:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:個別化教育計畫的困境與檢討:接受問卷調查的啟智班教師之書面陳述意見分析
書刊名:屏東師院學報
作者:胡永崇
作者(外文):Hu, Yeong-chrong
出版日期:2003
卷期:18(上)
頁次:頁81-120
主題關鍵詞:個別化教育計畫個別化教育方案智能障礙IEPIndividualized education programMental retardation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(15) 博士論文(3) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:14
  • 共同引用共同引用:17
  • 點閱點閱:33
     本研究皆玎395位於「啟智班IEP實施現況及啟智班教師對IEP之態度」之問卷調查研究(調查對象共931人)中,在開放性問題所陳述的書面意見。就啟智班教師之書面意見而言,啟智班個別化教育計畫(Individualized Education Program, IEP)之發展與執行可能遭遇幾個主要之困難:(1)家長參與不足;(2) IEP 與實際教學未能充分結合,有些教師所發展之IEP 可能僅為形式化之書面文件;(3)啟智班的工作環境可能存有若干不利於IEP 之發展與執行的因素,使得IEP 之落實產生困難;(4) IEP格式及內容可能過於繁瑣,教師發展IEP花費時間過多,可能因而影響日常教學;(5) IEP 格式不一,不同學者或評鑑委員對IEP 之要求不同,常造成教師無所適從之困擾;(6)相關專業人員參與IEP 不足,且參與智障學生之IEP 的專業人員類別,及參與內容與成效,亦有待評估;(7)電腦化的IEP 可能有其優勢,不過,也可能具有限制;(8)相關的IEP研習可能較缺乏實務之操作演練,使教師較難將研習應用於實務工之中。
     The present study was to analyze 395 written statements on survey research questionnaires of teachers serving students with mental retardation. The major IEP’s impediments that teachers had experienced or felt was as follows: (1)parents had participated IEP insufficiently; (2) IEP might be merely superficial paperwork, rather than a useful and functional teaching management tool; (3)lack of sufficient positive supports from instructional environments had impeded the development and implementation of IEP ; (4)the format and content of IEP might be too intricate; (5)different supervisors or professors might assert different IEP format that had distressed teachers for developing approved IEP; (6)less related service experts had involved the developments of IEP; (7)teachers highly expected to use computer to prepare IEP for saving time and cost; (8)teachers felt that many workshops of IEP had less practical usefulness.
期刊論文
1.Goodman, J. F.、Bond, L.(1993)。The individualized education program: A retrospective critique。The Journal of Special Education,26(4),408-422。  new window
2.陳麗君(19950600)。IEP--臺灣特教界揮之不去的夢魘?。國小特殊教育,19,74-77。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Jenkins, M. W.(1987)。Effect of a computerized individualized education program(IEP): Writer on time saving and quality。Journal of Special Education Technology,8,55-66。  new window
4.Ryan, L. B.、Rucker, C. N.(1986)。Computerized vs. nocomputerized individualized education program: Teachers' attitudes', time, and cost。Journal of Special Education Technology,8,5-12。  new window
5.李翠玲(19991200)。IEP在臺灣特殊教育界的回顧與前瞻。特教園丁,15(2),11-16。  延伸查詢new window
6.李翠玲(20000200)。「個別化教育計畫」納入特教法強制項目後實施現況調查研究。新竹師院學報,13,65-100。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.胡永崇(20020300)。啟智班IEP實施狀況及啟智班教師對IEP態度之研究。屏東師院學報,16,135-174。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Huefner, D. S.(2000)。The risks and opportunities of IEP requirements under IDEA '97。The Journal of Special Education,33,195-204。  new window
9.Lignugaris, B.、Marchand-Martella, N.、Martella, R. C.(2001)。Writing Better Goals and Short-Term Objectives or Benchmarks。Teaching Exceptional Children,34,52-58。  new window
10.黃金華(2000)。一位資源班老師的自白。特殊教育季刊,76,39-40。  延伸查詢new window
11.Education U.S.A.(2001)。Federal court: Schools must have formal IEP meetings。Education U.S.A.,43,7。  new window
會議論文
1.林千惠(1999)。啟智班個別化教育計畫實施情況及問題之調查研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育課程與教學研討會。彰化市:國立彰化師範大學特殊教育中心。137-160。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.林幸台、林寶貴、洪儷瑜、盧台華、楊瑛、陳紅錦(1994)。我國實施特殊兒童個別化教育方案之策略研究。臺北:國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育研究所。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.財團法人第一兒童發展文教基金會(1993)。中重度智障者功能性教學綱要。臺北市:財團法人第一兒童發展文教基金會。  延伸查詢new window
2.王天苗(1996)。生活適應能力檢核手冊。臺北市:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.教育部(1999)。國民教育階段智障類課程綱要。臺北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
4.Bateman, B. D.、Linden, M. A.(1998)。Better IEPs: How to develop legally correct and educationally useful programs。Longmont, CO:Sopris West。  new window
5.Siegal, A. L. M.(2000)。The complete IEP guide: How to advocate for your special Ed child。Berkeley, CA:Lawrence Siegel。  new window
6.林素貞(1999)。如何擬定個別化教育計畫。臺北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
7.林寶貴、邱紹春、蘇芳柳(1998)。台灣地區特殊教育暨殘障福利機構簡介。台北:國立台灣師範大學特殊教育中心。  延伸查詢new window
8.教育部(1999)。特殊教育學校(班)國民教育階段智能障礙類課程學習目標檢核手冊。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
9.Heward, W. L.(2000)。Exceptional children: An introduction to special education。Columbus:Merrill。  new window
單篇論文
1.Enell, N. C.(1984)。A cost comparison of preparing special education individualized education program(IEPs) with and without computer assistance(ED248667)。  new window
2.Payne, S. L.(1988)。Parent education to improve parental involvement in IEP's for severely head-injured children in grades 1-12(ED 303973)。  new window
3.Pyecha, J. N.(1980)。A national survey of individualized education program for handicapped children(ED 199970)。  new window
4.Smith, S. W.(2000)。Creating useful individualized education programs (IEPs)(ED 449636)。  new window
5.Whitworth, J. E.(1994)。Training in developing effective IEP's: The Illinois experience(ED 377661)。  new window
其他
1.National Education Association(NEA) Today(2001)。What do you do when parents show no interest in things like IEP meetings?,http://www.ebsco.com, 2002/12/02。  new window
2.Santorum, R.,Miller, Z.(2002)。The Teacher Paperwork Reduction Act of 2002,http://www.ldonline.org/news/santorum_june20_2002.html, 2002/10/13。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE