臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：注重並增進學童心理歷程能力的生活課程多元評量
書刊名：教育研究與發展期刊
作者：吳璧純 引用關係
作者(外文)：Wu, Pichun
出版日期：2009
卷期：5:4
頁次：頁129-157
主題關鍵詞：為了學習而評量；學習的評量；歷程評量；多元評量；生活課程；Assessment for Learning Scientific Literacy；Assessment of Learning；Process-based Assessment；Life Curriculum；Alternative Assessment
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:8
  • 點閱點閱:49
近年來許多學者在課堂評量的研究工作上，提出「為了學習而評量」以及「學習的評量」兩個概念以區分課堂評量的目的。「為了學習而評量」的觀念關心評量如何協助學生學習；相對地，「學習的評量」重視考核學生的學習結果或是判斷其能力等級。生活課程的評量包括前述兩類的評量，但是大部分時候是以「為了學習而評量」為主。但這兩種評量觀念的實施都需要用到多元的評量工具，這正是國民中小學九年一貫課程所呼籲重視的。 國民中小學九年一貫課程中的生活課程，強調多元評量的實施，然而在教學現場卻有許多教師，無法掌握多元評量的精神，無法適切地實施多元評量，甚至抗拒多元評量。本文嘗試以97生活課程綱要為藍本，指出生活課程以培養學童心理歷程能力為主；並且以教學與評量的系統關係，論述生活課程多元評量應有的面貌，舉例分析與比較評量題的優劣，且進一步討論生活課程評量的設計原則，提供教師實施生活課程多元評量的參考，以達成生活課程的目標。
Many researchers proposed the concepts of "assessment for learning" instead of that of "assessment of learning" while conducting classroom assessments. "Assessment for learning" concerns the role of assessment with the improvement of students’ learning; On the contrary, "assessment of learning" emphasizes on the judgment of students’ ability or learning results. Classroom assessments of Life Curriculum include these two kinds of assessments, but most of time, the purpose of assessments is "assessment for learning." However, both assessments can be carried out in a variety of ways based on students’ explorations and actual performance in order to avoid relying only on pencil-and-paper tests. To use various ways of assessment in classroom of Life Curriculum is accord with the rationale of the "Grades 1-9 Curriculum Guidelines for Elementary and Junior High School Education." "Grades 1-9 Curriculum Guidelines for Elementary and Junior High School Education" claims that alternative assessments instead of the paper-and-pencil tests should be implemented in the classrooms of the junior high school and of the elementary school. Nevertheless, this task is quite tough for most school teachers. For Life Curriculum teachers, they cannot adopt adequately those alternative assessments because of the following reasons: 1) not fully understanding the themes of Life Curriculum, 2) not knowing the techniques regarding alternative assessments, and 3) the extra teaching-loading owing to the implementation of the alternative assessments. It results in many teachers resist implementing the alternative assessments. The purposes of present article are analyzing the relationships between instruction and assessment from a systematic perspective based on "2008 Grades 1-9 Curriculum Guidelines for Elementary and Junior High School Education (Life Curriculum)." The aim is to facilitate teachers’ ability to implement alternative assessments and to achieve the goals of Life Curriculum.
期刊論文
1.吳璧純(20081100)。找回統整的生活課程：九年一貫生活課程研修及97生活課綱的特色。教育研究月刊，175，22-34。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.單文經(2006)。國民中小學應兼重能力培養與知識或訊息習得的教學。教育研究與發展期刊，2，43-66。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Bickhard, M.H.(1980)。A model of developmental and psychological processes。Genetic Psychological Monograph，102，61-116。  new window
4.Black, P. Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B.、Wiliam, D.(2004)。Working inside theblack box: Assessment for learning in the classroom。Phi Delta Kappan，86，9-21。  new window
5.Brookhart, S. M.(1999)。The art and science of classroom assessment: The missing part of Pedagogy。ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report，Vol. 27, No.1。  new window
6.Goodrich, H.(1997)。Understanding rubrics。Educational Leadership，54 (4)，6-12。  new window
7.Leahy, S., Lyon, C., Thompson, M.,、Wiliam, D.(2005)。Assessment minute, day by day。Educational Leadership，63 (3)，19-24。  new window
8.McTighe J.、O’Connor K.(2005)。Seven practices for effective learning。Educational Leadership，63 (3)，10-17。  new window
9.Moskal, B. M.(2000)。Scoring rubrics: What, when and how?Practical Assessment。Research & Evaluation，7(3)，1-8。  new window
10.Wiggins, G.(1997)。Practicing what we preach in: Designing authentic assessments。Educational leadership，54，6-12。  new window
會議論文
1.Perlman, C. C.(2003)。Performance assessment: Designing appropriate performance tasks and scoring rubrics。Measuring up: Assessment issues for teachers, counselors, and administrators，497-506。  new window
研究報告
1.吳璧純、王玉程、鄧婷尹與董蕙萍(2009)。以海洋探索為主題的生活課程行動研究。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳文典與黃茂在(2006)。國民小學一、二年級課程推行現況之調查及調適策略之研究。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.黃玉芬(2003)。國小低年級教師對生活課程實施教學評量之現況調查研究，屏東。  延伸查詢new window
2.魏玉姵(2005)。國小生活課程實施實作評量之行動研究：以二年級為例，屏東。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Shepard, L., Kagan, S.,、Wurtz, E. (Eds).(1998)。Principles and recommendations for early childhood assessments。Washington, DC：National Education Goals Panel。  new window
2.Stiggins, R. J.(2005)。Student-involved Assessment for Learning。New York, NY：Merrill/ Prentice Hall。  new window
3.Bredekamp, S.,、Copple, C. (Eds).(1997)。Developmentally appropriate practice in earlychildhood programs。Washington, DC：National Association for theEducation of Young Children。  new window
4.教育部(20030115)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要總綱。台北市：教育部。  延伸查詢new window
5.教育部(2003)。92年國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。臺北：教育部。  延伸查詢new window
6.Wiggins, Grant P.(1998)。Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve student performance。San Francisco, CA：Jossey-Bass Publishers。  new window
7.Marzano, R. J.(1992)。A different kind of classroom: Teaching with dimensions of learning。Alexandria, VA：Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development。  new window
8.Goldman, Alvin I.(1986)。Epistemology and cognition。Harvard University Press。  new window
9.Bredekamp, S.(1987)。Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8。National Association for the Education of Young Children。  new window
10.Arter, J. A.(2003)。Assessment for learning: Classroom assessment to improve student achievement and well-being。Measuring up:Assessment issues for teachers, counselors, and administrators, chapter 33。  new window
11.Bredekamp, S.,、Rosegrant, T. (Eds).(1993)。Reaching potentials: Appropriate curriculum and assessment for young children, volume 1。Washington, DC。  new window
12.Guddemi, M. P.(2003)。Assessment for children ages 3 to 8 years: Age-appropriate systems。Measuring up: Assessment issues forteachers, counselors, and administrators, chapter 19。  new window
13.McMillan, J. H.(2007)。Formative classroom assessment: The key to improving student achievement。Formative classroom assessment: Theory intopractice。NY。  new window
14.Torrance, H.,、Pryor, J.(1998)。Investigating for mative assessment: Teaching, learningand assessment in the classroom。Buckingham, Philadelphia。  new window
15.Toulman, S.(1976)。Knowing and acting: An invitation to philosophy。NY。  new window
圖書論文
1.教育部(2008)。生活課程綱要。97年國民教育九年一貫課程綱要。臺北市：教育部。  延伸查詢new window
2.Bartlett, E. J.(1982)。Learning to revise: Some component processes。What writers know。New York：Academic Press。  new window
3.張麗麗(2002)。藝術與人文學習領域的教學評量。藝術與人文教育。台北：桂冠圖書。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：811（臺灣：798，外國：13） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1885225 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67699630
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上