臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：警民接觸經驗與其對警察態度之影響性研究
書刊名：中國行政評論
作者：賴擁連
作者(外文)：Lai, Yung-lien
出版日期：2016
卷期：22:4
頁次：頁1-29
主題關鍵詞：法釋義學；立法學；法政策學；政策法學；Police-citizen relations；PCR；Community policing；COP；Attitudes toward the police；ATP；Police-citizen contact experiences；Policing legitimacy
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:11
  • 點閱點閱:15
民眾對於警察態度之研究，在歐美國家已發展約有50 年歷史，其研究目的在於瞭解民眾眼中的警察是何種形象以及警察的作為是否符合民眾之需求，以強調警察執法工作的合法性，因此受到各級警察機關的重視，研究結果經常作為警察機關改進執法與提升服務的重要參考。近年來臺灣的警政發展，已從過去的權威的警政（為執政當局服務）轉變成民主警政（為民眾服務），在此轉型階段，民眾對於警察態度之議題，更顯重要。本研究藉由西方國家所發展出的多面向民眾對警察態度以及三種預測該態度的因素群，針對大臺北地區1,806位年滿18 歲以上的市民，進行電話訪問，特別著重在民眾與警察接觸經驗，是否與其對於警察在一般性與社區服務兩方面的態度，存有關聯性。結果顯示有主動接觸經驗的受訪者對於警察的一般性態度與社區服務態度，顯著高於被動接觸經驗的受訪者。在迴歸分析方面，未有與警察接觸的受訪者中，鄰里脈絡是決定其對警察態度的重要因素群，但對於曾有警察接觸經驗者，接觸經驗的滿意程度，則是決定渠等滿意警察態度的關鍵因素。換言之，無論是主動接觸警察與被動接觸警察，如果警察能夠正視與民眾的接觸經驗，提高接觸過程的品質，將可以進一步提升民眾對於警察的態度與形象，強化警察執法的合法性。
While public attitudes toward the police (ATP) has become a key area of policing research in those democratic societies, this issue has been largely ignored in Taiwan society. The purpose of this study is to explore understanding of ATP by examining how demographics, neighborhood contexts and, specifically, contacted police experiences impact two different dimensions of attitudes: global and police neighborhood services. The findings indicated that those respondents who had voluntary contact experiences significantly hold more favorable ATP than their counterparts across two dimensions. Results derived from a series of OLS regressions showed that, among all respondents, educational attainment, marriage, victimization, and neighborhood contexts impact citizens' assessments to police. While police-initiated contact reduced the levels of public global image, citizen-initiated contact increased the magnitude of satisfaction with police performance. At the same time, marriage, residential length, and neighborhood contexts determined citizens' ratings of police among non-contact experience group. Although the impacts of demographics and neighborhood contexts varied across two dimensions of ATP, regardless of citizen/police-initiated contacts, respondents who were satisfied with contact experiences with police reported higher levels of satisfaction with police, suggesting the contact quality really matters during citizen-police encountering.
期刊論文
1.Jesilow, P.、Meyer, J.、Namazzi, N.(1995)。Public attitudes toward the police。American Journal of Police，14，67-88。  new window
2.Schuck, A. M.、Rosenbaum, D. P.、Hawkins, D. F.(2008)。The influence of race/ethnicity, social class, and neighborhood context on residents; attitudes toward the police。Police Quarterly，11(4)，496-519。  new window
3.Wu, Y.、Sun, I. Y.、Triplett, R. A.(2009)。Race, class or neighborhood context: Which matters more in measuring satisfaction with police?。Justice Quarterly，26，125-156。  new window
4.黃翠紋(20040800)。警政民意滿意度之調查研究--中華民國九十二年度調查報告摘要。中央警察大學學報，41，75-106。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Cao, L.、Frank, J.、Cullen, F. T.(1996)。Race, community context and confidence in the police。American Journal of Police，15(1)，3-22。  new window
6.Payne, B. K.、Gainey, R. R.(2007)。Attitudes about the police and neighborhood safety in disadvantaged neighborhoods: The influence of criminal victimization and perceptions of a drug problem。Criminal Justice Review，32，142-155。  new window
7.Reisig, M. D.、Giacomazzi, A. L.(1998)。Citizen perceptions of community policing: Are attitudes toward police important?。Policing，21，547-561。  new window
8.Brown, B.、Benedict, W. R.(2002)。Perceptions of the police: Past findings, methodological issues, conceptual issues and policy implications。Policing，25(3)，543-580。  new window
9.Rosenbaum, D. P.、Schuck, A. M.、Costello, S. K.、Hawkins, D. F.、Ring, M. K.(2005)。Attitudes toward the police: The effects of direct and vicarious experience。Police Quarterly，8(3)，343-365。  new window
10.周愫嫻、孫懿賢、張耀中、侯崇文、黃玉秀(20130600)。地方民意與警察形象。中央警察大學犯罪防治學報，17，39-74。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Decker, S.(1981)。Citizen attitudes toward the police。Journal of Police Science and Administration，9，91-87。  new window
12.Skogan, W. G.(2009)。Concern about crime and confidence in the police: Reassurance or accountability?。Police Quarterly，12(3)，301-318。  new window
13.Sun, I. Y.、Jou, S.、Hou, C. C.、Chang, Y. C. L.(2013)。Public trust in the police in Taiwan: A test of instrumental and expressive models。Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology，47(1)，123-140。  new window
14.Gibson, C. L.、Zhao, J.、Lovrich, N. P.、Gaffney, M. J.(2002)。Social integration, individual perceptions of collective efficacy, and fear of crime in three cities。Justice Quarterly，19，537-564。  new window
15.Goldsmith, A.(2005)。Police reform and the problem of trust。Theoretical Criminology，9(4)，443-470。  new window
16.Scaglion, R.、Condon, R. G.(1980)。Determinants of attitudes toward city police。Criminology，17(4)，485-494。  new window
17.黃翠紋(20060700)。警政民意滿意度之調查研究--中華民國九十四年度調查報告摘要。中央警察大學學報，43，1-32。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.黃翠紋(20050700)。警政民意滿意度之調查研究--中華民國九十三年度調查報告摘要。中央警察大學學報，42，219-248。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.黃翠紋(20030100)。警政民意滿意度之調查研究--中華民國九十一年第一次調查報告摘要。警政論叢，2，1-31。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.Cao, L.(2015)。Differentiating confidence in the police, trust in the police, and satisfaction with the police。Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management，38(2)，239-249。  new window
21.Borrero, M.(2001)。The widening mistrust between youth and police。Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services，82，399。  new window
22.Brandl, S. G.、Frank, J.、Worden, R. E.、Bynum, T. S.(1994)。Global and specific attitudes toward the police: Disentangling the relationship。Justice Quarterly，11(1)，119-134。  new window
23.Zhao, J. S.、Ren, L.(2015)。Exploring the dimensions of public attitudes toward the police。Police Quarterly，18，3-26。  new window
24.Zamble, E.、Annesley, P.(1987)。Some determinants of public attitudes toward the police。Journal of Police Science and Administration，15，285-290。  new window
25.Weitzer, R.、Tuch, S. A.(2002)。Perceptions of racial profiling: Race, class, and personal experience。Criminology，40，435-456。  new window
26.Sunshine, J.、Tyler, T. R.(2003)。The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing。Law & Society Review，37(3)，513-548。  new window
27.Schuck, A. M.、Rosenbaum, D. P.(2005)。Global and neighborhood attitudes toward the police differentiation by race, ethnicity and type of contact。Journal of Quantitative Criminology，21(4)，391-418。  new window
28.Schafer, F. A.、Huebner, B. M.、Bynum, T. S.(2003)。Citizen perceptions of police services: Race, neighborhood context, and community policing。Police Quarterly，6，440-468。  new window
29.Sampson, R.、Jeglum-Bartusch, D.(1998)。Legal cynicism and (subcultural?) tolerance of deviance: The neighborhood context of racial differences。Law and Society Review，32，777-802。  new window
30.Ren, L.、Cao, L.、Lovrich, N.、Gaffney, M.(2005)。Linking confidence in the police with the performance of the police: Community policing can make a difference。Journal of Criminal Justice，33(1)，55-66。  new window
31.Reisig, M. D.、Parks, R. B.(2000)。Experience, quality of life, and neighborhood context: A hierarchical analysis。Justice Quarterly，17，607-630。  new window
32.Lai, Y. -L.、Zhao, J. S.(2010)。The impact of race/ethnicity, neighborhood context, and police/citizen interaction on residents’ attitudes toward the police。Journal of Criminal Justice，38，685-692。  new window
33.Huebner, B. M.、Schafer, J. A.、Bynum, T. S.(2004)。African American and Whites perceptions of police services: Within- and between-group variation。Journal of Criminal Justice，32(2)，125-135。  new window
會議論文
1.黃玉秀、周愫嫻、孫懿賢(2012)。媒體閱聽與政黨取向對警政滿意度之影響。2012警察政策學術研討會。桃園：中央警察大學行政警察學系。62-73。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Bayley, D. H.、Mendelsohn, H.(1969)。Minorities and the police: Confrontation in America。New York：Free Press。  new window
2.Goldstein, H.(1977)。Policing in a free society。Cambridge, MA：Ballinger。  new window
3.Lai, Y. L.(2013)。Policing diversity: Determinants of whites, black, and Hispanic attitudes toward police。El Paso, TX：LFB Scholarly。  new window
4.Weitzer, R.、Tuch, S. A.(2006)。Race and policing in America: Conflict and reform。New York, NY：Cambridge University Press。  new window
5.Maxfield, M. G.、Babbie, E.(2005)。Research methods for criminal justice and criminology。Belmont, CA：Thomson。  new window
6.章光明(2012)。警察政策。桃園：中央警察大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.邱皓政(2006)。量化研究與統計分析。臺北市：五南。  延伸查詢new window
8.Cao, Liqun、Huang, Lanying、Sun, Ivan Y.(2014)。Policing in Taiwan: from authoritarianism to democracy。Routledge。  new window
9.Fratello, J.、Rengifo, A. F.、Trone, J.(2013)。Coming of age with stop and frisk: Experiences, self-perceptions, and public safety implications。New York：Vera Institute of Justice。  new window
10.Easton, David(1965)。A Framework for Political Analysis。Prentice-Hall。  new window
其他
1.蔡田木，許春金，陳玉書(2015)。104年度臺灣地區犯罪被害調查--電話調查報告，臺北：內政部警政署。  延伸查詢new window
2.大紀元(20160301)。德智庫評比臺灣轉型指標全球第一，http://www.epochtimes.com/b5/16/3/1/n4651057.htm。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Huang, W.、Vaughn, M. S.(1996)。Support and confidence: Public attitudes toward the police。Americans view crime and justice: A national public opinion survey。Thousand Oaks, CA：Sage。  new window
2.Lipsky, M.(2004)。Street-level bureaucracy: The critical role of street-level bureaucrats。Classics of public administration。Belmont, CA：Wadsworth Thomson Learning。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：730（臺灣：714，外國：16） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2111296 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67915695
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上