:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:九一一後美國之霸權治理策略:以伊拉克為例
書刊名:政治科學論叢
作者:陳文生
作者(外文):Chen, Wen-sheng
出版日期:2005
卷期:23
頁次:頁169-200
主題關鍵詞:霸權管理強制支配共識支配九一一布希主義先制戰略美國伊拉克聯合國Hegemonic governanceCoercive dominationConsensual domination911 attacksBush doctrinePreemptive strikeU.S.IraqUnited Nations
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:51
  • 點閱點閱:187
     從「全球治理」的角度,霸權日益衰微且國家逐漸兩入全球合作制度及典則之中,然而,美國在九一一事件後的外交策,特別是其二○○三年三月十九日對伊拉克發動戰爭,形同宣布美國的霸權地位,也反映出武力之威脅及使用是國際關係運作的最終手段。 本論文旨在以伊拉克為例,剖析美國在九一一後的「霸權治理」策略。本研究發現,美國在九一一後動員其獨霸的實力,試圖透過現實策略。本研究發現,美國在九一一後動員其獨霸的實力,試圖透過現實主義者所強調之「強制支配」手段,及葛蘭西所試圖掙脫之「共識支配」方式,對伊拉克進行領導。此外本文也認為,美國有權決定是否接受聯合國及國際法之規範;而美之霸權治理亡嚴重打擊全球治理機制之作用。展望未來,美會將其權力應用到什麼程度以維護美國利益,勢將影響未來的國際合作。
     From the perspective of "global governance", hegemons are declining and states are becoming increasingly enmeshed in a network of collaborative arrangements and regimes. However, the U.S. foreign policy after the September 11 attacks, especially its war against Iraq on March 19, 2003, is tantamount to declare American hegemony and reflects that the threat and use of force are the ultimate instruments of international relations. This paper aims to use Iraq case to elucidate the U.S. strategy of "hegmonic governance" after the September 11 attacks. The research finds that the U.S. has exercised its unrivalled power to dominate Iraq through both the "coercive domination" which realists emphasized and the "consensual domination" which Antonio Gramsci fought against. Furthermore, it concludes that the U.S. can bypass the United Nations and disregard international law as it wishes. According, the U.S. hegmonic governance has a great impact on the mechanism of global governance, and the extent to which the US will exert its strength to maintain its national interest will influences future international cooperation.
期刊論文
1.Hirsh, Michael(2002)。Bush and the World。Foreign Affairs,81(5),18-44。  new window
2.王崑義(20020400)。美國的反恐怖主義與國際安全--兼論九一一事件以後臺海兩岸的處境。遠景季刊,3(2),137-184。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.吳東野(20030100)。全球反恐聯盟及其相關問題之探討。遠景基金會季刊,4(1),1-39。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.鄭端耀(20030400)。布希政府安全戰略發展評析。遠景基金會季刊,4(2),1-37。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.吳東野(20040100)。美伊戰爭與波灣新秩序。遠景基金會季刊,5(1),1-42。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Glennon, Michael F.(2003)。Why the Security Council Failed。Foreign Affairs,82(3),34。  new window
7.Ikenberry, G. John(200209)。America's Imperial Ambition。Foreign Affairs,81(5),44-60。  new window
8.Rice, Condoleezza(2000)。Campaign 2000: Promoting the National Interest。Foreign Affairs,79(1),45-62。  new window
9.Walt, Stephen M.(2001)。Beyond bin Laden: Reshaping U.S. Foreign Policy。International Security,26(3),56-78。  new window
10.陳一新(20010100)。從布希外交團隊與領導風格看美國外交與兩岸政策。遠景季刊,2(1),1-33。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.陳文生(20040500)。美國推動聯合國安理會1441號決議案分析。問題與研究,43(3),23-47。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.馬振坤(20040500)。美伊戰爭--克勞塞維茲式分析。問題與研究,43(3),1-22。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.吳玉山(20021200)。仍是現實主義的傳統--九一一與布希主義。政治科學論叢,17,1-31。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.O'Connell, Mary Ellen(2002)。American Exceptionalism and the International Law of Self-defense。Denver Journal of International Law and Policy,31(1),43-57。  new window
15.Stahn, Carsten(2003)。Terrorist Acts as 'Armed Attack': The Right to Self-defense, Article 51(1/2) of the UN Charter, and International Terrorism。The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs,27(2),35-54。  new window
16.Nye, Joseph S., Jr.(2002)。Limits of American Power。Political Science Quarterly,117(4),545-559。  new window
17.LaFeber, Walter(2001)。The Post September 11 Debate Over Empire, Globalization, and Fragmentation。Political Science Quarterly,117(1),1-17。  new window
18.王崑義(2004)。從心理戰略解構美伊戰爭-兼論對我國的啟示。遠景基金會季刊,5(1),43-93。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.Bender, Peter(2003)。America: The New Roman Empire?。Orbis,47(1),145-159。  new window
20.Bahgat, Gawdat(2003)。The New Geopolitics of Oil: The United States, Saudi Arabia, and Russia。Orbis,47(3),447-461。  new window
21.Boniface, P.(2001)。The Specter of Unilateralism。The Washington Quarterly,24(3),155-162。  new window
22.Miller, S. E.(2002)。The End of Unilateralism or Unilateralism Redux?。The Washington Quarterly,25(1),15-30。  new window
23.Elliott, Michael(2003)。Looking for Help in the Wrong Place。Time。  new window
24.Spiezio, K. Edward(1990)。British Hegemony and Major Power War, 1815-1939: An Empirical Test of Gilpin's Model of Hegemonic Governance。International Studies Quarterly,34(2),165-181。  new window
25.Gvosdev, Nikolas K.、Takeyh, Ray(2003)。Democratic Impulses Verse Imperial Interests: America's New Mid-east Conundrum。Orbis,47(3),412-432。  new window
26.Murphy, Sean D.(2002)。Terrorism and the Concept of 'Armed Attack' in Article 51 of the U.N. Charter。Harvard International Law Journal,43(1),40-52。  new window
27.Ryn, Claes G.(2003)。The Ideology of American Empire。Orbis,47(3),383-398。  new window
會議論文
1.陳文生(2003)。先制攻擊?美國出兵伊拉克之正當性與影響評估。0。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳文生(2002)。九一一事件後美國之伊拉克政策:多邊強制在前,先制攻擊隨侍在側。0。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.The Commission on Global Governance(1995)。Our Global Neighbourhood: The Report of the Commission on Global Governance。Oxford University Press。  new window
圖書
1.Femia, Joseph V.(1981)。Political Thought: Hegemony, Consciousness, and the Revolutionary Process。Hegemony。Oxford::Oxford University Press.。  new window
2.Brown, Chris(1997)。Understanding International Relations。London:Macmillan Press Ltd。  new window
3.Robonson, William I.(1996)。Promoting Polyarchy : Globalization, U.S. Intervention, and Hegemany。New York:Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.Wallace, Rebecca M.(2002)。International Law。London:Sweet & Maxwell。  new window
5.The White House(2002)。National Security Strategy of the United States of America。Washington, DC:The White House。  new window
6.Gilpin, Robert、Gilpin, Jean M.(1987)。The Political Economy of International Relations。Princeton University Press。  new window
7.Stiglitz, Joseph E.(2002)。Globalization and Its Discontents。W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.。  new window
8.Gilpin, Robert(1981)。War and Change in World Politics。Cambridge University Press。  new window
9.Keohane, Robert O.、Nye, Joseph S. Jr.(1977)。Power and interdependence: world politics in transition。Boston, Massachusetts:Little Brown。  new window
10.Keohane, Robert O.(1984)。After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy。Princeton University Press。  new window
11.Kupchan, Charles A.(2002)。The End of the American Era。The End of the American Era。New York, NY。  new window
12.McGrew, Anthony(2000)。Power Shift: From National Government to Global Governance?。A Globalizing World? Culture, Economics, Politics。London, UK。  new window
13.Santos, Theotonio Dos(1999)。帝國主義與依附。帝國主義與依附。中國大陸。  延伸查詢new window
14.周煦(2001)。冷戰後美國的中東政策:1989-2000。冷戰後美國的中東政策:1989-2000。臺北市。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.蘇進強(2002)。911事件後全球戰略評估。911事件後全球戰略評估。臺北市。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Keddie, Nikki(1993)。The End of the Cold War and the Middle East。The End of the Cold War: Its Meaning and Implications。Cambridge。  new window
17.Viotti, Paul R.、Kauppi, Mark V.(1997)。International Relations and World Politics: Security, Economy, Identity。International Relations and World Politics: Security, Economy, Identity。New Jersey。  new window
18.Strange, Susan(1989)。Toward a Theory of Transnational Empire。Global Changes and Theoretical Challenges。Massachusetts。  new window
其他
1.Committee for a Workers' International(2003)。The Occupation of Iraq,0。  new window
圖書論文
1.Cox, Robert W.(1992)。Towards A Post-hegemonic Conceptualization of World Order: Reflections on the Relevancy of Ibn Khaldun。Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.Rosenau, James N.(1992)。Governance, Order, and Change in World Politics。Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics。Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.Hobden, Stephen、Jones, Richard Wyn(2001)。Marxist Theories of International Relations。The Globalization of World Politics: An introduction to international relations。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE