臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：冒險教育課程對小型企業員工教育訓練之長期成效研究
書刊名：臺灣運動教育學報
作者：王伯宇 引用關係
作者(外文)：Wang, Po-yu
出版日期：2015
卷期：10:1
頁次：頁31-50
主題關鍵詞：冒險教育；教育訓練；小型企業；長期成效；Adventure experiential education；HR training；Small-sized business
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:63
  • 點閱點閱:6
冒險教育是近年來逐漸重視的人力資源教育訓練方法，也有越來越多的運動休閒相關科系開授此一教育訓練課程。相較於以往的冒險教育研究多著墨於學生，而少數於一般企業之研究又多集中於訓練完之立即成效，本研究則針對該教育訓練於企業之長期成效做一探究，尤其是在臺灣此一以中小型企業為主的經濟體系裡。本研究採取了個案研究法，以半結構式的質性訪談來對一間小型企業做資料蒐集，以主軸編碼與主題式分析來對訪談資料做分析。研究結果發現在訓練完的兩年後，冒險教育參與者於工作面向、社交面向與個人發展面向之成效都依然明顯，其中工作面向之成效最為明顯，但個人面向之成效只有部分依然存在，並且三個面向的成效經過兩年已經是互相有強烈的關聯，要分割實屬不易。本研究建議後續的研究者可針對大型企業及參與者的更深層心理層面做更進一步的研究。
Adventure experiential education has been increasingly promoted as an ideal training approach for human resource development. More and more departments of sports and/or leisure/recreation also provide this kind of training programs. Previous studies of adventure experiential education upon businesses largely focus on the immediate training effects; this study focuses upon the long-term effects of adventure experiential education. This study employed a qualitative case study approach to examine the long-term effects of adventure experiential education on a small-sized business. Semi-structured interviews were employed for the data collection. Axial coding and thematic analysis were the methods employed for data analysis. The findings reveal that after 2 years’ period of time, the work-place, social and personal effects were still effective upon the interview participants. Furthermore, the effects of work-place were the most effective one, and the personal effects were only partly existed. The findings also suggest that it is not easy to have a clear cut among these 3 types of effects due to their long-term mutual influences. This study suggests future researchers can focus on big companies, off-work effects of adventure experiential education, and other psychological factors influencing the effect of adventure experiential education.
期刊論文
1.Miner, T.(1991)。Safety issue for experience-based training and development。Journal of Experiential Education，14(2)，20-25。  new window
2.Gass, M. A.、Priest, S.(2006)。The Effectiveness of Metaphoric Facilitation Styles in Corporate Adventure Training (CAT) Programs。The Journal of Experiential Education，29(1)，78-94。  new window
3.Buller, P. F.、Cragun, J. R.、Mcevoy, G. M.(1991)。Getting the Most Out of Outdoor Training。Training & Development，45(3)，58-61。  new window
4.吳崇旗、謝智謀(20100300)。繩索挑戰課程對大學生冒險教育生活效能與團隊凝聚力之影響。人文社會科學研究，4(1)，74-91。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.王伯宇、郭天祥(20040600)。冒險活動於企業教育訓練之運用。中華體育季刊，18(2)=69，34-42。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.陳修蕙、王俊杰、吳崇旗(20140700)。繩索挑戰課程對高關懷青少年影響之研究。輔仁大學體育學刊，13，58-79。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Brookes, A.(2003)。A critique of Neo-Hahnian outdoor education theory. Part one: Challenges to the concept of "character building"。Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning，3(1)，49-62。  new window
8.Broderick, A.、Pearce, G.(2001)。Indoor adventure training: A dramaturgical approach to management development。Journal of Organizational Change Management，14(3)，239-252。  new window
9.Dufrene, D. D.、Sharbrough, W.、Clipson, T.、McCall, M.(1999)。Bringing outdoor challenge education inside the business communication classroom。Business Communication Quarterly，62(3)，24-36。  new window
10.Couch, R. L.(1991)。Outdoor training: Can you afford teamwork。Financial Executive，7(3)，5-7。  new window
11.Luckmann, C.(1996)。Defining Experiential Education。Journal of Experiential Education，19(1)，6-7。  new window
12.Gahin, F. S.、Chesteen, S. A.(1988)。Executives contemplate the call of the wild。Risk Management，35(7)，44-51。  new window
13.Priest, S.(1998)。Physical challenge and the development of trust through corporate adventure training。Journal of Experiential Education，21(1)，31-34。  new window
14.Tarullo, G. M.(1992)。Making outdoor experiential training work。Training，29(8)，47-52。  new window
15.Clements, C.、Wagner, R. J.、Roland, C. C.(1995)。The ins and outs of experiential training。Training & Development，49(2)，52-57。  new window
16.吳崇旗、謝智謀(20060900)。探討戶外冒險教育的效益。中華體育季刊，20(3)=78，43-53。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Ajzen, Icek(2001)。Nature and operation of attitudes。Annual Review of Psychology，52，27-58。  new window
學位論文
1.林芳菁(2007)。企業員工參與探索教育對自我效能感與工作績效之影響--以壽險公司為例(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃貞諭(2009)。冒險教育對企業團隊發展成效之評估(碩士論文)。國立體育大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.Baker, W. L.(1998)。Training Transfer in Outdoor Experiential Learning: A Case Study of Two American Corporations(博士論文)。University of New Mexico，Albuquerque, NM。  new window
4.徐正芳(2005)。體驗式教學訓練成效之因素探討(碩士論文)。國立中央大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.黃俊英(2010)。企業研究方法。台北：東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.Silverman, D.(2010)。Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook。SAGE Publications。  new window
3.Bank, John(1985)。Outdoor development for managers。Brookfield, Vt.：Gower。  new window
4.黃良志、黃家齊、溫金豐、廖文志、韓志翔(2011)。人力資源管理：基礎與應用。臺北市：華泰文化。  延伸查詢new window
5.Knowles, M. S.、Holton, E. F.、Swanson, R. A.(2012)。The adult learner: The difinative classic in adult education and human resource development。New York：Routledge。  new window
6.Tracy, W. R.(1998)。The human resources glossary。Boca Raton, FL：St. Lucie press。  new window
7.李漢雄(2000)。人力資源策略管理。臺北市：揚智文化。  延伸查詢new window
8.Bryman, Alan(2004)。Social Research Methods。Oxford University Press。  new window
9.Patton, Michael Quinn(2002)。Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods。Sage。  new window
10.Rokeach, Milton J.(1973)。The Nature of Human Values。Free Press。  new window
11.Kolb, David A.(1984)。Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development。Prentice-Hall。  new window
12.Yin, Robert Kuo-Zuir(2009)。Case Study Research: Design and Methods。Sage Publications。  new window
其他
1.Neill, J.(2008)。A Program Evaluation Tool for Measuring the Impacts of Corporate Adventure Training，http://www.wilderdom.com/tools/leq/CorporateLEQScalesPaper.htm#Short&CustomizedVersions。  new window
圖書論文
1.Miner, T.(1999)。Adventure in workplace。Adventure Programming。State College, PA：Venture Publishing。  new window
2.謝智謀(2004)。體驗教育的過去、現在與未來。體驗教育推廣及資源手冊。臺北市：財團法人海棠文教基金會。  延伸查詢new window
3.李漢雄(2000)。訓練的規劃與執行。人力資源管理的12堂課。臺北市：天下。  延伸查詢new window
4.Charmaz, K.(2003)。Ground theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods。Strategies for qualitative inquiry。Thousand Oaks, CA：SAGE。  new window
5.Fielding, N.、Thomas, H.(2008)。Qualitative interviewing。Researching social life。Sage。  new window
6.Denzin, N. K.、Lincoln, Y. S.(2005)。Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research。Handbook of qualitative research。Thousand Oaks, CA：SAGE。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：899（臺灣：889，外國：10） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2581353 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68385604
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上