:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:創傷、敘事及精神分析:以拉岡精神分析觀點再思梅爾維爾之《白鯨記》為創傷敘事
作者:陳宥廷 引用關係
作者(外文):You-ting Chen
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:外國語文學研究所
指導教授:黃宗慧
沈志中
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2017
主題關鍵詞:創傷敘事拉岡真實小對形觀看trauma narrativeJacques Lacanthe realthe object athe gaze
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:18
本論文試圖以拉岡精神分析的觀點將赫爾曼•梅爾維爾的《白鯨記》詮釋為一創傷敘事。文中指出學者們對這本小說的研究聚焦於敘事結構與敘事策略,而此兩大問題其實都與創傷密切相關。重新以精神分析的概念(如真實、小對形)思考創傷的本質,有助於重新詮釋小說中諸多關於鯨魚的章節;這些章節看來與敘事者歷劫歸來的主線故事目的相違,但實則不然。同時,如此思考也提供了一個新的觀點,來解讀敘事者為何採取如此迀迴繞行的敘事策略。
論文共有三章。第一章處理敘事身分的問題,特別著重在回溯倖存者船難後的生活,並指出敘事中的強迫行為在此就可觀察到。為了理解這種強迫行為,本章進一步討論精神分析裡重複強制此一概念,並檢視拉岡如何重構此概念與創傷之間的關係。拉岡指出,創傷是一種與真實擦肩而過的遭逢;第二章針對此一說法加以闡釋,並探討此一遭逢如何產生一個創傷性的剩餘,其功能如同拉岡對小對形的描述。此一特殊物以鯨魚的形貌出現,成為倖存者生活中與敘事裡迷戀�強迫的對象。在他的敘事裡,可見為了捕捉(或再現)小對形而開展的欲望,而小對形則化為觀看出現。最後一章則剖析敘事者如何展開繁複的表意活動,不但為了捕獲心中的鯨形更為了虜獲小對形。此舉引發了眼睛與觀看之間的搏鬥,讓敘事者面對了來自觀看的殲滅效果。本文的結論則思考《白鯨記》作為一創傷敘事既是一則個人悲劇也是一個普遍經驗。
In this thesis, I aim to reconsider Herman Melville’s Moby-Dick as a trauma narrative, especially from the perspective of Jacques Lacan’s psychoanalytic insights. I argue that both the narrative structure and the narrative strategy—two problems that concern the Melvillean scholars most regarding this novel—are intimately related to trauma. Rethinking the nature of trauma through psychoanalytic concepts such as the real and the object a, in my view, affords an alternative interpretation of the cetological chapters which do not seem to serve the purpose of the survival tale told by the narrator. Meanwhile, it offers a revealing perspective on why he narrates in such a roundabout and circuitous way.
The thesis consists of three chapters. In the first chapter, I revisit the problem of narrative identity, with a special interest in retrieving the survivor’s life after the shipwreck. I maintain that the compulsive behavior observed there finds its way into the narrative. To advance our understanding of this behavior, I move on to investigate how the concept of the compulsion to repeat is analyzed in psychoanalysis, with an aim of examining how Lacan reformulates this concept and bears it on trauma. Trauma, as Lacan characterizes, is the missed encounter with the real. The subsequent chapter is devoted to exploring how this missed encounter produces a traumatic residue which functions like the Lacanian concept of the object a. This special object appears in the form of the whale and becomes an object of obsession both in the survivor’s life and in his narrative. And I argue it is in his narrative that we see a full display of the unconscious desire to capture, or to represent, the object a as the gaze. In the final chapter, I set out to dissect the elaborate signifying practice the narrator deploys with a view to not only capturing the whale in his mind but also subjugating the object a to the signifying chain. What incurs is a battle between the eye and the gaze, and what confront the narrator at the end of his narration are the annihilating effects of the gaze. To conclude this thesis, I reflect on how the narrative can be regarded as both a personal tragedy and a universal experience.
Allen, Austin. “Why You, Yes, You, Should Read Moby-Dick.” Web. June 16, 2016 < http://bigthink.com/book-think/why-you-yes-you-should-read-moby-dick>.
Attridge, Derek. “Language as History/History as Language: Saussure and the Romance of Etymology.” Post-Structuralism and the Question of History. Ed. Derek Attridge, Geoff Bennington, and Robert Young. London: Cambridge, 1987. 183-211.
Baltrušaitis, Jurgis. Anamorphic Art. Trans. W. J. Strachan. New York: Abrams, 1977.
Barbour, James. “The Composition of Moby-Dick.” American Literature 47.3 (1975): 343-60.
Barry, Peter. Beginning Theory: An Introduction to Literary and Cultural Theory. New York: Manchester UP, 2009.
Barthes, Roland. Mythologies. 1957. Trans. Annette Lavers. New York: Noonday P, 1989.
Belsey, Catherine. Culture and the Real: Theorizing Cultural Criticism. London and New York: Routledge, 2005.
Berthoff, Warner. The Example of Melville. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1962.
Bezanson, Walter E. “Moby-Dick: Work of Art.” Moby-Dick: Centennial Essays. Dallas: Southern Methodist UP, 1953. 30-58.
Bickley, R. Bruce Jr. The Method of Melville’s Short Fiction. Durham: Duke UP, 1969.
Bowie, Malcolm. Lacan. Cambridge and London: Harvard UP, 1991.
Bredahl, A. Carl Jr. Melville’s Angles of Vision. Gainesville: U of Florida P, 1972.
Brodhead, Richard H. “Trying All Things: An Introduction to Moby-Dick.” New Essays on Moby-Dick. Ed. Richard H. Brodhead. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1986. 1-21.
Brodtkorb, Paul, Jr. Ishmael’s White World: A Phenomenological Reading of Moby Dick. New Haven and London: Yale UP, 1965.
Brooks, Peter. Reading for the Plot: Design and Intention in Narrative. Cambridge and London: Harvard UP, 1984.
Casey, Edward S., and J. Melvin Woody. “Hegel, Heidegger, Lacan: The Dialectic of Desire.” Interpreting Lacan. Ed. Joseph H. Smith and William Kerrigan. New Haven and London: Yale UP, 1983. 75-112.
Copjec, Joan. “Vampires, Breast-Feeding, and Anxiety.” October 58 (1991): 24-43.
Descartes, René. Optics. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. Trans. John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff, and Dugald Murdoch. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1984. 152-75.
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder: DSM-5. Washington, D. C.: American Psychiatric Association, 2013.
Dillingham, William B. Melville’s Later Novels. Athens and London: U of Georgia P, 1986.
Dolar, Mladen. “‘I Shall Be with You on Your Wedding Night’: Lacan and the Uncanny.” October 58 (1991): 5-23.
Dryden, Edgar A. Melville’s Thematics of Form: The Great Art of Telling the Truth. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins UP, 1968.
Eldridge, Herbert G. “‘Careful Disorder’: The Structure of Moby-Dick.” American Literature 34.2 (1967): 145-62.
Evans, Dylan. An Introductory Dictionary of Lacanian Psychoanalysis. London and New York: Routledge, 1996.
Felluga, Dino. “Modules on Brooks: On Narrative Desire.” Introductory Guide to Critical Theory. January 31, 2011. Purdue U. July 22, 2016 .
Fink, Bruce. “Preface.” Reading Seminar XI: Lacan’s Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis. Ed. Richard Feldstein and Maire Jaanus. Albany: SUNY, 1995. ix-xv.
---. “The Real Cause of Repetition.” Reading Seminar XI: Lacan’s Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis. Ed. Richard Feldstein and Maire Jaanus. Albany: SUNY, 1995. 223-29.
---. Lacan to the Letter: Reading Écrits Closely. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2004.
---. The Lacanian Subject: Between Language and Jouissance. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1995.
Fogle, Richard Harter. Melville’s Short Tales. Norman: U of Oklahoma P, 1960.
Freud, Sigmund. “Beyond the Pleasure Principle.” 1920. The Standard Edition. Vol. XIIIV. 1-64.
---. “On the Psychical Mechanism of Hysterical Phenomena: A Lecture.” 1893. The Standard Edition. Vol. III. 25-39.
---. “Remembering, Repeating and Working-Through (Further Recommendations on the Technique of Psycho-Analysis II).” 1914. The Standard Edition. Vol. XII. 145-56.
---. Five Lectures on Psycho-Analysis. 1910. The Standard Edition. Vol. XI. 1-56.
---. Studies on Hysteria. 1893-1895. The Standard Edition. Vol. II.
---. The Interpretation of Dreams. 1900. The Standard Edition. Vol. IV-V.
---. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud. 24 vols. Ed. James Strachey, et al. Trans. James Strachey. London: The Hogarth P, 1953-74.
Garber, Megan. “‘It Repels the Reader’: Tech Glitches Led Moby-Dick’s First Critics to Pan It.” The Atlantic. November 15, 2013. Web. June 16, 2016 < http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2013/11/it-repels-the-reader-tech-glitches-led-i-moby-dick-i-s-first-critics-to-pan-it/281499/>.
Green, André. “The Unbinding Process.” New Literary History 12.1 (1980): 11-39.
Harrison, Kathryn. “How to Read Moby-Dick.” The New York Times. October 21, 2011. Web. June 16, 2016 .
Hayford, Harrison. “Unnecessary Duplicates: A Key to the Writing of Moby-Dick.” New Perspectives on Melville. Ed. Faith Pullin. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP, 1978. 128-61.
Herman, Judith. Trauma and Recovery. New York: Basic Books, 1992.
Hetherington, Hugh W. “Early Reviews of Moby-Dick.” Moby-Dick: Centennial Essays. Dallas: Southern Methodist UP, 1953. 89-122.
Howard, Lori N. “‘Ungainly Gambols’ and Circumnavigating the Truth: Breaking the Narrative of Moby-Dick.” “Ungraspable Phantom”: Essays on Moby-Dick. Ed. John Bryant, Mary K. Bercaw Edwards, and Timothy Marr. Kent, Ohio: Kent State UP, 2006. 25-36.
Johnston, Adrian. “Jacques Lacan.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2014 Edition). Ed. Edward N. Zalta. Web. June 9, 2016 .
Lacan, Jacques. “Position of the Unconscious.” 1964. Écrits 703-21.
---. “Science and Truth.” 1965. Écrits 726-45.
---. “Seminar on ‘The Purloined Letter.’” 1955. Écrits 6-48.
---. “The Freudian Thing or the Meaning of the Return to Freud in Psychoanalysis.” 1955. Écrits 334-63.
---. “The Function and Field of Speech and Language in Psychoanalysis.” 1953. Écrits 197-268.
---. “The Instance of the Letter in the Unconscious, or Reason since Freud.” 1956. Écrits 412-41.
---. “The Signification of the Phallus.” Écrits 575-84.
---. “The Subversion of the Subject and the Dialectic of Desire in the Freudian Unconscious.” 1960. Écrits 673-702.
---. Écrits: The First Complete Edition in English. Trans. Bruce Fink, Heloise Fink and Russell Grigg. New York and London: W. W. Norton, 2006.
---. Freud’s Papers on Technique, 1953-1954. Trans. John Forrester. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1988.
---. On Feminine Sexuality: The Limits of Love and Knowledge. Trans. Bruce Fink. New York: Norton, 1998.
---. The Ego in Freud’s Theory and in the Technique of Psychoanalysis 1954-1955. Trans. Sylvana Tomaselli. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1988.
---. The Ethics of Psychoanalysis 1959-1960. Ed. Jacques-Alain Miller. Trans. Dennis Porter. New York and London: Norton, 1992.
---. The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psycho-Analysis. Ed. Jacques-Alain Miller. Trans. Alan Sheridan. New York and London: W. W. Norton, 1978.
---. The Psychoses: The Seminar of Jacques Lacan Book III 1955-1956. Ed. Jacques-Alain Miller. Trans. Russell Grigg. New York and London: Routledge, 1993.
Laplanche, J., and J.-B. Pontalis. The Language of Psycho-Analysis. Trans. Donald Nicholson-Smith. Intro. Daniel Lagache. New York: Norton, 1973.
Law, Jules. “Desire without History.” Rev. of Reading for the Plot: Design and Intention in Narrative, by Peter Brooks. NOVEL: A Forum on Fiction 19.1 (1985): 91-94.
Lawrence, D. H. “Herman Melville’s Moby Dick.” Studies in Classic American Literature. 1923. New York: Penguin Books, 1977. 153-70.
Lee, A. Robert. “Moby-Dick: The Tale and the Telling.” New Perspectives on Melville. Ed. Faith Pullin. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP, 1978. 86-127.
Levi, Primo. The Periodic Table. 1975. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1996.
Leys, Ruth. “Traumatic Cures: Shell Shock, Janet, and the Question of Memory.” Critical Inquiry 20.2 (1994): 623-62.
---. Trauma: A Genealogy. Chicago and London: U of Chicago P, 2000.
Lodge, David. “Analysis and Interpretation of the Realist Text: A Pluralistic Approach to Ernest Hemingway’s ‘Cat in the Rain.’” Poetics Today 1.4 (1980): 5-22.
Mason, Ronald. The Spirit above the Dust: A Study of Herman Melville. Mamaroneck, N.Y.: Paul P. Appel, 1951.
McGowan, Todd. The Real Gaze: Film Theory after Lacan. Albany: SUNY, 2007.
Melville, Herman. “Hawthorne and His Mosses: By a Virginian Spending July in Vermont.” The Piazza Tales and Other Prose Pieces 1839-1860. Evanston: Northwestern UP, 1987. 239-53.
---. Great Short Works of Herman Melville. Ed. Warner Berthoff. New York: Perennial Classics, 2004.
---. Journals. Revised and annotated by Howard C. Horsford and Lynn Horth. Evanston: Northwestern UP, 1989.
---. Moby-Dick: An Authoritative Text, Reviews and Letters by Melville, Analogues and Sources, Criticism. Ed. Harrison Hayford and Hershel Parker. New York: W. W. Norton, 1967.
Miller, Jacques-Alain. “To Interpret the Cause: From Freud to Lacan.” Newsletter of the Freudian Field 3 (1989): 30-50.
---. “Extimité.” Lacanian Theory of Discourse: Subject, Structure, and Society. Ed. Mark Bracher, Marshall W. Alcorn, Jr., Ronald J. Corthell, and Françoise Massardier-Kenney. New York and London: New York UP, 1994. 74-87.
Morrison, Toni. Beloved. 1987. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2006.
Nasio, Juan-David. Five Lessons on the Psychoanalytic Theory of Jacques Lacan. 1992. Trans. David Pettigrew and François Raffoul. New York: SUNY, 1998.
Nobus, Dany. Jacques Lacan and the Freudian Practice of Psychoanalysis. London: Routledge, 2000.
Nusselder, André. The Surface Effect: The Screen of Fantasy in Psychoanalysis. London and New York: Routledge, 2013.
Parker, Hershel. Flawed Texts and Verbal Icons: Literary Authority in American Fiction. Evanston, Ill: Northwestern UP, 1984.
---. Herman Melville: A Biography Volume 2, 1851-1891. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins UP, 2002.
---. The Recognition of Herman Melville: Selected Criticism since 1846. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 1967.
Pavón-Cuéllar, David. “Extimacy.” Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology. Ed. Thomas Teo. New York: Springer, 2014. 661-64.
Prince, Gerald. Rev. of Reading for the Plot: Design and Intention in Narrative, by Peter Brooks. Style 19.3 (1985): 395-97.
Ragland, Ellie. “An Overview of the Real, with Examples from Seminar I.” Reading Seminars I and II: Lacan’s Return to Freud. Albany: SUNY, 1996. 192-211.
Ragland-Sullivan, Ellie. “Jacques Lacan.” Feminism and Psychoanalysis: A Critical Dictionary. Ed. Elizabeth Wright. Oxford: Blackwell, 1992. 201-7.
Reno, Janet. Ishmael Alone Survived. London and Toronto: Associated UP, 1990.
Rimmon-Kenan, Shlomith. Rev. of Reading for the Plot: Design and Intention in Narrative, by Peter Brooks. Comparative Literature 39.2 (1987): 176-79.
Robillard, Douglas. “Melville’s Reading in the Visual Arts.” Savage Eye: Melville and the Visual Arts. Kent, Ohio: Kent State UP, 1991. 40-54.
---. Melville and the Visual Arts: Ionian Form, Venetian Tint. Kent, Ohio: Kent State UP, 1997.
Saussure, Ferdinand de. Course in General Linguistics. Ed. Charles Bally, Albert Sechehaye and Albert Riedlinger. Trans. Wade Baskin. New York: McGraw-Hill Books Co., 1959.
Shepherdson, Charles. “The Intimate Alterity of the Real.” Lacan and the Limits of Language. New York: Fordham UP, 2008. 1-49.
Soler, Colette. “The Subject and the Other (II).” Reading Seminar XI: Lacan’s Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis. Ed. Richard Feldstein and Maire Jaanus. Albany: SUNY, 1995. 45-53.
Sontag, Susan. “On Style.” Against Interpretation and Other Essays. New York and London: Delta, 1966. 15-36.
Sten, Christopher. “Melville and the Visual Arts: An Overview.” Savage Eye: Melville and the Visual Arts. Kent, Ohio: Kent State UP, 1991. 1-39.
Stern, Milton. “Some Techniques of Melville’s Perception.” PMLA 73 (1958): 251-59.
Stewart, George R. “The Two Moby-Dicks.” American Literature 25.4 (1954): 417-48.
Wallace, Robert K. “‘Unlike Things Must Meet and Mate’: Melville and the Visual Arts.” A Companion to Herman Melville. Ed. Wyn Kelly. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2006. 342-61.
---. “Bulkington, J. M. W. Turner, and ‘The Lee Shore.’” Savage Eye: Melville and the Visual Arts. Kent, Ohio: Kent State UP, 1991. 55-76.
---. Melville & Turner: Spheres of Love and Fright. Athens and London: U of Georgia P, 1992.
Watters, R. E. “The Meaning of the White Whale.” University of Toronto Quarterly 20 (1951): 155-68.
Weber, Samuel. Return to Freud: Jacques Lacan’s Dislocation of Psychoanalysis. Trans. Michael Levine. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1991.
Žižek, Slavoj. For they know not what they do: Enjoyment as a Political Factor. London and New York: Verso, 1991.
---. Looking Awry: An Introduction to Jacques Lacan through Popular Culture. Cambridge: MIT P, 1991.
---. The Sublime Object of Ideology. London and New York: Routledge, 1989.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE