:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:解說內容之涉入程度對遊客之環境認知、遊憩體驗和滿意度之影響--以陽明山國家公園魚路古道為例
書刊名:觀光研究學報
作者:黃淑君林慧娟郭家汝
作者(外文):Huang, Shu-chunLin, Huei-jyuanGuo, Jia-ru
出版日期:2003
卷期:9:1
頁次:頁79-90
主題關鍵詞:解說內容涉入程度環境認知遊憩體驗滿意度Interpretive contentLevel of involvementEnvironmental cognitionRecreational experienceSatisfaction
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(10) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:10
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:30
本研究目的在探討陽明山國家公園魚路古道的遊客,對於解說設施內容之了解程度對其環境認知、遊憩體驗和滿意度的影響。研究結果顯示,遊客的環境認知包含了四個構面,分別為自然特性、設施特性、視覺特性和人文特性,充份了解解說內容的遊客在四個構面的平均值,都顯著的高於不夠了解解說內容的遊客;遊客之遊憩體驗包含了二個構面,分別是心理愉悅性和感官激發性,在心理愉悅性的平均值上,對解說內容有充份了解的遊客顯著的高於對解說內容不夠了解的遊客,但在感官激發性的平均值上,二者則沒有存在差異性;此外對解說內容有充份了解的遊客對設施資源、自然資源和人文資源滿意度的平均值也都顯著的高於對解說內容不夠了解的遊客。
The purpose of the study is to investigate the impact of the level of involvement of interpretive content on visitors’ environmental cognition, recreational experience, and satisfaction for Fish Trail in Yangmingshan National Park. The findings indicated that four dimensions were embedded in visitors' environmental recognition. They were marked as natural quality, facility quality, visual quality, and cultural quality. The means of the four dimensions were all significantly higher for the visitors with full understanding of the interpretive content. Two dimensions underlay visitors’ recreational experience. They were labeled as psychological enjoyment and sensory arousal. The mean of psychological enjoyment was significantly higher for the visitors with full understanding of the interpretive content. Yet, the mean of sensory arousal didn't show significant difference between the two types of visitors. In addition, the means of satisfaction of facility, nature, and culture resources were significantly higher for the former group of visitors.
Other
1.Havitz, M. E. & Dimanche, F.(1990)。Proposition for testing the involvement construct in recreation and tourist contexts。  new window
期刊論文
1.Rothschild, Michael L.(1984)。Perspectives on involvement: Current problems and future directions。Advances in Consumer Research,11(1),216-217。  new window
研究報告
1.王鑫(1991)。陽明山國家公園解說與環境教育系統規劃研究報告。台北:內政部營建署。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.鍾昌修(2002)。解說摺頁對國小兒童解說效果之研究--以臺北市立動物園無尾熊館為例(碩士論文)。世新大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳鳳珠(1994)。遊客中心多媒體解說效果評估:以玉山國家公園塔塔加遊客中心為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.楊婷婷(1996)。解說折頁解說效果之探討:以台北市立動物園大鳥籠為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Tilden, Freeman(1967)。Interpreting Our Heritage。Interpreting Our Heritage。Chapel Hill。  new window
2.Beck, Larry、Cable, Ted、吳忠宏(2000)。21世紀的解說趨勢:解說自然與文化的15項指導原則。臺北:品度。  延伸查詢new window
3.楊明賢(1999)。解說教育。揚智文化。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.中華民國國家公園學會(1995)。陽明山國家公園魚路古道規劃。  延伸查詢new window
2.李瑞宗(1994)。陽明山國家公園魚路古道之研究。  延伸查詢new window
3.李瑞宗(1997)。陽明山國家公園金包里大路(魚路古道)後續統劃。  延伸查詢new window
4.張長義、姜蘭虹(1985)。墾丁國家公園解說系統規畫之研究。  延伸查詢new window
5.張詩悌、林晏州(1997)。解說效果之探討--以板橋林家花園為例。  延伸查詢new window
6.Aldridge, D.(1972)。Upgrading Park interpretation & Communication With the Public。  new window
7.Chanowitz, B. & Langer, E.(1980)。Knowing more (or less) than you show: understanding control through the mindless-mindfulness distinction。  new window
8.Derwin, C. W. & Piper, J. B.(1988)。The African Rock Kopje exhibit evaluation and interpretive elements。  new window
9.Kuehner, R. A. & Eisner, G. H.(1978)。Response of Visitors to the Rainbow Trail: An Evaluation of an Interpretation Area in the Lake Tahoe Basin。  new window
10.Moscardo, G.(1991)。Museum Scripts: An example of the application of social cognitive research to tourism。  new window
11.Moscardo, G. & Pearce, P. L.(1986)。Visitor centers and environmental interpretation: An exploration of the relationships among visitor enjoyment, understanding and mindfulness。  new window
12.Murphy, J.(1975)。Recreation and Leisure Service。  new window
13.Sharpe, G. W.(1982)。An overview of interpretation。  new window
14.Shouten, F.(1995)。Improving visitor care in heritage attractions。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE