42。  new window
7.Schoeman, Elsabe(2007)。Harding v. Wealands: Substance v. Procedure in the English Courts。NZBLQ,13。  new window
8.謝志鵬(20071200)。一九九九年德國國際私法有關非契約之債法律關係新法規與我國修正草案相關條文之比較。政大法學評論,100,325-375。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.詹森林(2012)。侵害生命權事件慰撫金酌定標準之研究。慰撫金酌定研討會。詹森林。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.王澤鑑(1992)。民法學說與判例研究。王澤鑑。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.于敏(2006)。日本侵權行為法。法律。  延伸查詢new window
3.Johnson, Vincent R.、趙秀文(2006)。美國侵權法。五南。  延伸查詢new window
4.Friedenhai, Jack H.、Kane, Mary Kay、Miller, Arthur R.、夏登峻、黃娟、唐前宏、王衡(2003)。民事訴訟法。中國政法大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.林恩瑋(2013)。國際私法理論與案例研究。臺北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
6.沈娟(2006)。國際私法。社會科學文獻。  延伸查詢new window
7.李雙元、金彭年、張茂、歐福永(2004)。中國國際私法通論。法律。  延伸查詢new window
8.司法院、國立政治大學法律研究所(1986)。美國法律整編侵權行為法。司法週刊雜誌社。  延伸查詢new window
9.王澤鑑(1992)。民法學說與判例研究。王澤鑑。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.圓谷峻、趙莉(2008)。日本新侵權行為法。法律。  延伸查詢new window
11.曾世雄(1989)。非財產上之損害賠償。元照。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.曾世雄(2002)。損害賠償法原理。新學林。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.金玉珍(2009)。韓國民法典朝鮮民法典。北京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
14.蘇遠成(2008)。國際私法。五南。  延伸查詢new window
15.劉甲一(1984)。國際私法。三民。  延伸查詢new window
16.楊立新(2010)。侵權損害賠償。法律。  延伸查詢new window
17.von Bar, Christian(2000)。The Common European Law of Tort。  new window
18.Hood, Kirsty J.(2007)。Conflict of Laws Within UK。  new window
19.Fawcett, James、Carruthers, Janeen M.、Cheshire, North(2008)。Private International Law。  new window
20.Dobbs, Dan B.(1993)。Law of Remedies Damages-Equity-Restitution。  new window
21.Dickinson, Andrew(2008)。The Romen II Regulation。  new window
22.Symeonides, Symeon C.(2006)。The American Choice-of-Law R evolution: Past, Present and Future。  new window
23.Schwartz, Victor E.、Kelly, Kathryn、Partlett, David F.(2010)。Prosser, Wade and Schwartz's Tort。  new window
24.Joseph, Lookofsky、Ketilbijorn, Hertz(2009)。European Union Private International Law in Contract and Tort。  new window
25.Nagel, Heinrich、Gottwald, Peter(2007)。Intemationales Zivilprozessrecht。  new window
26.Weitraub, Russell J.(2006)。Commentary on the Conflict of Laws。  new window
27.Kegel, Gerhard、Klaus, Schurig(2004)。Intemationales Privatrecht。  new window
28.Kostiekiewcz, JolantaKren(2012)。Grundriss des Schweizerischen lntemationales Privatrechts。  new window
29.Looschelders, Dirk(2004)。Intemationales Privatrecht Art。EGBGB。  new window
30.Zweigert, Konard、Kötz, Heinz(1996)。Einführung in die Rechtsvergleichung。Tübigen。  new window
31.Siehr, Kurt(2001)。Intemationales Privatrecht。  new window
32.王澤鑑(2012)。人格權法--法釋義學、比較法、案例分析。台北:王澤鑑。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.陳隆修(1989)。國際私法上實體法與程式法問題評論。國際私法論文集--慶祝馬漢寶六制華誕。五南。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE