臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：幼兒教育券政策分析之研究
書刊名：中國行政評論
作者：蕭芳華
作者(外文)：Hsiao, Fang-hus
出版日期：1999
卷期：9:1
頁次：頁135-175
主題關鍵詞：幼兒教育券；社會剩餘變異；給付政策；效率增進原則；正義原則；Early childhood education voucher；Social surplus change；Subsidizing policies；The principle of efficiency improving；The principle of justice
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(10) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:10
  • 共同引用共同引用:92
  • 點閱點閱:86
　　　　　在最近的未來，臺灣地區的地方政府將熱衷於幼兒教育券政策的實施。這些政策 宣示家長將擁有其幼兒就讀幼稚園的選擇權，期藉此市場機制，增進幼稚園辦學的競爭性。 嚴格評之，現行幼教券的性質，社會福利的功能重於教育選擇權，減少家長負擔是最明顯可 見的利益。本文目的在釐清所謂教育券的真正設計內涵，暨其理論。 探討的重點，分別有(一)幼稚園的專業成長，才應是教育券實施的最終目標；(二)基於 效率增進原則，社會剩餘的變異是這類給付政策的評估準則；(三)正義原則仍是政策設計時 的一個重要價值。教育券因變項的組合，可以有多元的設計。決策者可依地方或特殊需要作 設計。 最後，作者評估現行幼兒教育券政策認為，好的政策，需要符合「效率」與「公平」的 價值原則，否則將無法課責，也難以達成政策目標。另，家長如未能獲得正確的消費資訊， 將無法作出正確的抉擇。幼教券的政策分析者應儘速就這些缺點予以彌補，以免浪費公帑。
　　　　　In Taiwan, there will be many more local governments' rush to announce the voucher policy for early childhood education in nearest future. Those policies put emphases on the givens to the parents "the power to choose the right kindergarten" for their children, through which the market mechanism will harden the competition within the kindergartens. But, strictly speaking, it acts more like as a function of social welfare policy, which is to reduce the parents' cost of Early Childhood Education. The purpose of this paper is to clarify that what an educational voucher really should be and what the theory it bases on. It the article, the discussion, firstly, focus on that the purpose of the voucher policy should be the professional growth in the kindergarten. Secondly, basing on the principle of efficiency improving, the social surplus change becomes the evaluating criteria for these kind of subsidizing policies. Thirdly, the principle of justice is also an important value worthy in the policy design. Furthermore, the variables and the types of voucher have been presented for designing in accordance with the local or specific needs. The experiences in British, United States, and France have been reviewed. At the end, the author evaluate the early childhood education vouchers, which so far has been put into execution, find that there were no detail analysis basing on the value of efficiency and justice. The accountability of these policies are weak and the voucher plan will not achieve the purpose without the correct information the parents (consumers) basing in order to choose the right kindergarten. All those fallbacks need to be urgently reimbursed to refresh the market mechanism that the voucher planning originally claimed for.
期刊論文
1.簡楚瑛、廖鳳瑞、林佩蓉、林麗卿(19951100)。當前幼兒教育問題與因應之道。教改通訊，14，32-33。  延伸查詢new window
2.Sabatier, Paul A.、Mazmanian, Daniel A.(1980)。The Implementation of Public Policy: A Framework of Analysis。Policy Studies Journal，8(4)，538-560。  new window
3.Aiken, Michael、Hage, Jerald(1968)。Organizational interdependence and intra-organizational structure。American Sociological Review，33(6)，912-930。  new window
4.Brett, E. A.(1996)。The participatory principle in development projects : The costs and benefits of cooperation。Public Administration and Development，16，5-19。  new window
5.Hertert, Linda(1996)。Systemic school reform in the 1990s: A local perspective。Educational Policy，10(3)，379-398。  new window
6.Matland, Richard E.(1995)。Synthesizing the Implementation Literature: The Ambiguity-Conflict Model of Policy Implementation。Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory，5(2)，145-174。  new window
7.Morris, Don R.(1996)。Institutionalization and the reform process: A system dynamics perspective。Educational Policy，10(4)，427-447。  new window
8.Wilensky, Harold L.(1964)。The Professionalization of Everyone?。American Journal of Sociology，70(2)，137-158。  new window
9.彭文賢(1982)。行政權威的多元設計模式。公共政策學報，5，54-71。  延伸查詢new window
10.彭文賢(1985)。政策執行與組織設計的關係。公共政策學報，8，101-128。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.毛連塭、吳清山、林佩蓉、幸曼玲、劉春榮(1994)。當前幼稚園教育問題及意見之調查研究。臺北市：國立教育資料館。  延伸查詢new window
2.盧美貴、鍾叡賜(1997)。台北市幼兒教育券政策研究。台北：台北市政府教育局。  延伸查詢new window
3.翁興利、張孝筠、蕭芳華、李裕光(1998)。當前幼托政策分流的分析研究。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.張菡育(1995)。未立案幼稚園輔導措施之研究。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Denhart, R. B.(2004)。Theories of Public Organization。Belmont, CA：Thomson Wadsworth。  new window
2.Johnes, G.(1993)。The economics of education。London, UK：England：The McMillan Press Ptd Ltd。  new window
3.Lane, Jan-Erik(1993)。Public Sector: Concepts, Models, and Approaches。London：Sage Publications Ltd.。  new window
4.Stiglitz, Joseph(1988)。Economics of the Public Sector。New York：Norton & Company, Inc。  new window
5.Levine, Daniel U.、Havighurst, Robert J.(1992)。Society and Education。Boston, MA：Alley and Bacon。  new window
6.Dye, Thomas R.(1992)。Understanding Public Policy。Prentice-Hall。  new window
7.Weimer, David L.、Vining, Aidan R.(1992)。Policy Analysis: Concepts and Practice。Prentice-Hall。  new window
8.Bierlein, Louann A.(1993)。Controversial Issues in Educational Policy。Sage Publications, Inc.。  new window
9.Cochran, Clarke E.(1993)。American Public Policy: An Introduction。New York：St. Martin's Press。  new window
10.馮燕(1995)。托育服務：生態觀點的分析。臺北：巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Stone, Deborah(1988)。Policy Paradox and Political Reason。New York：Glenview, IL：Harper-Collins：Scott, Foresman。  new window
12.Jun, Jong S.(1986)。Public Administration: Design and Problem Solving。New York：Macmillan。  new window
13.Starling, Grover(1988)。Strategies for Policy Making。Dorsey Press。  new window
14.朱志宏、丘昌泰(1994)。政策規劃。台北：國立空中大學。  延伸查詢new window
15.陳義勝(1993)。組織行為。台北市：華泰。  延伸查詢new window
16.張世賢、陳恆鈞(1997)。公共政策：政府與市場的觀點。商鼎文化出版社。  延伸查詢new window
17.翁興利(1996)。公共政策：知識應用與政策制訂。臺北：商鼎。  延伸查詢new window
18.Attkisson, C. Clifford、Hargreaves, William A.、Horowitz, Mardi J.、Sorensen, James E.(1978)。Evaluation of human service programs。New York：Academic。  new window
19.Kirkpatrick, D. W.(1990)。Choice in schooling: A case for tuition vouchers。Chicago：Loyola University Press。  new window
20.Maynard, A.(1975)。Experiment with choice in Education。London：Institute of Economic affairs。  new window
21.Stone, Deborah A.(1997)。Policy paradox: The art of political decision making。New York：W. W. Norton & Company。  new window
22.Dunn, William N.(1994)。Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction。Prentice-Hall International Inc.。  new window
23.Hodge, B. J.、Anthony, W. P.、Gales, L. M.(1996)。Organization theory: A strategic approach。Prentice-Hall International, Inc.。  new window
24.Senge, Peter、郭進隆、齊若蘭(1990)。第五項修練：學習型組織的藝術與實務。台北：天下文化。  延伸查詢new window
25.吳秉恩(1993)。組織行為學。臺北：華泰書局。  延伸查詢new window
26.Robbins, Stephen P.(1996)。Organizational Behavior: Concepts, Controversies, and Applications。Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey：Prentice-Hall。  new window
27.Hage, Jerald、Alter, Catherine(1991)。Organizations Working Together。Organizations Working Together。Newbury Park。  new window
28.Paine, Frank T.、Naumes, William(1982)。Organizational Strategy and Policy: Text and Cases。Organizational Strategy and Policy: Text and Cases。New York, NY。  new window
其他
1.薛承泰(2004)。老人照顧老人 將是臺灣現象，http://ntu.edu.tw/~psc_news9312/120701.htm， 20041207。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Schneider, Anne、Ingram, Helen(1990)。Policy Design: Elements, Premises and Strategies。Policy Theory and Policy Evaluation。New York：Greenwood Press。  new window
2.Angus, Max(1995)。Devolution of School Governance in an Australian State School System: Third Time Lucky。Cases Studies in Educational Change: An International Perspective。London：The Falmer Press。  new window
3.Neubert, Sandra(1995)。Texas educational reform: why? why not? who? what? and so what?。Cases Studies in Educational Change: An International Perspective。London：The Falmer。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：661（臺灣：653，外國：8） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2581353 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68388311
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上