:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:女性親密伴侶謀殺者之分類研究
作者:蔡宗晃
作者(外文):Tsung-Huang, Tsai
校院名稱:國立中正大學
系所名稱:犯罪防治研究所
指導教授:鄭瑞隆
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2015
主題關鍵詞:女性親密伴侶謀殺分類學親密伴侶暴力intimate partner femicidetypologyintimate partner violence
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:43
研究目的:親密伴侶殺人案件是最嚴重的家庭暴力事件,本研究是以男性親密伴
侶殺人者為對象,來分析殺人者特質及對此族群進行分類學研究。研究方法:本
研究主要藉由全國各地方法院判決書、監獄社工調查資料並輔以媒體報導資料,
透過量化研究輔以質性分析,針對我國男性親密伴侶者進行研究。研究內容包
括:1.以全國殺害女性伴侶之男性殺人者刑案資料探索加害者的特質與案件特
性。2.藉由質性分析將全國親密殺人者予以分類。3.探索不同類型的親密伴侶殺
人者在各項特質的差異。研究結果:依目前全國男性親密殺人者可分成六類,各
類型的特性包括:
1. 精神病理型:主要是受個案精神症狀影響而導致殺害親密伴侶。
2. 酒藥成癮型:加害人為酒精或藥物濫用者,導致生活功能敗壞,在使用酒、
藥下控制力變差而殺害親密伴侶。
3. 反社會暴力型:個案犯罪生涯中的反社會行為常出現對他人暴力,對親密伴
侶殺害是其反社會行為一部份
4. 邊緣嫉妒型:在親密伴侶背棄時,會採取瘋狂報復及操縱性自殺行為,會與
伴侶玉石俱焚。
5. 報復攻擊型:加害人在被害人極度刺激下產生報復行為而將之殺害,過去無
明顯暴力史。
6. 權控型:過去有明顯攻擊親密伴侶的行為,藉由暴力來獲得權力與控制,但
最後失控將親密伴侶殺害。
結論:完成親密伴侶的分類,並建立完整評估才能有適當的處遇。
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to analyze the characteristics
of intimate partner femicides (IPFs) and establish the typology among
IPF. Methods: The study works on IPF cases in Taiwan by utilizing mixed
method which comprises of quantitative research with auxiliary
qualitative analysis from criminal verdicts from all local courts, social
worker’s records from prisons, and relevant media reports. The
detailed contents of the research are as the following:
1. Exploring the characteristics of the perpetrators of IPF and the
pattern of the criminal cases based upon the nationwide criminal
records which comprises of intimate partner femicide.
2. Classifying the perpetrators of IPF in Taiwan based on the
qualitative analysis and quantitative discrimination analysis.
3. Displaying the unique differences among all categories of IPF
perpetrators.
Result: Six types of IPF perpetrators in Taiwan were drawn:
1. Psychotic/insane type: The perpetrators with individual psychiatric
symptoms resulting in IPF.
2. Alcoholic/substance addiction type: The perpetrators had impaired
daily function due to alcohol or drug abuse, which results in IPF
under alcohol or substance related deteriorated self control.
3. Antisocial/generally violent type: Committing violence against others
is common during the perpetrator’s criminal carrier with antisocial
behaviors. The IPF is merely part of the one’s antisocial behaviors.
4. Borderline/jealous rage type: While betrayed, the perpetrator’s
would commit violent revenge and deliberate suicide, they may
destruct/kill themselves before/with their IPF at the same times.
5. Revenge/counter type: While the offenders were shattered badly by
victims, the offenders would revenge and kill the victim. The
offenders do not have evident history of violence.
6. Powerful/overcontrol type: The perpetrators have apparent
behaviors of attack to their intimate partners before. Their desires
were to regain their power and control by violence, and they killed
their intimate partners out of control at the end.
Conclusion: Through comprehensive classification for IPFs and
professionals could be able to build integrative assessment with
following appropriate treatment and management.
外文部份
Adams, D. (2007). Why do they kill? Men who murder their intimate partner.
Nashville, Tennessee: Vanderbilt University Press.
Aldridge, M. L., & Browne, K. D. (2003). Perpetrators of Spousal Homicide: A Review.
Trauma Violence Abuse, 4(3), 265-276.
Andrews, D. A., Ivan, Z., Hoge Robert, D., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., & Cullen Francis, T.
(1990). Does Correctional Treatment Work? a Clinically Relevant and
Psychologically Informed Meta-analysis. Criminology, 28, 369-404.
Barber, C. W., Azrael, D., Hemenway, D., Olson, L. M., Nie, C., & Schaechter, J. (2008).
Suicides and Suicide Attempts Following Homicide: Victim-Suspect
Relationship, Weapon Type, and Presence of Antidepressants. Homicide
Studies, 12(3), 285-297.
Campbell, J. C. (1995). Predicition of homicide of and by battered women. In J. C.
Campbell (Ed.), Assessing dangerousness: Violence by sexual offenders,
batterers, and child abusers (pp. 96-113). Thousand Oak, CA: Sage
Campbell, J. C., Webster, D. W., Kozio-McLain, J., Block, C. R., Campbell, D. W., & Curry,
M. A. (2003). Risk factors for femicide in abusive relationships: results from a
multisite case control study. American Journal of Public Health, 93(7),
1089-1097.
Carden, A. (1994). Wife Abuse and Wife Abuser: review and Recommendations. The
Counseling Psychologist, 22(4), 539-582.
David, J. R. (1996). Disordered Personalities. Ontario: Rapid Psychler Press.
Dobash, R. E., Dobash, R. P., Cavanagh, K., & Lewis, R. (2004). Not a ordinary
killer-Just an ordinary guy. When men murder an intimate woman partner.
violence against women, 10(6), 577-605.
Dutton, D., & Kerry, G. (1999). Modus Operandi and Personality Disorder in
Incarcerated Spousal Killers. International Journal of Law & Psychiatry, 22(3-4),
287-299.
Harper, D. W., & Voigt, L. (2007). Homicide Followed Suicide: An Integrated
Theoretical Perspective. Homicide Studies, 11(4), 295-318.
Holtzworth-Munroe, A., & Stuart, G. L. (1994). Typologies of male batters: Three
subtypes and the differences among them Psychological Bulletin, 116,
476-497.
155
Jacqwlyn, C., Cambell, Glass, Sharps, Laughon, & Bloom. (2007). Intimate Partner
Homicide: Review and Implications of Research and Policy. Trauma Violence
Abuse, 8, 246-269.
McFarlane, J., Campbell, J. C., Wilt, S., Sachs, C. J., Ulrich, Y., & Xu, X. (1999). Stalking
and Intimate Partner Femicide. Homicide Studies, 3(4), 300-316.
Michael, L., Robert, W., McBride, & Constance, M. (2000). Change Is The Third Path-a
workbook for ending abusive and violent behavior (家庭暴力輔導手冊) (林明
傑等, Trans.). 台北: 張老師文化.
Nutt, D., & Nestor, L. (2013). Addiction. In What is addictions. United Kingdon:
Oxford.
Oldham, J. M., Skodol, A. E., & Bender, D. S. (2005). Manifestations, clinical diagnosis,
and comorbidity. In A. E. Skodol (Ed.), The American Psychiatric Publishing
Textbook of Personality Disorders. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric
Publishing.
Rosenbaum, M. (1990). The Role of Depression in Couples Involved in Murder-suicide
and Homicide. American Journal of Psychiatry, 147(8), 1036-1039.
Sharps, P., Campbell, J. C., Campbell, D., Gary, F., & Webster, D. (2001). The Role of
Alcohol in Intimate Partner Femicide. American Journal of Addiction, 10(2),
122-135.
Websdale, N. (1999). Understanding Domestic Homicide. Boston: Northestern.
Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1993). Spousal Homicide Risk and Estrangement. Violence
and Victims, 8(1), 3-16.
Wilson, M., Daly, M., & Wright, C. (1993). Uxoricide in Canada: Demographic Risk
Pattern. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 35, 263-291.
Wilson, M., Jordan, C. E., & Daly, M. (1995). Lethal and Nonlethal Violence against
Wives. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 37, 331-361.


中文部份
王佩玲. (2010a). 建構台灣婚姻暴力致命危險指標工具計畫. In 內政部委託研究
報告 (Ed.). 台北市: 內政部。
王佩玲. (2010b). 親密伴侶暴力案件保護令成效與相關因素之研究:以禁制,遷出
及遠離令為例. 社會政策與社會工作學刊, 14(2), 1-47。
王瑞霖. (2010). 男性親密暴力加害人婚姻互動與暴力經驗之研究. 嘉義縣: 國立
中正大學。
史倩玲. (2008). 情殺案頻傳戀愛教育待加強. 台灣立報。
吳芝儀. (2001). 不同類型犯罪者犯罪思考型態之研究. 犯罪學期刊, 7, 171-212。new window
吳芝儀. (2003). 累犯暴力犯罪者犯罪生涯及自我觀之發展與演變. 犯罪學期刊,new window
156
6(2), 127-176。
周月清. (1996). 婚姻暴力---理論分析與社會處置. 台北: 巨流圖書公司。new window
林明傑. (2009). 家庭暴力案件危險評估與危險分級之進階實務. 亞洲家庭暴力與new window
性侵害期刊, 5(2), 305-316。
林明傑, & 沈勝昂. (2004). 婚姻暴力加害人分類之研究. 中華心理衛生學刊,new window
17(2), 87-113。
林松齡. (1999). 母親對子女學業成就的影響:文化資產,經濟資源,與監督角色的比new window
較. 國立臺灣大學社會學刊, 7:4, 544-561。
侯祟文. (1999). 殺人事件中犯罪者與被害者關係研究. In 刑事政策與犯罪研究論
文集(二) (pp. 23-60). 台北: 法務部犯罪問題研究中心。
郭人豪. (2006). 殺人犯生命歷程及其男性氣概特質之質性研究. 嘉義縣: 國立中
正大學。
陳秀峰. (2010). 臺灣家庭暴力防治之現狀與未來---從被害人保護及加害人處遇
角度觀察. 亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊, 6(1), 187-210。
陳映燁, 徐新雅, & 李明濱. (2011). 人格障礙症. In 李明濱 (Ed.), 實用精神醫學
(pp. 241-265). 台北市: 國立台大醫學院。
陳筱萍, 周煌智, 吳慈恩, & 黃志中. (2004). 裁定前鑑定家庭暴力相對人特徵與
施暴的社會心理歸因. 中華輔導學報, 16, 149-181。
馮燕. (1992). 婦女生活壓力知覺與應變模式---多元角色觀點. 社會學學期, 21,new window
161-198。
黃志中. (2001). 精神虐待之醫療介入處置. 律師雜誌, 267, 21-29。
黃毅志. (2008). 如何精確測量職業地位?[改良版台灣地區新職業聲望與社經地
位量表]之建構. 東大教育學報, 19(1), 151-160。
葉宇記, 劉絮愷, 林信男, & 林憲. (1998). 殺配偶之精神鑑定. 台灣精神醫學會,new window
12(2), 130-141。
蔡宗達. (2006). 情殺行為歷程之研究. 台北: 國立台北大學犯罪學研究所碩士論
文。
鄭瑞隆. (2001). 家庭暴力被害經驗與青少年偏差行為關係之研究. 犯罪學期刊, 8,new window
215-246。
鄭瑞隆. (2004). 親密暴力:成因,後果與防治. 嘉義市: 蜂鳥。
賴薏如. (2012). 非同居親密暴力殺人案件初探: 東吳大學社會工作學系碩士論
文。
謝文彥. (2003). 殺妻犯罪行為之研究. 中央警察大學犯罪防治學報, 4, 135-174。new window
魏仲亨. (2006). 家庭內男性殺人犯生活歷程與犯罪模式之研究. 嘉義縣: 國立中
正大學碩士論文。
蘇昭月, 陳筱萍, 周煌智, 吳慈恩, & 黃志中. (2005). 運用敍說探索家庭暴力施
暴者的成長歷程與婚姻經驗. 亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊, 1(1), 1-25。
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE