資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(3.141.168.112)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
協同行動研究--以班級經營之常規改善為例
書刊名:
師大學報. 教育類
作者:
林素卿
作者(外文):
Lin, Su-ching
出版日期:
2003
卷期:
48:1
頁次:
頁89-109
主題關鍵詞:
行動研究
;
協同行動研究
;
反省
;
專業發展
;
班級經營
;
Action research
;
Collaborative action research
;
Reflection
;
Professional development
;
Classroom management
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
12
) 博士論文(
2
) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:
12
共同引用:
8
點閱:123
本研究旨在透過協同行動研究協助高職之初任教師,對班級經營的實務及所遭遇的問題,加以反省與改進。研究成員包括筆者及三位高職導師(二位資深、一位初任),蒐集資料的方法,包括座談、班級經營日誌及訪談。初任教師將「班級常規」界定為行動研究的焦點,小組成員透過不斷的討論,提出各種可能性和不同的觀點,幫助初任老師反省班級的實務、發展行動策略、付諸實施、再檢討與修正。在研究的過程中,初任教師雖常陷入理論與實務之間差距的困惑中,但在研究小組的支持與陪伴下,對高職教師的角色的扮演有更深的體會,學習從學生與不同老師的角度中,看待問題,再根據班級的特性和策略實施的結果,逐步修正自己的班級經營理念與策略。
以文找文
This study of collaborative action research projects, conducted by one teacher educator and several classroom teachers, focuses on how action research improves the practitioner-researcher's own understanding of (her/his) educational practices. The goal was to help the novice teacher examine problems associated with her own practice and initiate strategies and techniques to attempt solutions to these problems, primarily problems of classroom management and discipline. The literature review for this study covers two areas: action research and classroom management. The key concepts and general design of this study are based on action research: the strategies or steps included posing a question, planning, acting, observing, and reflecting. The knowledge gained from each loop (cycle) was used as the basis for further planning, acting, and reflection. Three classroom teachers (one was a novice teacher, two were expert teachers) from the same junior high school participated in this study. Data were collected from a number of different sources: classroom diaries written by the novice teacher, seminars, and semi-structured interviews Data analysis involved three stages: organizing data, coding data, and analyzing and interpreting data. This study found that collaborative action research can give teachers a greater breadth and depth of understanding of their own pedagogical strategies and thus result in more intelligent teaching on their part. The novice teacher in this study became more sensitive to individual differences within her own classroom and tried to improve the effectiveness of her classroom management. Although participants in this study agreed that collaborative action research was a good way to improve classroom discipline and to support one another's professional development, there was also some consideration of the potential problems and limitations of classroom management action research.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Oja, S. N.、Pine, G. J.(1988)。Collaborative action research: Teachers' stages of development and school contexts。Peabody Journal pf Education,64(2),96-115。
2.
林素卿(20000600)。國民中學班級經營問題及解決策略之研究。教育學刊,16,211-254。
延伸查詢
3.
Calhoun, E. F.(1993)。Action research: Three approaches。Educational Leadership,51(2),62-65。
4.
Veenman, S.(1984)。Perceived problems of beginning teacher。Review of Educational Research,54(2),143-178。
5.
陳麗欣(19921100)。國中學生生活方式與校園暴行被害經驗之關係。嘉義師院學報,6,157-194。
延伸查詢
6.
van Manen, M.(1977)。Linking ways of knowing with ways of being practical。Curriculum Inquiry,6(3),205-228。
7.
Elliott, John(1987)。Educational theory, practical philosophy and action research。British Journal of Educational Studies,35(2),149-169。
8.
Buck, G. H.(1992)。Classroom management and the disruptive child。Music Educator's Psychologist,12,310-316。
9.
Emmer, E. T.、Evertson, C. M.(1981)。Synthesis of research on classroom management。Educational Leadership,38(4),342-347。
10.
Greszik, B.(1995)。Violence in schools: Results of an inquiry carried out in Kassel。Zeitschrift für Pädagogik,41(2),265-284。
11.
Kelebay, Y. G.(1994)。The sound and fury at concordia: 'Highly Confidential'。Canadian Social Studies,29(1),13-15。
12.
Sanford, J. P.、Emmer, E. T.、Everston, C. M.、Clements, B. S.(1983)。Improving classroom management。Educational Leadership,41,56-60。
13.
Takahashi, S.、Inoue, W.(1995)。An essay on school violence and safety education in Japan。Thresholds in Education,21(2),26-28。
會議論文
1.
蔡德輝、楊士隆(1995)。青少年犯罪問題之探討。沒有紀錄。
延伸查詢
2.
Noffke, S. E.、Zeichner, K. M.(1987)。Action research and teacher thinking: The first phase of action research on action research project at the university of Wisconsin-Madison。Washington, DC。
3.
Pine, G. J.(1981)。Collaborative action research: The intergration of research and service。Detroit。
研究報告
1.
陳皎眉(1992)。我國國民中學問題學生家庭狀況調查。臺北。
延伸查詢
學位論文
1.
Knecht, A.(1997)。Action research and reflection in pre-service teacher education(博士論文)。Ohio State University,Columbus。
2.
李梅芬(1995)。國中生的社會連結與偏差行為之研究,0。
延伸查詢
圖書
1.
Altrichter, Herbert、Posch, Peter、Somekh, Bridget(1993)。Teachers investigate their work: An introduction to the method of action research。Routledge。
2.
林素卿(2002)。教師行動研究導論。高雄:復文圖書有限公司。
延伸查詢
3.
Altrichter, Herbert、Posch, Peter、Somekh, Bridget、夏林清、蕭幸玲、林益民、黃宜敏、中華民國基層教師協會(1997)。行動研究方法導論--教師動手作研究。臺北:遠流。
延伸查詢
4.
Sagor, Richard(1992)。How to conduct collaborative action research。Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development。
5.
McKernan, J.(1991)。Curriculum action research: A handbook of methods and resources for the reflective practitioner。NY:St. Martin's Press。
6.
Mansfield, W.、Alexander, D.、Farris, E.(1991)。Teacher survey on safe, disciplined, and drug-free schools。Washington, DC:U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Educational Statistics。
7.
蔣治邦(1992)。影響國民小學問題學生家庭因素之研究。臺北:教育部訓育委員會。
延伸查詢
8.
Bogdan, Robert C.、Biklen, Sari Knopp(1982)。Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods。Boston:Allyn and Bacon, Inc.。
9.
饒見維(1996)。教師專業發展--理論與實務。臺北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
延伸查詢
10.
單文經(1994)。班級經營策略研究。台北:師大書苑。
延伸查詢
11.
Kemmis, S.、McTaggart, R.(1988)。The action research reader。Geelong, Victoria:Deakin University Press。
12.
Carr, Wilfred、Kemmis, Stephen(1986)。Becoming Critical: Education, Knowledge, and Action Research。Falmer Press。
13.
歐用生(1996)。教師專業成長。師大書苑。
延伸查詢
14.
Jones, V. F.、Jones, L. S.(1986)。Comprehensive classroom management: Creating positive learning environments。Comprehensive classroom management: Creating positive learning environments。Newton, MA。
15.
Patton, Michael Quinn(1990)。Qualitative Evaluation & Research Methods。Beverly Hills, CA。
16.
(1997)。班級經營-理念與實際。班級經營-理念與實際。臺北。
延伸查詢
17.
黃德祥(1997)。學生違規及暴力行為的成因與處理。班級經營-理念與策略。臺北。
延伸查詢
18.
Best, J. W.、Kahn, J. V.(1989)。Research in Education。Research in Education。New Jersey。
19.
Chernow, F. B.、Chernow, C.(1981)。Classroom discipline and control: 101 practice techniques。Classroom discipline and control: 101 practice techniques。West Nyack, NY。
20.
Educational Research Service(1996)。What we know about classroom management to encourage motivation and responsibility。What we know about classroom management to encourage motivation and responsibility。Arlington, VA。
21.
Emmer, Edmund T.、Everston, C. M.、Sanford, J. P.、Clements, B. S.、Worsham, M. E.(1989)。Classroom management for secondary teachers。Prentice-Hall。
22.
Hamby, J. V.(1995)。Straight talk about discipline。Clemson, SC:National Dropout Prevention Center。
23.
Jones, F. H.(1987)。Positive classroom discipline。New York, NY:McGraw-Hill Book Company。
24.
McManus, M.(1995)。Troublesome behavior in the classroom: Meeting individual needs。New York, NY:Routledge。
25.
Medland, M.、Vitale, M.(1984)。Management of classroom。Management of classroom。New York, NY。
26.
Paine, S. C.、Radicchi, J.、Rosellini, L. C.、Deutchman, L.、Darch, C. B.(1983)。Structuring your classroom for academic success。Champaign, IL:Research Press Company。
27.
Zuber-Skerritt, O.(1992)。Action research in higher education - Examples and reflection。Action research in higher education - Examples and reflection。London, UK。
其他
1.
Burdon, P. R.(1983)。Classroom management guidelines for teacher education,沒有紀錄。
2.
Saurino, D. R.(1996)。Teacher team collaborative action research,沒有紀錄。
3.
Simmons, J. M.(1985)。Action research as a means of professionalizing staff development for classroom teachers & school staffs,沒有紀錄。
4.
Womack, S. T.(1997)。What action research is: A review of the literature,沒有紀錄。
圖書論文
1.
林素卿(2001)。學校行動研究在九年一貫課程統整與實施上之應用。行動研究與課程教學革新。臺北市:揚智。
延伸查詢
2.
Noffke, S. E.、Brennan, M.(1991)。Student teachers use action research: Issues and examples。Issues and practices in inquiry-oriented teacher education。New York:Falmer Press。
3.
Winter, R.(1996)。Some principles and procedures for the conduct of action research。New directions in action research。Bristol, PA:London:Falmer Press:Taylor & Francis Inc。
4.
Jones, V.(1996)。Classroom management。Handbook of research on teacher education。New York:Macmillan Library Reference USA。
5.
Doyle, W.(1986)。Classroom organization and management。Handbook of research on teaching。New York:Macmillan。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
多元教學活動融入正向管教精神--提升班級經營成效之行動研究
2.
性別平等教育融入原鄉小學族群文化課程之研究:以性別分工為例
3.
幼兒園獎懲制度之訂定與實施--以一個班級為例
4.
大學生跨文化能力涵養之研究--以卑南族除草祭互動電子繪本製作歷程為例
5.
運用繪本融入國中小族群及性別平等教育課程之協同行動研究
6.
初任教師創意教學角色認定檢證之縱貫研究:認定控制理論的觀點
7.
後母?難為?繼任導師班級經營困擾的原因與解決策略
8.
班級學生行為問題的處理與預防
9.
日語教育実習コースにおける実践研究--高校クラブ活動のクラス‧デザインを中心に
10.
數位休閒娛樂類文化創意產業工作職能目錄之建構研究--以架設web2.0資源共享平臺人員為例
11.
臺灣小麥故鄉的社區營造策略、困境與解決策略之研究
12.
反省性思考在教師班級經營上之運用
13.
死亡教育議題融入藝術課程之行動研究
14.
國小六年教師班級經營策略設計與運用之行動研究
15.
國小高年級數學試行「用擬題評量」之合作行動研究
1.
教練訓練模式於幼兒園融合情境實施之行動研究
2.
幼兒園知識管理之研究: 以班級經營為焦點
3.
國小英語教師專業發展之研究-以字母拼讀法教學為例
4.
一個行動研究者的雙重追尋:改善教學與對行動研究的認識
無相關書籍
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code