From the viewpoint of place-based education, this research investigates the realization of educational programs by local natural history museums. Qualitative research methodology is used in conducting this research. Subjects investigated in this research include four natural history educational museums, which are operated by municipal junior-high or elementary schools. Since natural history educational museums are government organizations, this research also examines their mission and the way they are administrated.
This research sums up the functions served by the natural history educational museums for the local communities with the concept of “status and role”. Generally speaking, the four natural history educational museums carry out place-based educational projects each with its own unique features. Yi-Lan Natural History Educational Museum specializes in volunteer training and utilization, effectively playing the role of a naturalist “cultivator”. Chia-Yi Natural History Educational Museum has taken a role in discovering and preserving the Old Ben-Gang heritage. Tai-Nan Natural History Educational Museum, with its collections of fossils excavated locally and Si-La-Ya Tribe artifacts of the Ping-Pu people, has become a window to the Tsuo-Jenn region. Ping-Dong Natural History Educational Museum, located in Kenting National Park, like a small piece of a quilt, has assumed the position for local ecosystem preservation.
The administration and the organization of natural history educational museums are like those in a parent-child relationship. Natural history educational museums grow under the “nurture” of both formal and informal education systems, with a role of “being fostered or adopted”:1. Funding mainly comes from the Ministry of Education. 2.With its expertise on museum management, National Museum of Natural Science (NMNS) supervises and directs natural history educational museums.3. There exists a significant administrative dependency between a natural history educational museum and its “adoptive school”. The operation of the museum could be affected or even disrupted with assignment changes of the school principal or a school director. Furthermore, natural history educational museums are hindered as well as being nurtured.
On the mission of natural history educational museums, and on the three main aspects of place-based education, we conclude as follows:
1. The main purpose of a natural history educational museum is education, a natural result
from its name, scale and capability.
2. The implementation of educational projects appears to be “place specific”, and the
project types varying from “school-oriented” to “museum-oriented” .The educational
projects emphasize “natural history exploration” of place-based education.
3. In engaging with local human resources, the most proficient is the utilization of
volunteers. Working with local organizations has mixed results, ranging from long-term
partnerships to one-time-only corporations. Involving with local folk artists and art
studios can have the most place-specific results.
4. While natural history educational museums engage local communities with their
collections, exhibitions and environmental protection programs, “Induction into
Community Processes” remains an area ignored by most.
5. The common challenges facing all natural history educational museums are the need for
museum operation expertise and the museums’ conflicting administrative status and
ambiguous organizational position.
Overall speaking, through the implementation of educational projects, natural history educational museums funnel central government funding to the local communities, playing the role of “resource transformers”. It is our hope that natural history educational museums, with volunteers’ outreach efforts, can all involve in local community affairs, engaging as final “receiving stations” , as well as the “transformer stations” .