論英國離婚法改革的法制發展--法政策、法理、法社會之探討_

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	論英國離婚法改革的法制發展--法政策、法理、法社會之探討
書刊名：	國立臺灣大學法學論叢
作者：	王曉丹
作者(外文)：	Wang, Hsiao-tan
出版日期：	2006
卷期：	35:5
頁次：	頁163-208
主題關鍵詞：	英國離婚法；英國1996年家庭法令；法律改革；法律政策；英國1998年人權法令；家庭法法理；法律介入；法社會學研究；Family law act 1996 in UK；Divorce law reform；Law and social policy；Human rights act 1998 in UK；Utilitarianism rights discourse of family law；Socio-legal study
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:3 共同引用:25 點閱:36

英國從60年代到今天，婚姻家庭型態已經產生巨大的轉變，離婚法的規定經過1969年的離婚修正法令及1996年家庭法令第二部分的改革，在法之實踐層面上有著重大的轉變。一般知曉離婚法變遷的人，會將這樣的變遷稱為從「過失離婚」到「無過失離婚」。本文試圖透過對於英國立法過程、立法／社會政策與政策評估的討論，分析法律改革的法社會意涵，並論及此發展過程背後的法理基礎。離婚法改革所涉及的，不只是離婚的法定理由而已，從「過失離婚法」到「無過失離婚法」，常常涉及離婚程序的發展，以英國而言，即為調解或商談程序的急速擴張。本文提出一個法制發展會涉及的三個面向：法政策、法理以及法社會。英國離婚法改革所涉及的立法／社會政策的辯論，其實是擺盪於兩個問題之間：法律是否應該成為倡導某種社會價值的機制，以及法律足不足以改變人們的社會行為。其次，在法理的層次，離婚法的改革深受學界的批評，反省的聲浪開始著眼於英國離婚法過於重視「效益」的實務操作，又因為受到歐洲人權法的影響，在實務上開始發展權利觀點的家庭法。法學界因而回過頭來思考家庭中權利體系的可能形貌，並進一步釐清國家介入個人離婚事項的基本法理，尋求規範的適當介入方式。最後，英國離婚法改革的過程同時也是相關法社會研究不斷發展的過程，這些法社會研究常常以其研究的成果，反過頭來提出法律改革的主張，發揮決定性的影響。

以文找文

This paper sets up to explore the divorce law reform of UK, focusing on the shift in its underlying assumptions, objectives and techniques. The main argument centres around the second part of the family Law Act 1996 which was withdrawn in 2001 after experimental pilots have shown its ineffectiveness. The discussions in this paper focus on the processes participated by the professionals and reflections made by different parts of society. There are three main issues identified in this paper. First, the divorce law reform in 1996 in Britain was formed mixed with four different approaches about family law and society and thus results to the contradictions in its possible practices. Second, the development of British family law from 1969 to 1996 was around the socio-legal debates between 'utilitarianism' and 'rights' discourse, especially in the area of legal practices. On the other hand, a new debate around individual autonomy/community values has raised the question of law's intrusion in family issues, including its possibility and limitation. Third, socio-legal study in the area of family law has developed empirical as well as theoretical approaches which may provide meaningful indications for the development of family law in Britain.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Armstrong, A.(1993)。Uncovering Reality: Excavating Women's Rights in African Family Law。International Journal of Law and the Family，7(3)，314-369。
2.	Bainham, A.(1990)。The Privatisation of the Public Interest in Children。The Modern Law Review，53(2)，206-221。
3.	Bainham, A.(1998)。Changing Families and Changing Concepts - Reforming the Language of Family Law。Child and Family Law Quarterly，10(1)，1-15。
4.	Berger, P.、Kellner, H.(1964)。Marriage and the Construction of Reality。Diogenes，46，1-23。
5.	Cleave, G.(2000)。The Human Rights Act 1998 - How will it Affect Child Law in England and Wales?。Child Abuse Review，9(6)，394-402。
6.	Davis, G.(1995)。Divorce Reform - Peering Anxiously in the Future。Family Law，25，564-566。
7.	Deech, R.(1990)。Divoce Law and Empirical Studies。Law Quarterly Review，106，229-241。
8.	Dewar, J.(1998)。The Normal Chaos of Family Law。The Modern Law Review，61(4)，467-485。
9.	(2005)。Newsline Extra。Family Law Journal，35，170-170。
10.	Ghandhi, P. R.、MacNamee, E.(1991)。The Fanmily In UK Law and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1966。International Journal of Law and Faimly，5。
11.	Hoggett, B.(1994)。Joint Parenting Systems; The English Experiment。Journal of Child Law，6(1)，8-12。
12.	Haskey, J.(1984)。Social Class and Socio-economic Differentials in Divorce in England and Wales。Population Studies，38(3)，419-438。
13.	Haskey, J.(1986)。Recent Trends in Divorce in England and Wales: The Effects of Legislative Changes。Population Trends，44，9-16。
14.	Haskey, J.(1992)。Pre-marital Cohabitation and the Probability of Subsequent Divorce: Analyses Using New Data from the General Household Survey。Population Trends，68，10-19。
15.	Hasson, E.(2003)。Setting a Standard or Reflecting Reality? - The Role of Divorce Law, and the Case of the Family Law Act 1996。International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family，17，338-365。
16.	Henson, D. M.(1993)。A Comparative Analysis of Same-sex Partnership Protections: Recommendations for American Reform。International Journal of Law and the Family，7，282-282。
17.	Lewis, J.(1996)。Marriage Saving Revisted。Family Law，26，423-425。
18.	Maclean, E.、Eekelaar, J.(1992)。Old and at Home。Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law，1，37-51。
19.	Olsen, F. E.(1985)。The Myth of State Intervention in the Family。Michigan University Journal of Law Reform，18(4)，835-864。
20.	Parker, S.(1992)。Rights and Utility in Anglo-Australian Family Law。The Modern Law Review，55，3311-3347。
21.	Poulter, S.(1987)。Ethnic Minority Customs, English Law and Human Rights。International & Comparative Law Quarterly，36，589-630。
22.	Roger, J.(1995)。Family Policy or Moral Regulation?。Critical Social Policy，15(1)，5-25。
23.	Smart, C.(1982)。Regulating Families or Legitimating Patriarchy? Family Law in Britain。International Journal of the Sociology of Law，10，129-129。
24.	Thery, I.(1986)。The Interests of the Child' and the Regulation of the Post-divorce Family。International Journal of the Sociology of Law，14，329-349。
25.	Whybrow, J.(2004)。The Judge, the Lawyer and the CAFCASS。Family Law Journal，4(1)，251-258。

圖書
1.	Parkinson, Lisa(1997)。Family Mediation。London：Sweet & Maxwell。
2.	Gledon, M. A.(1989)。The Transformation of Family Law: State, Law, and Family in the United States and Western Europe。Chicago, IL：The University of Chicago Press。
3.	施慧玲(2001)。家庭、法律、福利國家--現代親屬身分法論文集。元照。延伸查詢
4.	Giddens, Anthony(1992)。The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love, and Eroticism in Modern Societies。Stanford University Press。
5.	Collier, Richard、Collier, R.(1995)。Masculinity, Law and The Family。Masculinity, Law and The Family。London, UK。
6.	Bridge, A. J.、Bridge, S.、Luke, S.(1990)。Blackstone's Guide to the Children Act 1989。Blackstone's Guide to the Children Act 1989。0。
7.	Cretney, S.(1991)。Enduring Powers of Attorney: A Roport to theLord Chancellor。Enduring Powers of Attorney: A Roport to theLord Chancellor。0。
8.	Cretney, S.(1996)。Divorce Reform in England: Humbug and Hypocrisy or a Smooth Transition。Divorce: Where Next?。0。
9.	Cretney, S.、Masson, J.(1997)。Principles of Family Law。Principles of Family Law。0。
10.	Cretney, S. M.(2000)。Family Law。Family Law。London, UK。
11.	Cretney, S. M.(2000)。Family Law at the Millennium - Introduction and Overview。Family Law, Essays for the New Millennium。Bristol, UK。
12.	Davis, G.、Murch, M.(1988)。Grounds for Divorce。Grounds for Divorce。Oxford。
13.	Day Sclater, S.、Piper, C.(1999)。The Family Law Act in Context。Undercurrents of Divorce。Aldershot, UK。
14.	Diduck, A.(1999)。Dividing the Family Assets。Undercurrents of Divorce。0。
15.	Diduck, A.、Kaganas, F.(1999)。Family Law, Gender and the State。Family Law, Gender and the State。0。
16.	Douglas, G.(1998)。England and Wales: "Family Values" to the Fore?。International Survey of Family Law。0。
17.	Eekelaar, J.(1978)。Family Law and Social Policy。Family Law and Social Policy。Weidenfeld & Nicolson。
18.	Eekelaar, J.(1987)。Family Law and Social Control。Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence。0。
19.	(1989)。An Ageing World: Dilemmas and Challenges for Law and Social Policy。An Ageing World: Dilemmas and Challenges for Law and Social Policy。0。
20.	Eekelaar, J.、Sarcevic, P.(1993)。Parenthood in Modern Society: Legal and Social Issues for the Twenty-First Century。Parenthood in Modern Society: Legal and Social Issues for the Twenty-First Century。0。
21.	Eekelaar, J.(1994)。Families and Children: From Welfarism to Rights。Individual Rights and the Law in Britain。Oxford。
22.	Eekelaar, J.、Maclean, M.(1994)。A Reader on Family Law。A Reader on Family Law。Oxford。
23.	Eekelaar, J.、Madean, M.、Beinart, S.(2000)。Family Lawyers: The Divorce Work of Soliciton。Family Lawyers: The Divorce Work of Soliciton。Oxford, UK。
24.	Family Polity Studies Centre(2000)。Family Change: A Guide to the Issue。Family Change: A Guide to the Issue。0。
25.	Freeman, M.(1996)。The Family Law Act 1996。The Family Law Act 1996。0。
26.	Freeman, M.(1997)。England: Family Justice and Family Values in 1995。International Survey of Family Law。0。
27.	Levy, Allan、Alison, Green(2002)。Family Law and Human Rights。Family Law and Human Rights。0。
28.	Griffiths, A. M. O.(2002)。Legal Pluralism。An Introduction to Law and Social Theory。0。
29.	Kiernan, K. R.、Estaugh, V.(1993)。Cohabitation, Extra-marital Childbearing and Social Policy。Cohabitation, Extra-marital Childbearing and Social Policy。0。
30.	King, M.、Trowell, J.(1994)。Responding to Children's Needs: An Issue of Law。A Reader on Family Law。Oxford。
31.	King, M.、Piper, C.(1995)。How the Law Thinks about Children。How the Law Thinks about Children。Aldershot, UK。
32.	Krause, H. D.(1994)。Child Support Reassessed: Limits of Private Responsibility and the Public Interest。A Reader on Family Law。Oxford。
33.	Law Commission(1990)。Family Law: The Ground for Divorce。Family Law: The Ground for Divorce。0。
34.	(1989)。Birthrights: Law and Ethics at the Beginnings of Life。Birthrights: Law and Ethics at the Beginnings of Life。0。
35.	Lord Chancellor's Department(1993)。Looking to the Future, Mediation and the Ground for Divorce。Looking to the Future, Mediation and the Ground for Divorce。London, UK。
36.	Lord Chancellor's Department(1995)。Looking to the Future: Mediation and the Ground for Divorce。Looking to the Future: Mediation and the Ground for Divorce。London, UK。
37.	Lord Chancellor's Department(2005)。Separation: Children's Needs and Parent's Responsibilities - Next Steps。Separation: Children's Needs and Parent's Responsibilities - Next Steps。London, UK。
38.	O'Donovan, K.(1993)。Family Law Matters。Family Law Matters。0。
39.	Parkinson, L.(1987)。Separation, Divorce and Families。Separation, Divorce and Families。California。
40.	Piper, C.(1999)。The Wishes and Feelings of the Child。Undercurrents of Divvorce。Dartmouth。
41.	Robison, M.(1999)。Family Mediation Involving Children。Research Highlights in Social Work 35 - Effective Ways of Working with Children and their Families。0。
42.	Royal Commission on Marriage and Divorce(1956)。Report 195-44。Report 195-44。0。
43.	Schaffer, R.(1990)。Making Decisions about Children: Psychological Questions and Answers。Making Decisions about Children: Psychological Questions and Answers。0。
44.	Smart, C.(1984)。Marriage, Divorce and Women's Economic Dependency: A Discussion of the Politics of Private Maintenance。State, Law and the Family。0。
45.	Smart, C.(1994)。Regulation Families or Legitimating Patriarchy? - Family Law in Britain。Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence。0。
46.	Smart, C.、Neale, B.(1999)。Family Fragments。Family Fragments。0。
47.	Walker, J.(2000)。Information Meetings & Associated Provisions within the Family Law Act 1996。Information Meetings & Associated Provisions within the Family Law Act 1996。0。
48.	Weitzman, L.(1981)。The Marriage Contract。The Marriage Contract。New York。

其他
1.	Hunt, J.(2003)。Memorandum of Joan Hunt，0。
2.	Office for National Statistics(1999)。Population Trends，0。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	家庭法律社會學的臺灣拼圖--分享一個行腳讀書人的攝像本
2.	親權酌定事件中未成年人最佳利益維護之實務困境--從社工員的觀點
3.	家事服務中心運作現況與挑戰
4.	NPO推展程序監理人制度之行動研究--以現代婦女基金會雙專業團隊模式為例
5.	少年虞犯法理之省思與建構
6.	親屬法變革與法院功能之轉型
7.	遺產繼承之圖像與原理解析
8.	社工人員參與協助地方法院審判工作的角色與功能
9.	愛上「陌生人」？--法律體系管制親密關係之分析
10.	少年司法與社會福利--如何滿足受觀護少年福利需求
11.	論國家限制親權的憲法正當性--從虐童談起
12.	身分法之法律文化分析初探--以婚約篇為例
13.	司法審查之表述功能與社會變革：以性別平等原則在家庭中的落實為例
14.	同性婚者在我國身分法中應有之地位
15.	社會服務民營化「方案委託」之初探--以嘉義家扶中心執行監護權訪視為例

1.	兒童權利公約在台灣的國內法化－－以離婚後子女親權行使與兒少安置案件中兒童及少年被傾聽的權利為例
2.	《優婆塞戒經》研究
3.	子女權利與親權制度

1.	同性戀者權利平等保障之憲法基礎
2.	家庭、法律、福利國家 : 現代親屬法論文集
3.	子女最佳利益與離婚後親權行使
4.	子女最佳利益與離婚後親權行使

無相關著作

無相關點閱

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫