:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:氣候變遷的全球治理:行政法的新圖像
書刊名:臺灣國際法季刊
作者:葉俊榮 引用關係
作者(外文):Yeh, Jiunn-rong
出版日期:2013
卷期:10:2
頁次:頁7-34
主題關鍵詞:氣候變遷氣候變遷法全球行政法全球治理Climate changeClimate change lawGlobal administrative lawGlobal governance
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:366
  • 點閱點閱:1422
隨著『氣候變遷法』領域的逐漸形成,傳統法律受到氣候變遷大尺度、具有高度不確定性等特色的影響,需要新的調適。其中,受到衝擊最深的,恐怕是行政法。本文檢討氣候變遷對於行政法的衝擊,並觀察氣候變遷全球行政法的發展,最後提出在氣候變遷時代行政法的新圖像。本文發現在氣候變遷議題跨國境、跨領域、跨部門等跨領域的特色下,國家管制工具朝向強調市場導向、經濟誘因式的管制方式革新,而主權國家以上及以下的多層次治理也逐步發展。本文同時觀察到,氣候變遷的規範化在京都議定書後逐步出現全球行政法的現象:多元行政主體出現、規範越發強調行政與程序、主體責信確保以及各項規則的法效性更為多方承認等。本文認為,氣候變遷時代的行政法圖像應是在內容上更具多元性、彈性及全球開放性,同時國家責任將被重新重視,而在立法策略上應先有框架性的立法,再逐一進行領域的規範補充,方能形成完備的氣候變遷立法。
The features of large scale and high uncertainty of climate change have had great impact on traditional legal system. With its embedded regulatory structure, administrative law seems to be the area of law affected most by climate change governance. This article examines the impact of climate change to administrative law through analyzing the features of climate change governance and the development of global administrative law. In the end, I propose a changing landscape of administrative law in climate change era. In line with the trans-boundary, trans-disciplines, and trans-sectors features of climate change regime, regulatory tools are reformed to the direction of market-oriented and economic incentive regulation. Multilevel governance beyond and under the nation-state is developing too. Moreover, climate change has brought about the emergence of global administrative law, featured with multiple governing entities, administrative oriented norms, the requirement of accountability, and widely accepted rules. This article argues for a transformation of administrative law in the climate change era towards a more diverse, flexible and open one with the heightened state responsibility. In light of this transformation, legislative strategy to climate change should begin with a comprehensive framework law followed by individual policy and measures.
期刊論文
1.袁鶴齡(20031000)。全球治理與國際合作:論其策略與困境。全球政治評論,4,25-45。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.林子倫(20091000)。後京都氣候談判的五大難題。能源報導,9-13。  延伸查詢new window
3.Ackerly, B.、Michael, P. V.(2007)。Climate Change Justice: The Challenge for Global Governance。Georgetown International Environmental Law Review,20,553-571。  new window
4.Rabe, Barry(2005)。State Competition as a Source of Driving Climate Change Mitigation。New York University Environmental Law Journal,14,1-53。  new window
5.Chimni, Bhupinder S.(2005)。Cooption and Resistance: Two Faces of Global Administrative Law。New York University Journal of International Law and Policy,37,799-828。  new window
6.Murray, Brian C.、Hosterman, Heather(2009)。Climate Change, Cap-And-Trade and the Outlook For U.S. Policy。North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation,34(3),699-721。  new window
7.Harlow, Carol(2006)。Global Administrative Law: The Quest for Principles and Values。European Journal of International Law,17,158-214。  new window
8.Bodansky, Daniel(1993)。The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change: A Commentary。Yale Journal of International Law,18,451-559。  new window
9.Bodansky, Daniel(2009)。Is There an International Environmental Constitution?。Indiana Journal of Global Legal Study,16,565-584。  new window
10.Hunter, David(2010)。Implication of the Copenhagen Accord for Global climate Governance。Sustainable Development Law and Policy,10,1-14。  new window
11.Driesen, David M.(2008)。Sustainable Development and Market Liberalism's Shotgun Wedding: Emissions Trading Under the Kyoto Protocol。Indiana Law Journal,83,21-70。  new window
12.Van Asselt, Harro、Gupta, Joyeeta(2009)。Stretching too Far? Developing Countries and the Role of Flexibility Mechanisms Beyond Kyoto。Stanford Environmental Law Journal,28,311-379。  new window
13.Perkins, John(1997)。The Changing Foundation of International law: from State Consent to State Responsibility。Boston University International Law Journal,15,433-508。  new window
14.Adler, Jonathan H.(2007)。When is two a Crowd? The Impact of Federal Action on State Environmental Regulation。Harvard Environmental Law Review,31,67-114。  new window
15.Trisolini, Katherine A.(2010)。All Hands on Deck: Local Governments and the Potential for Bidirectional Climate Change Regulation。Standford Law Review,62,669-746。  new window
16.Pallis, M.(2005)。The Operation of UNHCR's Accountability Mechanisms。NYU Journal of International Law and Policy,37,869-917。  new window
17.Durrant, Nicola(2007)。Tortious Liability for Greenhouse Gas Emissions? Climate Change, Causation and Public Policy Considerations。QUT Law and Justice Journal,7,403-424。  new window
18.許耀明(20070600)。氣候變化綱要公約/京都議定書、美歐不同立場與和WTO補貼暨平衡措施協定之互動。中華國際法與超國界法評論,3(1),73-120。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.施文真(20081000)。由交易單位之法律性質重新檢視排放權交易制度與WTO之關係。政大法學評論,105,121-215。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.施文真(20091100)。溫室氣體減量法草案簡評--以排放權交易為主要分析對象。月旦法學,174,47-68。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.劉坤億(20031200)。全球治理的理想與現實。中國行政評論,13(1),29-56。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.Hardy, Bretiny(2007)。How Positive Environmental Politics Affected Europe's Decision to Oppose and Then Adopt Emissions Trading。Duke Environmental Law and Policy Forum,17,297-318。  new window
23.Franck, Thomas M.(1998)。Legitimacy in the International System。American Journal of International Law,82,705-759。  new window
24.Koh, Harold Hongju(1999)。How is International Human Rights Law Enforced?。Indiana Law Journal,74,1397-1417。  new window
25.Yeh, Jiunn-rong(20100900)。Globalization, Government Reform and the Paradigm Shift of Administrative Law。National Taiwan University Law Review,5(2),113-141。new window  new window
26.Berman, Paul Schiff(2005)。From International Law to Law and Globalization。Columbia Journal of Transnational Law,43,485-556。  new window
27.Burleson, Elizabeth(2010)。Climate Change Consensus: Emerging International Law。William and Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review,34,543-588。  new window
28.Bodansky, Daniel(1999)。The Legitimacy of International Governance: A Coming Challenge For International Environmental Law?。The American Journal of International Law,93(3),596-624。  new window
29.Jayasuriya, Kanishka(1999)。Globalization, Law and Transformation of Sovereign: The Emergence of Global Regulatory Governance。Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies,6(2),2-3。  new window
30.葉俊榮(19901200)。論環境政策上的經濟誘因:理論依據。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,20(1),87-111。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.林子倫(20080900)。臺灣氣候變遷政策之論述分析。公共行政學報,28,153-175。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.Kingsbury, Benedict(2009)。The Concept of 'Law' in Global Administrative Law。European Journal of International Law,20(1),23-57。  new window
33.Kingsbury, Benedict、Krisch, Nico、Stewart, Richard B.(2005)。The Emergence of Global Administrative Law。Law and Contemporary Problems,68(3/4),15-61。  new window
34.張亞中(20010700)。全球治理:主體與權力的解析。問題與研究,40(4),1-24。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.李建良(2010)。氣候變遷的法律對策與規範模式--系列總說與之一。氣候「變遷下的永續環境治理:法律與政策的因應模式」學術研討會,(會議日期: 2010年10月09日)。臺灣大學法律學院。  延伸查詢new window
2.許耀明(2010)。氣候變遷的跨國規範模式--巨災風險、跨國規範與其國際法意涵。「氣候變遷下的永續環境治理:法律與政策的因應模式」學術研討會,(會議日期: 2010年10月09日)。臺灣大學法律學院。  延伸查詢new window
3.葉俊榮(201010)。氣候變遷的治理模式:法律典範的衝擊與轉變。氣候變遷下的永續環境治理:法律與政策的因應模式學術研討會,臺灣大學法律學院環境永續政策與法律研究中心(主辦) (會議日期: 2010/10/09)。臺北:臺灣大學法律學院環境永續政策與法律研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.林春元(2012)。超越內國行政法與國際法--氣候變遷全球行政法的演變、形貌與影響(博士論文)。臺灣大學,臺北。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.辛年豐(2013)。環境風險的公私協力:國家任務變遷的觀點(博士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.葉俊榮(201010)。環境政策與法律。臺北:元照。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Helm, D.、Hepburn, C.(2009)。The Economics and Politics of Climate Change。Oxford University Press。  new window
3.Doelle, M.(2005)。From Hot Air to Action: Climate Change, Compliance and the Future of International Environmental Law。Toronto:Thomson Carswell。  new window
4.Faure, M.、Peeters, M.(2008)。Climate Change and European Emission Trading。Cheltenham:Edward Elgar Publishing Limited。  new window
5.Verheyen, Roda(2005)。Climate Change Damage and International Law: Prevention Duties and State Responsibility。Leiden:Brill Academic Publishers。  new window
6.葉俊榮(1999)。全球環境議題--臺灣觀點。台北:巨流出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.曹俊漢(20090000)。全球化與全球治理:理論發展的建構與詮釋。臺北:韋伯文化國際。new window  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Asia-Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate,http://www.asiapacificpartnership.org/english/default.aspx。  new window
2.California Environmental Protection Agency, Air Resources Board,http://www.arb.ca.gov/homepage.htm。  new window
3.Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative,http://www.rggi.org/home。  new window
4.(2011)。Western Climate Initiativ,http://www.westernclimateinitiative.org/wcipartners-and-observers-map。  new window
5.丁秋仁,蔡麗伶(2009)。美東11州自力減碳 推出「低碳燃料標準」,http://e-info.org.tw/node/40193。  延伸查詢new window
6.Pew Center on Global Climate Change, Regional Initiative,http://www.pewclimate.org/what_s_being_done/in_the_states/regional_initiatives.cfm。  new window
圖書論文
1.李建良(200710)。剖視國營事業污染行為的國家責任--以臺鹼安順廠污染事件為中心。2006行政管制與行政爭訟。臺北:中研院法律所籌備處。  延伸查詢new window
2.Yeh, Jiunn-rong(2010)。Emerging Climate Change Law and Changing Governance。Climate Change Law : International and National Approaches。Shanghai:Shanghai Academic of Social Science Press。  new window
3.張文貞(2009)。面對全球化:台灣行政法發展的契機與挑戰。當代公法新論(中):翁岳生教授七秩誕辰祝壽論文集。臺北:元照。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE