[1]朱耀明(2018)。中小學自造者教育的推動與實踐。教育研究月刊，288，31-41。
[2]任宗浩(2018)。還給學生學習探究的權利。科學研習，57(6)，2-5。
[3]林珈緯、黃天麒、陳大仁、黃彥彰、劉立雯&李松霖(2016)。K-12 程式設計邏輯學習系統與教學模式發展與設計。工程與科技教育學術研討會論文集，263-272。
[4]林淑梤、段曉林、靳知勤(2020)。素養導向系列叢書：中學自然科學領域探究與實作教材教法。台北市：五南出版社。
[5]吳祖賢、黃武元、陳正一、簡靜玲與黃德祐 (2018)。專題導向及相互教學翻轉教室對於學習者的認知層次、創造力與學習成效之影響。工程, 技術與科技教育學術研討會，232-257。
[6]吳璧純(2018)。學生自主學習, 老師 [做什麼]?。教育脈動，15，1-7。
[7]范斯淳(2016)。高中工程設計取向之課程設計與實驗: 跨學科 STEM 知識的整合與應用（博士論文）。取自http://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw:80/handle/20.500.12235/96471
[8]范斯淳、游光昭(2016)。科技教育融入STEM 課程的核心價值與實踐。教育科學研究期刊，61(2)，153-183。
[9]洪振方(2003)。探究式教學的歷史回顧與創造性探究模式之初探。高雄師大學報，15，641-662。
[10]侯世光、劉冠賢(2009)。增強科技創新研發能力的專題製作類教學活動。生活科技教育月刊，42(4)，87-92。
[11]施佳成 (2019)。從科學知識社會學視野探討臺灣自造者教育現況。臺灣教育評論月刊，8(6)，143-162。
[12]施佳成、古智雄 (2020)。非正式STEM課程的學習策略與自主學習行為。物理教育學刊，21(1)，1-21。
[13]姚經政、林呈彥 (2016)。STEM 教育應用於機器人教學—以 6E 教學模式結合差異化教學。科技與人力教育季刊，3(1)，53-75。
[14]徐明珠(2016)。以 Bloom 認知教育目標分類探討職能導向之數位出版編輯人才培育。中華印刷科技年報，171-188。
[15]陳毓凱、洪振方(2007)。兩種探究取向教學模式之分析與比較。科學教育月刊，305，4-19。
[16]陳均伊、張惠博(2008)。一位化學老師實施探究教學的歷程與省思之個案研究─ 以 [火山爆發] 教學活動為例。師大學報: 科學教育類，53(2)，91-123。
[17]陳鏗任(2014)。大學院校應用學習分析之概況。教育資料與圖書館學，51(4)， 1-36。
[18]陳世文(2018)。科學探究怎麼做？借鏡法國IBSE的經驗。科學研習，57(6)，6-15。
[19]陳永平、鄭朝陽(2020)。新課綱下的科技領域課程生活科技科目之創新教學自造者的實現-以「生活科技概論」電與控制應用為範疇。報告編號PEE1080347。臺北：教育部教學實踐研究計畫成果報告。
[20]梁雲霞 (2006)。從自主學習理論到學校實務。當代教育研究，14(4)，171-206。
[21]教育部 (2014)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。臺北市: 教育部。
[22]教育部 (2018a)。國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校：自然科學領域課程綱要。臺北市: 教育部。
[23]教育部 (2018b)。國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校：科技領域課程綱要。臺北市: 教育部。
[24]國立臺灣師範大學心理與教育測驗研究發展中心(2021)。十二年國教課綱國民中小學素養導向評量標準本位評量計劃。取自https://sbasa.rcpet.edu.tw/SBASA/HomePage/index.aspx
[25]游玉英(2020)。技術型高中學生自主學習指標建構與實證分析之研究（博士論文）。取自https://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh?docid=U0021-G080170004H
[26]游光昭、林坤誼、洪國峰(2010)。從反思與實踐看國中生在科技實作活動中的學習歷程表現。課程與教學，13(3)，219-250。
[27]程炳林(2001)。動機、目標設定、行動控制、學習策略之關係：自我調整學習歷程模式之建構及驗證。師大學報: 教育類，46(1)，67-92。
[28]張林、周國韜(2003 )。自我調節學習理論的研究綜述。心理科學，26(5)，870 -873。
[29]張民杰(2011)。師資培育課程有否特色教學法？臺灣師資培育電子報，21。2021年3月15日，取自https://tted.cher.ntnu.edu.tw/?p=408
[30]張芳瑜(2018)。科技領域素養導向課程規劃與教學評量之探討。科技與人力教育季刊，5(2)，1-15。
[31]詹志禹(1996)。認識與知識:建構論 VS. 接受觀。教育研究，49，25-38。
[32]劉明洲(2018)。從C. Anderson的《自造者時代》探討自造者教育的課程實踐。教育研究月刊，288，42-52。
[33]簡麗瑜(2018)。護理系學生的生物統計翻轉教學成效: 學習深度的改變。教學實踐與創新，1(1)，119-153。
[34]Anderson, R. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1-12.
[35]Armstrong, H. E. (1903). The teaching of scientific method and other papers on education. London : MacMillan. Retrieved from https://archive.org/stream/sciencemethostea00armsuoft#page/n7/mode/2up
[36]Artigue, M., & Blomhøj, M. (2013). Conceptualizing inquiry-based education in mathematics. Zdm, 45(6), 797-810.
[37]Asay, L. D., & Orgill, M. (2009). Analysis of essential features of inquiry found in articles published in the science teacher, 1998–2007. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21(1), 57-79.
[38]Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1977). Social learning theory.
[39]Barry, N. B., & BURKE, D. (2014). 6E Learning byDesign Model. Technology and engineering Teacher, 14-19.
[40]Baumann, P. J. (2010). In search of signature pedagogies for teacher education: The critical case of Kodály-inspired music teacher education (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://drum.lib.umd.edu/bitstream/handle/1903/10322/Baumann_umd_0117E_11158.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
[41]Bell, R. L., Smetana, L., & Binns, I. (2005). Simplifying inquiry instruction. The Science Teacher, 72(7), 30-33.
[42]Benson, P. (1997). The philosophy and politics of learner autonomy. In Autonomy and independence in language learning, 18-34). Longman.
[43]Benson, P. (2007). Autonomy in language teaching and learning. Language teaching, 40(1), 21.
[44]Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Vol. 1: Cognitive domain. New York: McKay, 20(24), 1.
[45]Boydston, J. A. (1980). John Dewey: The middle works, 1899–1924: Vol. 9. 1916 (pp. 1–370). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
[46]Bybee, R. W., & Trowbridge, J. H. (1990). Applying standards-based constructivism: A two-step guide for motivating students. New York: Cambridge University Press.
[47]Bybee, R. W. (2013). Keynote talk entitled Strategies for developing scientific literacy given at the ‘Best Practices in Inquiry-Based Science Education Summer School’ in Crete.
[48]Bybee, R. W. (2019). Using the BSCS 5E Instructional Model to Introduce STEM Disciplines. Science and Children, 56(6), 8-12.
[49]Candy, P. C. (1991). Self-direction for lifelong learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
[50]Dewey, J. (1910). Science as subject-matter and as method. Science, 31(787), 121-127.
[51]Dansereau, D. F. (1985). Learning strategy research. Thinking and learning skills, 1, 209-239.
[52]Dickinson, L. (1993). Talking shop: Aspects of autonomous learning. ELT journal, 47(4), 330-336.
[53]Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of research in education, 32(1), 268-291.
[54]Earl, L. M. (2012). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning. Corwin Press.
[55]Eisenkraft, A. (2003). Expanding the 5E model. Science teacher, 70(6), 56-59.
[56]Evensen, D. H., Hmelo, C. E., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2000). Problem-based learning: A research perspective on learning interactions. Routledge.
[57]Fisher, M., King, J., & Tague, G. (2001). Development of a self-directed learning readiness scale for nursing education. Nurse education today, 21(7), 516-525.
[58]Furtak, E. M., Seidel, T., Iverson, H., & Briggs, D. C. (2012). Experimental and quasi-experimental studies of inquiry-based science teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of educational research, 82(3), 300-329.
[59]Harlen, W. (2013). Assessment & Inquiry - Based Science Education: Issues in Policy and Practice. Trieste: The Global Network of Science Academies Science Education Programme.
[60]Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy and foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.
[61]Kent J. C., & Leanna A. (2012). Scaffolded Inquiry-Based Instruction with Technology: A Signature Pedagogy for STEM Education. Computers in the Schools, 29:1-2, 157-173.
[62]Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. New York: Association Press.
[63]Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory into practice, 41(4), 212-218.
[64]Lacey, F. (2007). Autonomy, never, never, never. Independence, 42, 4-8.
[65]Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1986). But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New directions for program evaluation, 1986(30), 73-84.
[66]Leonard, W. H., & Penick, J. E. (2009). Is the inquiry real? Working definitions of inquiry in the science classroom. Science Teacher, 76(5), 40–43.
[67]Little, D. (1995). Learning as dialogue: The dependence of learner autonomy on teacher autonomy. System, 23(2), 175-181.
[68]Loyens, S. M., Magda, J., & Rikers, R. M. (2008). Self-directed learning in problem-based learning and its relationships with self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 20(4), 411-427.
[69]McLain, M. (2021). Towards a signature pedagogy for design and technology education: a literature review. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 1-20.
[70]National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
[71]National Research Council (NRC). (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
[72]Omaggio, A. C. (1978). Successful language learners: What do we know about them. ERIC/CLL News Bulletin, 5, 2-3.
[73]Paris, S. G., & Byrnes, J. P. (1989). The constructivist approach to self-regulation and learning in the classroom. In Self-regulated learning and academic achievement (169-200). Springer, New York, NY.
[74]Paris, S. G., & Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational psychologist, 36(2), 89 101.
[75]Pilcher, C., & Miller, G. (2000). Learning strategies for distance education students. Journal of Agricultural education, 41(1), 60-68.
[76]Pintrich P.R. & De Groot E.(1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journa1 of Educational Psycho1ogy , 1990 , 82(1): 33 -40.
[77]Riga, F., Winterbottom, M., Harris, E., & Newby, L. (2017). Inquiry-based science education. Science Education: An International Course Companion, 247.
[78]Rocard, M., Csermely, P., Jorde, D., Lenzen, D., Walberg-Henriksson, H., & Hemmo, V. (2007). EC high level group on science education. Science Education NOW: A Renewed Pedagogy for the Future of Europe, 52.
[79]Rutherford, F. J. (1964). The role of inquiry in science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2, 80–84.
[80]Savin-Baden, M., & Major, C. H. (2004). Foundations of problem-based learning. Berkshire: SRHE & Open University Press.
[81]Schunk, D. H. (1989). Social cognitive theory and self-regulated learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement : Theory, research, and practice (pp. 83-110). New York: Springer.
[82]Schwab, J. J., & Brandwein, P. F. (1962). The teaching of science: The teaching of science as enquiry. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[83]Shulman, L. S. (2005a). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus, 134(3), 52-59.
[84]Shulman, L. S.(2005b). The signature pedagogies of the professions of law, medicine, engineering, and the clergy: Potential lessons for the education of teachers. Paper presented at the Math Science Partnership Workshop: Teacher education for effective teaching and learning, Irvine, CA.
[85]Trnova, E. (2014). IBSE and Creativity Development. Science Education International, 25(1), 8-18.
[86]Van Uum, M. S., Verhoeff, R. P., & Peeters, M. (2016). Inquiry-based science education: towards a pedagogical framework for primary school teachers. International journal of science education, 38(3), 450-469.
[87]Weinstein, C. E. & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. Wittrock (Ed), Handbook of research on teaching. New York: Macmillan. 315-327.
[88]Zimmerman, B. J. & Schunk, D. H. (2001), Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: Theoretical Perspectives. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.