科技之旅：史丹力‧庫伯力克的《2001：太空漫遊》中的人類後人類指南_

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

論文基本資料
摘要
外文摘要
參考文獻

題名：	科技之旅：史丹力‧庫伯力克的《2001：太空漫遊》中的人類後人類指南
作者：	甯大衛
作者(外文)：	Dawid Maritz Nel
校院名稱：	國立中山大學
系所名稱：	外國語文學系研究所
指導教授：	田偉文
學位類別：	博士
出版日期：	2022
主題關鍵詞：	慾望；拉岡；後人類；真實；主體性；科技；Desire；Lacan；Posthuman；Real；Subjectivity；Technology
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:0 共同引用:0 點閱:2

由史丹利．庫柏力克執導的電影《2001太空漫遊》以科技如何影響「人性」的形成與延續之為題材。庫柏力克臆測工具如何影響「人性」形成。他將科技進程視為一段旅程：使用科技、臣服科技、終究摒棄科技，傳達人類主體發展。這三項提升「主體性」的科技階段均表明，科技促進「人性」及「後人類性」發展進程，且人類與工具間的順序和權力關係不斷改變，走向極端化。有時科技有助「主體性」發展，有時予以制衡。當科技制衡「主體性」時，這種制衡卻能夠可幫助人類的自我意識穩固，讓自我意識持有主導權。科技之所以具備促進與制衡的雙重效果，是因為科技潛在的變化多端帶給人類新的「存在」方式。本論文論述以科技窺探「真實」隱憂，開啟新契機的同時，也會帶來反制，生存模式的規範選擇也有更多可能。庫柏力克選擇在電影最後幾幕裡讓由太空中的小孩星童（Star-Child）呈現在一種絕對開放的狀態，可能對「人性」做出的報復。而本論文藉此場景表達後人類提供人類無限潛能跟不同「存在」模式。科技會促進的歷程裡「後人類渴望「人性」，成為人類或保有人性，成為人類的後人類」的敘述不會輕易消逝。

以文找文

In 2001: A Space Odyssey, Stanley Kubrick carries the theme of Technology’s impact on Humanity’s formation and continuance. Kubrick speculates about how Humanity’s formation is contingent upon tools. Kubrick conveys human subjective development as a journey by technological development: one that utilizes Technology, then defers to it, and, finally, breaks from it. All three of these technological moments that elevate Subjectivity indicate that Technology facilitates the journey into Humanity and post-humanity; the relational order and power dynamics between humans and their tools are dynamic and polarizing. At times Technology helps Subjectivity arise, and, at other times, Technology suppresses it, which, paradoxically, also helps the human self-awareness needed to become a subjective agent settle in. The reason why Technology can have this dual effect (facilitation and suppression) will be shown to be linked to an imminent transformational potential Technology has for new ways of Being. This thesis frames Technological potential as a disconcerting glimpse into the real that provides an invitation for new opportunities but also repels and makes a selection for normative trajectories more probable rather than less. For Kubrick, it seems that what is selected in his Star-Child at the final moments of the film is the reprisal of Humanity from within the context of an absolute openness, which Kubrick figures through the child being in space, and which this thesis takes to mean the infinite potential that post-humanity affords for differential modes of Being. Technology facilitates the journey defined by a narrative that will not easily fall away: it is the posthuman who desires the human, to become human or remain human, to be a human posthuman.

以文找文

Abbott, Stacey. “Arthouse SF Film.” The Routledge Companion to Science Fiction. Ed. Mark Bould, Andrew M. Butler, Adam Roberts and Sherryl Vint. London: Routledge, 2009. 463–7.Pdf.
Abril, Daniel. “AI Might Be the Reason You Didn’t Get the Job.” Fortune, 11 Dec. 2019, www.flip.it/DwtoMw.
Brent Adkins, Deleuze and Guattari’s A Thousand Plateaus: A Critical Introduction and Guide, Edinburgh University Press, 2015. Print.
Arthur, Conan Doyle Sir. Hound of the Baskervilles. Flame Tree Publishing, 2022. Pdf.
Brown, Tony. “Desire and Drive in Researcher Subjectivity: The Broken Mirror of Lacan.” Qualitative Inquiry, vol. 14, no. 3, 2008, pp. 402–423., doi:10.1177/1077800407311960.
Calcagno, Antonio. “Alain Badiou : The Event of Becoming a Political Subject.” Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 34, no. 9, Nov. 2008, pp. 1051–70, doi:10.1177/0191453708098537.
Carr, Nicholas G. “Is Google Making Us Stupid.” Yearbook of The National Society for The Study of Education, vol. 107, no. 2, Oct. 2008, pp. 89–94, doi:10.1111/J.1744-7984.2008.00172.X.
Clarke, Arthur C., and Stanley Kubrick. 2001: A Space Odyssey. New American Library, 1968. Print.
Dews, P. “The Tremor of Reflection: Slavoj Žižek’s Lacanian Dialectics.” The Limits of Disenchantment: Essays on Contemporary European Philosophy, by Peter Dews, Verso, 1995, pp. 236–258.
Dick, Philip K., et al. Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? Boom! Studios, a Division of Boom Entertainment, Inc., 2019. Pdf.
Ellmann, Maud, editor. Psychoanalytic Literary Criticism. Longman, 1994.Print.
Ferrando, Francesca. “‘The Body’ In Post- and Transhumanism.” Post- and Transhumanism: An Introduction, by Stefan Lorenz Sorgner and Robert Ranisch, Peter Lang GmbH, Internationaler Verlag Der Wissenschaften, Frankfurt A.M., 2015, pp. 213–226. Print.
Flisfeder, Matthew. “Cinema, Ideology, and Form.” The Symbolic, the Sublime, and Slavoj Žižek’s Theory of Film, by Matthew Flisfeder, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 2012, pp. 105–131.Print.
Freud, Sigmund, and David McLintock. The Uncanny. London: Penguin, 2003. Pdf.
Freud, Sigmund, and A. A. Brill. The Interpretation of Dreams. CreateSpace, 2009. Pdf.
Fukuyama, Francis. The Origins of Political Order: From Prehuman Times to the French Revolution. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2012. Pdf.
---. Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution. Picador - Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2007. Pdf.
Fuller, Jason D. “Dreaded Monoliths: Rudolf Otto’s Das Heilige and 2001: A Space Odyssey.” Teaching Theology and Religion, 12.1, Jan. 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 7 Jan. 2009, onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9647.2008.00485.x.
“Greatest Philosophers in History: Martin Heidegger.” YouTube, uploaded by Eternalised, 20 Jan. 2021. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=quvmWTFG6kM&list=PL_0I7-
kEnl0Y_3uTzJ-j-Hqk2Memvivkg&t=4s.
Gross, Margaret Kathryn. “Sense-Making in Theory and Practice: A Meta-Theoretical Foundation and Application for Health Information Seeking.” University of Illinois, 2010. Pdf.
Hadot, Pierre I., et al. Philosophy as a Way of Life: Spiritual Exercises from Socrates to Foucault. Blackwell Publishing, 1995. Pdf.
Harris, Ricki. “Elon Musk: Humanity Is a Kind of ‘Biological Boot Loader’ for AI” Wired, Conde Nast, 1 Sept. 2019, www.wired.com/story/elon-musk-humanity-biological-boot-loader-ai/.
Harris, Sam. “Can We Build AI Without Losing Control of It?” TED: Ideas Worth Spreading, June 2016, www.ted.com/talks/sam_harris_can_we_build_ai_without_losing_control_over_it.
Harrison, Peter, and Joseph Wolyniak. “The History of ‘Transhumanism.‘” Notes and Queries, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 465-466., doi:10/1093/notesj/giv080.
Hayles, N.K. Prologue. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. U of Chicago P, 1999. pp. xi-xiv.Pdf.
Hayman, David. “The Purpose and Permanence of the Joycean Epiphany.” James Joyce Quarterly, 35/36, 1998, pp. 633–655. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/25473944. Accessed 22 June 2021.
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm. The Phenomenology of the Spirit. Translated by Terry Pinkard, Cambridge UP, 2018. Pdf.
Heidegger, Martin. The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. Garland, 1977. Pdf.
Heilbroner, Robert L. Visions of the Future: The Distant Past, Yesterday, Tomorrow. Oxford Univ Press, 1996. Print.
Hoch, David G. “Mythic Patterns in Space Odyssey: A Space Odyssey.” The Journal of Popular Culture, IV. 4, 1971, pp. 961–65., doi:10.1111/j.0022-3840.1971.0404_961.x.
Horne, Lydia “China’s AI Unicorns, Kung Fu Physics, and More News.” Wired, 12 Dec. 2019, www.wired.com/story/trouble-for-chinese-ai-unicorns-physics-of-a-kung-fu-masters-jump-and-more-news.
Jameson, Frederic. “The Politics of Theory: Ideological Positions in the Postmodernism Debate.” Modern Criticism and Theory: a Reader. 2nd ed., Pearson, 2000. Print.
Janes, Dominic. “Clarke and Kubrick’s Space Odyssey: A Queer Odyssey.” Science Fiction Film and Television, vol. 4, no. 1, Mar. 2011, pp. 57–78, doi:10.3828/SFFTV.2011.4.
Jonze, Spike. Her. Warner Bros., 2013.
Joronen, Mikko. “Heidegger on the History of Machination.” Critical Horizons, vol. 13, no. 3, 2012, pp. 351–376., doi:10.1558/crit.v13i3.351.
Kelly, Kevin. What Technology Wants. Penguin Books, 2011. Print.
Kirshner, Lewis A. “Rethinking Desire: The Objet Petit a in Lacanian Theory.” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, vol. 53, no. 1, Mar. 2005, pp. 83–102, doi:10.1177/00030651050530010901.
Kocijančič, Matic. “First as Creon, Then as Chorus: Slavoj Žižek’s Antigone.” Interlitteraria, vol. 25, no. 1, 2020, pp. 231–245., doi:10.12697/il.2020.25.1.19.
Kojève Alexandre. Introduction to the Reading of Hegel. Translated by James H Nichols, Basic Books, 1969. Pdf.
Kubrick, Stanley, and Arthur C Clarke. 2001: A Space Odyssey. Metro Goldwyn-Mayer, 1968.
Lacan, Jacques. Object Relation. Translated by A R Price, Polity Press, 2020. Pdf.
---, et al. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan: Freud’s Papers on Technique. W.W. Norton, 1991.Print.
---, and Bruce Fink. Écrits: The First Complete Edition in English. W.W. Norton, 2007. Print.
Le Guin, Ursula, and Charlie Jane Anders. The Left Hand of Darkness, Ace Books, New York, 2019. EPUB.
Lee, Kai-Fu. “AI’s Real Impact? Freeing us from the Tyranny of Repetitive Tasks.” Wired, 13
Dec. 2019, www.wired.co.uk/article/artificial-intelligence-repetitive-tasks. 15 Dec. 2019.
Lopez, Victor. “The Creation of the World: Philosophy between Art and Science.” Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale, no. 4, Jan. 2008, pp. 517–33.
Merkley, Paul. “‘Stanley Hates This But I Like It!’: North vs. Kubrick on the Music for Space Odyssey: A Space Odyssey.” Journal of Film Music, vol. 2, no. 1, Jan. 2009, pp. 1–34, doi:10.1558/JFM.V2I1.1.
McGrath, S J. “Sexuation in Jung and Lacan.” International Journal of Jungian Studies, 2.1, Mar. 2010, pp. 1–20., doi:10.1080/19409050903498311.
Miah, Andrew. “A Critical History of Posthumanism.” Medical Enhancement and Posthumanity, by Bert Gordijn and Ruth Chadwick, vol. 2, Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 2009, pp.71–94. Pdf
Nietzsche, Friedrich Wilhelm, and R. J. Hollingdale. Beyond Good and Evil: Prelude to a Philosophy of the Future Friedrich Nietzsche. Penguin, 2003. Pdf.
Nofz, Michael P., and Phil Vendy. “When Computers Say It with Feeling: Communication and Synthetic Emotions in Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey.” Journal of Communication Inquiry, vol. 26, no. 1, 2002, pp. 26–45., doi:10.1177/0196859902026001003.
Olivier, Bert. “Trauma and Literature: Derrida, 9/11 and Hart’s The Reconstructionist.” Journal of Literary Studies, vol. 24, no. 1, 2008, pp. 32–57., doi:10.1080/02564710701789032.
Reider, John. “The Return to the Frontier in the Extraordinary Voyage: Verne’s The Mysterious Island and Kubrick’s Space Odyssey: A Space Odyssey.” Extrapolation, 51. 2, Jan. 2010, pp. 201–15., doi:10.3828/extr.2010.51.2.2.
Roden, David "The Ethics of Becoming Posthuman." SEP-FEP, Loyola University, Rome, 10 July 2010 .https://www.academia.edu/296411/The_Ethics_of_Becoming_Posthuman.
Rowe, Christopher. “The Romantic Model of 2001: A Space Odyssey.” Canadian Journal of Film Studies, vol. 22, no. 2, Oct. 2013, pp. 41–63, doi:10.3138/CJFS.22.2.41.
Roy, Ayon. “The Specter of Hegel in Coleridge’s Biographia Literaria.” Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 68, no. 2, May 2007, pp. 279–304, doi:10.1353/JHI.2007.0015.
Savage, Robert. “Paleoanthropology of the Future: The Prehistory of Posthumanity in Arthur C. Clarkes 2001: A Space Odyssey.” Extrapolation, vol. 51, no. 1, 2010, pp. 99–112., doi:10.3828/extr.2010.51.1.7.
Schopenhauer, Arthur, et al. The World as Will and Idea. Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner & Co, 1909, www.gutenberg.org/files/38427/38427-pdf. Pdf.
Shackleford, Laura. “Postmodern, Posthuman, Post-Digital.” The Bloomsbury Handbook of Electronic Literature, edited by Joseph Tabbi, Bloomsbury Academic, 2017, pp. 335–58.
Shakespeare, William. Hamlet. Thomson Learning, 2005. Pdf.
Smith, Daniel W. “The Inverse Side of the Structure Žižek on Deleuze on Lacan.” Criticism, vol. 46, no. 4, 2005, pp. 635–650., doi:10.1353/crt.2005.0019.
Smith, David Woodruff. “Phenomenology” Ed. Edward N. Zalta. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Summer 2018. Web. 18 July2021.https://plato.stanford.edu/
entries/phenomenology/
Suvin, Darko. “Estrangement and Cognition.” Metamorphoses of Science Fiction: Studies in the Poetics and History of Cognitive Estrangement in Fiction, by Darko Suvin, Yale University Press, 1979, pp. 3–15. Print.
Taleb, Nassim Nicholas. The Black Swan. Penguin Books, 2008. Print.
The King James Version of the Bible. E-book edition, Project Gutenberg, 2011 Thomas, Dylan. “Do Not Go Gentle into That Good Night” Poets.org, Academy of American Poets, www.poets.org/poem/do-not-go-gentle-good-night.
Thompson, Nicholas. “Will Artificial Intelligence Enhance or Hack Humanity?” Wired, Conde Nast, 28 Apr. 2019, https://www.wired.com/story/will-artificial-intelligence-enhance-hack-humanity/.
Tiernan, Ray. “As Algorithms Battle Biases, Researchers Say Hiring Software Must Be More Than Meets the AI” FORTUNE, 26 Dec. 2019, www.fortune.com/2019/12/26/hiring-software-algorithm-artificial-intelligence-biased.
Tomasula, Steve. “Our Tools Make Us (and Our Literature) Post.” The Bloomsbury Handbook of Electronic Literature, edited by Joseph Tabbi, Bloomsbury Academic, 2017, pp. 39–58. Pdf.
Versai, Anna. “Artificial Intelligence and Moore’s Law.” TECHNOWIZE, 14 May 2017, https://www.technowize.com/artificial-intelligence-moores-law.
Vint, Sherryl. “Spectres of the Spectrum, and: Tribulation 99: Alien Anomalies Under America (Review).” Science Fiction Film and Television, vol. 1, no. 2, Oct. 2008, pp. 356–58.
Williams, Dale E. “2001: A Space Odyssey: A Warning before Its Time.” Critical Studies in Mass Communication, vol. 1, no. 3, 1984, pp. 311–322., doi:10.1080/15295038409360039.
Zimmerman, Michael. “The Last Man or Overman. “The Hedgehog Review: Critical Reflections on Contemporary Culture, Vol. 13, No. 2 (Summer, 2011), 31-44.
Žižek Slavoj. Absolute Recoil: Towards a New Foundation of Dialectical Materialism. Verso, 2015. Pdf.
---. How to Read Lacan. W.W. Norton & Company, 2007. Pdf.
---. In Defense of Lost Causes. Verso, 2017. Pdf.
---. Less than Nothing: Hegel and the Shadow of Dialectical Materialism. Verso, 2013. Pdf.
---. Organs Without Bodies: On Deleuze and Consequences. Routledge, 2015.Print.
---. The Fragile Absolute: Or, Why Is the Christian Legacy Worth Fighting for? Verso, 2009. Pdf.
---. “The Limits of Hegel.” Youtube, uploaded by Emporium, 26 March 2011.
---. “The Real Explained.” Youtube. Uploaded by gregmobs, 16 Aug. 2020, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jA8tn89-exk&list=PLB23GDiuvS79f7l6pEKZoj-j_J7HEI8A7&index=16&t=19s.www.youtube.com/watch?v=aOekX_Z9Qug
---. The Sublime Object of Ideology. Verso, 1989.
--- “What Can Psychoanalysis Tell Us About Cyberspace?” The Psychoanalytic
Review, vol. 91, no. 6, 2004, pp. 801–830., doi:10.1521/prev.91.6.801.55957.

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	意符裂隙裡的書寫：情動與語言共構的女性主體
2.	後人類主義、主體性重構與技術政治--人與技術關係的再敘事
3.	中國當代科幻小說中的疾病與醫療書寫
4.	未竟之旅--簡評《電影的虛擬生命》
5.	吾家即無家：《溫夫人的扇子》與《理想丈夫》中的家庭政治
6.	……：論一個無法書寫的知識
7.	幻想與旁觀他人之痛苦：媒體感官消費的精神分析考察
8.	精神分析的「美學-倫理學」
9.	「慾望那可怕的光輝」：葉慈詩歌的心理解析
10.	《超速性追緝》中的身體與科技
11.	庫雷西短篇小說集《愛在藍色時代》與《全日午夜》中的錯愛之愛
12.	論愛情：精神分析觀點
13.	閱讀交流的主體性：論主體在宗教敘事與社會實踐之間的辯證塑型
14.	創傷之「真實」：從見證的僵局到心理分析的突破
15.	真實女人或創傷女人？：拉岡性分化公式與陰性蕩力論之性別政治效力初探

1.	從偏執到後人類：科幻小說中科技對人性的衝擊
2.	創傷、敘事及精神分析:以拉岡精神分析觀點再思梅爾維爾之《白鯨記》為創傷敘事
3.	當代藝術中的後人類身體調控
4.	真實與幻見：台灣紀錄片中的寫實情結

無相關書籍

無相關著作

1.	“微時代”與人類學文化批評的理論歸趨
2.	從反人文主義到一種狹義的後人類：跨越擬人辯證法
3.	“後人類／人本”轉向下的人類、動物與生命--從阿甘本到青年馬克思
4.	Writing//Posthuman: The Literary Text as Cognitive Assemblage
5.	技術哲學視野中人與物居間關係的現代性危機診斷
6.	後人類話語反思--以齊澤克為中心
7.	媒介性主體性--後人類主體話語反思及其新釋
8.	後人類主義、主體性重構與技術政治--人與技術關係的再敘事
9.	從“代理”到“替代”的技術與正在“過時”的人類？
10.	微關係：後人類時代翻譯研究的大方向
11.	劉慈欣《三體》中的後人類擲骰論
12.	從“賽博格”與“人工智能”看科幻小說的“後人類”瞻望--以《他，她和它》為例
13.	後人類的警示：《羚羊與秧雞》中的語言哲學
14.	從城市空間到賽博空間：論《血尖》中的空間書寫與技術政治
15.	以“物”觀“人”：憂鬱的後人類解讀

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫