:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:對蚊子宣戰:二次戰後臺灣根除瘧疾的科技與社會研究
書刊名:臺灣社會研究季刊
作者:林宜平 引用關係
作者(外文):Lin, Yi-ping
出版日期:2011
卷期:81
頁次:頁187-235
主題關鍵詞:瘧疾戰後根除計畫科技與社會MalariaPost-warDDTEradication programScienceTechnology and society
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:577
  • 點閱點閱:400
二次戰後WHO以噴灑DDT消滅瘧蚊,在世界各國展開根除瘧疾計畫,台灣是戰後全球除瘧行動中,極少數完全根絕瘧疾,並且長期維持無本土病例的國家。本研究從科技與社會的觀點,回顧從日治到美援台灣瘧疾防制「對人法」與「對蚊法」的爭議;戰後以DDT家戶噴射對瘧蚊宣戰的準備、攻擊、肅清與保全;批判檢視台灣戰前/戰後瘧疾死因與盛行率的變化;最後從社會世界的理論觀點,討論台灣成功除瘧的歷史與社會脈絡。 本研究發現,台灣戰後的除瘧行動,有延續自日治時期的瘧蚊研究,瘧原蟲檢驗技術,藥物治療,以及防瘧體系的支持。戰後世界衛生組織、美國與國民黨政府耗費眾多人力與物力,全力支持DDT家戶噴射,有冷戰與戒嚴的特殊歷史脈絡。台灣根除瘧疾得以長期維持,除了對人法舊技術與對蚊法新技術同時並行,以及戒嚴時期限制人民海外旅行之外,矮小瘧蚊也不敵台灣生態環境的變遷,節節敗退。此外,台灣在1952 年代全面噴射DDT之前,瘧疾盛行率已經大幅下降。 DDT是戰後全球瘧疾根除計畫的邊界物,標準化的家戶噴射作業流程雖然無法在全球各地同步執行,但是和台灣的人與非人行動者,組成穩固的防瘧技術網絡,成為非常少數的成功案例。本研究具體回應「超越國家單位的國際書寫架構」,從社會世界的理論觀點,討論DDT在台灣除瘧所扮演的角色,不但可以協助理解技術物的多重社會性格,對當前全球公共衛生政策,也有重要貢獻。
After World War II, the World Health Organization promoted the use of residual DDT spraying to eradicate malaria. Taiwan was one of the very few countries to successfully eradicate malaria and to stay malaria-free for many years. In this study, I took the Science, Technology and Society (STS) perspective to review the Taiwanese history of malaria eradication, starting from the Japanese colonial period up to the USAID after WWII, as well as the scientific controversies surrounding malaria control. I explored the “war against mosquitoes” from the phases of preparation, attack, consolidation, and maintenance, and re-analyzed the malaria mortality and morbidity data to elucidate the social and historical context of malaria eradication in Taiwan. I suggest that the malaria eradication efforts in Taiwan had indeed continued from the Japanese Colonial period. There were entomological studies, parasite-examining techniques, medication, and anti-malaria public health systems. During the post-war period, the WHO, US and Taiwanese governments spent a lot of money and manpower to support DDT residual spraying. Other than treating the patients and the mosquitos, Taiwanese people were not allowed to travel under marshal law, and An. Minimus retreated because of the ecological changes in Taiwan. Furthermore, the prevalence of malaria in Taiwan had dramatically dropped before DDT spraying began in 1952. DDT was a boundary object in the post-war global malaria eradication program. While the standardized house-spraying methods could not apply to many countries during this time, there were human and non-human actors forming to consolidate malaria eradication networks in Taiwan. This study aims to retell the Taiwan story on the international level. Social world theory helps clarify the multiple social characters of objects, and may contribute to global public health policies.
期刊論文
1.郭文華(20100300)。如何看待美援下的衛生?一個歷史書寫的反省與展望。臺灣史研究,17(1),175-210。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.邱大昕(20080400)。「殘障設施」的由來:視障者行動網絡建構過程分析。科技、醫療與社會,6,21-67。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.范燕秋(19960900)。醫學與殖民擴張--以日治時期臺灣瘧疾研究為例。新史學,7(3),133-173。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.顧雅文(20041200)。日治時期臺灣瘧疾防遏政策--「對人法」?「對蚊法」?。臺灣史研究,11(2),185-222。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Armstrong, David(1995)。The Rise of Surveillance Medicine。Sociology of Health and Illness,17(3),393-404。  new window
6.劉翠溶、劉士永(19990600)。臺灣歷史上的疾病與死亡。臺灣史研究,4(2),89-132。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.林文源(20070400)。論行動者網絡理論的行動本體論。科技、醫療與社會,4,65-108。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.郭文華(19981200)。美援下的衛生政策:一九六0年代臺灣家庭計畫的探討。臺灣社會研究季刊,32,39-82。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.楊翠華(20081200)。美援對臺灣的衛生計畫與醫療體制之形塑。中央研究院近代史研究所集刊,62,91-139。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.朱真一(2009)。<瘧疾研究所及早期服務的前輩(上)>。《臺灣醫界》,53(3),58-61。  延伸查詢new window
11.朱真一(2009)。<瘧疾研究所及早期服務的前輩(下)>。《臺灣醫界》,53(5),53-56。  延伸查詢new window
12.朱真一(2009)。<戰後熱帶醫學發展的關鍵人物:謝獻臣博士(上)>。《臺灣醫界》,52(9),46-49。  延伸查詢new window
13.魯凡(1962)。<夕訪教授話當年>。《臺灣撲虐》,1(10),6。  延伸查詢new window
14.沈銘鏡(2006)。<沈銘鏡教授感:言但艱困自勵中成長,一生奉獻醫學與教育>。《楓城新聞》,131,2。  延伸查詢new window
15.殷海光(1957)。<反攻大陸問題>。《自由中國》,17,3。  延伸查詢new window
16.謝獻臣(1990)。<臺灣虐疾;過去與現在>。《科學月刊》。  延伸查詢new window
17.楊照(2002)。<臺灣人不該遺忘「案普」!--段公衛史上成功對抗虐疾的奮鬥故事>。《新新聞》,709,39-41。  延伸查詢new window
18.Cohn BA, Wolff MS, Cirillo PM, Sholtz RI.(2007)。DDT and Breast Cancer in Young Women: New Data on the Significance of Age at Exposure。Environmental Health Perspectives,115(10),1406-1414。  new window
19.Soper FL、Knipe FW、Casini G、Riehl Louis A、Rubino A.(1947)。Reduction of Anopheles Density Effected by the Preseason Spraying of Building Interiors with DDT in Kerosene, at castel Volturno, Italy, in 1944-1945 and in the Tiber Delta in 1945。American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene,27,177-200。  new window
20.Attaran A, Maharaj R. Liroff R.(2000)。Ethical Debate: Doctoring Malaria, Badly: The Global Campaign to Ban DDT. ; DDT for Malaria Control Should not Be Banned.; Commentary: Reduction and Elimination of DDT Should Proceed Slowly。British Medical Journal,321,1403-1405。  new window
21.Gallon M, Law J.(1982)。On Interests and their Transformation: Enrolment and Counter-Enrolment。Social Studies of Science,12(4),615-625。  new window
22.Carter ED.(2008)。God Bless General Peron: DDTand the Endgame of Malaria Eradication in Argentina in the 1940s。Journal of the History of Medicine and allied Science,64(1),78-122。  new window
23.Clarke A, Montini T.(1993)。The Many Faces of Ru486: Tales of Situated Knowledge and Technological Contestations。Science, Technology & Human Values,18(1),42-78。  new window
24.Farid MA.(1991)。Views and Reflections on anti-malaria Programs in the world。Kaohsing Journal of Medical Science,7,243-255。  new window
25.Desowitz RS.(1991)。'Treat the Patient, not the Mosquiro' -or vice versa.', The Malaria Farid MA. 1980, 'The malaria Programme from Euphoria to Anarchy。WHO Forum,1,9-39。  new window
26.Farley J.(1994)。Mosquitoes or Malaria? Rockefeller campaigns in the American South and Sardinia。Parassitologia,36,165-173。  new window
27.Ferriman A.(2001)。Attempts to Ban DDT Have Had 'Trgic Consequences'。British Medical Journal,322,1270。  new window
28.fujimura J.(1988)。The Molecular Biological Bandwagon in Cancer Research: where Social Worlds Meet。Social Problem,35(3),261-283。  new window
29.Gladwell, M.(20010702)。The Mosquito Killer。The New Yorker,42-51。  new window
30.Hsieh HC.(1954)。DDT Intoxication in a Family of Southern Taiwan。AMA Arohives of Industrial Hygiene and Occupational Health,10,344-346。  new window
31.Humphreys M.(1996)。Kicking a Dying Dog: DDT and Demise of Malaria in the American South, 1942-1950。Isis,87,1-17。  new window
32.O'shaughnessy PT.(2008)。Parachuting Cats and Crushed Eggs the Controversy overthe Use of DDT to control Malaria。American Journal of Public Health,98(11),1940-1948。  new window
33.tongnotti e.(2009)。Program to Eradicated Malaria in Sardinia, 1946-1950。Emerging Infectious Disease,15(9),1946-1950。  new window
34.Timmermans S, Leiter V.(2000)。The Redemption of Thalidomide: Standardizing the Rick of Birth Defects。Social Studies of Science,30(1),41-72。  new window
研究報告
1.馬賴古麥(2003)。總檢九十三年度原住民族委員會及所屬單位預算案。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.蔡姿儀(2007)。戰後臺灣瘧疾防治之研究 (1945~1965)(碩士論文)。國立中央大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.丁文惠(2007)。台灣日治時期瘧疾防治研究(碩士論文)。國立成功大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.張淑卿(2004)。防癆體系與監控技術:台灣結核病史研究(1945-1970s)(博士論文)。國立清華大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Packard, Randall M.(2007)。The Making of a Tropical Disease: A Short History of Malaria。The Making of a Tropical Disease: A Short History of Malaria。Baltimore, MD:The Johns Hopkins University Press。  new window
2.李文昭、Carson, Rachel(2008)。寂靜的春天。臺中:晨星出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.連秀美(2007)。蚊子博士連日清--抗瘧大師的傳奇一生。臺北:遠流。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳紹馨(1979)。臺灣的社會變遷與人口變遷。臺北:聯經出版事業公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.黃俊傑(1991)。農復會與臺灣經験 (1949~1979)。臺北:三民。  延伸查詢new window
6.行政院衛生署(1995)。臺灣地區公共衛生發展史。臺北:行政院衛生署。  延伸查詢new window
7.Carson, Rachel(1962)。Silent Spring。Houghton Mifflin。  new window
8.行衛院衛生署(1993)。《臺灣撲虐紀實》。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
9.行政院衛生署疾病管制局(2005)。《抗虐實錄:虐疾根除四十週年紀念特刊》。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
10.梁妃儀、蔡篤堅(2004)。《戰後臺灣防疫經驗歷史回顧展望:臺灣撲虐工作導覽手冊》。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
11.蓋洛提、方俊育、林宜平(2004)。社會世界、行動者網路與爭議 : 以膽固醇、飲食中脂肪與心臟病為例。科技渴望社會。臺北:群學。  延伸查詢new window
12.蔡篤堅、梁妃儀(2003)。<瘧疾研究所代表的臺灣醫學倫理發展意涵>。臺灣醫療道德之演變:若干歷程及個案探討。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
13.鄭天佐(2004)。《在真空中求成長:鄭天佐院士一生有趣的回憶》。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
14.Clarke A, Star SL.(2007)。Social Worlds/Arena Analysis: A Theory/Method Package。The Handbook of Science and Technology studies, Third Edition。Cambridge。  new window
15.李淑娟(2001)。<根除虐疾:傳染病防治史,最卓越的成就>。發現臺灣公衛行腳:臺灣十大公衛計畫紀實。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
16.Brown P.(1997)。Culture and the Glbal Resurgence of Malaria。The Anthropology of Infectious Disease: International Health Perspectives。Amsterdam。  new window
17.Clarke A.(1991)。Social Worlds/Arenas Theory as Organizational Theory。The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, Third Edition。Cambridge。  new window
18.Fujimura, JH.(1992)。Crafing Science: Standardized Packages, Boundary Objects, and 'translation'。Science as Practice and Culture。  new window
19.Latoru b.(1978)。Science in Action。Cambridge, MA。  new window
20.Lin YP, Liu SY(2010)。Forgotten Wars: Anti-malaria Campaign in Taiwan 1905-1965。Health and Hygiene in Modern chines East Asia。  new window
21.Mitchell t.(2002)。Can the Mosquito Speaks?' Rule of Experts: Egpt, Techno-Politics, Modernity。Berkeley。  new window
22.Snowden Fm.(2006)。The conquet of Malaria: Italy, 1900-1962。New Heaven, CT。  new window
23.Humphreys, Margaret(2001)。Malaria: Poverty, Race, and Public Health in the United States。Baltimore, MD:The Johns Hopkings University Press。  new window
24.Spielman A、D'Antonio M.(2001)。Mosquitos: A Natural History of Our Most Persitsent and Deadly Foe。New York。  new window
25.Webb JLA.(2009)。Humanity's Burden: A Global History of Malaria。New York, NY。  new window
26.Tren R, Bate R.(2001)。Malaria and the DDT Story。London。  new window
27.Strapleton DH.(2009)。malaria Eradication and the Technological Model: The Rockefeller Foundation and Public Health in East Asia。Disease, Colonialism, and the State: Malaria in Modern East Asian HIstory。Hong Kong。  new window
28.Strauss A.(1978)。A Social Worlds Perspective。AStudies in Symbolic Interaction (1)。Greenwich, CT。  new window
29.Taiwan Malaria Research Institure(1963)。Annexes to the Plan of Operations for Malaria Endication in china( Taiwan)。  new window
其他
1.中國農村復興聯合委員會(1948)。第1期中國農村復興聯合委員會工作報告。  延伸查詢new window
2.中國農村復興聯合委員會(1958)。第10期中國農村復興聯合委員會工作報告。  延伸查詢new window
3.(1995)。大家談,噴過滴滴涕仍然有蚊蠅,服務員態度又壞。  延伸查詢new window
4.(1955)。<新店等地區DDT失靈>。  延伸查詢new window
5.(1955)。<滴滴涕功過,掃蕩蚊吶,殃及家貓,老鼠得勢,橫行無優>。  延伸查詢new window
6.(1956)。DDT毒死家貓,老鼠應運橫行,顏處長請住戶合作,斷絕鼠糧以滅眾患。  延伸查詢new window
7.聯合國新聞(2006)。衛生組織重新提倡使用DDT抗擊虐疾,http://www.un.org/chinese/News/fullstorynews.asp?newsID=6642。  延伸查詢new window
8.(1952)。<防虐之道言重滅蚊>。  延伸查詢new window
9.(1995)。<投鼠忌器,滅蟲竟殺貓,桃議員為貓請命,要求不噴DDT>。  延伸查詢new window
10.臺灣省省議會。建議衛生處對瘧疾研究所現有臨時雇員早作安置準備以免改組時造成該批人員失業案。  延伸查詢new window
11.(2010)。公共衛生大事記,http://203.65.17.106/project/public/main3.htm, 20100220。  new window
12.(2007)。<榮總虐疾感染案 3醫師判刑>。  延伸查詢new window
13.行政院農委會(2007)。<臺灣水牛再出發>,http://www.coa.gov.tw/view.php?catid=12559。  延伸查詢new window
14.(2008)。疾病管制局數位博物館,http://www.cde.gov.tw/museum/, 20080210。  延伸查詢new window
15.行政院環保署(2006)。<認識持久性有機污染物(Persistent organic pollutants,簡稱POPs)>,http://www.niea.gov.tw/epaper/epeper_detail.asp?c_id=66。  延伸查詢new window
16.張瓈文(2003)。<根除38年,臺灣首見虐疾介入感染>。  延伸查詢new window
17.(1955)。<世界衛生組織託我製DDT>。  延伸查詢new window
18.(2001)。World's Biggest Health Threats。  new window
19.Development and Health,http://www.bbc.co.uk/scotland/education/int/geog/health/health/malaria/causes/index.shtml。  new window
20.Who.(1998)。Malaria. Fifty Years of the World Health Organization in the western Pacifica Region。  new window
圖書論文
1.Clarke, Adele E.(1991)。Social worlds/Arenas Theory as Organizational Theory。Social Organization and Social Process: Essays in honor of Anselm Strauss。New York:Aldine De Gruyter。  new window
2.Yip, K.(2009)。Health disease, and the National State: Perspectives on Malaria Eradication in Taiwan。Disease, Colonialism, and the State: Malaria in Modern East Asian History。Hong Kong:Hong Kong University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE