臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：國際關係攻勢現實主義理論之評析
書刊名：朝陽人文社會學刊
作者：林宗達
作者(外文)：Lin, Tsung-ta
出版日期：2011
卷期：9:2
頁次：頁59-105
主題關鍵詞：古典現實主義；新現實主義；結構現實主義；攻勢現實主義；守勢現實主義；霸權；全球霸權；區域霸權；Classical realism；Neorealism；Structural realism；Offensive realism；Defensive realism；Hegemony；Global hegemony；Regional hegemony
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(3) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:60
  • 點閱點閱:271
攻勢現實主義立足於現實主義之無政府與無秩序之國際體系、國家理性、權力與安全等假定與對此進行部分修正，以及新現實主義之國際體系結構對國家行為影響之分析的基礎之上，進而提出「無政府狀態之國際體系與國家自助」、「安全、權力與軍力」、「虛幻的全球性霸權與區域霸權」、「強權與其審慎的攻勢擴權戰略」、「維繫區域霸權的策略 —離岸平衡」與「戰爭的原因 —國際體系結構與強權衝突的層級之關聯」等六大重要論點，如此之論，使攻勢現實主義成為當前國際關係現實主義理論的主要學派之一。 儘管如此，但不可否認的是，在攻勢現實主義之理論內涵中，仍有諸多缺陷。這些理論的缺陷包括解釋國際政治現象之侷限與反證問題、偏狹的權力論、現實主義傳統權力的擴展無法保障新世紀之霸權的安全、太過強調強權之間的權力競爭而忽略強權對安全的實際考量與合作等四大問題，然此卻侷限了攻勢現實主義可以更為寬廣地解釋與分析國際政治之能力。
Based on anarchic international system, national rationality, power and security of realist assumption and the modification of these assumptions, and the analysis of international systemic structure of neorealism, offensive realism presents the six theses, including ‘anarchic international system and national self-help,’ ‘security, power, and military capability,’ “great power and the strategy of its prudently expanding power,’ ‘the strategy of maintaining regional hegemony-offshore balance,’ ‘the cause of war-the linkage of international systemic structure and the conflict level of great power,’ etc. Such as prominent theses that make offensive realism to be one of realist schools. Although offensive is a eminent international relations theory, there are many weaknesses in its theses, which are inclusive of the limit of explaining the phenomena in international politics and the problem of anti-evidence, the view of parochial power, the expansion of realist traditional power not assuring hegemonic security in new century, too emphasizing the power competition between great powers but neglecting their real consideration and cooperation in security issue. These weaknesses limit the capability of much more explaining and analyzing international politics.
期刊論文
1.Montgomery, Evan Braden.(2006)。Breaking Out of the Security Dilemma Realism, Reassurance, and the Problem of Uncertainty。International Security，31(2)，151-185。  new window
2.Layne, Christopher(2002)。Offshore Balancing Revisited。The Washington Quarterly，25(2)，233-248。  new window
3.Layne, Christopher(1993)。The Unipolar Illusion: Why the New Power Will Rise。International Security，17(4)，5-51。  new window
4.Mearsheimer, John J.(1994)。The False Promise of International Institutions。International Security，19(3)，5-49。  new window
5.鄭端耀(20030300)。國際關係攻勢與守勢現實主義理論爭辯之評析。問題與研究，42(2)，1-21。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Snyder, Glenn H.(2001)。Mearsheimer’s World—Offensive Realism and the Struggle for Security。International Security，27(1)，149-73。  new window
7.Tang, Shiping,(2008)。Fear in the International Politics: Two Positions。International Studies Review，10(3)，451-71。  new window
8.Layne, Christopher.(1997)。From Predominance to Offshore Balancing: America’s Future Grand Strategy。International Security，22(1)，86-124。  new window
9.Layne, Christopher.(2002)。The ‘Poster Child for Offensive Realism’: America as A Global Hegemony。Security Studies，12(2)，120-64。  new window
圖書
1.Vasquez, John A.(1998)。The Power of Power Politics: From Classical Realism to Neotraditionalism。New York：Cambridge：Cambridge University Press：Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.Waltz, Kenneth N.(1979)。Theory of International Politic。Reading, Mass：Addison-Wesley Pub. Co。  new window
3.Griffiths, Martin、Terry O’Callaghan.(2007)。“Realism.”。New York：Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.李永成(2007)。霸權的神話－米爾斯海默進攻性現實主義理論研究。北京：世界知識出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.Wittkopf, Eugene R.、Kegley, Charles W. Jr.、Scott, James M.(2003)。American Foreign Policy: Pattern and Process。Wadsworth/Thomson。  new window
6.Art, Robert J.(2003)。A Grand Strategy for America。Cornell University Press。  new window
7.Nye, Joseph S. Jr.(2003)。The Paradox of American Power: Why the World's Only Superpower Can't Go it Alone。New York：Oxford University Press。  new window
8.Schweller, Randall L.(2006)。Unanswered Threats: Political Constraints on the Balance of Power。Princeton University Press。  new window
9.Donnelly, Jack(2000)。Realism and International Relations。Cambridge University Press。  new window
10.Mearsheimer, John J.、Alterman, G.(2001)。The Tragedy of Great Power Politics。W. W. Norton & Company。  new window
11.林宗達(2003)。中共與美國飛彈攻防之軍備建構。台北。  延伸查詢new window
12.林宗達(2003)。強權較勁—中共與美國飛彈攻防之外交戰略。台北。  延伸查詢new window
13.Forde, Steven.(2007)。“Thucydides on Peace.”。The Realist Tradition and Contemporary International Relations。Baton Rouge。  new window
14.Howard, Michael.(1991)。“Ethics and Power.”。The Theory and Practice of International Relations。Englewood Cliff, New Jersey。  new window
15.Keohane, Robert O.(1986)。“Neorealism and World Politics,”。Neorealism and Its Critics。New York。  new window
16.Kousoulas, D.G.(1985)。Power and Influence: An Introduction to International Relations。Washington D.C.。  new window
17.Lieber, Robert J.(1995)。No Common Power: Understanding International Relations。New York。  new window
18.Oye, Kenneth A.(2005)。“The Conditions for Cooperation in World Politics.”。International Politics: Enduring Concepts and Contemporary Issues。Beijing。  new window
19.Russett, Bruce、Harvey Starr、David Kinsella,(2006)。World Politics: The Menu For Choice。London。  new window
20.Schmidt, Brian C.(2007)。“Realist Conception of Power,”。Power in World Politics。London ; New York。  new window
21.Bagby, Laurie M. Johnson.(2007)。Mathematici versus Dogmatici: Understanding the Realist Project through Hobbes。The Realist Tradition and Contemporary International Relations。Baton Rouge。  new window
22.Couloumbis, T.A.、James H. Wolfe.(1978)。Introduction to International Relations: Power and Justice。Englewood Cliff, New Jersey。  new window
23.Waltz, Kenneth N.(2001)。“Political Structures.”。Essential Readings in World Politics。New York。  new window
24.Webber, Cynthia.(2005)。International Relations Theory: A Critical Introduction。London & New York。  new window
25.Donnelly, Jack.(2009)。“Realism. ”。Theories of International Relations。New York。  new window
26.Dougherty, James E.、Pfaltzgraff, Robert L. Jr.(1990)。Contending Theories of International Relations: A Comprehensive Survey。New York：Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc.。  new window
27.Dunne, Tim、Brian C. Schmidt.(2008)。“Realism.”。The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations。New York。  new window
28.Wight, Martin.(1978)。“International Anarchy.”。Power Politics。New York。  new window
29.Goldstein, Joshua S.、Jon C. Pevehouse.(2008)。International Relations。New York。  new window
30.Zakaria, Fareed.(1999)。From Wealth to Power: The Unusual Origins of America’s World Role。Princeton, New Jersey。  new window
31.Mearsheimer, John J.(2005)。“Anarchy and the struggle for power.”。International Politics: Enduring Concepts and Contemporary Issues。Beijing。  new window
32.Morgenthau, Hans J.(2005)。“Six Principles of Political Realism.”。International Politics: Enduring Concepts and Contemporary Issues。Beijing。  new window
33.Mearsheimer, John J.(1999)。“A Realist Reply.”。Theories of War and Peace: An International Security Reader。Massachusetts。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：711（臺灣：705，外國：6） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1695817 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67497041
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上