:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:被壓抑的回歸--珠江三角洲農民與城市空間
作者:葉蔭聰 引用關係
作者(外文):Iam-Chong Ip
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:建築與城鄉研究所
指導教授:夏鑄九
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2007
主題關鍵詞:中國珠江三角洲城市城市過程農民農民工社群村落現代性都市文化ChinaPearl River Deltacityurban processpeasantpeasant workercommunityvillagemodernityurbanity
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:1
本研究嘗試處理兩個新問題,這些新問題既源於當代中國開放改革以來的社會轉變,亦受著近年城市理論及研究的啟發;第一類問題涉及「城市」的當代意義,在行政體系轉變以外,當代中國出現了怎樣的新的城市空間?;第二類涉及主體問題,在國家權力運作下,城市論述的問題意義偏向自上而下,只關心如何使各類群體如何適應,與官方政策及制度如何整合起來,卻沒有注意到各類群體如何主動生產城市空間,當中的社會過程又如何?只有回答及回應這些問題,才能為當代中國城市研究尋找到新方向,亦是探尋當代中國現代性的切入點。本研究選擇研究珠江三角洲兩類基層社會的群體--外來農民工及本地農民,並以東莞S鎮中井村作為田野考察基地,從他們的主體城市經驗角度來看城市過程。
珠江三角洲的農民工是這個「世界工廠」的勞動大軍,他們由內陸農村來到城市及沿海地區,被置放在「打工仔╱女」的身份位置上。不少研究文獻指出這個社會群體由生產體制所塑造,在勞動過程中,生產體制複製著現存制度中的不平等關係,包括城鄉及地域差距。本研究試圖進一步從再產生(reproduction)的面向,指出生產的社會關係與城市的政治經濟過程的連結,資本主義帶來的社會矛盾,沒有體現在再生產勞動力的集體消費(如住屋及教育)上,更沒有由於政府介入而產生的城市政治,他們作為「打工仔╱女」,被抽離於工業城鎮的社會之外。值得注意的是兩類特別的新空間,一為親屬同鄉關係,另一為工廠-宿舍體制,大部份集體消費功能被吸納回資本主義生產制度及空間中。工人的「打工仔╱女」身份,不是一個階級身份,而是一個被工廠規訓、監視甚至收納的個體,這樣的身份設置,限制了他們發展成當地社會的一員,使他們無法作為一個社會階級在當地社會安頓及扎根。
同時,農民工亦並不完全被動接受這種制度安排,他們亦有回應這種新權力組合的方式。雖然工廠-宿舍制度打造個體化的「打工者」,但是,不少民工期望部份或全部脫離工廠-宿舍,建立自己的「家」,甚至進一步在銷售市場上當小規模個體戶,在兩者互相滋長下而形成當地的民工社群。他們在日常論述中,把自主與自由投注在「家」這個空間,以及「老闆」的身份上,後者更成為出人頭地的代名詞。他們追求獲取小老闆身份的慾望,源起於他們對薪資勞動的異化制度感到挫折,進而渴望重新進入及掌握金錢經濟、商品流動,以及地方市場。故此,他們的異化勞動所帶來的城市經驗,並不是西方社會學理論所理解的「都市厭棄」,他們真正的厭棄對象,是工廠制度與薪資勞動,但諷刺地,它帶來自由與羈絆,而農民工應對的方式亦主要並非個體心理的封閉,而是主動籌謀逃逸,想像向上的階級流動。從這個角度看,「小商戶化」既是擺脫異化舉動,亦是一種特別的金錢「拜物主義」(fetishism),成為一種特有的都市文化。
至於本地農民,他們經歷了農村內部的階級分化。80年代後,農民面對無產階級化壓力增加,農民失去土地,在地方市場上也開始失去優勢,這些正在改變著農村的社會分工,唯一減慢或轉化這個過程的是,農村基層組織的膨脹及吸納,由於其基層管理權力的膨脹,以及加強治安能力的需要,增聘了不少年青勞動力,稍為紓緩了部份無產階級化的壓力,同時形成了本地社群的基礎。然而,90年代的土地風潮亦形成了新的社會階級結構,90年代末以後,雖然隨著土地風潮的過去,幹部不再容易在改動土地用途上積累財富資本,但過去的十多年,已造就了一群富人,幹部的特權在工業生產體系中仍然延續,他們的資本積累依靠工廠繼續進行,地方幹部的權力在工業資本發展中,仍然是造成階級分化的重要因素,並在地理空間形成獨特關係。
階級分化以及本地社群的形成,構成了多種非官方「集體」或社群冒現的背景,形成農村城市化過程中空間政治的重要社會關係。村民重新發明及活化的村落傳統,以及由此形成的社會紐帶,彰顯道義經濟,衝擊著黨國在基層的權威,同時,亦構成新農村治理的動態關係。這些社群的冒起,是本地農民脫離土地過程中及後的產物,他們環繞著作為社會財貨(social goods)的「土地」,商議出一種道義經濟的社群共識,並以此作為爭取自身利益的基礎,與農村政權周旋。
本研究所辨認的群體能動性,曾是及持續受社會主義中國所壓抑的,他們正以迂迴的路徑回歸,展現在當代中國的都市文化及現代性中。本文嘗試把本研究的發現,置放在當代中國現代性論述中進行考察,指出了知識份子論述在新的語境中建立批判性所遇到的困境,無法在理論或實踐上對社會動力群體作出辨認及展望。因此,本研究從主體及空間的角度,所呈現的新興都市文化多樣性,特別是「家居-市場」與社群的自主性,以及非正規與傳統的新意義,這些認識可以協助我們作重新建構當代中國知識份子的批判性視角,以及社會投入與實踐(engagement)。
This study attempts to answer two new questions. These two questions emerge out of the social transformation since the open policy and economic reform in contemporary China. They are also inspired by the urban theories and research in recent years. The first question involves the contemporary significance of “city”. Beside the changes in administrative system, what new urban spaces appear in contemporary China? The second question is about subjectivity. The operation of state power turns the problematic of urban discourses into a top-down perspective. It is only concerned with how various groups of people adapt to the new environment and how they integrate themselves into the government policies and institution. However, it neglects how various social groups actively produce urban spaces and the social processes involved. Answering and responding to these questions, one could be able to look for new directions for urban studies in contemporary China. This is also the cutting point for exploring modernity. This study focuses on two groups of people from the grassroots in the Pearl River Delta, peasant workers from inland province and local peasants. With the field experience in Zhongjing village, Town S, Dongguan city as the site of this research, I analyze the urban processes from the subjective experience of peasant workers and local peasants.
In Pearl River Delta, peasant workers are the labor force of this “World Factory”. They comes from inland province to cities and coastal areas. They are placed at the subject position of “dagong zai/mei”. Many studies point out that the production regime shapes this social group, and in the labor process, it replicates the inequality of the current social system, including urban-rural and regional disparities. This study attempts to further explore the dimension of reproduction and to specify the articulation of the social relations of production with the urban politico-economic process. The social conflict brought about by capitalism emerges neither in the collective consumption for labor reproduction (such as housing and education), nor in the urban politics initiated by state intervention. As “dagong zai/mei”, they are alienated from the society of industrial towns. There are two types of new spaces are noteworthy. The first one is kinship and native-place relationships. Another one is factory-dormitory regime. Most functions of collective consumption are absorbed into capitalist production and space. The identity of “dagong zai/mei” is not a class identity. It is an individual subject to factory discipline, monitoring and even absorption. This identity position restricts them from developing into members of the local society. They are not able to settle down and take roots in it as a social class.
Yet peasant workers do not accept these institutional arrangements passively. They strongly respond to this new power configuration. Even though the factory-dormitory regime builds up the individualized identity of “dagong zai/ mei”, many peasant workers seek partial or complete ways out of factory-dormitory to establish their “homes”. Some even becomes self-employed in the local retailing market. In the midst of the interaction between the factory and the local market, there emerges the local peasant workers'' communities. In their daily discourses, they see their “homes” and the identity of “boss” as a space of autonomy and freedom. To become a boss is to achieve upward mobility. Their desire of gaining the identity of “small boss” arises from their frustration by the alienated system of wage labor. They desperately pursue access to money economy, commodity circulation and local market. Their urban experience of alienated labor is not “blasé” defined by western sociological theories. What they detest is factory system and wage labor rather than city life. But ironically these two systems bring them both freedom and fetter. In response, they do not retreat to their individual psychology; instead they actively plan to escape and imagine ways of upward mobility. From this perspective, “petty bourgeois-ization” is not only getting out class alienation, but also a sort of money fetishism, a special kind of urbanity.
The local peasant undergoes the process of class differentiation within rural village. From the 1980s onwards, they are under the pressure of proletarianization. They lost farm land and advantages in local market. These transformations change the social division of labor in rural village. The only way against this process is the expansion of village government and its administrative power. The need of strengthening security force leads to more recruitment of young people. It mitigates the pressure of proletarianization and forms the basis of the local society. In the 1990s, a new class structure is also formed by land expropriation and speculation. After the late 1990s when the land speculation no longer runs high, the local cadres could not accumulate wealth and capital by expropriating farm land. In spite of it, a small group of wealth people have become established over the past two decades and the privilege of cadres continues to exist in the industrial production system. They could rely on factory to further capital accumulation. The power of local cadres in the industrial production is still an important factor widening class difference and shaping local geography.
In the context of class differentiation and the formation of local society, various “collectivities” or communities comes out as the important social relations in urbanization. They play important role in the spatial politics of the village. Villagers re-invent and revitalize their historical heritage and build up social connections. Their moral economy poses a great challenge to the authority of the part-state power in the grassroots. The new governance of village also relies on it. The emergence of these communities are consequence of the alienation of peasants from their land. With their land as “social goods”, they conjure up a community consensus of moral economy to fight for their interest and negotiate with the village government.
The social agencies identified by this research were and are repressed by socialist China. But now many communities return to contemporary urbanism and modernity in oblique ways. This study attempts to contextualize itself in the contemporary Chinese discourses on modernity. It addresses their difficulties in establishing a critical perspective facing intellectuals in the new context,. They are not able to identify and call for any social agent in theory and practice. This study, from the perspectives of subjectivity and space, shows the diversity of newly emerging urbanities, particularly the autonomy of “household-market” and community, and the new meanings of “informality” and “tradition”. They provide a new beginning for contemporary Chinese intellectual to formulate critical perspectives and social engagement.
一.中文資料

公羊(2003)《思潮:中國“新左派”及其影響》。北京:中國社會科學出版社。
王俊祥、王洪春(2001)《中國流民史. 現代卷》。合肥:安徽人民出版社。
王剛、羅峰(1999) 〈社區參與、社會進步和政治發展的新驅動力和生長點 ———以五里橋街道為案例的研究報告〉。《浙江學刊》,第 2 期,72-75。
王穎(2000)〈城市發展研究的回顧與前贍〉。《社會學研究》,第1期,65-75。
王銘銘(2003)〈鄉村研究與文明史的想像〉。《走在鄉土上──歷史人類學扎記》,頁1033。北京:中國人民大學出版社。
王銘銘(2004)《溪村家族──社區史、儀式與地方政治》。貴陽:貴州人民大學出版社。
毛澤東(1977[1955])〈徵詢對農業十七條的意見〉。《毛澤東選集》第五卷,頁260-263。北京:人民出版社。
毛澤東(1977[1957])〈一九五七年夏季的形勢〉。《毛澤東選集》第五卷,頁456-465。北京:人民出版社。
毛澤東(1991[1925])〈中國社會各階級的分析〉。《毛澤東選集》第一卷,頁3-11。北京:人民出版社。
王曉明(1997)〈「人文精神」論爭與知識份子的認同困境〉。陳清僑編,《身份認同與公共文化:文化研究論文集》,頁355-367。香港:牛津大學出版社。
王曉明(2003)〈1990年代與新意識形態〉。《半張臉的神話》,頁1-26。桂林 : 廣西師範大學出版社。
仝志輝(2002)《鄉村關系視野中的村莊選舉:以內蒙古橋鄉村委會換屆選舉為個案》。西安:西北大學出版社。
仝志輝(2004)《選舉事件與村莊政治:村莊社會關聯中的村民選舉參與》。北京:中國社會科學出版社。
弗里曼、畢克偉與塞爾登(2001)《中國鄉村,社會主義國家》(陶鶴山譯)。北京:社會科學文獻出版社。
史柏年(1997)〈老人社區照顧的發展與策略〉。《中國青年政治學院學報》,第1期,94-97。
包亞明(2004)《游蕩者的權力:消費社會與都市文化研究》。北京:中國人民大學出版社。
包亞明、王宏圖、朱生堅(2001)《上海酒吧 : 空間、消費與想象》。南京:江蘇人民出版社。
甘陽、崔之元編 (1997) 《中國改革的政治經濟學》。香港 : 牛津大學出版社。
卡鴻(Craig Calhoun)(1997)〈民間社會與公共領域〉(梁穎詩譯)。陳清僑編,《身份認同與公共文化:文化研究論文集》,頁47-64。牛津大學出版社,1997。
列寧(1896[1984])〈俄國資本主義的發展:大工業國內市場形成的過程〉。《列寧全集第三卷》,頁1-562。北京:人民出版社。
朱健剛(1999a)〈國家、權力與街區空間──當代中國街區權力研究導論(上)〉。《中國社會科學季刊》,26,夏季,171-193。
朱健剛(1999b)〈國家、權力與街區空間──當代中國街區權力研究導論(下)〉。《中國社會科學季刊》,27,秋季,181-194。
李沛良、劉兆佳編(1981)《人民公社與農村發展:台山縣斗山公社的經驗》。香港:中文大學出版社。
李思名(1997)〈全球化、經濟轉型和香港城市形態的轉化〉。《地理學報》,第52期 (Supplement),52-61。
李培林 (1996)〈流動民工的社會網絡和社會地位〉。《社會學研究》,第64期,43-51。
李強(2001a)〈中國外出農民工及其匯款之研究〉。《社會學研究》,第94期,4月,64-76。
李強(2001b)《社會分層與貧富差別》。廈門:鷺江出版社。
李博(Wolfgang Lippert)(2003)《漢語中的馬克思主義術語的起源與作用》。北京:中國社會科學出版社。
李路路、李漢林(2000)《中國的單位組織:資源、權力與交換》。杭州:浙江人民出版社。
李歐梵(2001)《上海摩登--一種新都市文化在中國》(毛尖譯)。北京:北京大學出版社。
李實(2000)〈城鄉個人收入比較〉。熊景明編,《進入21世紀的中國農村》,頁339-362。北京:光明日報出版社。
李澤厚、劉再復(1995)《告別革命 : 回望二十世紀中國》。香港 : 天地圖書。
沈原(2006)〈社會轉型與工人階級的再形成〉。《社會學研究》,第2期,13-36。new window
汪暉(2000a)〈當代中國的思想狀況與現代性問題〉。《台灣社會研究季刊》,第37期,1-43。new window
汪暉(2000b)《死火重溫》。北京:人民文學出版社。
汪暉(2001)〈“新自由主義”的歷史根源及批判〉。《台灣社會研究季刊》,第42期,1-65。
吳介民(2000)〈壓榨人性空間:身分差序與中國式多重剝削〉。《台灣社會研究季刊》,第39期,1-44。new window
吳毅(2002)《村治變遷中的權威與秩序:20世紀川東雙村的表達》。北京:中國社會科學出版社。
吳毅、賀雪峰、羅興佐、董磊明、吳理財(2006)〈村治研究的路徑與主體--兼答應星先生的批評〉。《鄉村中國評論第一輯》,頁259-272。桂林:廣西師範大學出版社。
東莞市統計局(2005)《東莞統計年鑑2005》。北京:中國統計出版社。
東莞市統計局(2000)《東莞統計年鑑2005》。北京:中國統計出版社。
東莞市規劃所 (2003)《S鎮總體規劃》,東莞:東莞市政府。
周大鳴(2005)《渴望生存:農民工流動的人類學考察》。廣州:中山大學出版社。
周其仁、戴小京(1986)〈農民、市場和制度創新〉。周其仁編,《農村變革與中國發展(下卷)》,454-483。香港,牛津大學出版社。
周素卿、陳東升(2001)〈後進者的全球化:東南亞台灣企業地域生產網絡的建構與對外投資經驗〉。《都市與計劃》,第28卷,第4期,421-459。new window
林毅夫(1994)〈中國的農村改革與農業增長〉。《制度、技術與中國農業發展》,頁76-103。上海:三聯。
邁克爾.佩羅曼(Michael Perelman)(2001)《資本主義的誕生--對古典政治經濟學的一種詮釋》(裴達鷹譯)。桂林:廣西師範大學出版社。
姜向群(1995)〈我國老年人社會服務及其改革方向〉。《人口研究》,第4期,13-17。
時永福等 (1999)〈走出“單位群落”〉。《中國社會報》,3月 2日。
珠江三角洲12市統計局 (2000)《珠江三角洲12市社會經濟主要指針統計資料2000》。東莞:東莞市統計局。
馬克思(1975a〔1867〕)《資本論》第一卷。北京:人民出版社。
馬克思(1975b〔1865〕)〈工資、價格和利潤〉。中共中央馬克思、恩格斯、列寧、斯大林著作編譯局編,《馬克思恩格斯選集》第一卷,頁149-204。北京:人民出版社。
馬克思和恩格斯(1972〔1848〕)〈共產黨宣言〉。中共中央馬克思、恩格斯、列寧、斯大林著作編譯局編,《馬克思恩格斯選集》第一卷,頁228-286。北京:人民出版社。
高華(2000)《紅太陽是怎樣升起來的?》。香港:香港中文大學出版社。
馬傑偉 (2005)《酒吧工廠 : 打造現代身體》。南京:江蘇人民出版社。
秦暉(2003a)〈自由主義、社會民主主義與當代中國“問題”〉。《思潮:中國“新左派”及其影響》,頁382-400。北京:中國社會科出版社。
秦暉(2003b)〈“農民”與“農業者”〉。[Online] Available: http://www.frchina.net/data/personArticle.php?id=148
秦暉(2003c)〈傳統中華帝國的鄉村基層控制:漢唐間的鄉村組織〉。《農民中國:歷史反思與現實選擇》,頁219-252。鄭州:河南人民出版社。
秦暉(2004a)〈“大共同體本位”與傳統中國社會——兼論中國走向公民社會之路〉。《傳統十論 : 本土社會的制度,文化及其變革》,頁61-126。上海:復旦大學出版社。
秦暉(2004b)〈公社之謎——農業集體化的再認識〉。《傳統十論 : 本土社會的制度,文化及其變革》,頁295-322。上海:復旦大學出版社。
秦暉(2006a)〈超越派性之争 尋找變革道路——秦暉、温鐵軍、汪暉之間的一場討論〉。[Online] Available: http://www.chinaelections.org/NewsInfo.asp?NewsID=47832
秦暉(2006b)〈拒絕原始積累〉。[Online] Available: http://boxun.com/hero/qinhui/57_1.shtml
秦暉(2006c)〈當代中國的「左」與「右」〉。[Online] Available: http://www.chinaelections.org/NewsInfo.asp?NewsID=100553
秦暉(2006d)〈農民需要怎様的“集體主義” ——民間組織資源與現代國家整合〉[Online] Available: http://www.comment-cn.net/data/2006/1002/article_19836.html
孫潔怡(1998)〈社區組織與社區居民自治意向〉。《社會》,第 11 期,36-37。
夏學鑾編(1996)《社區照顧的理論、政策與實踐》。北京:北京大學出版社。
夏鑄九(2001)〈全球化過程中台灣社會的挑戰:跨界的生產網絡vs.跨界的政治〉。《都市與計劃》,第28卷,第4期,413-420。new window
國家統計局農村社會經濟調查總隊 (2000)《中國農村貧困監測報告》。北京:中國統計出版社。
張樂天(2005)《告別理想:人民公社制度研究》。上海:東方出版。
陳文鴻(1983)〈「讓部份農民先富起來」--從經濟角度評中國農業新政策〉。《大躍進、文化大革命與新經濟政策》,頁51-72。香港:曙光出版社。
陳可文、陳湘舸(1982)〈論城市化不是唯一的道路〉。《求索》,第 5 期。
深圳當代社會觀察研究所(2002)《宿舍在中國:南中國企業員工住宿調查報告》。深圳:深圳當代社會觀察研究所。
渠敬東(2001)〈生活世界中的關系强度――農村外來人口的生活軌迹〉。柯蘭君、李漢林編,《都市�堛漣囓�――中國大城市的流動人口》,頁40-70。北京:中央編譯出版社。
張曉輝、趙長保、陳良彪(1995)〈1994:農村勞動力跨區域流動的實證描述〉。《戰略與管理》,第6期,26-34。
陸學藝編(2002)《當代中國社會階層研究報告》。北京:社會科學文獻出版社。
湖北省大悟縣地方志編纂委員會編(1996)《大悟縣志》。武漢:湖北科學出版社。
項飆(2000)《跨越邊界的社區:北京「浙江村」的生活史》。北京:三聯。
黃平(1997)〈尋求生存的衝動:從微觀角度看中國農民非農活動的根源〉。《未完成的敘說》,頁163-186。成都:四川人民出版社。
黃樹民(2002)《林村的故事:一九四九年後的中國農村變革》(素蘭、納日碧力戈譯)。北京:三聯。new window
費孝通(1984)《小城鎮,大問題》。上海:江蘇人民出版社。
費孝通(1987〔1939〕)《江村經濟 : 中國農民的生活》。香港:中華書局。
發展研究所綜合課題組(1994〔1988〕)〈中國的發展:財富增長與制度適應〉。周其仁編《農村變革與中國發展(下卷)》,頁484-523。香港,牛津大學出版社。
賀雪峰(2003)《鄉村治理的社會基礎 : 轉型期鄉村社會性質研究》。北京 : 中國社会科学出版社。
溫鐵軍(2002)〈我們是怎樣失去遷徙自由的〉。[Online] Available: http://www.tecn.cn/data/detail.php?id=560
安東尼奧.葛蘭西(1983)《獄中扎記》(葆熙譯)。北京:人民出版社。
趙剛(2000)〈如今批判還可能嗎?--與汪暉商榷一個批判的現代主義計劃及其問題〉。《台灣社會研究季刊》,第37期,45-73。new window
《經濟學動態》編輯部編(1986)《1984 年經濟理論動態》。北京:人民出版社。
蔡昉、白南生(2006)《中國轉軌時期勞動力流動》。北京市:社會科學文獻出版社。
廣東省統計局(2006)《廣東省統計年鑒》。北京市:中國統計出版社。
鄧小平(1994〔1980〕)〈社會主義首先要發展生產力〉。《鄧小平文選》,第二卷,頁311-14。北京:人民出版社。
鄧小平(1993〔1984〕)〈辦好經濟特區,增加對外開放城市〉。《鄧小平文選》,第三卷,頁51-52。北京:人民出版社。
鄧小平(1993〔1992〕)〈在武昌、深圳、珠海、上海等地的談話要點〉。《鄧小平文選》,第三卷,頁370-383。北京:人民出版社。
劉小楓(2001)〈金錢.性別.生活感覺--紀念齊美爾《貨幣哲學》問世一百年〉。齊美爾著,劉小楓選編,《金錢、性別、現代生活風格》,頁i-xxii。台北:聯經。
劉林平(2001)〈外來人群體中的關系運用――以深圳“平江村”為個案〉。《中國社會科學》,第5期,112-124。
劉林平(2002)《關系、社會資本與社會轉型――深圳“平江村”研究》。北京:中國社會科學出版社。
劉應杰(2000)《中國城鄉關係與中國農民工人》。北京:中國社會科學出版社。
鄭陸霖(1999)〈一個半邊陲的浮現與隱藏:國際鞋類市場網絡重組下的生産外移〉。《台灣社會研究季刊》,第35期,1-46。new window
閻蓓(1999)《新時期人口遷移》。長沙:湖南人民出版社。
邁斯納(Maurice Meisner)(2005)《毛澤東的中國及其後:中華人民共和國史》(杜蒲譯)。香港:中文大學出版社。
應星(2006)〈評村民自治研究的新方向--以《選舉事件與村庄政治》為例〉。《鄉村中國評論第一輯》,頁249-258。桂林:廣西師範大學出版社。
鍾朋榮 (1990)《十年經濟改革 : 歷程、現狀、問題、出路》。鄭州 : 河南人民出版社。
謝國雄(1997)《純勞動:台灣勞動體制諸論》。台北:中央研究院社會學研究所。new window
賽爾登(Mark Selden)(2002)《革命中的中國:延安道路》(魏曉明、馮崇義譯)。北京:社會科學文獻出版社。
邊燕杰(2002)〈美國社會學界的中國社會分層研究〉。邊燕杰編,《市場轉型與社會分層--美國社會學者分析中國》,頁1-40。北京:三聯。
戴錦華(1999)〈清醒的立場〉。《猶在鏡中 : 戴錦華訪談錄》,頁1-25。北京 : 知識出版社。
戴聰、薛桂霞(2000)〈農業技術推廣〉。《進入21世紀的中國農村》,熊景明主編,頁283-300。北京:光明日報出版社。
瞿宛文(2001)〈全球化與自由化之後的台灣石化業〉。《台灣社會研究》,第44期,13-47。new window
魏承思(2004)《中國知識份子的浮沉》。香港:牛津大學出版社。
羅麗莎(Lisa Rofel)(2006)《另類的現代性:改革開放時代中國性別化的渴望》。南京:江蘇人民出版社。
顧忠華(2005)〈論社會科學的開放性與公共性〉。《臺灣社會學刊》第35卷,第12期, 1-21。new window

一.英文資料

Adorno, Theodor et al. (1976). The positivist dispute of German sociology. New York: Harper & Row.
Andersen, Hans Thor & Sten Engelstoft. (1992). Material production and the urban concept. Research in Urban Sociology, Volume 2 (pp. 273-295). Greenwich and London: JAI Press.
Appadurai, Arjun. (1990). Disjuncture and difference in the global economy. Public culture, 2, 2, 5-20.
Arnold, Thomas Clay. (2001). Rethinking moral economy. American Political Science Review, 95(1), 85-95.new window
Arrighi, Giovanni. (1970). Labor supplies in historical perspective: A study of the proletarianization of the African peasantry in Rhodesia. Journal of Development Studies 6(3), 197-234.
Arrighi, Giovanni and Beverly J. Silver. (1984). Labor movements and capital migration: The United States and Western Europe in world-historical perspective. In C. Bergquist (Ed.), Labor in the Capitalist World-Economy (pp. 183-216). Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.
Bauman, Zygmunt. (1992). Love in adversity: On the state and the intellectuals, and the state of the intellectuals. Thesis Eleven, 31, 81-104.
Benjamin, Walter. (1978). Paris, capital of the nineteenth century. Reflections: Essays, Aphorisms, Autobiographical Writings (pp. 146-162). New York: Schocken Books.
Bernardes, Jon. (1999). We must not define ''The Family''! Marriage and Family Review, 28, 3/4, 2l-41.
Bérubé, Michael. (2005). Experience. In Tony Bennett, Lawrence Grossberg and Meaghan Morris (Eds.), New Keywords: A Revised Vocabulary of Culture and Society (pp. 121-123). Oxford: Blackwell.
Blockmans, Wim P. (1994). Voracious states and obstructing cities: An aspect of state formation in preindustrial Europe. In Charles Tilly and Wim P. Blockmans (Eds.), Cities and the Rise of States in Europe A. D. 1000-1800 (pp. 218-250). Boulder: Westview Press.
Booth, William James. (1993). A note on the idea of the moral economy. The American Political Science Review, 87(4), 949-954.
Booth, William James. (1994). On the idea of the moral economy. The American Political Science Review, 88 (3), 653-667.
Bogue, D. J. (1969). Principles of demography. New York: Springer.
Borden, Iain. (2001). Another pavement, another beach: Skateboarding and the performative critique of architecture. In Iain Borden, Joe Kerr, Jane Rendell and Alicia Divaro (Eds.), The Unknown City: Contesting Architecture and Social Space. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre & Loïc J.D. Wacquant. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
Bowles, Samuel., & Herbert Gintis. (1986). Democracy and capitalism : property, community, and the contradictions of modern social thought. New York: Basic Books.
Boyd, Monica. (1989). Family and personal networks in international migration: Recent developments and new agendas. International Migration Review, 23, 638-670.
Brah, Avtar. (1996). Diaspora, border and transnational identities. Cartographies of Diaspora (pp. 178-210). London and New York: Routledge.
Braverman, Harry. (1974). Labor and monopoly capital : the degradation of work in the twentieth century. New York and London : Monthly Review Press.
Brenner, Neil. (2000). The urban question as a scale question: Reflections on Henri Lefebvre, urban theory and the politics of scale. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24(2), 361-378.
Brenner, Neil. (2001). The limits to scale? Methodological reflections on scalar structuration. Progress in Human Geography, 25(4), 591-614.
Burawoy, Michael. (1979). Manufacturing consent : changes in the labor process under monopoly capitalism. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
Burawoy, Micahel. (1981). The function and reproduction of migrant labour: Comparative material from Southern Africa and the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 81(5), 1050-1087.
Burawoy, Michael. (1985). The politics of production : factory regimes under capitalism and socialism. London : Verso.
Burawoy, Michael. (2003). For a sociological Marxism: The complementary convergence of Antonio Gramsci and Karl Polanyi. Politics and Society, 31(2), 193-261.
Cai, Yongshun. (2003). Collective ownership or cadres'' ownership? The non-agricultural use of farmland in China. The China Quarterly, 175, 662-680.
Castells, Manuel. (1976a[1968]). Is there an urban sociology? In C. G. Pickvance (Ed.), Urban Sociology (pp. 33-59). London: Tavistock.
Castells, Manuel. (1976b[1969]). Theory and ideology in urban sociology. In C. G. Pickvance (Ed.), Urban Sociology (pp. 60-84). London: Tavistock.
Castells, Manuel. (1978). City, class, and power. London: Macmillan.
Castells, Manuel. (2000). The rise of the network society. Oxford: Blackwell.
Chamberlain, Health B. 1993. On the search for civil society in China. Modern China, 19, 2, 199-215.
Chan, Anita, Richard Madsen & Jonathan Unger. (1992). Chen village under Mao and Deng. Berkeley : University of California Press.
Chan, Anita & Hong-zen Wang. (2005). The impact of the state on workers'' conditions – Comparing Taiwanese factories in China and Vietnam. Pacific Affairs, 77(4), 629-646.
Chan, Anita, Richard Madsen, and Jonathan Unger. (1992). Chen village under Mao and Deng. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Cheal, David. (1993). Unity and difference in postmodern families. Journal of Family Issues, 14, 1, 5-19.new window
Cheng, T. J. and Mark Selden. (1994). The origins and social consequences of China''s hukou system. China Quarterly, 139, 644- 668.
Choe, Sang-chuel. (1996). Urban corridors in Pacific Asia. In Fu-chen Lo and Yue-man Yeung (Eds.), Globalization and the World of Large Cities. Tokyo, New York and Paris: United Nations University Press.
Chow, Rey. (1993). Writing diaspora : Tactics of intervention in contemporary cultural studies. Bloomington : Indiana University Press.
Clifford, James. (1988). On ethnographic authority. Predicament of Culture: Twentieth-Century Ethnography, Literature and Art. Cambrdige: Harvard University Press.
Clifford, James. (1997). Routes : Travel and translation in the late twentieth century. Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Press.
Cohen, Paul. (1984). Discovering history in China : American historical writing on the recent Chinese past. New York : Columbia University Press.
Crang, Mike. (1998). Cultural geography. London & New York : Routledge.
Davis, Deborah S., Richard Kraus, Barry Naughton and Elizabeth J. Perry (Eds.). (1995). Urban spaces in contemporary China: The potential for autonomy and community in post-Mao China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Davis, Deborah (Ed). (2000). The consumer revolution in urban China. Berkeley: University of California Press.
de Certeau, Michel. (1984). The practice of everyday life. (Trans. Steven Rendall). Berkeley : University of California Press.
Ding, X. L. (2000a). The illicit asset stripping of Chinese state firms. The China Journal, 43, 1-28.
Ding, X. L. (2000b). Informal privatization through internationalization: The rise of nomenklatura capitalism in China''s offshore businesses. British Journal of Political Science, 30(1), 121-146.new window
Djilas, Milovan. (1957). The new class : An analysis of the communist system. New York : Frederick A. Praeger.
Duara, Prasenjit. (1988). Culture, power, and the state : rural North China, 1900-1942. Standford: Standford UP.
Duara, Prasenjit. (1999). Imagining China: Regional division and national unity. In Shu-Min Huang and Cheng-Kuang Hsu (Eds.), Imagining China: Regional Division and National Unity (pp. 161-200). Taipei: Institute of Ethnology.
Duara, Prasenjit. (2000). Response to Philip Huang''s “Biculturality in modern China and Chinese studies”. Modern China, 26(1), 32-37.new window
Engels, Frederick. (1994[1845]). The condition of the working class in England : From personal observation and authentic sources. Chicago, Ill.: Academy Chicago Publishers.
Evans, Peter. (1995). Embedded autonomy: States and industrial transformation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Fraser, Nancy. (1989). What''s critical about critical theory? The case of Habermas and gender. Unruly Practices: Power, Discours and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press
Freedman, Maurice. (1958). Lineage organization in Southeastern China. London: Athlone Press.
Friedman, Edward, Paul G. Pickowicz, Mark Selden & Kay Ann Johnson. (1991). Chinese village, socialist state. New Haven : Yale University Press.
Friedmann, John. (1997). World city futures : The role of urban and regional policies in the Asia-Pacific region. Hong Kong : Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies, Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Gans, Herbert. (1962). The urban villagers : Group and class in the life of Italian-Americans. New York: Free Press.
Geertz, Clifford. (1973). The interpretation of cultures : selected essays. London: Fontana Press.
Gottdiener, Mark and Joe Feagin. (1988). The paradigm shift in urban sociology. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 24(2), 163-187.
Gupta, Akhil & James Ferguson. (1997). Anthropological Locations: Boundaries and Grounds of a Field Science (pp. 147-162). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Habermas, Jurgen. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere. Cambrdige: Polity.
Hall, Stuart. (1994[1980]). Cultural studies: Two paradigms. In Nicholas B. dirks, Geoff Eley and Sherry B. Ortner (Eds.), Culture/Power/History: A Reader in Contemporary Social Theory (pp. 520-38). New York: Princeton.
Hankiss, Elemer. (1990). East European alternatives. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hareven, T. K. (1982). Family Time and Industrial Time. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Harris, J.R. and M. P. Todaro. (1970). Migration, unemployment and development: A two-sector analysis. American Economic Review, 60(1), 126-142.new window
Hart, Keith. (1973). Informal income opportunities and urban empolyment in Ghana. Journal of Modern African Studies, 11(1), 61-89.new window
Hartmann, Heidi. (1976). Capitalism, patriarchy and job segregation by sex. Martha Blaxall and Barbara Reagan (Eds.), Women and the Workplace: The Implication of Occupational Segregation (pp. 137-69). Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Harvey, David. (1985a). Consciousness and the urban experience : Studies in the history and theory of capitalist urbanization. Oxford: Blackwell.
Harvey, David. (1985b). The urban process under capitalism: A framework for analysis. The Urbanization of Capital : Studies in the History and Theory of Capitalist Urbanization (pp. 1-31). Oxford: Blackwell.
Harvey, David. (1989). The urban experience. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Harvey, David. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
Harvey, David L. & Michael H. Reed. (1996). The culture of poverty: An ideological analysis. Sociological Perspectives, 39(4), 465-496.
Hinton, William. (1966). Fanshen : A documentary of revolution in a Chinese village. New York : Vintage Books.
Ho, Peter. (2001). Who owns China''s land? Property rights and deliberate institutional ambiguity. The China Quarterly, 166, 394-421.
Hsing, You-tien. (1998). Making capitalism in China: The Taiwan connection. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Huang, Philip C. C. (2000). Biculturality in modern China and in Chinese studies. Modern China, 26(1), 3-31.new window
Hugo, G. J. (1981). Village-community ties, village norms and ethnic and social networks: A review of evidence from the Third World. In G. F. DeJong and R. W. Gardner (Eds.), Migration Decision Making: Multidisciplinary Approaches to Microlevel Studies in Developed and Developing Countries (pp. 186-224). New York: Pergamon Press.
Johnson, Graham E. (1993). The political economy of Chinese urbanization: Guangdong and the Pearl River Delta region. In Greg Guldin and Aidan Southall (Eds.), Urban Anthropology in China (pp. 167-204). Leiden, New York and Koln: E. J. Brill.
Kahn, Joel S. (1995). A world system of culture. Culture, Multiculture, Postculture (pp. 124-156). London: Sage.
Katznelson, Ira. (1992). Marxism and the city. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Keyes, Charles et al. (1983). Peasant strategies in Asian societies: Moral and rational economic approaches--A symposium.” Journal of Asian Studies, 152(4), 753-868.
Kung, Lydia. (1983). Factory women in Taiwan. Arm Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Kuper, H. (Ed). (1965). Urbanization and migration in West Africa. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.
Kwok, R. and So, Alvin (Eds.). (1995). The Hong Kong-Guangdong link: Partnership in flux. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
Landes, Joan B. (1988). Women and the public sphere in the age of the French revolution. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Lee, C. K. (1998). Gender and the South China miracle: Two worlds of factory women. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.
Lefebvre, Henri. (1991). Critique of everyday life, vol. 1, Introduction. (Trans. John Moore). Lodon: Verso.new window
Lewis, John Wilson (Ed.). (1971). The city in communist China. California: Standford University Press.
Lewis, Oscar. (1959). Five Families. New York: Basic Books.
Lewis, Oscar. (1973). Some perspectives on urbanization with special reference to Mexico City. In A. Southall (Ed.), Urban Anthropology: Cross-cultural Studies of Urbanization (pp. 125-38). New York: Oxford University Press.
Lewis, W. Arthur. (1954). Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour. Manchester School, 22 (May), 139-91.
Lim, Linda Y. C. (1983). Capitalism, imperialism and patriarchy: The dilemma of Third World women workers in multinational factories. In J. Nash and M. P. Fernandez-Kelly (Eds.), Women, Men and the International Division of Labor (pp. 70-91). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Lin, George C. S. (1997). Red capitalism in South China: Growth and development of the Pearl River Delta. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
Lin, George C. S. (2001). Metropolitan development in a transitional socialist economy: Spatial restructuring in the Pearl River Delta, China. Urban Studies, 38(3), 383-406.
Lin, Nan & Chih-jou Jay Chen. (1999). Local Elites as Officials and Oweners Shareholding and Property Rights in Daqiuzhuang. In Jean Oi and Andrew Walder (Eds.), Property Rights and Economic Reform in China (pp. 145-70). Standford, Calif: Standford University Press.
Little, Daniel. (1989). Understanding peasant China: Case studies in the philosophy of social science. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Mandel, Ernest. (1992). Power and money : a Marxist theory of bureaucracy. London and New York: Verso.
Marcus, George. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world System: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95-117.
Marglin, Stephen. (1974). What do bosses do? The Review of Radical Political Economics. 6(2), 60-112.
Marston, Sallie A. (2000). The social construction of scale. Progress in Human Geography, 24(2), 219-242.
Marston, Sallie A. and Neil Smith. (2001). States, scales and households: Limits to scale thinking? A response to Brenner. Progress in Human Geography, 25(4), 615-619.
Martindale, Don. (1958). Prefatory remarks: The theory of the city. In Max Weber. The City (pp. 9-62). New York: The Free Press.
Marx, Karl. 1993(1857). The chapter on money. Grundrisse (p. 115-238). London and New York: Penguin.
Mazumdar, D. (1976). The urban informal sector. World Development, 4(8), 655-679.
McGee, T. G. (1970a). Beachheads and enclaves : The urban debate and the urbanization process in Southeast Asia since 1945. Hong Kong : Department of Geography and Geology, University of Hong Kong.
McGee, T. G. (1970b). Hawkers in selected Asian cities : A preliminary investigation. Hong Kong: Centre of Asian Studies, University of Hong Kong.
McGee, T. G. (1973). Peasants in cities: A paradox, a paradox, a most ingenious paradox. Human Organization, 32(1): 135-142.new window
Mills, C. Wright. (1959). Sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mingione, Enzo. (1988). Fragmented society. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Moore, Donald S. (1997). Remapping resistances: “Ground for struggle” and politics of place. In Steve Pile and Michael Keith (Eds.) Geographies of Resistance (pp. 87-106). London and New York: Routledge.
Morley, David. (2000). Home territories : Media, mobility and identity. London & New York : Routledge.
Moser, Caroline N. (1978). Informal Sector or Petty Commodity Production: Dualism or Independence in Urban Development? World Development, 6 (9/10): 1041-64.
Moulier-Boutang, Yann. (1999). The art of flight: An interview. [Online] Available: http://info.interactivist.net/article.pl?sid=03/02/07/1350202
Nee, Victor. (1989). A theory of market transition: From redistribution to markets in state socialism. American Sociological Review, 54, 5, 663-681.
Nee, Victor. (1996). The emergence of a market society: Changing mechanism of stratification in China. American Journal of Sociology, 101, 4, 908-949.
Negt, Oskar and Alexander Kluge. (1993). Public sphere and experience: Toward an analysis of the bourgeois and proletarian public sphere. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Noble, Trevor. (1998). Postmodernity and Family Theory. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 39, 3, 257-277.
Oi, Jean C. (1989). State and peasant in contemporary China: The political economy of village government. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Oi, Jean C. (1992). Fiscal Reform and the Economic Foundations of Local State Corporatism in China. World Politics, 45 (1), 99-126.new window
Oi , Jean C. (1995). The role of the local state in China''s transitional economy. The China Quarterly 144, 1132-1149.
Pahl, R. E. (1983). Concepts in contexts: Pursuing the urban of ‘Urban’ Sociology. In Anthony Sutcliffe & Derek Fraser (Eds.), The Pursuit of Urban History (pp. 371-82). London: Edward Arnold.
Pahl, R. E. and Claire Wallace. (1985). Household work strategies in economic recession. In Nanneke Redclift and Enzo Mingione (Eds). Beyond Employment: Household, Gender and Subsistence (pp. 189-227). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Papademetriou, D. (1988). International migration in a changing world. In C. W. Stahl (Ed.), International Migration Today, Volume 2: Emerging Issues (pp. 237-250). Paris: UNESCO.
Park, Robert. (1967[1925]). The city: Suggestions for the investigation of human behavior in the urban environment. Robert E. Park, Ernest W. Burgess & Roderick D. McKenzie. The City (pp. 1-46). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Passaro, Joann. (1997). “You can’t take the subway to the field!”: “Village” epistemologies in the global village. In Akhil Gupta and James Ferguson (Eds.), Anthropological Locations: Boundaries and Grounds of a Field Science (147-162). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Pei, Minxin. (2006). China''s trapped transition: The limits of developmental autocracy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Polanyi, Karl. (1957). The great Transformation: The political and economic origins of our time. Boston: Beacon Press.
Popkin, Samuel L. (1979). The rational peasant. Berkeley: University of California.
Pun, Ngai. (1999). Becoming Dagongmei (working girls): the politics of identity and Difference in Reform China. China Journal, 42, 1-18.
Pun, Ngai. (2000). Opening a minor genre of resistance in reform China: Scream, dream, and transgression in a workplace. Positions, 8(2), 531-555.
Pun, Ngai. (2005). Made in China : women factory workers in a global workplace. Durham : Duke University Press/Hong Kong University Press.
Rabinow, Paul. (1984). Reflections on fieldwork in Morocco. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Rabinow, Paul. (1996). Representation are social facts: Modernity and post-modernity in anthropology. Essays on the Anthropology of Reason (pp. 28-58). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Reddy, William M. (1984). The rise of market culture: The textile trade & French society, 1750-1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rimmer, R. J. (1994). Regional economic integration in Pacific Asia. Environment and Planning A, 26(11), 1731-1759.
Robinson, Jennifer. (2006). Ordinary cities : Between modernity and development. London and New York: Routledge.
Rowe, William T. (1984). Hankou: Commerce and society in a Chinese city, 1796-1889. Standford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Rowe, William T. (1989). Hankou: Conflict and Community in a Chinese City, 1796-1895. Stanford, CA: Stanford University. Press.
Rowe, William T. (1990). The public sphere in modern China. Modern China, 16(3), 309-29.
Ruf, Gregory Ruf. (1998). Cadres and kin: Making a socialist village in West China, 1921–1991. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Said, Edward. (1993). Culture and imperialism. New York: Vintage.
Salaff, Janet Weitzner. (1971). Urban residential communities in the wake of the cultural revolution. In John Wilson Lewis (Ed.), The City in Communist China (pp. 289-324). California: Standford University Press.
Salt, J. (1987). Contemporary trends in international migration study. International Migration, 25(3), 241-265.
Sassen-Koob, S. (1983). Labor migration and the new industrial division of labor. In J. Nash and M. P. Fernandez-Kelly (Eds.), Women, men and the International Division of Labor (pp. 175-204). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Sassen-Koob, S. (1979). Formal and informal associations: Dominicans and Colombians in New York. International Migration Review, 13(2), 314-332.
Sassen, Saskia. (2001). The global city: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Sayer, Andrew. (1992). Method in social science. London: Routledge.
Scanzoni, J., Polonko, K., Teachman, J. & Thompson, L. (1989). The sexual bond: Rethinking families and close relationships. Newbury Park: Sage.
Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in human capital. American Economic Review, 51(1), 1-17.new window
Scott, James C. (1977). The moral economy of the peasant. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Shue, Vivienne. (1988). The reach of the state: Sketches of the Chinese body politics. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Simmel, Georg. (1950[1903]). The metropolis and mental life. In Kurt H. Wolff (Ed.), The Sociology of Georg Simmel. New York: Free Press.
Sit, V.F.S. & Yang Chun. (1997). Foreign investment-induced “exo-urbanization” in the Pearl River Delta, China. Urban Studies, 34(4), 647-677.
Skinner, G. William. (1964). Marketing and social structure in rural China. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Asian Studies.
Smart, J. (1993). Land rents and the rise of a petty bourgeoisie in contemporary China. Anthropology of Work Review, 14(2), 3-6.
Smart, J. (1995). Capitalist production under socialism in the People''s Republic of China (PRC) since 1978. Anthropology of Work Review, 16 (3-4), 14-19.
Smart, Josephine. (1999). The global economy and South China development in post-1978 China: Relevance and limitations of the flexible accumulation approach. Urban Anthropology, 28 (3-4),407-445.
Smart, J. and A. Smart. (1993). Obligation and control: Employment of kin in capitalist labour management in China. Critique of anthropology, 13(1), 7-31.new window
Smart, A. and J. Smart. (2000). Failure and strategies of Hong Kong firms in China: An ethnographic perspective. In Henry Wai-chung Yeung and Kris Olds (Eds.), Globalization of Chinese Business Firms (pp. 244-271). London: Macmillan.
Smith, Chris and Ngai Pun. (2006). The dormitory labour regime in China as a site for control and resistance. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(8), 1456-1470.
Soja, Edward W. (2000). Postmetropolis: Critical Studies of Cities and Regions. Oxford: Blackwell.
Solinger, Dorothy J. (1991). China''s transients and the state : A form of civil society? Hong Kong : Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies, Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Solinger, Dorothy J. (1999). Contesting citizenship in urban China : peasant migrants, the state, and the logic of the market. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Southall, Aidan. (1993). Urban theory and the Chinese city. In Greg Guldin and Aidan Southall (Eds.), Urban Anthropology in China (pp. 19-40). Leiden, New York and Koln: E. J. Brill.
Stocking, George W. (1992). The ethnographer’s magic and other essays in the history of anthropology. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.
Storper, Michael. (2001). The poverty of radical theory today: From the false promises of Marxism to the mirage of the cultural turn. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25(1), 155-179.new window
Strand, David. (1995). Conclusion: Historical perspectives. In Richard Kraus Deborah S. Davis, Barry Naughton, Elizabeth J. Perry (Eds.), Urban Spaces in Contemporary China: The Potential for Autonomy and Community in Post-Mao China (pp. 394-426). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sung, Y. W. (1997). Hong Kong and the economic integration of the China circle. In B. Naughton (Ed.), The China Circle: Economics and Electronics in the PRC, Taiwan and Hong Kong (pp. 41-80). Washington, D. C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Szelyenyi, Ivan and Kostello, E. (1996). The Market Transition Debate: Toward a Synthesis? American Journal of Sociology, 101(4), 1082-1096.
Szelenyi, Ivan and Robert Manchin. (1987). Social policy under state socialism: market, Redistribution and social inequalities in East European socialist societies. In G. Esping-Andersen, M. Rien & L. Rainwater (Eds), Stagnation and Renewal in Social Policy (pp. 102-39). Armonk, N. Y.: M. E. Sharpe.
Szelenyi, Ivan. (1988). Eastern Europe in an epoch of transition : between socialism and capitalism. Hong Kong : Centre of Urban Studies & Urban Planning, University of Hong Kong.
Tam, Siu-Mi Maria. (1994). The structuration of Chinese modernization : women workers of Shekou industrial zone. Ann Arbor, Mich. : UMI.
Tekeli, Ilhan. (1995). The patron-client relationship, land-rent economy and the experience of “urbanization without citizens” In Neary, S.J., Symes, M.S. & Brown, F.E. (Eds.), The Urban Experience - A People-Environment Perspective (Proceedings 13th International Conference of the IAPS), Manchester (UK), 13-15 July 1995.
Thompson, E. P. (1968). The making of the English working class. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Thompson, E. P. 1993(1971). The moral economy of the English crowd in the eighteenth century.” Customs in Common (pp. 185-258). New York: The New Press.
Tilly, Charles. (1994). Entanglements of European cities and states. In Charles Tilly and Wim P. Blockmans (Eds.), Cities and the Rise of States in Europe A. D. 1000-1800 (pp. 1-27). Boulder: Westview Press.
Tilly, Louise & Joan Scott. (1988). Women, work and family. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Todaro, M.P. (1969). A model of labor migration and urban unemployment in less developed countries. American Economic Review, 59, 138-148.
Tonboe, Jens Christian. (1992). From urban theory to the sociology of space. Research in Urban Sociology, Volume 2 (pp. 195-212). Greenwich and London: JAI Press.
Unger, Jonathan. (1994). Rich men, poor men: The making of new classes in the countryside. In David Goodman and Beverley Hopper (Eds.), China''s Quiet Revolution: New Interactions Between State and Society. New York: St.Martin''s Press.
Unger, Jonathan & Anita Chan. (1999). Inheritors of the boom: Private enterprise and the role of local government in a rural South China township. The China Journal, 42, 45-74.
Wakeman, Frederic. (1993). The civil society and public sphere debate: Western reflections on Chinese political culture. Modern China, 19, 2, 108-138.
Walder, Andrew. (1986). Communist neo-traditionalism : Work and authority in Chinese industry. Berkeley and Los Angeles : University of California Press.
Walder, Andrew. (1992). Property rights and stratification in socialist redistributive economies. American Sociological Review, 57, 524-39
Walder, Andrew. (1996). Markets and inequality in transitional economics: Toward testable theories. American Journal of Sociology, 101, 4, 1060-1073.
Wallerstein, Immanuel. (1979). The rural economy in modern society. The Capitalist World-economy : Essays (pp. 119-131). Cambridge and New York : Cambridge University Press.
Wallerstein, Immanuel. (1984). Household structures and labour force formation in the capitalist world. In Immanuel Wallerstein and Joan Smith (Eds.), Household and the World Economy (pp. 7-22). Beverly Hills: Sage.
Watson, James. (2004). Presidential address: Virtual kinship, real estate, and diaspora formation: The Man lineage revisited. The Journal of Asian Studies, 63(4), 893-910.
Weinstein, Deena & Michael A. Weinstein. (1993). Simmel and the dialectic of the double boundary: The case of “the metropolis and mental life”. Postmodern(ized) Simmel (pp. 101-114). London: Routledge.
Weston, Kath. (1997). The Virtual anthropologist. In Akhil Gupta and James Ferguson (Eds.), Anthropological Locations: Boundaries and Grounds of a Field Science (pp. 163-184). Berkeley: University of California Press.
White, James W. (1998). Old Wine, Cracked Bottle? Tokyo, Paris, and the Global City Hypothesis. Urban Affairs Review, 33(4), 451-477.
White, Lynn T. (1971). Shanghai''s polity in cultural revolution. In John Wilson Lewis (Ed.), The City in Communist China (pp. 325-372). California: Standford University Press.
Whyte, Martin King & William L. Parish. (1984). Urban life in contemporary China. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Whyte, Martin King. (1993). Adaptation of rural family patterns to urban life in Chengdu. Greg Guldin and Aidan Southall (Eds.), Urban Anthropology in China (pp. 358-380). Leiden, New York and Koln: E. J. Brill.
Whyte, William Foote. (1955). Street corner society : the social structure of an Italian slum. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Williams, Raymond. (1983). Keywords. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Willis, Paul E. (1977). Learning to labour : How working class kids get working class jobs. Farnborough, Eng. : Saxon House.
Willis, Paul. (1980). Notes on method. Stuart Hall, Dorothy Hobson, Andrew Lowe and Paul Willis (Eds.), Culture, Media, Language. London: Routledge.
Willis, Paul. (1997). TIES: Theoretically informed ethnographic study. Stephen Nugent and Cris Shore (Eds.), Anthropology and Cultural Studies (pp. 182-92). London: Pluto Press.
Wirth, Louis. (1938). Urbanism as a way of life. American Journal of Sociology, 44(1), 1-24.new window
Woo, Edward S. W. (1998). Urban development. In Y. M. Yeung and David K. Y. Chu (Eds.), Guangdong: Survey of a Province Undergoing Rapid Change. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
Yan, Hairong. (2006). Rurality and labor process autonomy. Cultural Dynamics, 18(1), 5-31.new window
Yang, C. K. (1959). Chinese communist society : The family and the village. Cambridge, Mass. : M. I. T. Press.
Yang, Mayfair Mei-hui. (2004). Spatial Struggles: postcolonial complex, state disenchantment, and popular reappropriation of space in rural Southeast China. The Journal of Asian Studies, 63(3), 719-755.
Yeung, Yue-man & Fu-chen Lo. (1996). Globalization and world city formation in Pacific Asia. In Fu-chen Lo and Yue-man Yeung (Eds.), Globalization and the World of Large Cities. Tokyo, NY and Paris: United Nations University Press.
Zhang, Li. (2001). Strangers in the city : Reconfigurations of space, power, and social networks within China''s floating population. Stanford, Calif. : Stanford University Press.
Zheng, Tianxiang. (1989). The Spatial Relationships among Hong Kong, Macau and the Pearl River Delta Area. Asian Geographer, 8(1/2), 89-102.new window
Zhou, Daming. (1993). An approach to the problems of population movement and cultural adaptation in the urbanizing Pearl River Delta. In Greg Guldin and Aidan Southall (Eds.), Urban Anthropology in China (pp. 205-215). Leiden, New York and Koln: E. J. Brill.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
1. 評John A. Crespi (江克平), «Manhua Modernity: Chinese Culture and the Pictorial Turn» (Oakland: University of California Press, 2020)
2. 評Xiaoning Lu, «Moulding the Socialist Subject: Cinema and Chinese Modernity (1949~1966)» (Leiden: Brill, 2020)
3. 以城帶鄉與城鄉一體:1990年~2011年中國城鎮化發展模式的雛議
4. 或然歷史的幽靈:《米鹽紀》的全球史書寫、中國想像和後冷戰的文化政治
5. 現代主體的再生:改革開放四十年中國社會變遷的一個審視視角
6. 近代中國城市的公共領域
7. 鄉村再建中的“鄉紳”--日本東北地區鄉村的田野調查經驗對中國社會的啟示
8. 新奇的城市、矛盾的臺北:臺語片中的寶島遊記
9. 在日本能否找到中國?--評吳偉明編《在日本尋找中國:現代性及身份認同的中日互動》(香港:中文大學出版社,2013)
10. 在制度化與激進化之間:中國新生代農民工的組織化趨勢
11. 中國都市的想像與現實
12. 評Jeremy Brown (周傑榮), «City Versus Countryside in Mao's China: Negotiating the Divide» (毛澤東時代中國的城鄉對壘:差異與博弈) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012)
13. 從沿海缺工潮到中西部缺工潮--中國沿海地區製造業內遷與中西部地區社會經濟結構轉變
14. 非正當性支配:韋伯論城市國家與現代國家之正當性基礎
15. The Reception of Modernity in East Asia: Japan in China's Encounter with the West
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE