:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:公民社會與社區參與--從心態期待到空間讓渡
書刊名:公共行政學報. 政大
作者:李宗勳
作者(外文):Li, Tzung-shiun
出版日期:2009
卷期:30
頁次:頁131-148
主題關鍵詞:公民社會社區參與公共空間公共判斷協力領導Civil societyCommunity participationPublic spacePublic judgmentCollaborative leadership
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(16) 博士論文(5) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:11
  • 共同引用共同引用:80
  • 點閱點閱:74
在探討從過去的公民、現在的公民及未來的公民時須兼顧現象、本質與條件,特別是如何形塑「公民環境論」,從上位的政府心態調整開始,並逐漸從「心態上期待公民」提升暨增量為「環境上讓出空間給公民」,政府扮演帶領角色,惟重要的是民眾的推動,也就是說要同時兼顧動能及量能;其次,便是如何來「形塑公民」。本文將針對當前相當盛行之公民社會中社區參與的理論與實務進行引介與省思,並以社區安全治理剖析社區參與如何能由「公共選擇」的基礎參與層次逐漸提升為「公共判斷」的更高層次參與,並同步檢視公部門如何由心態上不排斥公民參與到積極期待,進而在治理環境上讓出空間給公民實質投入。也將強調協力領導是一種人與人之間相互的關係,也是一種彼此生命的分享,既能實踐自己的工作理念,又能造福他人,唯有建構「比市場機制及層級節制更深層的社會價值」,公民參與才能長久並經得起對話與檢驗。本文比較多從社會與社區的參與需求角度撰寫,而訴求的主要對象為公共管理者,期待透過政府部門主動積極的規劃公共參與機制與協力治理事務,蓄積充足公共生命力的「量能」進而引領提升民間參與的動能。
he purpose of this paper is to show following 21 centry’s coming, we are gradually not depend on government to solve our problem… , but we haven’t developing suitable structure and procedure to bring community governance into practice. In fact, when we discuss civil in the past, civil in now and civil in the future, we need to concern phenomenon, essence and conditions, especially is how to construct “Civil Engagement Environment”. The important is to start from government’s mind expectation and gradually enhance to “empowering civil to engagement and running”. The paper will emphasis collaborative leadership is to wake up public life and public mind, only by way of digging deeper than markets and hierarchies’ public value, civil society can be sustainable development. The paper is writing for public manager and expect through public sector active constructing public participation and collaborative governance mechanic, to store up sufficient public vitality’s capacity and lead civil participation’s kinetic energy.
期刊論文
1.Feldman, M. S.、Khademian, A. M.、Ingram, H.、Schneider, A. S.(2006)。Ways of knowing and inclusive management practices。Public Administration Review,66(S1),89-99。  new window
2.李宗勳(20080400)。社區治安網絡政策風險管理與「安全治理」個案分析。研考雙月刊,32(2)=264,16-29。  延伸查詢new window
3.Green, A. O.、Hunton-Clarke, L.(2003)。A Typology of Stakeholder Participation for Company Environmental Decision-Making。Business Strategy and the Environment,12(5),126-299。  new window
4.Arnstein, Sherry R.(1969)。A ladder of citizen participation。Journal of the American Institute of Planners,35(4),216-224。  new window
5.李宗勳(2008)。社區營造與安全治理—從單向管理到共同治理。警察行政管理學報,第四期,1-26。  延伸查詢new window
6.趙永茂(2008)。地方與區域治理發展地區域與挑戰。研考雙月刊,第32卷第5期,3-15。  延伸查詢new window
7.Waugh Jr.,、William L.(2002)。Valuing Public Participation in Policy Making。Public Administration Review,62(3),379-383。  new window
會議論文
1.Fischer,F.(2008)。Citizen and Experts in Environment Policy:Situating Technological Knowledge in Practical Deliberation。  new window
2.Kells,P.(2008)。Safe Community Citizens:Made not Born。  new window
圖書
1.Stone, D.(1988)。Policy Paradox:The Art of Political Decision Making。New York:W. W. Norton & Company Inc.。  new window
2.李宗勳(2005)。警察與社區風險治理。桃園:中央警察大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.李宗勳(2008)。網絡社會與安全治理。台北市:元照。  延伸查詢new window
4.Jensen, Rolf(1999)。The Dream Society: How the coming shift from information to imagination will transform your business。McGraw-Hill。  new window
5.李宗勳(20070000)。政府業務委外經營:理論、策略與經驗。臺北:智勝文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.吳英明、但昭強、施惠文(2007)。價值領導與管理。台北。  延伸查詢new window
7.吳信如(譯);Anselm Grun(2008)。領導就是喚醒生命—靈性化的生命力領導。台北。  延伸查詢new window
8.Rhodes,R.A.W.,、M.Bevir(2006)。Governance Stories。London。  new window
圖書論文
1.Ostrom, E.(2005)。Doing institutional analysis digging deeper than markets and hierarchies。Handbook of New Institutional Economics。Springer。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE