:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:「我是雙性戀,但選擇做女同志!」--兩位非異性戀女性的性認同形成歷程
書刊名:中華輔導學報
作者:劉安真程小蘋劉淑慧 引用關係
作者(外文):Liu, AnchenChen, Hsiao-pingLiu, Shu-hui
出版日期:2002
卷期:12
頁次:頁153-183
主題關鍵詞:同性戀同性戀認同發展性認同雙性戀HomosexualityHomosexual identity developmentLesbianSexual identityBisexual
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(16) 博士論文(1) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:15
  • 共同引用共同引用:130
  • 點閱點閱:177
本研究之目的在探討非異性戀女性之性認同內涵與形成歷程,研究方法採用質性研究,研究結果將以故事的方式來呈現。 研究結果發現,兩位受訪者的性認同內涵皆為「認為自己在性傾向上是雙性戀,但在身份認同上選擇做為女同志」。受訪者指出,因為感受到自己受到男女兩性的吸引,認為自己在性傾向上是屬於雙性戀;然而,基於女女關係的特質較男女關係更令她們感到滿意,因此,她們選擇做為女同志。這兩位女性的性認同內涵挑戰了「一個人不是同性戀,就是異性戀」的二分法觀點,因為她們的性認同不僅無法歸屬於一個固定的類別,而且還呈現了更多元而豐富的內涵。兩位受訪者的經驗不僅表達出「性傾向」與「性認同」的差異,而且還指出,性認同有可能成為一種選擇,呈現了個人在性認同上的自主性。 在性認同形成歷程上,兩位受訪者皆呈現了非線性的狀態。她們在認同形成的早期,皆經歷過如同「同性戀認同發展模式」中的混淆→探索→肯定的歷程,但在形成同志自我認同之後,又修正自己的性認同,並對目前的性認同抱持較為開放與彈性的態度。可見對某些女性而言,性認同的發展會隨時間與情境而不斷修正。因此,性認同的發展歷程可能是非線性,也可能是沒有終點的。
The purpose of this study was to explore the identity nature and process for nonheterosexual women. After interviewing two self-identified lesbians, the results were presented case by case, and then with cross-case format to integrate the similarities and differences of their identity formation process. Both participants agree that “in terms of sexual orientation, they are bisexual, but they identify themselves as lesbians.” Their experiences showed that they have had intimate relationships with men and women in different period of time, however, they were more satisfied with the relationships when they were with women. Therefore, they choose to be lesbians. The identities these two women had challenging the traditional dialectic perspective that people were either homosexual or heterosexual. Their experiences showed there maybe differences between “sexual orientation” and “sexual identity.” The data indicated the possibility of choice and autonomy in terms of sexual identity. In contrast to traditional identity development theories, which claimed liner development, the women's in this study experienced the process of confusion, exploration, and affirmative. However, they changed their identity became bisexual after developed lesbian identity, and holding more open and flexible attitude for current identity. The data seemed to imply, for some women, that sexual identity may change according to the contexts and the timing, and the process of sexual identity may not be liner and without the ending point. Implications for counselors were discussed.
期刊論文
1.張小虹(19970800)。女女相見歡:歪讀張愛玲的幾種方式。中外文學,26(3)=303,31-47。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Cass, V. C.(1979)。Homosexual Identity Formation: A Theoretical Model。Journal of Homosexuality,4(3),219-235。  new window
3.Richardson, Diane(1983)。The Dilemma of Essentiality in Homosexual Theory。Journal of Homosexuality,9,79-90。  new window
4.Coleman, E.(1981)。Developmental stages of the coming out process。Journal of Homosexuality,7(2-3),31-43。  new window
5.趙彥寧(20000600)。臺灣同志研究的回顧與展望--一個關於文化生產的分析。臺灣社會研究,38,207-244。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.周柏伶(20000400)。同性戀輔導。輔導通訊,61,37-41。  延伸查詢new window
7.Conger, J.(1975)。Proceedings of the American Psychological Association for the year 1974: Minutes of the annual meeting of the Council of Representatives。American Psychologist,30(6),620-651。  new window
8.Garnets, L.、Hancock, K.、Cochran, S.、Goodchilds, J.、Peplau, A.(1991)。Issues in psychotherapy with lesbian and gay men: A survey of psychologists。American Psychologist,46(9),964-972。  new window
9.呂承芬(20000400)。同性戀輔導案例。輔導通訊,61,32-36。  延伸查詢new window
10.陳郁齡(1999)。談青少年同性戀。輔導通訊,58,46-54。  延伸查詢new window
11.王鍾和(19990900)。我的孩子是「同性戀」?--如何幫助孩子探索自我之性別傾向。學生輔導,64,88-93。  延伸查詢new window
12.洪佳玲(19990400)。「同性戀」的輔導。諮商與輔導,160,21-23。  延伸查詢new window
13.賈紅鶯(19960600)。青少年同性戀傾向的認識與輔導。諮商與輔導,126,10-16。  延伸查詢new window
14.張學善(19960900)。同性戀個案諮商的倫理課題。輔導季刊,32(3),51-58。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.簡家欣(19970300)。九○年代臺灣女同志的性別抗爭文化:T婆角色的解構、重構與超越。思與言,35(1),145-209。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.McCarn, S. R.、Fassinger, R. E.(1996)。Revisioning sexual minority identity formation: A new model of lesbian identity and its implications for counseling and research。Counseling Psychologist,24(3),508-535。  new window
17.Troiden, R. R.(1989)。The formation of homosexual identities。Journal of Homosexuality,17(1/2),43-73。  new window
18.呂承芬(1998)。我需要很多愛、問題家庭。諮商與輔導,146,39-41。  延伸查詢new window
19.Buhrke, R. A.、Ben-Ezra, L. A.、Hurley, M. E.、Ruprecht, L. J.(1992)。Content analysis and methodological critique of articles concerning lesbian and gay male issues in counseling journals。Journal of Counseling Psychology,39,91-99。  new window
20.Chapman, B. E.、Brannock, J. C.(1987)。Proposed model of lesbian identity development: An empirical examination。Journal of Homosexuality,14,69-81。  new window
21.De Cecco, J. P.(1981)。Definition and meaning of sexual orientation。Journal of Homosexuality,6,51-67。  new window
22.De Cecco, J. P.、Elia, J. P.(1993)。A critique and synthesis of biological essentialism and social constructionist views of sexuality and gender。Journal of Homosexuality,24,1-26。  new window
23.McDonald, G. J.(1982)。Individual differences in the coming out process for gay men: Implications for theoretical models。Journal of Homosexuality,8,47-60。  new window
24.Minton, Henry L.、McDonald, G. J.(1984)。Homosexual identity formation as a developmental process。Journal of Homosexuality,9,91-104。  new window
25.Sophie, J.(1986)。A critical examination of stage theories of lesbian identity development。Journal of Homosexuality,12,39-51。  new window
會議論文
1.徐西森(1996)。同性戀問題、案例分析及處遇模式之研究。四屆亞洲性學會議。臺北:國際性學學會暨中華民國性教育協會。  延伸查詢new window
2.郭麗安、王釋逸、張歆祐(2000)。大學生同志身份認同之分析研究。高雄。  延伸查詢new window
3.Town, Shane(1996)。Is it safe to come out yet? The impact of secondary schooling on the positive identity development of ten young gay men, or, that's a queer way to behave?。The 77th Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association。New York, NY。  new window
學位論文
1.Chao, Yengning(1996)。Embodying the invisible body politics in constructing contemporary Taiwanese lesbian identities(博士論文)。Cornell University。  new window
2.莊景同(2000)。超越政治正確的"女女"牽"拌"--從"女女"伴侶關係看生命掙扎與價值體現(碩士論文)。輔仁大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳麗如(2000)。她們的故事:七個女同志的認同歷程(碩士論文)。屏東師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
4.洪雅琴(1997)。女同性戀者性取向認同發展歷程個案研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.Lansdale, S.(1995)。The Issue of Choice for Lesbians,Santa Barbara, CA。  new window
圖書
1.張小虹(1996)。女同志理論 : 性/別與性慾取向。女性主義理論與流派。臺北:女書文化。  延伸查詢new window
2.Plummer, Kenneth(1975)。Sexual Stigma: An Interactionist Account。London:Routledge & Kegan Paul。  new window
3.Calhoun, Cheshire、張娟芬(1997)。同女出走。臺北:女書文化。  延伸查詢new window
4.Foucault, Michel、謝石、沈力(1990)。性史。臺北:結構群文化公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.鄭美里(1997)。女兒圈:臺灣女同志的性別、家庭與圈內生活。臺北:女書文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Troiden, Richard R.(1988)。Gay and lesbian identity: A sociological analysis。General Hall, Inc.。  new window
7.臺大女同性戀文化研究社(1995)。我們是女同性戀。臺北:碩人。  延伸查詢new window
8.台北市政府民政局(2001)。認識同志手冊。台北:台北市政府。  延伸查詢new window
9.張娟芬(1998)。姊妹「戲」牆。臺北:聯合文學。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.張喬婷(2000)。馴服與抵抗:十位校園女菁英拉子的情慾壓抑。臺北:唐山。  延伸查詢new window
11.Miles, Matthew B.、Huberman, A. Michael、Newman, G.(1994)。Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook。Sage Publications。  new window
12.周華山(1995)。同志論。香港上環:香港同志研究社。  延伸查詢new window
13.劉志如(1997)。同性戀。諮商實務。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
14.Broido, E. M.(2000)。Constructing identity: The nature and meaning of lesbian, gay, and bisexual identities。Handbook of counseling and psychotherapy with lesbian, gay, and bisexual clients。Washington, DC。  new window
15.Esterberg, K. G.(1997)。Lesbian & Bisexual Identities: Constructing Communities, Constructing Selves。Lesbian & Bisexual Identities: Constructing Communities, Constructing Selves。Philadelphia, PA。  new window
16.Perez, R. M.、DeBord, K. A.、Bieschke, K. J.(2000)。The challenge of awareness, knowledge, and action。Handbook of counseling and psychotherapy with lesbian, gay, and bisexual clients。Washington, DC。  new window
17.Rhoads, R. A.(1994)。Coming out in College: The Struggle for a Queer Identity。Westport, CT:Bergin & Garvey。  new window
其他
1.同志諮詢熱線(1998)。「誰殺了同性戀?」座談會,http://www.hotline.org.tw/gay/kilLhtm, 2001/12/15。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Gonsiorek, J. C.、Rudolph, J. R.(1991)。Homosexual identity: Coming out and other developmental events。Homosexuality: Research implications for public policy。Newbury Park, CA:Sage。  new window
2.Rothblum, E. D.(2000)。Somewhere in des moines or San Antonio: Historical perspectives on lesbian, gay, and bisexual mental health。Handbook of counseling and psychotherapy with lesbian, gay, and bisexual client。Washington, DC:American Psychological Association。  new window
3.Cass, V. C.(1996)。Sexual orientation identity formation: A Western phenomenon。Textbook of homosexuality and mental health。Washington, DC:American Psychiatric Press。  new window
4.Brown, L. S.(1995)。Lesbian identities: Concepts and issues。Lesbian, gay, and bisexual identities over the lifespan: Psychological perspectives。New York, NY:Oxford University Press。  new window
5.Kitzinger, C.(1995)。Social constructionism: Implications for lesbian and gay psychology。Lesbian, gay, and bisexual identities over the lifespan: Psychological perspectives。New York, NY:Oxford University Press。  new window
6.Reynolds, A. L.、Hanjorgiris, W. F.(2000)。Coming out: Lesbian, gay, and bisexual identity development。Handbook of counseling and psychotherapy with lesbian, gay, and bisexual clients。Washington, DC:American Psychological Association。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE