:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:進城費之遊客願付價格與觀光及生態效益之研究--以宜蘭地區為例
書刊名:管理資訊計算
作者:于健 引用關係蘇仲達
作者(外文):Yu, ChienSu, Chung-ta
出版日期:2020
卷期:9:1
頁次:頁1-14
主題關鍵詞:地方依附進城費願付價格宜蘭遊客Place attachmentCongestion chargeWillingness-to-payYilanTourist
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:56
  • 點閱點閱:5
自國道五號通車後,宜蘭遊客數量年年成長,對當地的交通、生態環境及遊客的旅遊品質皆帶來莫大的影響,各種紓解方案應運而生,其中之一即對進入宜蘭地區之車輛徵收進城費。本研究透過條件評估法(CVM)推估遊客對進城費之願付價格,並探討遊客背景與地方依附對其之影響。以成年且造訪過宜蘭的遊客為研究對象,共得到326份有效樣本。研究結果發現:(1)遊客平均願付價格為82.40元,中位數為96.00元,超過五成的遊客認為進城費可減緩國五塞車程度及生態承載量問題。(2)所得、塞車頻率、對宜蘭的地方認同及收費管制措施的認同度愈高的遊客,其願付價格較高。(3)非收費管制措施以現行「尖峰時全線高承載管制」之認同度最高,而收費管制措施則以進城費之認同度最高。(4)依據交通部交通流量推估進城費年經濟效益約3億元,足可用於改善宜蘭地區交通、觀光及生態環境。
It has impacted on the transportation, eco-tourism environment and tourist quality of Yilan County by tourist growing up year by year, since the Hsuehshan Tunnel opened. Various solutions have emerged. One of which is to collect congestion charge for vehicles entering the Yilan County. This study uses the Contingent Valuation Method (CVM) to estimate the willingness-to-pay of congestion charge for tourists entering Yilan County and to explore the effect of tourists' background and place attachment on it. The adult tourists had been to Yilan County selected as subjects for this study. 326 valid questionnaires were collected. The results in this study are as follows: (1) The mean WTP value of congestion charge was 82.40 NTD, the median WTP value was 96.00 NTD, more than 50% of tourists believe that the WTP of congestion charge can slow down the level of traffic congestion in National Freeway 5 and ecological carrying capacity in Yilan County. (2) Income, frequency of traffic congestion, place attachment and the charge control measures affected WTP positively. (3) The identity of "high occupancy vehicle restriction for all lanes in peak time" was highest in non-charge control measures and the identity of congestion charge was highest in charge control measures. (4) According to the traffic flow of Ministry of Transportation and Communications, the annual tourism benefit of congestion charge is about 300 million NTD, which can be used to improve the transportation, tourism and ecological environment in Yilan County.
期刊論文
1.譚克平(2008)。極端值判斷方法簡介。臺東大學教育學報,19(1),131-150。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Costello, A. B.、Osborne, J. W.(2005)。Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis。Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation,10(7),173-178。  new window
研究報告
1.交通部高速公路局(2017)。國道5號雪山隧道行車安全規定檢討之委託研究案。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.陳淑君(2004)。居民對文化資產保存認知與願付價格之研究(碩士論文)。朝陽科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.沈美惠(2004)。垃圾污染減量的效益評估:條件評估法之應用(碩士論文)。逢甲大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.劉俊志(2004)。居民與遊客對於鯉魚潭風景特定區之地方依附差異探討(碩士論文)。國立東華大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.鐘士佳(2005)。高雄市城市光廊場所依戀之研究(碩士論文)。逢甲大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳慧蓉(2006)。遊客觀光意象與地方依附感關係之探討--以高雄縣美濃鎮為例(碩士論文)。靜宜大學,臺中市。  延伸查詢new window
6.鍾采芳(2011)。我國民眾避免全球暖化衝擊之願付價值研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.林麗娟(2016)。遊客懷舊情感與地方依附對負責任環境行為之影響--以金門山后聚落為例(碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.李佩芸(2013)。遊客懷舊情緒、幸福感與地方依附之相關研究--以台南老屋為例(碩士論文)。南台科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
9.周秀蓉(2014)。地景藝術黃色小鴨展出對城市行銷效益之研究--以市民的地方依附為中介變項(碩士論文)。南華大學。  延伸查詢new window
10.許崴傑(2018)。不同專門化休閒潛水者環境支應性感知與場所依戀關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立虎尾科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
11.陳冠霖(2010)。文化景觀之評價--以淡水古蹟園區為例(碩士論文)。中國文化大學。  延伸查詢new window
12.陳素宜(2014)。台中市垃圾費隨袋徵收研究(碩士論文)。逢甲大學。  延伸查詢new window
13.盧美玲(2013)。都市公園意象、地方依附與滿意度關係之研究--以台南市南瀛綠都心公園為例(碩士論文)。南台科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.蕭代基(20020000)。環境保護之成本效益分析:理論、方法與應用。臺北:俊傑書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Mitchell, R. C.、Carson, R. T.(1989)。Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method。Washington, DC:Johns Hopkins University Press。  new window
其他
1.交通部高速公路局(2018)。2018年元旦連假國道重點擁塞路段時段旅行時間倍數表,http://www.freeway.gov.tw/Upload/Html/20171220178/inf/pre-jam.pdf。  延伸查詢new window
2.交通部觀光局(2002)。2001年國人旅遊狀況調查,https://admin.taiwan.net.tw/FileDownLoad/FileUpload/90%E5%9C%8B%E4%BA%BA%E4%B8%AD%E6%91%98.pdf。  new window
3.交通部觀光局(2018)。2017年國人旅遊狀況調查,https://admin.taiwan.net.tw/FileDownLoad/FileUpload/20180807101024524329.pdf。  延伸查詢new window
4.交通部觀光局(2018)。觀光遊憩據點Scenic Spots,https://stat.taiwan.net.tw/scenicSpot。  延伸查詢new window
5.交通部高速公路局(2018)。106年日交通量參考(主線),https://www.freeway.gov.tw/Publish.aspx?cnid=1652&p=9432。  延伸查詢new window
6.蔡偉祺,簡榮輝(20150408)。假日上國5車牌單雙號分流,https://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20150408000411-260114?chdtv。  延伸查詢new window
7.林泊志(20160616)。雪隧塞車嚴重宜議長倡收入城費,https://tw.appledaily.com/new/realtime/20160616/887420/。  延伸查詢new window
8.林敬倫(20170117)。雪隧塞車難解?高公局:研議開放變換車道,https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/breakingnews/1950371。  延伸查詢new window
9.戴慧瑜(20170503)。國5塞車採「計時」收費解套?台業者:嚇跑遊客,http://www.epochtimes.com/b5/17/5/3/n9102734.htm。  延伸查詢new window
10.Transport for London(2019)。C-Charge Celebrates Successful First Year,https://tfl.gov.uk/info-for/media/press-releases/2004/february/ccharge-celebrates-successful-first-year。  new window
11.Trafikverket(2019)。Trängselskatt och infrastrukturavgifter,https://www.trafikverket.se/resa-och-trafik/vag/Trangselskatt--infrastrukturavgifter/。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE