:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:兩岸未來互動模式之研究:以「自由聯繫邦」為基礎之探析
書刊名:全球政治評論
作者:張登及 引用關係蔡育岱 引用關係譚偉恩 引用關係
作者(外文):Chang, Teng-chiTsai, Yu-taiTan, Wei-en
出版日期:2011
卷期:35
頁次:頁29-51
主題關鍵詞:自由聯繫邦兩岸關係變動主權安全委託Free associated stateTwo cross-strait relationsDynamic sovereigntySecurity consignation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:117
  • 點閱點閱:52
本文提供一種有別於現行論述兩岸關係的互動模式框架,以所謂「自由聯繫邦」(Free Associated States, FAS)作為一種新「思想實驗」(mental experiment)。其目的在於拋磚引玉,使學界或國人對此相關議題進行超越統獨二元論的再思考,同時冀求在各方對此概念進行辯論的過程中,探索自由聯繫邦概念之適用可能性。此模式係屬於一種「動態主權」(dynamic sovereignty)與「安全委託」(security consignation)形式,傳達了一種對主權認知的轉換與接受。它是一種求同存異方式,不是要去消極擱置主權爭議,而是以維持現狀為基礎,讓兩岸在同一個框架內緊密聯繫,構建類似自由聯繫邦的關係,不使主權凝滯,兩岸有自由進退的選擇。隨著兩岸交流加深,在未來適當的時機,再確定長遠的關係。
This article provides one kind to be different with the traditional model of two cross-strait relations. By the so-called Free Associated States (FAS) takes one new choice approach. Its goal offers a few ordinary introductory remarks so that others may offer their valuable ideas. Besides, by the article, the authors expect that academic researchers and people can surmount reunified or independent dualism to rethink the possibility and operation of FAS during the process of debate. This model has one kind form of “the dynamic sovereignty” and “the security consignation”; in the meantime, it conveys sovereignty cognition that can be transformed and be accepted to seek common ground while reserving differences. This approach is not to passively lay the sovereignty dispute aside, but to maintain the “status quo” as the foundation. On the contrary, let two cross-strait establish the FAS model and make the content of sovereignty in shifting, simultaneously evolve itself with the interflow between cross-strait until the time it fixed to the future direction.
期刊論文
1.李定國(2003)。對經濟全球化導致國家主權變化的認知。湖北師範學院學報,23(3),40-43。  延伸查詢new window
2.Ago, Robert(1957)。Positive Law and International Law。American Journal of International Law,51(4),691-733。  new window
3.Elgie, Robert(2002)。The Politics of the European Central Bank: Principal-Agent Theory and the Democratic Deficit。Journal of European Public Policy,9,186-200。  new window
4.姜家雄、蔡育岱(20070700)。國際關係與非政府組織研究。國際關係學報,24,115-144。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Perez, Antonio(1996)。Review Essay: Who Killed Sovereignty? Or: Changing Norms Concerning Sovereignty in International Law。Wisconsin International Law Journal,14(2),463-490。  new window
6.Ullman, Richard(1983)。Refining Security。International Security,8(1),129。  new window
7.張登及(20091200)。本體安全視角下的恐怖主義:以英國倫敦七七恐怖攻擊事件為例的分析。問題與研究,48(4),67-93。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.林文程、林正義(20061200)。臺灣修憲與臺美中三角關係。臺灣民主季刊,3(4),125-163。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.秦亞青(20010600)。國際政治的社會建構--溫特及其建構主義國際政治理論。美歐季刊,15(2)=142,231-264。  延伸查詢new window
10.張亞中(20010700)。全球治理:主體與權力的解析。問題與研究,40(4),1-24。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.嚴震生(19981200)。波多黎各的定位問題與公民投票經驗。問題與研究,37(12),17-45+104。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Friedman, Thomas L.(1999)。The Lexus and the Olive Tree。New York:Farrar, Straus, Giroux。  new window
2.林濁水(2006)。共同體:世界圖像下的台灣。台北:左岸文化。  延伸查詢new window
3.劉貞曄(2005)。國際政治中的非政府組織。天津:人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.蔡育岱、譚偉恩(2006)。現代國際公法精義。台北:晶華文化。  延伸查詢new window
5.Igarashi, Masahiro(2002)。Associated Statehood in International Law。Hague:Kluwer Law International。  new window
6.Krasner, Stephen D.(2001)。Problematic Sovereignty。New York:Columbia University Press。  new window
7.Held, David、McGrew, Anthony、Goldblatt, David、Perraton, Jonathan(1999)。Global Transformations: Politics, Economics and Culture。Stanford University Press。  new window
8.Friedman, Thomas L.(2005)。The World is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-first Century。Farrar, Straus and Giroux。  new window
9.Bull, Hedley(1977)。The Anarchical society: A Study of Order in World Politics。New York:Columbia University Press。  new window
10.Soroos, Marvin S.(1986)。Beyond Sovereignty: The Challenge of Global Policy。Columbia, South Carolina:University of South Carolina Press。  new window
11.Krasner, Stephen D.(1999)。Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy。Princeton University Press。  new window
12.楊永明(2003)。國際安全與國際法。臺北:元照出版社。  延伸查詢new window
13.Donnelly, Jack(2000)。Realism and International Relations。Cambridge University Press。  new window
14.The Commission on Global Governance(1995)。Our Global Neighborhood: The Report of the Commission on Global Governance。Oxford University Press。  new window
15.Brown, Melissa J.(2004)。Is Taiwan Chinese? The Impact of Culture, Power, and Migration on Changing Identities。University of California Press。  new window
16.Katzenstein, Peter J.(1996)。The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics。New York:Cambridge University Press。  new window
其他
1.(19981215)。波多黎各公投,反建州派險勝。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Pollack, Mark(2002)。The Commission as An Agent。At the Heart of the Union: Studies of the European Commission。New York:Palgrave MacMillan Press。  new window
2.Risse-Kappen, Thomas(1995)。Bringing Transnational Relations Back In。Bringing Transnational Relations Back In:Non-State Actors, Domestic Structures and International Institutions。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE