:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:學校教育課責從他律到自律的困境與策進作為
書刊名:教育研究月刊
作者:劉鎮寧 引用關係
作者(外文):Liu, Chen-ning
出版日期:2019
卷期:299
頁次:頁111-125
主題關鍵詞:教育課責學校評鑑績效責任Educational accountabilitySchool evaluationAccountability
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:75
  • 點閱點閱:3
本文主要係以學校面對教育事務的推動,應具備自律性的教育課責做為論述核心。首先,探討學校教育課責的概念內涵;其次,以教育部國民及學前教育署推動的補救教學為例,探析學校教育課責從他律到自律的困境;接著,分別從教育局(處)和學校提出自律性教育課責的策進作為:一、教育局(處)同時扮演教育課責的主體和客體,應加強人員專業素養,強化政策品質;二、教育局(處)應建立學校績效表現、校長考核與教育課責的連結;三、學校面對教育課責應建立內部管考,而非被動等待外部的評鑑訪視;四、學校應定期公布自評結果並同時提供外評報告,達到資訊公開接受利害關係人的檢視;五、學校應建立組織學習模式全面改善和提升效能;最後,綜以結語。
This study focuses on self-disciplined educational accountability of schools when implementing educational affairs. First of all, it explores conceptual content of school educational accountability; secondly, using remedial teaching implemented by K-12 Education Administration of Ministry of Education as an example, it explores the Dilemma from heteronomy to self-discipline of school educational accountability; subsequently, from Education Bureau(Department) and schools, it proposes promoting action of self-disciplined educational accountability: (1) Education Bureau(Department) plays the roles as both subject and object of educational accountability and it should enhance the staff’s professional literacy and policy quality; (2) Education Bureau(Department) should construct connection among school performance, principal appraisal and educational accountability; (3) regarding educational accountability, schools should establish internal management and examination instead of passively relying on external evaluation and visit; (4) schools should regularly announce self-evaluation results and provide external evaluation reports to result in open information and receive review from stakeholders; (5) schools should establish organizational learning model to completely improve and upgrade efficacy. At last, conclusions are offered.
期刊論文
1.吳清山、林天祐(2001)。績效責任。教育研究月刊,83,139-140。  延伸查詢new window
2.Koppell, Jonathan G. S.(2005)。Pathologies of Accountability: ICANN and the Challenge of Multiple Accountabilities Disorder。Public Administration Review,65(1),94-108。  new window
3.張瓊玲(20090100)。探討非營利組織與政府互動的課責機制:以托育服務為例。競爭力評論,13,27-74。  延伸查詢new window
4.湯維玲(20140600)。論述補救教學方案績優學校之積極作為。教育研究,242,31-48。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.吳政達(20051200)。我國地方政府層級教育課責系統建構之評估:模糊德菲法之應用。教育與心理研究,28(4),645-665。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.游家政、曾祥榕(20041200)。教育評鑑的後設評鑑。教育資料集刊,29,53-94。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Romzek, Barbara S.、Ingraham, Patricia Wallace(2000)。Cross pressures of accountability: Initiative, command, and failure in the Ron Brown plane crash。Public Administration Review,60(3),240-253。  new window
8.鄭筱燕、潘欣蓉(20140600)。實施補救教學方案之困境與因應策略。臺灣教育評論月刊,3(6),37-39。  延伸查詢new window
9.劉鎮寧(20141200)。國民小學執行補救教學的錯誤態樣之研究。教育行政論壇,6(2),1-20。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.顏國樑、宋美瑤(20130100)。苗栗縣國民小學攜手計畫課後扶助執行成效之分析與建議。學校行政,83,177-197。  延伸查詢new window
11.劉鎮寧(20160100)。中小學補救教學政策執行問題之分析--以高雄市為例。學校行政,101,166-184。  延伸查詢new window
12.王金國(20161100)。補救教學之問題與建議。臺灣教育評論月刊,5(11),12-17。  延伸查詢new window
13.林進材(2018)。從學科教學知識的觀點論述補救教學政策實施的困境與對策。臺灣教育,709,103-110。  延伸查詢new window
14.劉坤億(20091000)。政府課責性與公共治理之探討。研考雙月刊,33(5)=273,59-72。  延伸查詢new window
15.陳敦源(20090400)。透明之下的課責:臺灣民主治理中官民信任關係的重建基礎。文官制度季刊,1(2),21-55。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.陳菁雯(2006)。官僚組織課責行為模式之研究:理論建構與實務驗證(博士論文)。中國文化大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.高天財(2011)。高雄市國民小學教育人員對「攜手計畫課後扶助」政策認知與執行成效之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺南大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.蘇明宏(2011)。宜蘭縣「攜手計畫課後扶助方案」實施現況之研究(碩士論文)。國立東華大學,花蓮縣。  延伸查詢new window
4.賴彥全(2011)。地方政府教育課責系統之研究--以臺北縣活化課程為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳瀅羽(2017)。探討臺灣都市計畫委員會的功能與課責(碩士論文)。國立成功大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.周佳蓉(2007)。環保團體課責表現衡量架構之建立與實證研究(博士論文)。國立中山大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.李錦玫(2013)。政府審計與公共課責之研究(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Harmon, Michael M.(1995)。Responsibility as Paradox: A Critique of Rational Discourse on Government。Sage Publications。  new window
2.Edwards, Michael、Hulme, David(1996)。Beyond the Magic Bullet: NGO Performance and Accountability in the Post-Cold War World。Kumarian Press。  new window
3.Mulgan, Richard(2003)。Holding Power to Account: Accountability in Modern Democracies。Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
4.Light, P. C.(2011)。Monitoring government: Inspectors general and the search for accountability。Washington, DC:Brookings Institution Press。  new window
5.Callahan, K.(2006)。Elements of effective governance: Measurement, accountability and participation。New York, NY:Routledge。  new window
其他
1.湯志民(2001)。臺北市國民中小學校務評鑑之評析,http://scholar.google.com.tw/scholar_url?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww3.nccu.edu.tw%2F-tangcm%2Fdoc%2F2.html%2Farticle%2FE208.pdf&hl=zh-TW&sa=T&oi=ggp&ct=res&cd=0&d=3952059326313385557&ei=e-e5W53LNIKyQ700qHQCA&scisig=AAGBfin0-JDjUal2ii4cRiDXp231k_GS50Q&nossl=l&ws=1366x599。  new window
2.香港教育局(2018)。學校發展與問責架構,https://www.edb.gov.hk/tc/sch-admin:sch-qualityassurance/about-sch-quality-assurance/index.html。  new window
3.汪明生,邱靖蓉(2008)。課責與南部地方政府間夥伴關係建立之研究:PAM與LAD觀點,http://www/taspaa/essay/pdf/010.pdf。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE