參考文獻
一、中文文獻
方世榮(1998)，統計學導論，台北：華泰。
世界經理文摘(1999)，如何評估教育訓練績效，世界經理文摘，154，頁10-12。
余品嫻(1997)，政府部門中評練評估之研究，研考雙月刊，21(1)，頁84-93。
余源情(2004)，服務業訓練評鑑實施層次影響因素，中正大學勞工研究所未出版碩士論文。
吳明隆(2002)，SPSS統計應用實務，台北：文魁。
吳瓊治(2002)，教育訓練績效評估之探討，品質月刊，38(6)，頁37-41。
李元墩、傅永均與陳清燿(1999)，企業教育訓練成效評估模式之實驗研究-以燁隆鋼鐵公司為例，黃埔學報，36，頁155-174。
李奉儒等譯(1991)，質性教育研究，嘉義：濤石。
李宜萍(2001)，訓練績效評估，管理雜誌， 372，頁132~133。
李隆盛(2000)，克伯屈評鑑模式，人力培訓專刊，頁7-8.
周月娥(2000)，講師特性對外籍勞工訓練成效影響之探討，元智大學管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
林月雲、陳素貞(1999)，公務人力訓練績效評估研究，公務人力發展中心研究報告。
林宜玄、蕭芳玲(2004)，訓練評鑑模式之比較分析，商業職業教育，93，頁11-20。
邱皓政(2006)。量化研究與統計分析。台北：五南。
胡夢鯨(1998)。成人教育學理論與模型。台北：師大書苑。
孫本初、楊家誠(2003)，刑事警察在職訓練成效評估之研究，中央警察大學學報，40，頁147-180。張建裕(2001)，訓練評鑑資訊系統發展與應用之研究，國立中正大學成人及繼續育研究所碩士論文。
張紹勳(2001)，研究方法LISREL AMOS，台北：滄海。
張紹勳、張紹評與林秀娟(2004)，SPSS For Windows-統計分析下冊，台北：松崗。
張惠雅(2000)，訓練四層次評鑑模式之內涵與評論，人力資源發展月刊，160，頁7-13。
麻@煒(2000)，高科技產業員工教育訓練成效評估之個案研究，台北科技大學技術及職業教育研究所碩士論文。
陳素貞(1998)，企業訓練績效評估研究-國內外標竿企業之比較，國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
陳嘉棋(2004)，教育訓練績效間相關性研究-以國內某家人壽保險公司為例，朝陽科技大學保險金融管理系碩士論文。
陳德望(2002)，管理課程訓練績效評估之研究-以科技與機械公司為例，靜宜大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
陳麗琇(2002)，高科技產業教育訓練弁鄔e外之研究~以新竹科學園區為例，中山大學人力資源管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
黃光雄譯(1989)，教育評鑑的模式，台北：師大書苑。
黃同圳、釦貍?1995)。國內高科技產業教育訓練制度現況調查，就業與訓練，5(6)，頁29-35。。
黃英忠(1994)，人力資源管理，台北：華泰。
黃振豐、曾俊傑(2001)，台灣六大會計師事務所教育訓練績效之分析，淡江人文社會學刊，9，頁47-80。葛樹人(1987)。心理學測驗。台北：桂冠。
劉淑芬(2005)，職場中個人隱性工作知識分享之前導研究，環球科技人文學刊, 1, 頁29-48.劉淑芬(2006)，企業訓練評鑑模式之前導研究-以Kirkpatrick之模式為例，2006年商管科技學會年會曁學術研討會，桃園：中華商管科技學會曁龍華科技大學管理學院主辦。
劉賢靜(1996)，台灣一千家大企業辦理訓練之影響因素及訓練需求之研究，中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所未出版碩士論文。
鄭晉昌(2006)，訓練目標與成效評估別脫勾，人才資本，4，頁15-17.
簡建忠(1994)，訓練評鑑，台北：五南。
簡建忠(1995)，人力資源發展，台北：五南。
魏國萌(2006)，企業內訓練投資報酬評鑑模式初探-以某半導體公司晶粒挑檢訓練為例，中正大學勞工研究所未出版碩士論文。
魏惠娟(1999)，成人教育方案發展-理論與實際，台北：五南。
羅業勤(1999)，企業訓練績效評估，勞工行政，136，頁11-16。
二、英文文獻
Alliger, G. M., Tannenbaum, S. I., Bennett, W., Traver, H., Shotland, A. (1997). A meta-analysis of the relations among training criteria. Personnel Psychology, 50(2), 341-358.
Alliger, G., & Janak, E. (1989). Kirkpatrick’s level of training criteria: thirty years later, Personnel Psychology, 42(2), 331-343.
Alvarez, K., Salas, E., & Garofano, C. (2004). An integrated model of training evaluation and effectiveness. Human Resource Development Review, 3(4), 385-416.
Bailey, A. (2003). Training Analytics. The Canadian Learning Journal, 21-23.
Bates, R. (2004). A critical analysis of evaluation practice: the Kirkpatrick model and the principle of beneficence, Evaluation and program planning, 27(3), 341-347.
Berk, J. (2004). Training Evaluations. Training & Development, 58(9), 39-44.
Beverly, G. (1995). Does your training make a difference-prove it, Training, 32(3), 27-34.
Birnbrauer, H. (1987). Evaluation technique that work. Training and Development, 41(1), 7-9.
Bloom, B. S. (1994). Reflections on development and use of the taxomony. In L. W. Anderson & L. A. Sosniak (Eds.). Bloom’s Taxomony: A forty-year retrospective (pp. 1-8) Chicago, IL: thE National Society for the Study of Education.
Bramley P. (1996). Evaluating Training Effectiveness, McGraw-Hill, England.
Brinkerhoff, R. O. (1988). An integrated evaluation model for HRD. Training & Development, 42(2), 66-68.
Buren, M. E. & Erskine, W. (2002). State of the industry: ASTD’s annual review of trends in employer-provided training in the United States. Alexandria, VA: American Society for Training and Development.
Bushnell, D. S. (1990). Input, process, output: a model for evaluating training. Training and Development Journal, 44(3), 41-43.
Carnevale, A. P. & Schulz, E. R. (1998). Return on investment: Accounting for training. In Donald L. Kirkpatrick (ed.) Another Look at Evaluating Training Programs. (pp.224-256). VA: American Society for Training & Development.
Carter, S. D. (2002). Matching training methods and factors of cognitive ability: A means to improve training outcomes. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 13(1), 71-87.
Chevalier, R. (2004). The link between learning and performance, Performance Improvement, 43(4), 40-44.
Clark, D. (2005). Learning and Performance Glossary. Retrieved September 7, 2006, from http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/hrd/glossary.html
Confederation of British Industry (1998). The skills revolution for a learning nation. In Stewart Ranson (ed.). Inside the Learning Society, (pp.25-30). NY: Redwood.
Dixon, N. M. (1990). The relationship between trainee responses on participation reaction forms and posttest scores. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 1(1), 129-137.
Dixon, N. M. (1996). New routes to evaluation, Training & Development, 50(5), 82-85.
Cooper, D. R., and Emory, C.W. (1995), Business Research Methods, 5th ed., Chicargo: Irwin press.
Drucker, P. F. (1993). Post-capitalist Society. New York : Harper Business.
Dye, K. L. (2002). Effective HRD Evaluation: An Expanded view of Kirkpatrick’s Four Levels, Indiana University, unpublished Ph. D. Dissertation in the School of Education.
Eseryel, D. (2002). Approaches to evaluation of training: Theory & practice, Educational Technology & Society, 5(2), 93-98.
Flower, F. J. (1984). Survey research methods, Applied Social Research Methods Series, 1, Beverly Hills: Sage.
Gay, L. R. (1992). Educational Research Competencies for Analysis and Application. N.Y. Macmillan.
Goldstien, I. L. (1993). Training in organizations: needs assessment, development, and evaluation. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks.
Goldwasser, D. (2001). Beyond ROI. Training, 38(1), 82-90.
Green, D. T. (2004). Corporate Training Programs: A Study of the Kirkpatrick Phillips Model at Electronic Data Systems, Capella University, unpublished Ph. D. Dissertation in the School of Education.
Hale, R. (2003). How training can add real value to the business: part 1, Industrial and Commercial Training, 35(1), 29-32.
Hanson, D. K. (2003) An Index to Measure Trainers’ Attitueds about Conducting Training Evaluation, Idaho State University, unpublished Ed. D. dissertation in Educational Leadership.
Hicks, S. (2000) Why ROI? Training & Development, 54(7), 57.
Holton, E. F. & Naquin, S. (2005). A critical analysis of HRD evaluation models from a decision-making perspective, Human Resource Development Quarterly, 16(2), 257-280.
Holton, E. F. (1996). The Flawed four-level evaluation model. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 7(1), 5-21.
Kaufman R. and Keller J. M., (1994). Levels of Evaluation: Beyond Kirkpatrick. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 5(4), 371-380.
Kaufman, R., Keller, J.M., & Watkins, R.(1996). What works and what doesn’t: Evaluation beyond Kirkpatrick. Performance and Instruction, 35(2), 8-12.
Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1959a). Techniques for evaluating training programs. Training Directors, 13(11), 3-9.
Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1959b). Techniques for evaluating training programs:part2-Learning. Training Directors, 13(12), 21-26.
Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1960a). Techniques for evaluating training programs: part 3-Behavior. Training Directors, 14(1), 13-18.
Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1960b). Techniques for evaluating training programs. Training Directors, 14(2), 28-32.
Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1975). Techniques for evaluating training programs. In Evaluating Training Programs (pp.1-14). Alexandria, VA: American Society for Training and Development.
Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1994). Evaluation Training Programs: The Four Levels. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1996a). Evaluation, in Craig, Robert L. ed. The ASTD Training and Development Handbook: a Guide to Human Resource Development. pp. 294-312. NY: McGraw-Hill.
Kirkpatrick, L. D. (1996b). Great ideas revisited-revisiting Kirkpatrick’s four-level model, Training & Development, 50(1), 54-59.
Kirkpatrick, L. D. (1998). Evaluating Training Programs: Evidence vs. Proof. In D. Kirkpatrick (Ed.), Another Look at Evaluating Training Programs (pp.9-14). VA: American Society for Training & Development.
Kirkpatrick, J. & Hawk, L. (2006). Curricula and Evaluation: Maximizing Results, Training & Development, 60(6), 61-62.
Knowles, M. S. (1990). The adult learner: A neglected species. Houston: Gulf Publishing Company.
Mann, S. (1996). What should training evaluations evaluate? Journal of European Industrial Training, 20(9), 14-20.
McCain, D. V. (2005). Evaluation Basics. VA: American Society for Training and Development.
Merriam, S. B. & Caffarella, R. S. (1999). Learning in adulthood: A comprehensive guide. S.F.: Jassey-Bass.
Nadler, L. (1989) Developing Human Resource (3rd ed). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Newstorm, J. W. (1978) Catch: 22-The problems of incomplete evaluation of training, Training and Development Journal, 32, 22-24.
Parry, S. B. (1996). Measuring training’s ROI. Training & Development, 50(5), 72-77.
Phillips, J. J. (1983). Handbook of Training Evaluation and Measurement Methods. T.X.: Gulf.
Phillips, J. J. (1996). ROI: The search for best practices. Training and Development, 50(2), pp. 42-47.
Phillips, J. J. (1999). ROI: The search for best practices. The Manchester Review, 4(2), 11-18.
Phillips, J. J. (2003). ROI best practices. Retrieved Sep. 1, 2006, from www.clomedia.com/content/templates/clo_fairfield.asp?articleid=275
Phillips, J. H. (2000). Evaluating Training Programs for Organizational Impact: Five Reports. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation in Instructional Technology, Wayne State University.
Pinsonnealt, A. (1993). Survey Research Methodology in management, Journal of Management System, 10(2),75-105.
Rey de Polanco, N. (2005). The influence of training evaluations on the training transfer: An experience in a multinational Venezuelan-American corporation. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation in Educational Leadership, Lynn University.
Rynes, S. & Rosen, B., (1995) A field survey of factors affecting the adoption and perceived success of diversity training, Personnel Psychology, 48(2),247-270.
Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2001) The science of training: A decade of progress. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(2), 471-499.
Stock, A. (1996) The expansion of adult education and training in Europe: trends and issues. In Peter Raggatt, Richard Edwards and Nick Small (eds.). The Learning Society-Challenges and Trends, pp. 26-44. NY: Roultedge.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (1983). The CIPP model for program evaluation. In Geroge F. Madaus, Michael S. Scriven & Daniel L. Stufflebeam (eds.). Evaluation Models, MA: Kluwer Academic Publisher. pp.117-142.
Tannenbaum, S. L., & Woods, S. B. (1992). Determining a strategy for evaluating training: operating within organizational constraints. Human Resource Planning, 15(2), 63-81.
Thurow, L. C. (1999). Building Wealth: The new rules for individuals, companies, and nations in a knowledge-based economy. NY: Harper Collins Publishers.
Tyler, R. W. (1991). General statement on program evaluation. In M. W. Mclaughlin & D. C. Phillips (Eds.), Evaluation and Education: At Quarter Century (pp. 3-17). Chicago: The National Society for the Study of Education.
Ｗaggen, A. K. (2000). Essentials for evaluation. Info-line, pp. 75-90.
Wang, G., Dou, Z. & Li, N. (2002). A system approach to measuring return on investment for HRT intervention, Human Resource Development Quarterly, 13(2), 203-224.
Ｗarr, P., & Bunce, D. (1995). Trainee characteristics and the outcomes of open learning. Personnel Psychology, 48(2), 347-375.
Willerd, K. A. (1997). Balancing your evaluation act. Training, 34(3), 52-58.