:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:鐵杆莊稼?清末內務府辛者庫人的家戶與生計
書刊名:中央研究院近代史研究所集刊
作者:賴惠敏 引用關係
作者(外文):Lia, Hui-min
出版日期:2002
卷期:38
頁次:頁71-128
主題關鍵詞:辛者庫人內務府漢軍鐵杆莊稼Sin jeku jetere ahaImperial household departmentHan bannersbannermenIron rice bowl
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(2) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:24
  • 點閱點閱:48
過去學者研究清初內務府辛者庫人都認為他們是最低賤的奴僕,在此則討論辛者庫人在嘉慶、道光以後更複雜的發展。「鐵杆莊稼」象徵旗人領俸餉過日,生活無虞,從戶口冊、俸餉冊的記載可瞭解清末國家財政困難,並非人人能依靠鐵杆莊稼過活,本文討論的三個管領下辛者庫人得各憑本事維生,故在嘉慶、道光朝已經有明顯的階層變化。七班的辛者庫人完全是漢軍旗,有21%的人丁都是從事雜役工作的蘇拉,到光緒年間他們仍從事雜役工作,而且比例下降為13.9%。四班的辛者庫人當差的比例約18.47%,族群包括漢軍與蒙古軍。其中有八人任九品以上官職,另有科舉功名文生員一人和官學生七人。安立管領下人丁包括滿洲、蒙古、漢軍旗人,在嘉慶朝有將近40%的男性當差,光緒朝則降為20%。不過整個看來,此管領下人丁獲得官職的人數增加,九品官以上有24位,其中包括官至二品的兩廣總督德壽。安立管領的辛者庫人長期擔任世襲的差務,如庫使、庫守、廚役、司俎人、領催,以及銀匠、銅匠、鐵匠等特殊技藝,容易累積家產,再加上清中葉廣開捐納之門,讓他們獲得買官的機會。 舊時北京有句俗話:「不分滿漢,但問旗民」,似乎說明社會階層以旗人、民人作分野。但是,在內務府的旗人中滿漢地位還是大不相同的,滿洲人和蒙古人挑差的機會高於漢軍,同時他們還有世襲差務的機會。
Scholars who have studied Sin jeku jetere aha in the Imperial Household Department during the early Qing Dynasty concluded they were the humblest of slaves. This essay paints a more complex picture of the lives of Sin jeku jetere aha since the Jiaqing and Daogung reigns. The term ‘iron rice bowl’ suggests that the Manchus led an easy life on their official salaries. We can see from census and pay records, however, that the empire had financial difficulties in its late period, and therefore not everyone could live off the iron rice bowl. Under three supervisors discussed in this essay, the Sin jeku jetere aha all had to independently earn their own livings, so there were significant changes in their class positions. The Sin jeku jetere aha of the Seventh Duty Group belonged to were all Han Bannermen; of these, 21 percent of the adults were “office boys” working at a variety of menial tasks. Some were still engaged in such work during the Guangxu reign, but the proportion decreased to 13.9 percent. About 18.47 percent of Sin jeku jetere aha of the Fourth Duty Group, including Han and Mongol Bannermen, held official positions. Eight men had official positions at or above the ninth rank, a government student and seven official students. The Bannermen of Supervisor Anliincluded Manchus, Mongols, and Han. Almost 40 percent of males held official positions during Jiaqing reign while the figure drops to 20 percent for the Guangxu period. Nonetheless, in general the number of adults who held official positions under the supervisorsincreased, including 24 people who held official positions beyond the ninth rank, including Geng Deshou, who became the Liangguang Governor-General. Because Supervisor Anli’s Sin jeku jetere aha occupied such specialized hereditary posts as storehouse keepers, kitchen helpers, sacrifice helpers, silversmiths, coppersmiths, ironsmiths, and the like, they were easily able to accumulate private property. Additionally, the fact that buying official positions became permissible from the middle period of the Qing dynasty made it possible for them to buy such posts. An old saying in Beijing proclaimed that, “It doesn’t matter whether you are Han or Manchu, as long as you’re a Bannerman.” This seems to real a percpetion of the social gap between the Banners and ordinary commoners. Nevertheless, among Banners in the Imperial Household Department, the status of Han and Manchu was quite different. Manchu and Mongol Bannermen had more opportunity to choose and inherit their duties.
期刊論文
1.陳國棟(19821200)。清代內務府包衣三旗人員的分類及其旗下組織:兼論一些有關包衣的問題。食貨月刊,12(9),325-343。  延伸查詢new window
2.廣田豪佐(1940)。北滿農村????家族共同體形成解體(上)。滿鐵調查月報,20(10)。  延伸查詢new window
3.廣田豪佐。北滿農村????家族共同體形成解體(下)。滿鐵調查月報,20(11)。  延伸查詢new window
4.張德澤(1964)。太平天國革命運動對清廷財政的打擊─清內務府奏銷檔之反映。歷史教學,1964(3)。  延伸查詢new window
5.傅克東(1986)。從內佐領和管領談到清代辛者庫人。清史研究通訊,1986(3)。  延伸查詢new window
6.趙凱(1988)。清代旗鼓佐領考辨─兼論有關清代包衣的若干問題。故宮博物院院刊,1988(1)。  延伸查詢new window
7.李喬(1985)。八旗生計問題述略。歷史檔案。  延伸查詢new window
8.王業鍵(1987)。十八世紀福建的糧食供需與糧價分析。中國社會經濟史研究,1987(2),69-100。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.劉翠溶(1992)。明清家族人口與社會經濟變遷。臺北:中央研究院經濟社會研究所。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Shirokogoroff, S. M.、高丙中(1997)。滿族的社會組織--滿族氏族組織研究。商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
3.孫文良(1990)。滿族大辭典。瀋陽。  延伸查詢new window
4.金易、沈義羚(1992)。宮女談往錄。北京。  延伸查詢new window
5.李中清、Campbell, Cameron(1997)。Fate and Fortune in Rural China: Social Organization and Population Behavior in Liaoning, 1774-1873。Cambridge, New York。  new window
6.Laslett, Peter、Schofield, R. S.、Wrigley, E. A.(1981)。The Population History of England, 1541-1871。Cambridge, MA。  new window
7.中國第一歷史檔案館(1991)。圓明園。上海:古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.Laslett, Peter、Wall, Richard(1972)。Household and Family in Past Time。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
9.金啟孮(1989)。北京郊區的滿族。呼和浩特。  延伸查詢new window
10.老舍(1981)。正紅旗下。北京:人民文學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.允祿(1983)。世宗憲皇帝上諭八旗。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
12.北京市政協文史資料委員會(2000)。風俗趣聞。北京:北京出版社。  延伸查詢new window
13.劉小萌(1996)。八旗子弟。福州:福建人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
14.中國科學院民族研究所遼寧少數民族社會歷史調查組(1963)。滿族社會歷史調查報告。  延伸查詢new window
15.夏仁虎、駢志騫(1986)。舊京瑣記。北京:北京古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
16.趙爾巽(1976)。清史稿。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
17.祁美琴(1998)。清代內務府。中國人民大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
18.(1988)。清代內閣大庫散佚檔案選編。清代內閣大庫散佚檔案選編。瀋陽。  延伸查詢new window
19.遼寧省檔案館(1993)。盛京內務府糧莊檔案彙編。盛京內務府糧莊檔案彙編。瀋陽。  延伸查詢new window
20.中國社會科學院民族研究所遼寧少數民族社會歷史調查組(1958)。滿族社會歷史調查資料。滿族社會歷史調查資料。  延伸查詢new window
21.千種達夫(1965)。滿族家族制度?慣習。滿族家族制度?慣習。東京。  延伸查詢new window
22.中國人民政治協商會議、北京市委員會文史資料研究委員會(1986)。北京往事談。北京往事談。北京。  延伸查詢new window
23.信修明(1992)。老太監的回憶。老太監的回憶。北京。  延伸查詢new window
24.常人春(1993)。紅白喜事─舊京婚喪禮俗。紅白喜事─舊京婚喪禮俗。北京。  延伸查詢new window
25.Wakefield, David(1998)。Fenjia: Household Division and Inheritance in Qing and Republic China。Fenjia: Household Division and Inheritance in Qing and Republic China。Honolulu。  new window
26.小橫香室主人(1981)。清宮遺聞。上海:上海書店。  延伸查詢new window
27.王道瑞(1985)。清代辛者庫。歷史檔案。北京。  延伸查詢new window
28.杜家驥(2002)。清代八旗管領與「辛者庫」問題。八旗制度與滿族文化。瀋陽。  延伸查詢new window
29.(清)奕賡(1970)。侍衛瑣言。佳夢軒雜著。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
30.韋慶遠(1995)。論〞八旗生計〞。明清史新析。北京。  延伸查詢new window
31.Wolf, Arthur(1985)。Chinese family size: A myth revitalized。The Chinese Family and its Ritual Behavior。Taipei。  new window
32.Hajnal, John(1983)。Two kinds pre-industrial household formation。Family Forms in Historic Europe。Cambridge。  new window
33.Harrell, Stevan(1985)。The Rich Get Children: Segmentation, Stratification, and Population in Three Chekiang Lineage, 1550-1850。Family and Population in East Asian History。Stanford。  new window
34.(1991)。官銜嘆。清蒙古車王府藏戲曲本(第3冊)。北京。  延伸查詢new window
35.(1991)。侍衛論。清蒙古車王府藏戲曲本(第4冊)。北京。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(清)福格(1997)。聽雨叢談,北京。  延伸查詢new window
2.內務府奏銷檔。  延伸查詢new window
3.(1987)。內務府堂人事類,北京。  延伸查詢new window
4.(清)崑岡(1976)。欽定大清會典,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.中央研究院歷史語言研究所現存清代內閣大庫原藏明清檔案,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
6.內務府會計司呈稿,北京。  延伸查詢new window
7.內閣題本刑科,北京。  延伸查詢new window
8.(1987)。內閣滿漢黃冊,北京。  延伸查詢new window
9.(清)托津(1991)。嘉慶朝大清會典,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
10.(清)清高宗(1935)。清朝文獻通考,上海。  延伸查詢new window
11.賴惠敏。清前期之旗人家庭糾紛(1644-1795),臺北。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE