臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：國際關係攻勢與守勢現實主義理論爭辯之評析
書刊名：問題與研究
作者：鄭端耀
作者(外文)：Cheng, Tuan Y.
出版日期：2003
卷期：42:2
頁次：頁1-21
主題關鍵詞：現實主義；攻勢現實主義；守勢現實主義；新現實主義；國際關係理論；Realism；Offensive realism；defensive realism；Neo-realism；International relation theory
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(32) 博士論文(13) 專書(6) 專書論文(2)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:30
  • 共同引用共同引用:66
  • 點閱點閱:727
　　　　　國際關係現實主義理論於後冷戰時期面臨嚴竣挑戰，國際環境趨向緩和導致現實主義理論遭受強烈質疑，而現實主義內部又產生攻勢與守勢現實主義兩個學派辯論。由於兩者對無政府狀態性質、權力作用以及外交政策有不同的詮釋，他們對於國家安全、國際合作、權力結構影響力及政策角色皆有不同的主張。不過，縱然雙方間有許多差異，本文研究結果顯示，兩者之間只是程度之差，而非種類之別，而且兩派觀點各有其優缺點，如果能截長補短，雙方間其實具有多方面互補功能，對現實主義發展能產生正面助益。此外，只要攻勢與守勢現實主義的理論建構不至於過度推演發展，兩者的辯論對現實主義理論研究與實務政策取向，皆能增添探索與選擇的空間。
　　　　　The theory of realism has been seriously challenged after the Cold War. The long peaceful international environment has undermined its theoretical assumptions. The theory, due to its internal theoretical disputes, has been divided into two schools of though-defensive realism and offensive realism. They have different interpretation of the concept of anarchy, the nature of power politics, and the role of the policy maker; they disagree with each other on various issues regarding national security, international cooperation, and foreign policy. However, in terms of the analytical appraisal of the two schools, this research shows that their theoretical differences only exist in degree but not in kind. Each approach has its theoretical applicability and limit, and in fact the two approaches could be incorporated into a broader framework and generate more explanatory power since they are complementary in many aspects. Moreover, as long as the debate between defensive and offensive realism will not be over-extended beyond the theoretical bounds of realism, it should prove positive to the development of the theory of realism as a whole.
期刊論文
1.Mearsheimer, John(1990)。Why We Will Soon Miss the Cold War。The Atlantic Monthly，266(2)，35-50。  new window
2.Lapid, Yoself(1989)。The Third Debate: On the Prospects of International Theory in a Post-Positivism Era。International Studies Quarterly，33(1)，235-254。  new window
3.Glaser, Charles L.(1994)。Realists as Optimists。International Security，19(3)，67-70。  new window
4.Lieber, Keir A.(2000)。Grasping the Technological Peace: The Offense-Defense Balance and International Security。International Security，25(1)，71-104。  new window
5.袁易(20010600)。對於Alexander Wendt有關國家身份與利益分析之批判：以國際防擴散建制為例。美歐季刊，15(2)=142，265-291。  延伸查詢new window
6.Keohane, Robert O.(1998)。International Institutions: Two Approaches。International Studies Quarterly，32(4)，379-396。  new window
7.Taliaferro, Jeffery W.(2000)。Security Seeking under Anarchy: Defensive Realism Revisited。International Security，25(3)，128-161。  new window
8.Glaser, Charles L.、Kaufmann, Chaim(1998)。What Is the Offense-Defense Balance and Can We Measure It?。International Security，22(4)，44-82。  new window
9.Jervis, Robert(1978)。Cooperation Under the Security Dilemma。World Politics，30(2)，167-214。  new window
10.Legro, Jeffrey W.、Moravcsik, Andrew(1999)。Is Anybody Still a Realist?。International Security，24(2)，5-55。  new window
11.Walt, Stephen(1985)。Alliance Formation and Balance of World Power。International Security，9(4)，3-43。  new window
12.鄭端耀(20010600)。國際關係「社會建構主義理論」評析。美歐季刊，15(2)=142，199-229。  延伸查詢new window
13.石之瑜(20010600)。做為藝術的政治學--兼評建構主義的科學哲學立場。美歐季刊，15(2)=142，293-310。  延伸查詢new window
14.秦亞青(20010600)。國際政治的社會建構--溫特及其建構主義國際政治理論。美歐季刊，15(2)=142，231-264。  延伸查詢new window
15.Mearsheimer, John J.(1990)。Back to the Future: Instability in Europe After the Cold War。International Security，15(1)，5-56。  new window
16.Schweller, Randall L.(1994)。Bandwagoning for Profit: Bringing the Revisionist State Back In。International Security，19(1)，72-107。  new window
17.鄭端耀(19971200)。國際關係「新自由制度主義」理論之評析。問題與研究，36(12)，1-22+72。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Lynn-Jones, Sean M.(1995)。Offense-Defense Theory and Its Critics。Security Studies，4(4)，660-691。  new window
19.Mearsheimer, John J.(1994)。The False Promise of International Institutions。International Security，19(3)，5-49。  new window
20.Evera, S. V.(1998)。Offense, Defense and the Cause of War。International Security，22，5-43。  new window
21.Hopf, T.(1991)。Polarity, the Offense-Defense Balance in Military Technology。American Political Science Review，85，475-494。  new window
22.Labs, E. J.(1997)。Beyond Victory。Security Studies，6，1-49。  new window
23.Levy, J. S.(1984)。The Offense/ Defense Balance in Military Technology。International Studies Quarterly，28，219-238。  new window
24.Lynn-Jones, S. M.(1998)。Realism and America's Rise。International Security，23，157-182。  new window
25.Sagan, S. D.(1986)。1914 Revisited: Allies, Offense and Instability。International Security，11，151-176。  new window
圖書
1.Waltz, Kenneth N.(1979)。Theory of International Politic。Reading, Mass：Addison-Wesley Pub. Co。  new window
2.Carr, Edward Hallett(1964)。The Twenty Years' Crisis, 1919-1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations。New York, NY：Harper and Row。  new window
3.Baldwin, David A.(1993)。Neorealism and Neoliberalism:the Contemporary Debate。New York：Columbia University Press。  new window
4.Smith, Steve、Booth, Ken、Zalewski, Marysia(1996)。International Theory: Positivism and Beyond。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
5.Wendt, Alexander E.(1999)。Social Theory of International Politics。Cambridge：Harvard University Press。  new window
6.Morgenthau, Hans Joachim(1948)。Politics among nations: the Struggle for Power and Peace。New York：A. A. Knopf。  new window
7.Keohane, Robert O.(1989)。International Institutions and State Power: Essays in International Relations Theory。Westview Press。  new window
8.Van Evera, Stephen(1999)。Causes of War: Power and The Roots of Conflict。Cornell University Press。  new window
9.Keohane, Robert O.、Nye, Joseph S. Jr.(1977)。Power and interdependence: world politics in transition。Boston, Massachusetts：Little Brown。  new window
10.Mearsheimer, John J.、Alterman, G.(2001)。The Tragedy of Great Power Politics。W. W. Norton & Company。  new window
11.Brown, M. E.、Lynn-Jones, S. M.、Miller, S. E.(1995)。The Perils of Anarchy。The Perils of Anarchy。Cambridge, MA。  new window
12.Doyle, M. W.、Ikenberry, G. J.(1997)。New Thinking in International Relations Theory。Boulder, Colorado：Westview Press。  new window
13.Snyder, J.(1991)。Myths of Empire。Myths of Empire。Ithaca, NY。  new window
14.Zakaria, F.(1998)。From Wealth to Power。From Wealth to Power。Princeton, NJ。  new window
其他
1.Rose, Gideon(1998)。Review: Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy，https://www.jstor.org/stable/25054068。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：669（臺灣：664，外國：5） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1669892 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67470908
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上