臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：臺灣成年民眾對奈米產品與科技的公眾感知
書刊名：臺灣公共衛生雜誌
作者：林宜平 引用關係／吳亭亭／黎雅如／周桂田 引用關係／鄭尊仁
作者(外文)：Lin, Yi-ping／Wu, Ting-ting／Li, Ya-ru／Chou, Kuei-tien／Cheng, Tsun-jen
出版日期：2010
卷期：29:5
頁次：頁431-439
主題關鍵詞：奈米科技；公眾感知；風險；利益；信任；Nanotechnology；Public perception；Risk；Benefit；Trust
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:7
  • 共同引用共同引用:38
  • 點閱點閱:269
期刊論文
1.張苙雲、譚康榮(20051200)。制度信任的趨勢與結構 : 「多重等級評量」的分析策略。臺灣社會學刊，35，75-126。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Gardner, G. T.、Tiemann, A. R.、Gould, L. C.、Deluca, D. R.、Doob, L. W.、Stolwijk, J. A. J.(1982)。Risk and benefit perceptions, acceptability judgments, and self-reported actions toward nuclear-power。Journal of Social Psychology，116(2)，179-197。  new window
3.Kipen, H. M.、Laskin, D. L(2005)。Smaller Is Not Always Better: Nanotechnology Yields Nanotoxicology。American Journal of Physiology - Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology，289，696-697。  new window
4.Cobb, M. D.、Macoubrie, J.(2004)。Public Perceptions About Nanotechnology: Risks, Benefits and Trust。Journal of Nanoparticle Research，6(4)，395-405。  new window
5.Siegrist, M.、Cvetkovich, G.(2000)。Perception of hazards: The role of social trust and knowledge。Risk Analysis，20(5)，713-720。  new window
6.周桂田(20070400)。Public Trust and Risk Perceptions: A Preliminary Study of Taiwan's GMOs, 2003-2004。科技、醫療與社會，4，151-178。new window  new window
7.Wynne, B.(2006)。Public engagement as a means of restoring public trust in science-hitting the notes, but missing the music?。Community Genetics，9(3)，211-220。  new window
8.Siegrist, M.(2000)。The Influence of Trust and Perceptions of Risks and Benefits on the Acceptance of Gene Technology。Risk Analysis，20(2)，195-203。  new window
9.Macnaghten, Phil、Kearnes, Matthew B.、Wynne, Bria(2005)。Nanotechnology, governance, and public deliberation: what role for the social sciences?。Science Communication，27(2)，268-291。  new window
10.Lee, C. J.、Scheufele, D. A.、Lewenstein, B. V.(2005)。Public attitudes toward emerging technologies: Examining the interactive effects of cognitions and affect on public support for nanotechnology。Science Communication，27(2)，240-267。  new window
11.Alhakami, Ali Siddiq、Slovic, Paul(1994)。A Psychological Study of the Inverse Relationship between Perceived Risk and Perceived Benefit。Risk Analysis，14(6)，1085-1096。  new window
12.Currall, S. C.(2009)。Nanotechnology and society: New insights into public perceptions。Nature Nanotechnology，4，79-80。  new window
13.Gaskell, G.、Ten Eyck, T.、Jackson, J.、Veltri, G.(2005)。Imagining nanotechnology: Cultural support for technological innovation in Europe and the United States。Public Understanding of Science，14，81-90。  new window
14.Scheufele, D. A.、Corley, E. A.、Shih, T.-J.、Dalrymple, K. E.、Ho, S. S.(2009)。Religious beliefs and public attitudes toward nanotechnology in Europe and the United States。Nature Nanotechnology，4，91-94。  new window
15.林宜平、林彥君、詹長權、鄭尊仁(20100400)。臺灣民眾對不同來源電磁場感知的利益、風險與管制信任。臺灣公共衛生雜誌，29(2)，87-96。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Service RF.(2004)。Nanotoxicology. Nanotechnology grows up。Science，304，1732-34。  new window
17.Dreher KL.(2004)。Health and environmental impact of nanotechnology: toxicological assessment of manufactured nanoparticles。Toxicol Sci，77，3-5。  new window
18.鄭尊仁、林宜平、雷侑蓁(2006)。奈米科技的健康風險管理。台灣衛誌，25，169-76。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.Kahan DM, Braman D, Slovic P, Gastil J, Cohen G.(2009)。Cultural cognition of the risks and benefits of nanotechnology。Nature Nanotech，4，87-90。  new window
20.Pidgeon N, Harthorn BH, Bryant K, Rogers-Hayden T.(2009)。Deliberating the risks of nanotechnologies for energy and health applications in the United States and United Kingdom。Nature Nanotech，4，95-8。  new window
21.Editorial.(2009)。Getting to know the public。Nature Nanotech，4，71。  new window
22.Siegrist, M.(1999)。A causal model explaining the perception and acceptance of gene technology。Journal of Applied Social Psychology，29(10)，2093-2106。  new window
23.Siegrist M, Earle TC, Gutscher H, Keller C.(2005)。Perception of mobile phone and base station risks。Risk Anal，25，1253-64。  new window
24.Currall SC, King EB, Lane N, Madera J, Turner S.(2006)。What drives public acceptance of nanotechnology?。Nature Nanotech，1，153-5。  new window
25.Siegris.t M Keller C Kastenholz H Frey S Wiek A.(2007)。Laypeople’s and experts’ perception of nanotechnology hazards。Risk Anal，27，59-69。  new window
會議論文
1.European Commission(2005)。Nanotechnologies: A Preliminary Risk Analysis on the Basis of a Workshop Organized in Brussels on 1–2 March 2004 by the Health and Consumer Protection Directorate General of the European Commission。Brussels, Belgium。24-7。  new window
研究報告
1.Eurobarometer.(2009)。Europeans and biotechnology in 2005: patterns and trends。  new window
2.Kahan DM, Slovic P, Braman D, Gastil J, Cohen GL.(2008)。Affect, values, and nanotechnology risk perceptions: an experimental investigation, 2007。  new window
3.International Risk Governance Council(2008)。Nanotechnology risk governance。  new window
圖書
1.Slovic, Paul E.(2000)。The perception of risk。Earthscan Publications。  new window
2.THE ROYAL SOC’Y、THE ROYAL ACAD. OF ENG’G(2004)。NANOSCIENCE AND NANOTECHNOLOGIES: OPPORTUNITIES AND UNCERTAINTIES。London：The Royal Society & The Royal Academy of Engineering Report。  new window
3.洪永泰(2001)。戶中選樣之研究。台北：五南圖書出版公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Macoubrie J.(2005)。Informed Public Perceptions of Nanotechnology and Trust in Government. Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies。Washington, DC。  new window
5.American Association for Public Opinion Research(2006)。Standard Definitions: Final Disposition of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys. 4th ed.。Lenexa, Kansas。  new window
圖書論文
1.Wynne, Brian(1992)。Risk and Social Learning: Reification to Engagement。Social Theories of Risk。Praeger。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：908（臺灣：775，外國：133） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1166620 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67077667
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上