:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣民眾對不同來源電磁場感知的利益、風險與管制信任
書刊名:臺灣公共衛生雜誌
作者:林宜平 引用關係林彥君詹長權鄭尊仁
作者(外文):Lin, Yi-pingLin, Yen-chunChan, Chang-chuanCheng, Tsun-jen
出版日期:2010
卷期:29:2
頁次:頁87-96
主題關鍵詞:電磁場利益健康風險管制信任感知Electromagnetic fieldBenefitHealth riskRegulatory trustPerception
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:36
  • 點閱點閱:77
目標:探討台灣民眾對基地台、高壓電線、變電箱、手機、微波爐與無線網路所感知的利益、健康風險與對管制的信任程度。方法:本研究於2008年10月,委託中央研究院調查訪問中心,以電話抽樣完成2,035例18歲以上民眾的橫斷性調查訪問。結果:台灣民眾對不同來源電磁場的利益、風險與管制信任互有相關,但是手機使用頻率只與對手機和基地台的利益感知有關。一般線性模式的分析發現,影響民眾對高壓電線與基地台高風險感知的變項,除了女性與高教育程度之外,還包括低利益、低信任,以及同意電磁場會導致癌症。結論:本研究建議政府相關單位加強民眾對電磁場的管制信任,並增加補助電磁場健康風險研究,以降低民眾疑慮。
Objectives: To explore the perceived benefits, risks and regulatory trust with regard to electromagnetic fields (EMF) from various sources (including mobile phone base stations, power lines, transformers, mobile phones, microwave ovens, and wireless internet) in Taiwanese people. Methods: A cross-sectional telephone survey was conducted by the Center for Survey Research, Academia Sinica in October, 2008, with a randomized sample of 2,035 adults aged 18 and older. Results: The benefits, risks and regulatory trust perceptions of various sources of EMF were all correlated. The frequency of mobile phone usage, however, was correlated only with the perceived benefit of mobile phones and base stations. General linear model analysis indicated that female, higher education, low benefit, low trust, and agreement that EMF is carcinogenic were the major factors determining the perception of risk from power lines and base stations. Conclusions: We suggest the regulatory agencies in Taiwan increase the general population’s trust for EMF regulation. Further, the government should sponsor further EMF health risk studies in order to reduce public concerns.
期刊論文
1.張苙雲、譚康榮(20051200)。制度信任的趨勢與結構 : 「多重等級評量」的分析策略。臺灣社會學刊,35,75-126。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Gardner, G. T.、Tiemann, A. R.、Gould, L. C.、Deluca, D. R.、Doob, L. W.、Stolwijk, J. A. J.(1982)。Risk and benefit perceptions, acceptability judgments, and self-reported actions toward nuclear-power。Journal of Social Psychology,116(2),179-197。  new window
3.Chou, Kuei-tien(2008)。Glocalized Dioxin - Regulatory Science and Public Trust in a Double Risk Society。Soziale Welt,59,177-193。  new window
4.Siegrist, M.(2000)。The Influence of Trust and Perceptions of Risks and Benefits on the Acceptance of Gene Technology。Risk Analysis,20(2),195-203。  new window
5.Slovic, Paul(1999)。Trust, Emotion, Sex, Politics and Science: Surveying the Risk-assessment Battlefield。Risk Analysis,19(4),689-701。  new window
6.吳齊殷(19960400)。戶中抽樣與否對樣本代表性的影響:以大臺北地區電話訪問為例。調查研究,1,39-65。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Alhakami, Ali Siddiq、Slovic, Paul(1994)。A Psychological Study of the Inverse Relationship between Perceived Risk and Perceived Benefit。Risk Analysis,14(6),1085-1096。  new window
8.WertheimerN, Leeper E.(1979)。Electrical wiring configurations and childhood-cancer。Am J Epidemiol,109,273-84。  new window
9.Siegrist M, Earle TC,, Gutscher H, Keller C.(2005)。Perception of mobile phone and base station risks。Risk Anal,25,1253-64。  new window
10.林宜平、張武修(2006)。行動電話電磁場的風險管理與溝通:預警架構的政策運用。研考雙月刊,30,68-80。  延伸查詢new window
11.Neutra RR, Delpizzo V.(2002)。Transparent democratic foresight strategies in the California EMF program。Public Health Rep,117,553-63。  new window
12.McCarty C, House M, Harman J, Richards S.(2006)。Effort in phone survey response rates: the effects of vendor and client-controlled factors。Field Meth,18,172-88。  new window
13.Hartge P.(2006)。Participation in populaton studies。Epidemiology,17,252-4。  new window
研究報告
1.The International Agencyfor Researchon Cancer(2008)。Electricmagnetic Radiation。Geneva。  new window
2.WHO(2002)。Establishing a Dialogue on Risks from Electromagnetic Fields。Geneva:WHO。  new window
3.European Commission(2003)。Eurobarometer。Brussels, Belgium。  new window
4.European Commission(2007)。Special Eurobarometer. Electromagnetic Fields。Brussels, Belgium。  new window
5.林宜平(2007)。「非屬原子能游離輻射對環境衝擊之研究」期末成果報告。台北。  延伸查詢new window
6.The American Association for Public Opinion Research(2006)。Standard Definitions: Final Disposition of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys. 4th ed.。Lenexa, Kansas。  new window
圖書
1.Slovic, Paul E.(2000)。The perception of risk。Earthscan Publications。  new window
2.洪永泰(2001)。戶中選樣之研究。台北:五南圖書出版公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.李隆安、章英華、楊孟麗等(2007)。調查問卷設計。調查研究方法。台北。  延伸查詢new window
4.Beck U.(2006)。Risk society revisited。The Sociology of Risk and Gambling Read。New York, NY。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE