臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：臉書使用之第三人效果研究：以壹傳媒交易案為例
書刊名：資訊社會研究
作者：林聖庭
作者(外文)：Lin, Sheng-ting
出版日期：2014
卷期：26
頁次：頁31-62
主題關鍵詞：壹傳媒；第三人效果；社群網站；社會距離；涉入感；Next Media；The Third-Person Effect；Social network；Social distance；Involvement
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:70
  • 點閱點閱:143
2012年台灣壹傳媒交易案在臉書（Facebook）上得到高度討論，臉書還成為組織和動員的有效管道。研究者試探究臉書使用者如何評估該新聞的影響性，基此援引「第三人效果」作為理論框架，以調查法探討在臉書上討論的新聞事件，會不會讓使用者認為他人比自己更容易受到影響，因而產生「限制媒介」的行為意圖。研究發現有三：一、臉書使用者認為壹傳媒交易案對他人的影響，沒有顯著大於對自己的影響，且受訪者在評估社會距離近的人時，傾向認為他們比社會距離遠者更容易受影響。二、「涉入感」是有效預測第三人效果的變項，涉入感較強的受訪者，對於壹傳媒交易案產生了「反轉的第三人效果」；三、「對自己的影響」和「對他人的影響」的感知皆能預測臉書使用者支持限制媒介的意願。
In 2012, when Want Want China Times Group was going to acquire the Next Media Group, the government was requested to draft the antitrust law exclusively regulating the media by many civic groups, many of whom were organized online. These groups used Facebook to connect and mobilize effectively. This paper tries to investigate how Facebook users evaluate the influences of the information concerning the sale of the Next Media on themselves by adopting the Third-Person Effect theory (TPE). The research surveyed the Facebook users' cognition and behaviors about the sale of Next Media and hypothesized that people with different levels of issue-involvement may react differently.The survey data finds that: First, Facebook users do not think that the information concerning the sale influences others more than on themselves. Second, issue-involvement is a significant variable to predict the Third-Person Effect. Facebook users with high issue-involvement will have ”the Reverse Third-Person Effect”. Finally, the perceived effect on self and the perceived effects on others can positively predict the intentions and behaviors of supporting the censorship of sale of the Next Media.
期刊論文
1.林美雅、向倩儀、蔡維鴻(20050600)。瘦身廣告的第三人效果。中華傳播學刊，7，227-253。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Vallone, R.、Ross, L.、Lepper, M. R.(1985)。The hostile media phenomenon: Biased perception of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，49(3)，577-585。  new window
3.Tong, S. T.、Van Der Heide, B.、Langwell, L.、Walther, J. B.(2008)。Too much of a good thing? The relationship between number of friends and interpersonal impressions on Facebook。Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication，13(3)，531-549。  new window
4.Rucinski, Dianne、Salmon, Charles T.(1990)。The‘Other’as the Vulnerable Voter: A Study of the Third-Person Effect in the 1988 U.S. Presidential Campaign。International Journal of Public Opinion Research，2(4)，345。  new window
5.陳志賢、陳志萍(20070400)。電視改革的第三人效果與新社會運動模式--以大高雄地區民眾意見調查為例。新聞學研究，91，35-83。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Paek, H. J.、Pan, Z.、Sun, Y.、Abisaid, J.、Houden, D.(2005)。The third-person perception as social judgment: An exploration of social distance and uncertainty in perceived effects of political attack ads。Communication Research，32(2)，143-170。  new window
7.Salwen, Michael B.、Driscoll, Paul D.(1997)。Consequences of third person perception in support of press restrictions in the O.J. Simpson trial。Journal of Communication，47(2)，60-78。  new window
8.蘇鵬元(20120907)。臉書社會運動台灣新力量。新新聞，1331，13-35。  延伸查詢new window
9.羅文輝、程曉萱(20120700)。谷歌退出中國新聞的第三人效果研究。資訊社會研究，23，66-95。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Dority, B.(1989)。Feminist Moralism,"Pornography" and Censorship。Pornography: Private Right or Public Menace，111，112。  new window
11.Elder, T. J.、Douglas, K. M.、Sutton, R.(2006)。Perceptions of social influence when messages favour 'us' versus 'them' A closer look at the social distance effect。European Journal of Social Psychology，36(3)，353-365。  new window
12.Hense, R.、Wright, C.(2006)。The Development of the Attitudes Toward Censorship Questionnaire。Journal of Applied Social Psychology，22(21)，1666-1675。  new window
13.Lo, V.、Paddon, A.(2001)。Third‐person effect, gender differences, pornography exposure and support for restriction of pornography。Asian Journal of Communication，11(1)，120-142。  new window
14.Paradise, A.、Sullivan, M.(2012)。Visible Threats? The Third-Person Effect in Perceptions of the Influence of Facebok Cyberpsychology。Behavior and Social Networking，15(1)，55-60。  new window
15.Snyder, M. L.、Stephan, W. G.、Rosenfield, D.(1978)。Attributional egotism。New directions in attribution research，2，91-117。  new window
16.Stephan, W. G.、Gollwitzer, P. M.(1981)。Affect as a mediator of attributional egotism。Journal of Experimental Social Psychology，17(5)，443-458。  new window
17.White, H. D.(1986)。Majorities for censorship。Library journal，111(12)，31-38。  new window
18.Xu, Jie、Gonzenbach, William J.(2008)。Does a perceptual discrepancy lead to action? A meta-analysis of the behavioral component of the third-person effect。International Journal of Public Opinion Research，20(3)，375-385。  new window
19.Zhang, Jie、Daugherty, T.(2009)。Third-person effect and social networking: Implications for online marketing and word-of-mouth communication。American Journal of Business，24(2)，53-64。  new window
20.Lasorsa, D. L.(1989)。Real and Perceived Effects of Amerika。Journalism Quarterly，66(2)，373-378。  new window
21.Perloff, R. M.(1989)。Ego-involvement and the Third Person Effect of Televised News Coverage。Communication Research，16(2)，236-267。  new window
22.Price, Vincent、Tewksbury, David(1996)。Measuring the Third-person Effect of News: The Impact of Question Order, Contrast and Knowledge。International Journal of Public Opinion Research，8(2)，120-141。  new window
23.Jensen, J. D.、Hurley, R. J.(2005)。Third-person effects and the environment: Social distance, social desirability, and presumed behavior。Journal of Communication，55(2)，242-256。  new window
24.Sun, Ye、Shen, Lijiang、Pan, Zhongdang(2008)。On the behavioral component of the third-person effect。Communication Research，35(2)，257-278。  new window
25.Cohen, Jeremy、Mutz, Diana、Price, Vincent、Gunther, Albert C.(1988)。Perceived Impact of Defamation: An Experiment on Third-person Effects。Public Opinion Quarterly，52(2)，161-173。  new window
26.Chia, S. C.、Lu, K. H.、Mcleod, D. M.(2004)。Sex, lies, and video compact disc: A case study on third-person perception and motivations for media censorship。Communication Research，31(1)，109-130。  new window
27.Gunther, A. C.(1991)。What We Think Others Think: Cause and Consequence in the Third-person Effect。Communication Research，18(3)，355-372。  new window
28.Gunther, Albert C.、Mundy, Paul(1993)。Biased Optimism and the Third-person Effect。Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly，70(1)，58-67。  new window
29.Gunther, A. C.、Thorson, E.(1992)。Perceived persuasive effects of product commercials and public service announcements: Third-person effects in new domains。Communication Research，19(5)，574-596。  new window
30.Lo, V.、Wei, R.(2002)。Third-person effect, gender, pornography on the Internet。Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media，46(1)，13-33。  new window
31.Meirick, Patrick C.(2004)。Topic-relevant Reference Groups and Dimensions of Distance: Political Advertising and First- and Third-person Effects。Communication Research，31(2)，234-255。  new window
32.Mutz, Diana C.(1989)。The influence of perceptions of media influence: Third person effects and the public expression of opinions。International Journal of Public Opinion Research，1(1)，3-23。  new window
33.林素真(20091000)。總統大選公民辯論會之第三人效果。新聞學研究，101，45-88。new window  延伸查詢new window
34.Gunther, A. C.、Hwa, A. P.(1996)。Public perceptions of television influence and opinions about censorship in Singapore。International Journal of Public Opinion Research，8(3)，248-265。  new window
35.McLeod, Douglas M.、Eveland, William P. Jr.、Nathanson, Amy I. Jr.(1997)。Support for Censorship of Violent and Misogynic Rap Lyrics: An Analysis of the Third-person Effect。Communication Research，24(2)，153-174。  new window
36.谷玲玲、張惠蓉(20020700)。網路社群的人際互動--以玉山虛擬航空公司為例。新聞學研究，72，55-83。new window  延伸查詢new window
37.Davison, W. P.(1983)。The Third-Person Effect in Communication。Public Opinion Quarterly，47，1-15。  new window
38.羅文輝(20001000)。媒介負面內容與社會距離對第三人效果認知的影響。新聞學研究，65，95-129。new window  延伸查詢new window
39.Salwen, Michael B.、Dupagne, Michel(1999)。The third-person effect: Perceptions of the media's influence and immoral consequences。Communication Research，26(5)，523-549。  new window
40.Gunther, Albert C.(1995)。Overrating the X-rating: The third-person perception and support for censorship of pornography。Journal of Communication，45(1)，27-38。  new window
41.胡幼偉、蔡烔青、郭文平(19941000)。第三者效果：一項民意研究的新課題。民意研究季刊，190，49-68。  延伸查詢new window
42.Festinger, Leon(1954)。A theory of social comparison processes。Human Relations，7(2)，117-140。  new window
43.李政忠、曾淑芬(20040100)。網路調查所面臨的問題與解決建議。資訊社會研究，6，1-24。new window  延伸查詢new window
44.Boyd, Danah M.、Ellison, Nicole B.(2007)。Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship。Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication，13(1)，210-230。  new window
45.Miller, A. G.、Jones, E. E.、Hinkle, S.(1981)。A Robust Attribution Error in the Personality Domain。Journal of Experimental Social Psychology，17，587-600。  new window
46.McLeod, Douglas M.、Detenber, Benjamin H.、Eveland, William P., Jr.(2001)。Behind the Third-person Effect: Differentiating Perceptual Processes for Self and Other。Journal of Communication，51(4)，678-695。  new window
47.Neuwirth, Kurt、Frederick, Edward(2002)。Extending the Framework of Third-, First-, and Second-Person Effects。Mass Communication and Society，5(2)，113-140。  new window
48.Meirick, P. C.(2005)。Rethinking the Target Corollary: The Effects of Social Distance, Perceived Exposure, and Perceived Predispositions on First-person and Thirdperson Perceptions。Communication Research，32(6)，822-843。  new window
會議論文
1.胡幼偉(199706)。選舉新聞的第三者效果。1997年中華傳播學會論文研討會：傳播、科技與社會。台北縣深坑。  延伸查詢new window
2.羅文輝、吳筱玫、向倩儀、劉蕙苓(2007)。網路色情對青少年性態度與性行爲的影響。2007中華傳播學會論文研討會。台北。  延伸查詢new window
3.林照眞(2012)。爲什麼聚合？有關台灣電視新聞轉借新媒體訊息之現象分析與批判。中華傳播學會年會。臺中：靜宜大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Thomson, J. A.、Wigley, S. M.(2011)。Understanding Self Advertising on Social Networking Cites: An Application of Festinger’s Social Comparison Theory。  new window
2.胡幼偉(1998)。傳播訊息的第三者效果：理論探源與實證研究。臺北市：五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Rheingold, H.(1993)。The Virtual Community: Finding Connection in a Computerized World。Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc。  new window
其他
1.(20121217)。從反媒體壟斷看「電視發展」這檔事，http://www.brain.com.tw/News/ RealNewsContent.aspx?ID=17963， 2012/12/17。  延伸查詢new window
2.林文彬(20121005)。全球第三大國臉書用戶破十億。  延伸查詢new window
3.涂鉅旻(20121214)。反壟斷學生：壹傳媒案審查應公開，http://newtalk.tw/ news/2012/12/14/31975.html， 2012/12/14。  延伸查詢new window
4.郭政芬(20121210)。反媒體巨獸聯盟：希望政府嚴審併購案。  延伸查詢new window
5.劉力仁，歐素美，洪美秀，李覯慧(20121214)。反媒體壟斷學界發起千人大連署。  延伸查詢new window
6.劉力仁，曾韋禎(20130110)。市占怎麼算？四大報銷量當基準，http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2013/new/ jan/10/today-fo3.htm， 2013/01/10。  延伸查詢new window
7.張勵德(20121017)。《蘋果》工會判與黎對談〉，http://www.appledaily.com.tw/appledaily/article/ headline/20121017/34579157/， 2012/10/17。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Freedman, Des(2010)。The political economy of the "New" News Environment。New media, old news: Journalism and democracy in the digital age。London：Sage。  new window
2.Salmon, C. T.(1986)。Perspectives on involvement in consumer and communication research。Progress in communication sciences。Norwood, NJ：Ablex。  new window
3.Ross, L.(1977)。The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process。Advances in experimental social psychology。New York：Academic Press。  new window
4.Tajfel, Henri、Turner, John C.(1979)。An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict。The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations。Brooks/Cole。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1063（臺灣：1046，外國：17） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1695817 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67507779
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上