:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從歷史制度論探討社會照顧機構之組織變遷--以屏東榮家為例
書刊名:人文社會科學研究
作者:邱瑜瑾林青
作者(外文):Chiou, Yu-chinLin, Ching
出版日期:2012
卷期:6:3
頁次:頁22-55
主題關鍵詞:歷史制度論組織變遷非營利組織榮民研究老人福利政策Historical institutionalismOrganizational changesNonprofit organizationVeteran researchAging welfare policy
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:92
  • 點閱點閱:89
本研究採取歷史制度論的觀點,探討影響屏東榮家的制度變遷的外在動因與內在動因;並從時間序列分析屏東榮家組織變遷不同階段的變革特色,以及不同階段的組織變革對於社會照顧專業發展之影響。研究方法採取內容分析法與深度訪談法,蒐集有關榮家變遷的相關資料。本研究的重要發現如下:一、在歷史脈絡下的外在與內在動因分析面向上:屏東榮家組織變遷受到內、外在動因交互作用所影響,在外在動因上有政治、經濟、社會三大要素;在內在動因上主要來自組織文化、專業制度與住民需求三種因素。二、在組織變遷階段與特色面向上:可分為開創時期(1950年-1979年)、精進發展時期(1980年-1989年)、專業多元時期(1990年-迄今)等三個階段。透過此三階段的時間序列分析,發現了組織變遷的過程反映了歷史制度論者所論述制度並非長久不變,決策關鍵點會不斷調整其結構限制,形成一種斷續式的均衡。三、在組織變革對照顧專業服務發展之影響面向上:第一階段開創時期在專業服務上「以就業為主,救濟為輔」的模式;到了第二階段的精進發展時期,朝向「人性關懷與權益保障」的福利思維發展;進入第三階段專業多元發展時期,朝向「社區化」的政策方向發展。四、在屏東榮家作為社會照顧機構的特色面向上,主要有三方面:(一)組織的制度特色,包含組織領導者風格、「同儕領導」的模式、延續軍中的管理模式。(二)組織的文化特色,包含「榮家」具有情感召喚的意義、榮民習慣於規律的生活模式、榮民兩岸情結逐漸淡化。(三)專業服務特色,包含同時兼具「安養」與「養護」兩大專業照顧主軸、對專業人力的規範、服務人員多為榮民第二代。
This study explores the extrinsic and intrinsic motivation that impacts the institutional change of Pingtung Veterans Home from the point of view of historical institutionalism. Also, this study conducts time series analysis to find the characteristics of institutional changes of Pingtung Veterans Home at different stages as well as the impacts of professional social care developments at different stages of institutional changes. The research method adopts content analysis and in-depth interview to collect information related to the changes of the Veterans Home. The important findings of this study are as follows:1. In the analytical aspect of historical extrinsic and intrinsic motivation: The institutional changes of Pingtung Veterans Home were affected by the interaction of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. There are three elements of politics, economy, and society in extrinsic motivation. And there are three factors of institutional culture, professional systems, and resident needs in intrinsic motivation.2. In the aspect of stages and features of institutional changes: It can be divided into three stages of initiation period (1950-1979), advancing development period (1980-1989), and professional diversification period (1990-present). Through the time series analysis of these three stages, the study found that the process of institutional change reflecting the systems discussed by the historical institutionalism commentators is not always invariable. The critical juncture decision points will continue to adjust its structural limitations and form a punctuated equilibrium.3. In the aspect of impacts of institutional changes on professional care service development: In the imitation period, the professional care service was in a "mode of employment-orientation supplemented by relief." In the second stage of advancing development period, it headed towards the development of "welfare thinking of humane caring and rights safeguard." In the current third stage of professional diversification development, it works towards the policy of "community development."4. For Pingtung Veterans Home being featured as a social care institution, there are three main aspects:(1) Features of institutional systems including institution's leader style, "peers leadership" mode, and the continuation of military management mode.(2) Cultural features of an institution including the significance of emotional summon from the "Veterans Home," veterans being accustomed to the mode of a regular life, and veterans' cross-strait complex slowly fading.(3) Features of professional service including two major professional cares of "retirement home" as well as "eldercare and rehabilitation", norm of professional personnel, and service personnel who are mostly the second generation of veterans.
期刊論文
1.(1960)。屏東榮家人力編制。臺灣省政府公報,秋字第27期。  延伸查詢new window
2.(1973)。規定各機關、學校若有工友出缺時,應以三分之一的員額輔導榮民就業。臺灣省政府公報,冬字第6期。  延伸查詢new window
3.(1979)。國軍退徐役軍官榮民證之申請。臺灣省政府公報,夏字第2期。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳燕禎(20060600)。我國老人照顧資源變遷之初探。社區發展季刊,114,239-248。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.楊培珊、鄭讚源、黃松林(2009)。「榮譽國民之家」組織文化革新:由慈善安置到專業服務。社區發展季刊,125,62-176。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Nørgaard, Asbjørn Sonne(1996)。Rediscovering Reasonable Rationality in Institutional Analysis。European Journal of Political Research,29,31-57。  new window
7.張康齡(20031000)。再論高職存廢問題--雙重偶連性的觀點。人文及社會學科教學通訊,14(3)=81,76-87。  延伸查詢new window
8.曾建元(2001)。歷史制度論探源。世新大學學報,11,195-206。  延伸查詢new window
9.March, James G.、Olsen, Johan P.(1996)。Institutional Perspectives on Political Institutions。Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions,9(3),247-264。  new window
10.Hall, Peter A.、Taylor, Rosemary C. R.(1998)。The Potential of Historical Institutionalism: A Response to Hay and Wincott。Political Studies,46(5),958-962。  new window
11.黃宗昊(20100900)。歷史制度論的方法立場與理論建構。問題與研究,49(3),145-176。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.劉曉芬(20060500)。歷史制度主義觀點的教育政策分析--以高職轉型綜合高中為例。教育政策論壇,9(2),1-21。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.蔡相廷(20101100)。歷史制度主義的興起與研究取向--政治學研究途徑的探討。臺北市立教育大學學報. 人文社會類,41(2),39-76。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Krasner, Stephen D.(19840100)。Review Article: Approaches to the State: Alternative Conceptions and Historical Dynamics。Comparative Politics,16(2),223-246。  new window
15.胡婉玲(20011200)。論歷史制度主義的制度變遷理論。新世紀智庫論壇,16,86-95。  延伸查詢new window
16.Pierson, Paul(2000)。Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics。American Political Science Review,94(2),251-267。  new window
17.詹火生、林慧芬(2003)。台灣社會福利過去、現在與未來。國家政策論壇,冬季號。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.楊雨榮(2008)。面臨高齡化時代榮譽國民之家組織再造之研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.退輔會統計處(2009)。榮民各項資料統計年鑑。台北:行政院國軍退除役官兵輔導委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.屏東榮家(1950-1979)。屏東榮家大事記。屏東:屏東榮家。  延伸查詢new window
3.范麗娟(1996)。榮家榮民適應生活與需求之深度訪談。台北:行政院國家科學委員會。  延伸查詢new window
4.白秀雄(1995)。民生主義福利社會之理論與實踐。臺北:正中書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Thelen, Kathleen(1992)。Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
6.Migdal, Joel. S.(1997)。Studying the State。Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure。  new window
其他
1.黃秉德(2008)。非營利機構的新經營觀點:社會事業與社會創投,http://npo-emba.blogspot.com/2008/03/blog-post_05.html $d20090425, 2009/04/25。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Steinmo, S.(2008)。What is historical institutionalism?。Approaches in the social sciences。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE