It is allowed for the tax authority to estimate the taxable amount if the tax base is obviously lower without the justifiable reason according to Article 35(6)of Law of Tax Collection and Administration.It is believed that it is the evidence that the tax estimating works as one of the anti-avoidance measures.However,the tax estimating is such a mechanic under which a specified empirical rule may be used to take the place of the tax information which is absent for the taxpayer doesn’t submit to the tax authority who should do so under the tax law.Normally the taxpayer has submitted the documentations about a transaction which is on the anti-avoidance investigation in the general tax collection procedure.There are not enough evidences,particularly direct evidences,to determine the real tax base when the legal form is abused in almost cases.However,it is not raised by the breach of the documentary obligation of the taxpayer.Therefore the taxable event cannot be determined on the approach of tax estimating.As aproven approach of the prima facie,it is doubted that it could be adopted to find out the economic substance.Under the tax estimating approach,the tax authority just can"estimate"roughly the amount of tax base,which is not the real one in most cases.As a result,the principle of ability-to-pay for tax purpose,which governs the anti-avoidance mechanism as the general principle,should not work when the tax estimating is adopted.Moreover,the tax base may be increased on discretion since there is no procedural rules governing the tax estimating until now.Therefore,it is a mistake to adopt the tax estimating as an anti-avoidance measure.It is not a method to determine the real tax base of an avoidance arrangement unless the taxpayer doesn’t submit the documentations according to the tax law.