臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：我國地方政府層級教育課責系統建構之評估：模糊德菲法之應用
書刊名：教育與心理研究
作者：吳政達 引用關係
作者(外文)：Wu, Cheng-ta
出版日期：2005
卷期：28:4
頁次：頁645-665
主題關鍵詞：教育課責系統；績效責任；模糊德菲法；Educational accountability system；Accountability；Fuzzy delphi method
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(8) 博士論文(3) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:8
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:229
本研究旨在建構我國地方政府層級之教育課責系統，廣納有關的政策利害關係人（包括教育行政人員、學校行政人員、國中小教師及家長等）之意見。並就教育課責系統實施之目的、負責的個人與單位、發展規準、架構、報告書內容、模式、發展策略、主要指標及教育課責系統之成效測量等項目進行評估，根據問卷調查歸納結論如下： 1.教育課責系統實施之目的主要在於提供學校教師和校長能夠獲得適當專業發展的機會。 2.負責教育課責系統的個人與單位以教師所獲得的一致性最高。 3.教育課責系統最應對學生負起教育的績效責任。4.教育課責系統最重要的發展規準項目為：評量時應考慮學校及學生的多元性。 5.教育報告書的內容以教師訓練與課程的改善為第一優先。 6.教育課責系統模式中以專業模式獲得的可行性最高。 7.公平、有效的課責系統應包括多重指標，且應涵蓋兩大類：一類為評量性指標；另一類為非評量性指標。 8.教育課責系統之成效測量可採用全國性的基本學力測驗，其中英文科及數學科所獲得的一致性最高。
The goal of this study is to construct educational accountability system in Taiwan local government by collecting stakeholders’ opinions including administrators, school administration staff, primary and secondary teachers and parents etc. We design the survey questionnaire about the implementation of educational accountability in Taiwan local government according to the purpose, audiences, criteria, modes, models, indicators, reports, development strategies and evaluation etc. Based upon data of literature review and questionnaire, conclusions have been reached as follows: 1.The purpose of educational accountability system is to offer both teachers and the principal opportunities to develop professionalism. 2.Teachers are the main persons who take responsible for educational accountability. 3.Educational accountability system should take responsible for the students. 4.Taking students’ and schools’ diversity into consideration in evaluation is the most important development criterion of educational accountability system. 5.Teacher training and curriculum development are prior items in the educational report. 6.Professional model is more feasible than other educational accountability models. 7.The indicators of educational accountability system should compose of evaluative indicators and non-evaluative indicators. 8.English and mathematics are most feasible to measure the outcomes of educational accountability system.
期刊論文
1.McEwen, N.(1995)。Accountability in education in Canada。Canadian Journal of Education，20(1)，3-17。  new window
2.Radnor, H. A.、Ball, S. J.、Vincent, C.(1998)。Local educational governance, accountability, and democracy in the United Kingdom。Educational Policy，12(1/2)，124-137。  new window
3.Macpherson, R. J. S.(1996)。Educative accountability policy research: Methodology and epistemology。Educational Administration Quarterly，32(1)，80-106。  new window
4.Fidler B.、Ouston, J.、Earley, P.(1998)。The Educational Accountability of School in England and Wales。Educational Policy，12(1/2)，111-123。  new window
圖書
1.Kogan, M.(1986)。Education accountability: An analytic overview。Dover, NH：Hutchinson Education。  new window
2.Hwang, C. L.、Lin, M. L.(1987)。Group Decision Making under Multiple Criteria。New York。  new window
3.Klir, G. J.、Folger, T. A.(1988)。Fuzzy Sets Uncertainty & Information。New Jersey：Prentice-Hall。  new window
4.DfEE、QCA(1997)。Excellence in schools。London：The Stationery Office。  new window
5.Education Commission of the States(1998)。Designing and implementing standards-based accountability systems。Denver, Colorado：Education Commission of the States。  new window
6.Chen, S. J. J.、Hwang, C. L.(1992)。Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications。Springer-Verlag。  new window
7.Dubois, D. J.、Prade, H. M.(1980)。Fuzzy Sets and Systems: Theory and Applications。Academic Press。  new window
8.Elmore, R. F.(1990)。Restructuring school: The next generation of educational reform。Restructuring school: The next generation of educational reform。San Francisco, CA。  new window
9.教育部(2001)。2001年教育改革之檢討與改進會議大會參考資料：新思考、新行動、新願景。2001年教育改革之檢討與改進會議大會參考資料：新思考、新行動、新願景。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Ananda, S.，Rabinowitz, S. N.(2001)。Building a workable accountability system: Policy brief，http://web.WestEd.org/online_pubs/po-01-02.pdf， 2002/01/28。  new window
2.Thomas B. Fordham Foundation(2000)。Standards, testing and accountability，http://www.edexcellence.net/topics/standards.html#anchor1072507， 2002/01/28。  new window
3.Accountability Task Force(2000)。So All Succeed: Delivering the Promise of Michigan Public Schools，0。  new window
4.Bush, G. W.(2001)。No Child Left Behind，0。  new window
5.Cohen, M.(2002)。Emerging Issues in the Design of Next Generation Accountability Models，0。  new window
6.Council of Chief State School Officers(2002)。Designing School Accountability Systems: Toward a Framework and Process，0。  new window
7.Council of Chief State School Officers(2003)。Statewide Educational Accountability under NCLB: Central Issues Arising from an Examination of State Accountability Workbooks and U.S. Department of Education Reviews under the No Child Left behind Act of 2001，0。  new window
圖書論文
1.Halstead, M.(1994)。Accountability and values。Accountability and control in educational setting。London：Cassell。  new window
2.Simkins, T.(1992)。Policy, accountability and management: Perspectives on the implementation of reform。Implementing educational reform: The early lessons。London：Longman。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：439（臺灣：426，外國：13） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1669892 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67477872
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上