:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣人愛情發展的歷程初探兼論兩性輔導之重點
書刊名:諮商輔導文粹
作者:卓紋君 引用關係
作者(外文):Cho, Wen Chun
出版日期:2000
卷期:5
頁次:頁1-30
主題關鍵詞:分手兩性吸引婚姻愛情兩性輔導Love relationshipBreakupMarriageDatingCounseling
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(16) 博士論文(3) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:13
  • 共同引用共同引用:102
  • 點閱點閱:256
近三十幾年,西方愛情的研究開始發展,並且逐漸受到學者的重視。許多愛情的理論與測量工具紛紛出籠。反觀國內,研究愛情的文獻報告多半借用西方的理論與量表來探討國人的兩性關係或行為。本研究收集一般民眾(lay people)的愛情經驗,透過內容分析,初步呈現臺灣人愛情關係發展的歷程與內涵,並藉以提出兩性輔導的重點與方向。 資料收集以訪問為主,訪問主題:預鉻人自身的經歷為本,說出你自己的愛情故事,並說出自己對所經歷過的愛情,當時的感覺或情緒(emotion)、行為表現(behavior)、以及想法與看法(cognition)是什麼。有效樣本共100位,包括未婚男、女各25名,已婚男、女各25名;其居他地之分佈以中、南部居多,北部及東部佔約29%;年齡層由15歲到51歲,平均約28歲;交往時間長短由4天至15年,已婚者之婚齡為2個月到20年;教育背景由小學至研究所畢業皆有。 研究者與協同分析者細讀分一份逐字稿,根據故事分析(narrative analyzis)原則分別找出反映國人在愛情關係發展的類別,並予以描述和計數。初步分析結果顯示;(1)兩人相識的方法以同學或工作關係居多。(2)國人愛情關係的形成受兩性吸引因素,及個人認知及情緒感受所影響。(3)愛情一旦展開,便同時牽動個人在認知、行為與情緒的變化,而且與對方的知、情、行息息相關,是一種互相依存(interdependent)的關係。(4)愛情關係的結束主要受彼此相待的方式與品質影響;剛婚嫁的決定固然與個人心態和相待品質有關,但家人的干預是反映文化的另一關鍵因素。研究者並就分析結果提出兩性輔導的重點與方向。
This study explored the development of love relationship among Taiwanese people. The researcher conducted in-depth interviews with 100 subjects, including 25single females, 25 single males, 25 married females, and 25 married males. The content of the interview focused on interviewees’ emotions, cognition, and behavior of love relationship they experienced. Subjects were from different areas of Taiwan. Their education background varied from elementary level to graduate level. Their age range was from 15 to 51 and their love relationship was lasted from 4 days to 15 years. The researcher analyzed the interview reports based on four themes: (1) channels of knowing mates, (2) attractions between couples, (3) the developmental process of love relationship, and (4) reasons for breakup and marriage. The main findings were as follows: First, most people got acquainted with mates through either schoolmate relations or working relations after they graduated. Second individual’s functions of cognition and emotion. Third, romantic love relationship is dynamic and interdependent in the sense that individuals’ cognition, emotion, and behavior changed depending upon their interaction with lovers. Finally, the decision of getting married or breakup was not only related to interpersonal factors, but also influenced by outside forces (e.g., parents’ opinions), which reflected traditional Chinese culture. The implications for counseling Taiwanese heterosexual relationships were discussed.
期刊論文
1.卓紋君(19980900)。當今心理學界對愛情的研究與方向。中華心理衛生學刊,11(3),87-107。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.卓紋君(1994)。中國人的愛情風格。高市鐸聲,5(1),70-77。  延伸查詢new window
3.Hendrick, C.、Hendrick, S.(1986)。A Theory and Method of Love。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,50(2),392-402。  new window
4.利翠珊(19971200)。婚姻中親密關係的形成與發展。中華心理衛生學刊,10(4),101-128。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Kerckhoff, A. C.、Davis, K. E.(1962)。Value consensus and need complementarity in mate selection。American Sociological Review,27(3),295-303。  new window
6.Hazan, Cindy、Shaver, Phillip R.(1987)。Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,52(3),511-524。  new window
7.Sternberg, Robert J.(1986)。A Triangular Theory of Love。Psychological Review,93(2),119-135。  new window
學位論文
1.楊茜如(2000)。大學生愛情觀、性別角色與兩性關係及相關因素之研究(碩士論文)。彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.林宜旻(1994)。愛情類型、嫉妒與關係滿意度之相關研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.柯淑敏(1994)。分手經驗的個人意義--一種故事的觀點(碩士論文)。輔仁大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.余振民(1998)。未婚男性的愛情觀--現象學方法的研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學,台北市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Brehm, S. S.(1992)。Intimate Relationships。New York, NY:McGraw-Hill。  new window
2.彭懷真(1996)。新新人類新話題。台北:希代。  延伸查詢new window
3.Lieblich, Amia、Tuval-Mashiach, R.、Zilber, T.(1998)。Narrative Research: Reading, Analysis, and Interpretation。SAGE Publications。  new window
4.李美枝(1990)。兩性對性別角色之偏好及兩性之間的喜歡、愛情與婚前性行爲容許度。女性心理學。臺北:大洋。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.朱重聖(1983)。淺論我國婚姻與家庭制度的演變。  延伸查詢new window
2.李維庭(1995)。愛上一個人--愛情現象的詮釋。  延伸查詢new window
3.林語堂(1974)。吾國與吾民。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳勤惠(2000)。焦慮矛盾依附的女大學生之情傷經驗硏究。  延伸查詢new window
5.張老師月刊編輯部(1990)。中國人的婚戀觀。  延伸查詢new window
6.張老師月刊編輯部(1995)。中國人的愛情觀。  延伸查詢new window
7.楊國樞(1990)。中國人之緣的觀念與功能。  延伸查詢new window
8.Berscheid, E. & Walster, E.(1974)。A little bit about love。  new window
9.Guerrero, L. K., Eloy, S. V. & Wabnik, A. I.(1993)。Linking maintenance strategies to relationship development and disengagement: A reconceptualization。  new window
10.Hendrick, C & Hendrick, S.(1989)。Research on love: Does it measure up?。  new window
11.Lemieux, R.(1994)。An exploration of behavioral love。  new window
12.Levinger, G. & Snoek, J. D.(1972)。Attraction in relationships: A new look at interpersonal attraction。  new window
13.Levinger, G.(1983)。Development and change。  new window
14.Lewis, R. A.(1972)。A developmental framework for the analysis of premarital dyadic formation。  new window
15.Lewis, R. A.(1973)。A longitudinal test of a developmental framework for premarital dyadic formation。  new window
16.Marson, P. J.,Hecht, M. L. & Robers, T.(1987)。'True love ways’: The subjective experience and communication of romantic love。  new window
17.Murstein, B. I.(1976)。The stimulus-value-role-theory of marital choice。  new window
18.Orlinsky, D. E.(1974)。Structual features of the romantic love relationships。  new window
19.Rubin, Z.(1974)。From liking to loving: Patterns of attraction in dating relationships。  new window
20.Rusbult, C. E., & Buunk, B. P.(1993)。Commitment processes in close relationships: An interdependence analysis。  new window
21.Simpson, J. A.(1987)。The dissolution of romantic relationships: Factors involved in relationship stability and emotional distress。  new window
22.Surra, C. & Huston, T.(1986)。Mate selection as a social transition。  new window
圖書論文
1.Shaver, P.、Hazan, C.、Bradshaw, D.(1988)。Love as attachment: The integration of three behavioral systems。The psychology of love。New Haven, CT:Yale University Press。  new window
2.余德慧(1990)。中國社會的人際苦痛及其分析。中國人中國心:人格與社會篇。台北:遠流。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE