:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:SWOT分析應用於社區發展經營策略之研究--以參與農村再生培根計畫之社區為例
書刊名:臺灣社區工作與社區研究學刊
作者:謝政勳
作者(外文):Hsieh, Cheng-hsun
出版日期:2016
卷期:6:3
頁次:頁1-44
主題關鍵詞:農村再生社區培力SWOT分析策略規劃Rural regenerationCommunity empowermentSWOT analysisStrategic planning
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:300
  • 點閱點閱:193
社區營造推動至今已近二十個年頭,許多資源投注社區,帶來鄰里地區生活的提升,但也有社區因陷入資源競爭問題而發展停滯。近來政策資源有限,公部門補助越趨減少,民間贊助不易爭取,社區如何重新檢視本身經營條件,思索創新方向並找出亮點新策略,應用SWOT 分析即為一簡單又具效益的工具。社區組織要在競爭激烈的大環境中戮力生存,極重要的策略規劃常被忽略。研究者多年擔任培根計畫課程講師與陪伴輔導者,觀察社區所做的分析結論多未能與其未來願景及行動有一強力連結關係。故本研究目的有:(一)分析並釐清社區組織應用SWOT 分析的盲點與思考內涵,提出具體思維作為凝聚在地共識的參考依歸;(二)探析社區組織應用SWOT 分析的思考內涵,作為社區居民凝聚共識的參考依歸;(三)建構社區工作者可參考之SWOT 思辨分析架構,作為引領社區發展決策之依據。本研究從認知SWOT 分析內涵開始,藉文獻探討各構面社區需考量之因素以釐出思考架構,並以研究者過去五年內實際參與引導之社區為例,統整分析51 個社區討論內容。針對社區SWOT 分析應用,本研究提出之結論,首先為建構更完整的社區SWOT 分析參考架構,針對劣勢分析修正建議應新增兩問項:「社區內欠缺必要之軟硬體資源」及「社區三生(生活、生產、生態)發展失當」,以符合一般社區會考量的部分;其次SWOT 分析應用於社區發展經營策略規劃有其必要性包括:社區組織實力的自我檢視、社造資源與潮流脈動的掌握、社造行動計畫的規劃依據。希冀社區營工作的推展能善用策略規劃知識,周詳策略應對,善用優點並利用機會以突破困境,進而務實地逐步實踐社區願景。
Community development has been advocated in the past twenty years. Many resources have been invested into communities to improve the standard of living in the neighborhood. However, the development of some communities remains stagnant due to stiff competition for resources. Owing to limited resources, decrease in departmental subsidies and difficulties in getting private sponsorships, it is crucial for communities to re-evaluate their own operation conditions and to brainstorm innovative directions as well as to explore new strategies. SWOT analysis is a simple-to-use and effective tool that can help achieve such goals. With survival in the highly competitive environment being the focus of community organizations, the importance of strategic planning is often overlooked. Over the years, the researcher has taken on roles of lecturers and counsellors in different incubation schemes, and has observed that there is yet no strong connection between the conclusion made in the community and the future vision as well as actions in the communities. Therefore, the purposes of the present study are: 1. To analyze and clarify the blind spots and connotation of the SWOT analysis applied in community organizations in order to propose specific ideas for the communities to achieve cohesion and consensus. 2. To investigate and analyze the way of thinking of the community organizations adopting SWOT analysis as so to provide reference to residents in the community in achieving cohesion and consensus. 3. To construct a speculative and analytical SWOT framework which community workers can refer to and use as a basis to lead community development decision-making. Starting with a cognitive analysis of the SWOT content, followed by literature review of the factors that communities should consider from different perspectives, this study clarified and developed a thinking framework based on 51 discussion topics related to the communities which the author has engaged in and led over the past five years. In regard to the application of the SWOT analysis in the communities, this study puts forward the following conclusions: first, for the construction of a complete SWOT analysis framework , weaknesses should be added : " the lack of necessity of hardware and software within the community " and " sustainable development of the community misconduct " ; secondly , the SWOT analysis of strategic planning for community development its necessity , include :1. Evaluation of the strengths of the communities. 2. Handling and control of social resources and trends. 3. The basis for formulating social action plans. It is hoped that strategic planning knowledge will be put to use in promoting community work and by making good use of comprehensive strategies and strengths with the right opportunities we can overcome obstacles and realize the community's vision in a gradual and pragmatic manner.
期刊論文
1.鄧博維、林棋凡、楊嘉玟、莊鴻濱、蔡維鈞、郭秋伶(20080000)。高雄市左營區觀光行銷策略之研究。觀光餐旅評論,2(1),21-36。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳振杰、黃茱珺、蔡漢生、吳連賞(20081200)。高雄市文化創意產業發展的現狀與前景規劃之研究。環境與世界,18,43-73。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.馬綺霞(20081000)。地方博物館行銷策略研究--朱銘與日本吉卜力美術館之比較分析。藝術論文集刊,10/11,181-205。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Wallerstein, N.(1992)。Powerlessness, empowerment and health: Implication for health promotion programmes。American Journal of health promotion,6(3),197-205。  new window
5.張淑青(20060100)。澎湖淡季觀光策略性行銷之研究--SWOT分析及TOWS矩陣之應用。朝陽商管評論,5(1),59-88。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.陳亮全(20000200)。近年臺灣社區總體營造之展開。住宅學報,9(1),61-77。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Collett, Stacy(1999)。SWOT Analysis。Computerworld,33(29),58-61。  new window
8.郭瑞坤、王春勝、陳香利(20071200)。居民社區培力與社會資本、社區意識關聯性之研究--以高雄市港口社區為例。公共事務評論,8(2),97-129。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Zimmerman, Marc A.(1995)。Psychological empowerment: Issues and illustrations。American Journal of Community Psychology,23(5),581-599。  new window
10.周郁峮(20000400)。淺談策略管理程序--S.W.O.T分析。絲織園地,32,26-28。  延伸查詢new window
11.宋麗玉(20081200)。增強權能策略與方法:臺灣本土經驗之探索。社會政策與社會工作學刊,12(2),123-194。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.張墩卿(20081200)。嘉義縣社區發展工作之績效評析。嘉南學報. 人文類,34,884-896。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.陳美惠、陳至瑩(20090600)。社區林業計畫主要執行者的被培力狀況與情緒智慧對於計畫執行成效關係之研究。中華林學季刊,42(2),193-205。  延伸查詢new window
14.黃文彥(20060900)。合作與參與:社區發展的困境與策略。社區發展季刊,115,408-418。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.蔡秀美(20040500)。社區營造中社區增權展能概念與學習規劃之探討。成人及終身教育,1,11-18。  延伸查詢new window
16.Florin, P.、Wandersman, A.(1990)。An introduction to citizen participation, voluntary, organizations and community development: Insights for empowerment through research。American Journal of Community Psychology,18,41-54。  new window
17.郭信霖、許忠治、吳怡萍(20140900)。應用SWOT分析雞籠文化節慶活動之服務行銷。管理資訊計算,3(2),121-134。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.張崇山(20071200)。從SWOT分析看博物館展示的發展方向:以工博館為例。科技博物,11(4),41-52。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.廖俊松(20070600)。從網絡治理觀點觀察重建區社區總體營造計畫之執行。政策研究學報,7,35-64。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.李雯智(20061100)。焦點團體之理論探索與教育研究論文評析。學校行政,46,183-192。  延伸查詢new window
21.宋慶財、李雪香(20110600)。從SWOT矩陣分析法探討傳統民居永續發展之可行性--以五溝村客家伙房民宿為例。設計學研究,特刊,111-132。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.李思璇、程紹同(20120900)。以SWOT理論分析Club Med臺灣品牌行銷策略。休閒研究,4(3),46-53。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.張翔竣(20061100)。節慶活動SWOT分析--以大甲媽祖文化節為例。雲科大體育,9,213-218。  延伸查詢new window
24.張麗春(20090600)。臺灣地區學校衛生護理人員員工充能對工作滿意度影響研究。護理暨健康照護研究,5(2),100-108。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.郭訓德、陳家榮、柯淳涵、謝嘉榮(20060900)。Strategic Analysis for Sustainable Development of the Sibao Farm Community in the Taroko National Park。中華林學季刊,39(3),329-342。  延伸查詢new window
26.陳榮聰、戴劍鋒、彭克仲(20121000)。創新SWOT矩陣分析花蓮縣富里鄉農會碾米廠競爭優勢之研究。臺灣農學會報,13(5),487-511。  延伸查詢new window
27.蔡必焜(2009)。推動鄉村社區發展的一些思考。台灣農業推廣學會通訊,80,1-2。  延伸查詢new window
28.薛怡珍、賴明洲、林孟龍(20100700)。應用生態博物館規劃七股地區生態旅遊遊程。臺灣觀光學報,7,39-54。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.蘇東生(20080800)。SWOT分析應用於鳳梨釋迦產業經營策略之研究。行政院農業委員會臺東區農業改良場研究彙報,17,51-72。  延伸查詢new window
30.Rappaport, J.(1987)。Terms of empowerment/exemplars of prevention: Toward a theory of community psychology。American Journal of Community Psychology,15,121-148。  new window
31.Tumer, M.(2001)。How Does Your Company Measure Up?。Black Enterprise,32(4),52-53。  new window
32.Williams, J.(1996)。On becoming a strategic partner with management。Communication World,13(3),31-32。  new window
33.方雅慧(20080300)。偏鄉社區營造之啟動:宜蘭社區大學的課程案例。教育實踐與研究,21(1),65-95。new window  延伸查詢new window
34.劉立偉(20081200)。社區營造的反思:城鄉差異的考量、都市發展的觀點、以及由下而上的理念探討。都市與計劃,35(4),313-338。new window  延伸查詢new window
35.柯于璋(20050900)。社區主義治理模式之理論與實踐--兼論臺灣地區社區政策。公共行政學報,16,33-57。new window  延伸查詢new window
36.Wallerstein, N.、Bernstein, E.(1988)。Empowerment education: Freire's ideas adapted to health education。Health Education Quarterly,15(4),379-394。  new window
37.江大樹、張力亞(20080300)。社區營造中組織信任的機制建構:以桃米生態村為例。東吳政治學報,26(1),87-142。new window  延伸查詢new window
38.Weihrich, Heinz(1982)。The TOWS Matrix: A Tool for Situational Analysis。Long Range Planning,15(2),54-66。  new window
39.周雅容(19970400)。焦點團體法在調查研究上的應用。調查研究:方法與應用,3,51-73。new window  延伸查詢new window
40.鄭夙芬(20050500)。焦點團體研究法的理論與應用。選舉研究,12(1),211-239。new window  延伸查詢new window
41.劉鶴群(20120600)。社會排除概念之本土意涵--臺灣民眾焦點團體的歸納研究。東吳社會工作學報,23,47-79。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.許燕真(2006)。探討社區營造之府際關係--南投縣與彰化縣之比較(碩士論文)。國立暨南國際大學,南投縣。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃忠華(2005)。節慶觀光活動行銷策略之研究--以臺東南島文化節為例(碩士論文)。臺中健康暨管理學院。  延伸查詢new window
3.郭麗津(2004)。從社區培力到「社區規劃師」--台北市社區規劃體制化進程之分析(1995-2004)(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.羅秀華(2003)。文山社區由充權到治理的發展歷程(博士論文)。國立臺灣大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Mayer, S. E.(1994)。Building Community Capacity: The Potential of Community Foundations。Minneapolis, MN:Rainbow Research。  new window
2.葉至誠(2010)。社區工作與社區發展。臺北市:秀威資訊科技。  延伸查詢new window
3.Kaufman, Roger、Herman, Jerry(1991)。Strategic Planning in Education: Rethinking, Restructuring, Revitalizing。Lancaster:Technomic。  new window
4.謝臥龍、王雅各、盧蕙馨、范麗娟、成虹飛、顧瑜君、駱慧文、吳天泰、蔡篤堅、魏惠娟(2004)。質性研究。臺北:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.Porter, M. E.、周旭華(1999)。競爭策略--產業環境及競爭者分析。臺北:天下遠見出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.文化環境基金會(1999)。台灣社區總體營造的軌跡。台北市:行政院文化建設委員會。  延伸查詢new window
7.Dubois, B. L.、Miley, K. K.(1996)。Social Work: An Empowering Profession。Boston:Allyn & Bacon。  new window
8.方至民(2000)。企業競爭優勢。臺北市:前程企業管理有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
9.Griffin, Ricky W.、方世榮(1999)。基礎管理學。台北:東華。  延伸查詢new window
10.游振昌(1997)。策略規劃--農企業經營環境的認識。台北:中國生產力中心。  延伸查詢new window
11.Jones, Careth R.、George, Jennifer M.、Hill, Charles W. L.、宋玲蘭、林溥鈞(2002)。當代管理學。台北:美商麥格羅‧希爾國際公司臺灣分公司。  延伸查詢new window
12.Home Office(2004)。Firm foundation: The government's framework for community capacity building。London:Home Office, Civil Renewal Unit。  new window
13.Learned, E. P.、Christensen, C. P.、Andrews, K. P.、Guth, W.(1969)。Business policy: Text and cases。Homewood, IL:Irwin。  new window
14.Hamilton, E.(1992)。Adult Education for Community Development。Greenwood。  new window
15.李欽湧(1994)。社會政策分析。台北:巨流圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
16.蘇景輝(2009)。社區工作:理論與實務。巨流。  延伸查詢new window
17.雪倫.狄肯曼、林潔盈(2002)。如何行銷博物館:推廣博物館.美術館和展覽的概念和方法。臺北:五觀藝術管理。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.水保法規資料庫(2016)。農村再生培根計畫執行注意事項,http://www.swcb.gov.tw/class2/index.asp?ct=laws&m1=10&m2=55&AutoID=177。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.鄭麗珍(2003)。增強權能理論與倡導。社會工作理論--處遇模式與案例分析。台北市:洪業文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.Cottrel, L. S. Jr.(1983)。The Competent Community。New perspectives on the American community。Homewood, IL:Dorsey。  new window
3.Minkler, M.(1990)。Improving health through community organization。Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice。San Francisco:Jossey-Bass。  new window
4.Zimmerman, M. A.(2000)。Empowerment theory: Psychological, orangizational and community levels of analysis。Handbook of Community Psychology。New York:Plenum。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE