:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:婚姻暴力加害人分類之研究
書刊名:中華心理衛生學刊
作者:林明傑 引用關係沈勝昂
作者(外文):Lin, Min-chiehShen, Sheng-ang
出版日期:2004
卷期:17:2
頁次:頁67-92
主題關鍵詞:婚姻暴力親密伴侶間暴力家庭暴力婚姻暴力加害人危險評估分類學Marital violenceIntimate violenceDomestic violenceMale battererSpouse abuserIntimate abuserRisk assessmentTypology
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(22) 博士論文(2) 專書(1) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:17
  • 共同引用共同引用:243
  • 點閱點閱:200
國外之研究均指出婚姻暴力加害人不是一同質性之團體,而國內之實際案例亦有如此發現。本研究之目的即在了解台灣地區婚姻暴力加害人之可能分類及其與致命危險間之相關。研究樣本以高雄縣市家庭暴力防治中心所接受之婚姻暴力案件為來源,委請接案之社會工作人員就受害婦女收集其「危險評估量表(Danger Assessment, DA)」、「簡易衝突行為量表(Brief Conflict Tactics Scale, CTS)、及研究者設計之「婚姻暴力被害婦女問卷」。本研究共收集有121 個有效樣本,以DA量表之結果做群集分析發現婚姻暴力加害人可區分為四類,即低暴力型(佔53.6%)、酗酒高致命型(佔20.5%)、高暴力高控制型(佔21.4%)、及邊緣高控制型(佔4.5%),而其中有九位無法分類。四類婚姻暴力加害人在CTS之暴力量、致命暴力次數、及DA量表總分均至少有一對達顯著差異。而在年齡、教育程度、及有無職業,均無法達到顯著差異。本研究之優缺點及日後建議亦在文中有所討論。
All foreign studies showed that intimate violence offenders is not a homogeneous group, which is also found true among the real cases in Taiwan. The purpose of this study was to explore the typology of intimate abusers and the lethal risk among them. Intimate abuse cases in Kaohsiung City and County during one month period were selected as sample in this study. The abused females in the sample were administrated the Danger Assessment, the Brief Conflict Tactics Scale, and a questionnaire by the social workers. 121 samples were collected in this study. There were four types of intimate abusers identified by cluster analysis through 15 items in DA. They were low-violent (53.6%), alcoholism-lethal (20.5%), high - violent-high-control (21.4%), , borderline-high-control (4.5%) abusers. It were found that at least one pair among four types reached significant difference in the CTS totals, the times of lethal violence, and the DA total. However, the ages, the educational level, and employment status among them were not reached significant difference. The advantages and disadvantages of this study, and the suggestion for future study were discussed.
期刊論文
1.鄭瑞隆、許維倫(19990600)。遭受婚姻暴力婦女因應方式之研究。犯罪學期刊,4,225-271。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Holtzworth-Munroe, A.、Stuart, G. L.(1994)。Typologies of Male Batterers : Three Subtypes and the Differences among Them。Psychological Bulletin,116(3),476-497。  new window
3.Straus, M. A.、Hamby, S. L.、Boney-McCoy, S.、Sugarman, D. B.(1996)。The revised conflict tactics scales (CTS-2): Development and preliminary psychometric data。Journal of Family Issues,17(3),283-316。  new window
4.沈慶鴻(20000600)。婚姻暴力受虐者習得的無助感之分析研究。實踐學報,31,53-91。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃翠紋(20020600)。警察逮捕婚姻暴力加害人意願之員警本身、系統支持及雙方當事人因素分析。犯罪學期刊,9,147-178。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.曾慶玲、周麗端(19990600)。父母婚姻暴力對兒童問題行為影響研究。家政教育學報,2,66-89。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.沈慶鴻(20010600)。婚姻暴力代間傳遞之探索性研究。實踐學報,32,99-134。  延伸查詢new window
8.黃富源(19950100)。警察系統回應婚姻暴力的理論與實務。警政學報,26,59-92。  延伸查詢new window
9.Hare, Robert D.、Hart, Stephen D.、Harpur, Timothy J.(1991)。Psychopathy and the DSM-IV criteria for antisocial personality disorder。Journal of Abnormal Psychology,100(3),391-398。  new window
10.Tweed, R. G.、Dutton, D. G.(1998)。A comparison of impulsive and instrumental subgroups of batterers。Violence and Victims,13(3),217-230。  new window
11.林明傑、沈勝昂(20031200)。我國婚姻暴力加害人之危險評估--DA量表在我國適用之研究。犯罪學期刊,6(2),177-215。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.陳若璋(19920300)。臺灣婚姻暴力之本質、歷程與影響。婦女與兩性學刊,3,117-147。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.林明傑(20000600)。美加婚姻暴力犯之治療方案與技術暨其危險評估之探討。社區發展季刊,90,197-215。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.陳若璋(19920600)。臺灣婚姻暴力高危險因子之探討。國立臺灣大學社會學刊,21,123-160。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Goodman, L. A.、Bennett, L.、Dutton, M. A.(2000)。Predicting repeat abuse among arrested batterers: Use of the Danger Assessment Scale in the criminal justice system。Journal of Interpersonal Violence,15(1),63-74。  new window
16.Holtzworth-Munroe, A.、Meehan, J. C.、Herron, K.、Rehman, U.、Stuart, G. L.(2000)。Testing the Holtzworth-Munroe and Stuart Batter Typology。Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,68(6),1000-1019。  new window
17.Shortt, J. W.、Gottman, J.、Jacobson, N.、Rushe, R. H.、Babcock, J. B.、Taillade、Waltz, J.(1995)。The relationship between heart rate reactivity, emotionally aggressive behavior, and general violence in batterers。Journal of Family Psychology,9(3),227-248。  new window
會議論文
1.Campbell, J. C.(2000)。Issues in risk assessment in the field of intimate partner violence。5th Annual BISC-MI (Bat terer Intervention Services Coalition of Michigan) Conference。  new window
學位論文
1.侯玟里(2000)。受虐婦女之生命威脅狀況、創傷後反應與身心症狀之相關(碩士論文)。高雄醫學大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.趙葳(2003)。婚姻暴力受虐婦女的依附及習得的無助感之研究(碩士論文)。東海大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Dutton, D. G.(1998)。The Abusive Personality: Violence and Control in Intimate Relationships。New York, NY:Guilford Press。  new window
2.Dutton, D. G.、Golant, S. K.(1995)。The Batterer: A Psychological Profile。New York:Basic Books。  new window
3.Healey, K.、Smith, C.、O'Sullivan, C.(1998)。Batterer Intervention: Program Approaches and Criminal Justice Strategies。Washington, DC:National Institute of Justice。  new window
4.張紹勳、張紹評、林秀娟(2001)。SPSS For windows多變量統計分析。台北:松崗電腦圖書資料股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.Jacobson, N.、Gottman, J.(1998)。When men batter women。New York:Simon & Schuster。  new window
6.American Psychiatric Association(1994)。Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder: DSM-IV。Washington, D.C.:American Psychiatric Association。  new window
7.周月清(19950000)。婚姻暴力:理論分析與社會工作處置。臺北:巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Walker, L. E.(1979)。The battered women。New York:Harper & Row Publishers。  new window
9.Straus, M.(1990)。Appendix B: New scoring methods for violence and new norms for the Conflict Tactics Scales。Physical Violence in American Families: Risk Factors and Adaptations to Violence in 8,145 Families。New Brunswick, NJ。  new window
其他
1.Gondolf, E. W.(1997)。Multi--site evaluation of batterer intervention systems: A summery of finding for a 12--month follow--up,http://www.mincava.umn.edu/papers/gondolf/sumofcdc.htm。  new window
圖書論文
1.Hare, R. D.(1998)。Psychopaths and their nature: Implications for the mental health and criminal justice systems。Psychopathy: Antisocial, criminal, and violent behavior。Guilford Press。  new window
2.Campbell, J. C.(1995)。Prediction of homicide of and by battered women。Assessing dangerousness: Violence by sexual offenders, batterers, and child abusers。Sage。  new window
3.Straus, M.(1990)。The Conflict Tactics Scales and its critics: An evaluation and new data on validity and reliability。Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families。Transaction Publishers。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE