臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：補助、不補助？--博物館補助的辯論與審思
書刊名：博物館學季刊
作者：林玟伶 引用關係
作者(外文)：Lin, Wen-ling
出版日期：2010
卷期：24:3
頁次：頁47-59+61
主題關鍵詞：補助政策；文化政策；博物館；Policy of subsidy；Cultural policy；Museum
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:63
  • 點閱點閱:32
從全球博物館發展的角度觀之，隨著各國政府財政緊縮、權力下放等內外變革，致使當代博物館面臨政府補助減少或取消，而須自籌財源的窘境。據此，本研究將藉由討論博物館補助的議題，檢視正反面的爭論，反思博物館在社會的責任與價值，以此思索補助的機制應如何形成。最後指出博物館透過補助，有助於外部利益之產生，同時讓博物館免於財政壓力，能夠穩固研究、典藏、教育及推廣的基本功能，並展現出文化多樣性，同時健全補助機制以及博物館的積極回應，終將有助於創造政府、公民與博物館共同對話的場域。
The museum of the day is facing financial difficulties due to government grant cuts and decentralization. Most museums need to raise funds for their operation/survival. This paper discusses museum subsidy issue by examining the arguments on both positive and negative sides and rethinks the responsibility and value of museums to the society, so as to ponder how the subsidy mechanism was formed. Finally, the study indicates that a subsidy will help a museum display its public benefit and keep it from financial pressure, so that the museum can concentrate on its functions like research, collection, education and promotion as well as on displaying its cultural diversity. Sound subsidy mechanism and active responses from museums will lead to create dialogues among government, citizen and museum.
期刊論文
1.Bailey, S.(1997)。Charging for admission to museums and galleries: Arguments and evidence。Museum Management and Curatorship，16(4)，355-369。  new window
2.Bailey, S. J.、Falconer, P.(1998)。Charging for admission to museums and galleries: A framework for analyzing the impact on access。Journal of Cultural Economics，22，167-177。  new window
3.Frey, B.(1998)。Superstar museums: An economic analysis。Journal of Cultural Economics，22(203)，13-125。  new window
4.Haag, V. D.(1979)。Should the government subsidize the arts?。Policy Review，10，63-73。  new window
5.Lin, Y. N.(2009)。Importance-performance analysis of the Taipei Fine Arts Museum's service。Museum Management and Curatorship，24(2)，105-121。  new window
6.O'Hagan, W. J.(1995)。National museums: To charge or not to charge?。Journal of Cultural Economics，19，33-47。  new window
7.Santagata, W.(2002)。Cultural districts, prooerty rights and sustainable economic growth。International Journal of Urban and Regional Research，269(1)，9-23。  new window
8.林詠能、林玟伶(20090900)。最佳實踐或最低標準：我國博物館認定計畫建置。科技博物，13(3)，11-37。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Evans, Graeme(2005)。Measure for measure: Evaluating the evidence of culture's contribution to regeneration。Urban Studies，42(5/6)，959-983。  new window
10.Gibson, Lisanne(2008)。In defence of instrumentality。Cultural Trends，17(4)，247-257。  new window
11.Harrison, Julia D.(1994)。Ideas of Museums in the 1990s。Museum Management and Curatorship，13(2)，160-176。  new window
12.Levitt, Ruth(2008)。The political and intellectual landscape of instrumental museum policy。Cultural Trends，17(4)，223-231。  new window
13.Scott, Carol A.(2009)。Exploring the evidence base for museum value。Museum Management and Curatorship，24(3)，195-212。  new window
14.Montgomery, John(2003)。Cultural Quarters as Mechanisms for Urban Regeneration. Part 1: Conceptualising Cultural Quarters。Planning, Practice & Research，18(4)，293-306。  new window
會議論文
1.Bennett, Tony(2008)。Cultural capital, social inequality and cultural policy。The International Forum for Cultural Policy and Capitals of Culture，(會議日期: 2008/04/26-04/27)。Taipei：National Cultural Association。  new window
研究報告
1.劉新圓(2001)。私人博物館的興起與立法之必要性。財團法人國家政策研究基金會。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.並木誠士、中川理、蔡世蓉(2008)。美術館的可能性。臺北市：典藏藝術家庭股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.Pick, J.、江靜玲(1995)。藝術與公共政策。臺北：桂冠圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.Strinati, Dominic、袁千雯(2005)。通俗文化理論。臺北：韋伯文化國際出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.Pigou, A. C.、陸民仁(1971)。福利經濟學。臺北：臺灣銀行經濟研究室。  延伸查詢new window
5.Abbing, Hans、嚴玲娟(2008)。為什麼藝術家那麼窮？。臺北：典藏藝術家庭股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.Bourdieu, Pierre、Darbel, Alain、Schnapper, Dominique(1991)。The Love of Art: European Art Museums and Their Public。Polity Press。  new window
7.Heilbrun, James、Gray, Charles M.(2001)。The Economics of Art and Culture。Cambridge University Press。  new window
8.Holden, J.(2004)。Capturing Cultural Value: Howe Culture Has Become a Tool of Government Policy。London：DEMOS。  new window
9.House of Commons(19890627)。Certain museums and galleries: Policies on charging for admission, minutes of evidence. Education, Science and Arts Committee, House of Commons, Session 1989-90。London：HMSO。  new window
10.Lorente, P.(1996)。The Role of Museums and the Arts in the Regeneration of Liverpool。Leicester：University of Leicester。  new window
11.Miller, Toby、Yùdice, George(2002)。Cultural Policy。Sage。  new window
12.Abbing, H.(2002)。Why Are Artists Poor? The Exceptional Economy of the Arts。Amsterdam：Amsterdam University Press。  new window
13.Banfield, Edward C.(1984)。The Democratic Muse。New York：Basic。  new window
14.Department for Culture, Media and Sport(2005)。Understanding the Future: Museums and 21st Century Life-The Value of Museums。London：DCMS。  new window
15.Department for Culture, Media and Sport(2007)。Culture and Creativity in 2007。London：Department for Culture, Media and Sport。  new window
16.Myerscough, John(1988)。The Economic Importance of the Arts in Britain。London：Policy Studies Institute。  new window
17.Weil, S. E.(1995)。A Cabinet of Curiosities: Inquiries into Museums and Their Prospects。Washington, DC：Smithsonian Institution。  new window
18.Travers, Tony、Glaister, Stephen(2004)。Valuing Museums: Impact and Innovation among National Museums。London：National Museum Directors Conference。  new window
19.Hooper-Greenhill, E.(1994)。Museums and Their Visitors。London：Routledge。  new window
20.Barker, Chris、羅世宏(2004)。文化研究：理論與實踐。臺北市：五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
21.Picard, Robert G.、馮建三(1994)。媒介經濟學。臺北：遠流出版事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
22.Sandell, R.(2002)。Museums and the Combating of Social Inequality: Roles, responsibilities, resistance。London：Routledge。  new window
23.Merriman, Nick(1991)。Beyond the Glass Case: the Past, the Heritage and the Public in Britain。Leicester University Press。  new window
24.Baumol, William J.、Bowen, William G.(1966)。Performing Arts-The Economic Dilemma: A Study of Problems common to Theater, Opera, Music and Dance。New York：Twentieth Century Fund。  new window
25.Jenks, Chris、俞智敏、陳光達、王淑燕(1998)。文化。巨流。  延伸查詢new window
26.Throsby, David(2001)。Economics and culture。Cambridge University Press。  new window
27.Bourdieu, Pierre、Nice, Richard(1984)。Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste。Harvard University Press。  new window
28.Webster, Frank、馮建三(1999)。資訊社會理論。遠流。  延伸查詢new window
29.張譽騰(20030000)。博物館大勢觀察。臺北：五觀藝術管理。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Wittlin, A.(1970)。A twelve point program for museum renewal。Reinventing the Museum: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives on the Paradigm Shift。Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.。  new window
2.Barker, Emma(1999)。Exhibiting the canon: The blockbuster show。Contemporary Cultures of Display。The Open University Press。  new window
3.Bourdieu, Pierre(1990)。Artistic taste and cultural capital。Culture and Society: Contemporary Debates。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.Moore, T.(1968)。Reasons for subsidizing american theater。The Economics of the Arts。London：Martin Robertson。  new window
5.Peacock, A. T.(1969)。Welfare economics and public subsidies to the Arts。The Economics of the Arts。London：Martin Robertson and Company。  new window
6.Well, Stephen E.(1990)。Rethinking the Museum And Other Meditations。Rethinking the Museum And Other Meditations。Washington。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：700（臺灣：694，外國：6） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1695817 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67497031
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上