:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:論稅法與其他法領域之交錯與調整
書刊名:朝陽商管評論
作者:宋政佳 引用關係
作者(外文):Sung, Cheng-chia
出版日期:2017
卷期:16:2
頁次:頁23-39
主題關鍵詞:稅捐法秩序交錯調整實質支配TaxesSubstantial controlLegal orderCrisscross
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:106
  • 點閱點閱:7
整體法秩序以實現正義為理念,以落實憲法之價值為依歸,而各別之法律不外具體化憲法之價值。稅法,較其他法規範較晚生成,是故,整體稅捐之法律關係,稅捐法概念須借用其他法領域概念。基此,稅法與各法領域間具有相當之交錯,然而,稅捐法與憲法、民事法、行政法、其他法領域皆為整體法秩序之一環,基於法秩序之統一性,各別法領域雖各有其規範目的,各領域之價值與內容須互相調和以避免矛盾。是故,對於事實之認定有形式與實質之觀察,稅法於認定事實、適用法律究竟應以何種關係為據。
The whole legal order is to realize justice in theory and implement the value of the constitution in destination. However, the individual laws are to embody the value of the constitution. The tax law was formed later than other laws, therefore, the legal relation of whole taxes as well as the concept of tax law adopt the concept of other laws. Thus, there are some crisscrosses between the tax law and the other laws. However, as far as legal level is concerned, tax law, constitution, civil law, administrative law and other laws fall within part of the whole legal order. Based on uniformity of legal order, although different laws have different purposes, values and contents of different laws in various field should be adjusted mutually so as to avoid conflicts, therefore, the adjustment between different laws will occur. Furthermore, there is relationship of form and essence in all laws. What should be the legal basis of finding out facts and governing law of tax law? As for this question, this thesis puts forth that substantial control relationship should be the standard of finding out facts and governing law.
期刊論文
1.柯格鐘(20130400)。股票孳息他益信託之課稅--從信託法理談起。當代財政,28,17-29。  延伸查詢new window
2.村上義弘(1992)。租税法理論と行政法理論の相違についての一考察。租税法研究,20,105-106。  延伸查詢new window
3.新井隆一(1992)。稅法法学と関連学問領域・序論。租稅法研究,20,43+117。  延伸查詢new window
4.村井正(1977)。租稅法律関係の構成。租税法研究,5,3-4。  延伸查詢new window
5.王文宇(20020600)。信託財產之獨立性與主體性。法令月刊,53(6),45-53。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.李惠宗(20120500)。富者的原罪?--從司法院釋字第688號解釋的體系正義論檢討股票孳息他益信託課稅的立法選擇。法令月刊,63(5),1-24。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.陳清秀(20130400)。論課稅要件事實之認定。植根雜誌,29(4),121-146。  延伸查詢new window
8.黃士洲(20061100)。稅法對私法的承接與調整--以消極信託於擬制贈與上的評價為例。臺灣本土法學雜誌,88,1-13。  延伸查詢new window
9.黃茂榮(20110200)。稅捐法與民事法。植根雜誌,27(2),1-27。  延伸查詢new window
10.葛克昌(20020100)。信託行為與實質課稅原則。月旦法學,80,26-31。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.黃俊杰、林健生(20120900)。孳息他益股票信託之稅捐課徵。月旦財經法雜誌,30,49-89。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.陳明進(2013)。併購交易商譽元素、衡量及攤銷之稅務爭議研討。商譽攤銷爭稅務爭訟研討會,(會議日期: 2013年5月27日)。台北市:台大法學院。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.木村弘之亮(1999)。租稅法学。稅務経理協会。  延伸查詢new window
2.北野弘久(1978)。企業・土地稅法論。勁草書房。  延伸查詢new window
3.増田英敏(2008)。リーガルマインド租税法。成文堂。  延伸查詢new window
4.謝哲勝(2007)。信託法。台北:元照。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳清秀(2015)。現代財稅法原理。元照出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.吳庚(2012)。行政法之理論與實務。三民。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳清秀(2012)。稅法總論。元照。  延伸查詢new window
8.北野弘久(1983)。憲法と財政法。三省堂。  延伸查詢new window
9.北野弘久(2004)。現代企業稅法論。岩波書店。  延伸查詢new window
10.増田英敏(2006)。租税憲法学。成文堂。  延伸查詢new window
11.清永敬次(2007)。稅法。ミネルヴァ書房。  延伸查詢new window
12.福家俊朗(2001)。現代財政の公共性と法:財政と行政の相互規定性の法的位相。信山社。  延伸查詢new window
13.葛克昌(2009)。所得稅與憲法。翰蘆。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.王志誠(20050000)。信託之基本法理。臺北:元照出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE