臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：電視改革的第三人效果與新社會運動模式--以大高雄地區民眾意見調查為例
書刊名：新聞學研究
作者：陳志賢 引用關係／陳志萍
作者(外文)：Chen, Chih-hsien／Chen, Lola C. P.
出版日期：2007
卷期：91
頁次：頁35-83
主題關鍵詞：第三人效果；新社會運動；路徑分析；電視改革；電視的批判效能感；The third-person effect；New social movement；Path analysis；Television reform；Media efficacy
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(9) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:8
  • 共同引用共同引用:544
  • 點閱點閱:111
本研究主要目的是想瞭解大高雄地區居民對電視與電視改革行動的認知及評價，並探討第三人效果與其他可能影響因素。路徑分析發現：受訪者教育程度愈高、愈具備電視批判效能感、愈不認為電視對自己有太多負面影響、愈自認瞭解電視產業發展者、愈贊同媒體管制看法的民眾，就愈傾向支持電視改革。而單因子變異數分析則顯示，愈認為別人與自己都不太受電視負面影響者可能才是臺灣電視改革的主要支持群體。
The study aims to understand how the residents in Kaohsiung city and county perceive and evaluate Taiwan’s television performance and reform. The third-person effect as well as other possible influential factors are also taken into account and empirically examined in a telephone survey. According to the statistical results of a path analysis, residents with a higher education, media efficacy, and regulatory views tend to support television reform. Contrary to the hypothesis of the third-person effect, the study argues that the less negative impacts on both themselves and others are presumed by those respondents, the more likely that they will support television reform. A new social movement model has been tested and suggested as a better approach to comprehend television reform in southern Taiwan.
期刊論文
1.Jensen, J. D.、Hurley, R. J.(2005)。Third-person effects and the environment: Social distance, social desirability, and presumed behavior。Journal of Communication，55(2)，242-256。  new window
2.Chia, S. C.、Lu, K. H.、Mcleod, D. M.(2004)。Sex, lies, and video compact disc: A case study on third-person perception and motivations for media censorship。Communication Research，31(1)，109-130。  new window
3.Gunther, A. C.(1991)。What We Think Others Think: Cause and Consequence in the Third-person Effect。Communication Research，18(3)，355-372。  new window
4.Gunther, Albert C.、Mundy, Paul(1993)。Biased Optimism and the Third-person Effect。Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly，70(1)，58-67。  new window
5.Gunther, A. C.、Thorson, E.(1992)。Perceived persuasive effects of product commercials and public service announcements: Third-person effects in new domains。Communication Research，19(5)，574-596。  new window
6.Meirick, Patrick C.(2004)。Topic-relevant Reference Groups and Dimensions of Distance: Political Advertising and First- and Third-person Effects。Communication Research，31(2)，234-255。  new window
7.Rojas, Hernando、Shah, Dhavan V.、Faber, Ronald J.(1996)。For the Good of Others: Censorship and the Third-person Effect。International Journal of Public Opinion Research，8(2)，163-186。  new window
8.Tsfati, Yariv、Cohen, Jonathan(2005)。The Influence of Presumed Media Influence on Democratic Legitimacy: The Case of Gaza Settlers。Communication Research，32(6)，794-821。  new window
9.David, P.、Liu, K.、Myser, M.(2004)。Methodological artifact or persistent bias?。Communication Research，31(2)，206-233。  new window
10.Gunther, A. C.、Hwa, A. P.(1996)。Public perceptions of television influence and opinions about censorship in Singapore。International Journal of Public Opinion Research，8(3)，248-265。  new window
11.Tewksbury, D.、Moy, P.、Weis, D. S.(2004)。Preparations for Y2K: Revisiting the behavioral component of the third-person effect。Journal of Communication，54(1)，138-155。  new window
12.Salwen, Michael B.、Driscoll, Paul D.(1997)。Consequences of Third-person Perception in Support of Press Restrictions in the O. J. Simpson Trial。Journal of Communication，47(2)，60-78。  new window
13.Shah, Dhavan V.、Faber, Ronald J.、Youn, Seounmi(1999)。Susceptibility and Severity: Perceptual Dimensions Underlying the Third-person Effect。Communication Research，26(2)，240-267。  new window
14.Carroll, William K.、Hackett, Robert A.(2006)。Democratic Media Activism Through the Lens of Social Movement Theory。Media Culture Society，28(1)，83-104。  new window
15.Hourigan, Niamh(2001)。New Social Movement Theory and Minority Language Television Campaigns。European Journal of Communication，16(1)，77-100。  new window
16.管中祥、張時健(20050300)。新自由主義下的臺灣媒體改革運動。臺灣史料研究，24，196-236。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.羅文輝、林文琪、牛隆光、蔡卓芬(20030100)。媒介依賴與媒介使用對選舉新聞可信度的影響--五種媒介的比較。新聞學研究，74，19-44。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Davison, W. P.(1983)。The Third-Person Effect in Communication。Public Opinion Quarterly，47，1-15。  new window
19.羅文輝(20001000)。媒介負面內容與社會距離對第三人效果認知的影響。新聞學研究，65，95-129。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.張茂桂(19940900)。民間社會、資源動員與新社會運動--臺灣社會運動研究的理論志向。香港社會科學學報，4，33-66。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.林麗雲(20030600)。坐而言，起而行：「無盟」的實踐。臺灣社會研究季刊，50，145-169。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.何榮幸(19960100)。一個自主性新聞專業團體的誕生--記「臺灣新聞記者協會」組織過程與實踐經驗。新聞學研究，52，95-108。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.楊汝椿(19960100)。另類記者的媒體改造經驗：兼論內部新聞自由和新聞倫理重建。新聞學研究，52，83-94。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.McCarthy, John D.、Zald, Mayer N.(1977)。Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory。American Journal of Sociology，82(6)，1212-1241。  new window
25.Gunther, Albert C.(1995)。Overrating the X-rating: The third-person perception and support for censorship of pornography。Journal of Communication，45(1)，27-38。  new window
26.Henriksen, Lisa、Flora, June A.(1999)。Third-person perception and children: Perceived impact of pro- and anti-smoking ads。Communication Research，26(6)，643-665。  new window
27.王甫昌(19960700)。臺灣反對運動的共識動員：一九七九至一九八九年兩次挑戰高峰的比較。臺灣政治學刊，1，129-209。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.Gamson, William A.、Modigliani, Andre(1989)。Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach。American Journal of Sociology，95(1)，1-37。  new window
29.羅文輝、牛隆光(20030400)。自尊、第三人效果與對限制媒介支持度的關聯性研究。新聞學研究，75，141-167。new window  延伸查詢new window
30.林照真(19990700)。當前臺灣近似媒體觀察組織的幾個盲點。新聞學研究，60，171-176。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.Snow, David A.、Rochford, Edmund Burke Jr.、Worden, Steven K. Jr.、Benford, Robert D.(1986)。Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation。American Sociological Review，51(4)，464-481。  new window
32.McLeod, Douglas M.、Detenber, Benjamin H.、Eveland, William P., Jr.(2001)。Behind the Third-person Effect: Differentiating Perceptual Processes for Self and Other。Journal of Communication，51(4)，678-695。  new window
33.Grass, G.、Grunow, B.(2003)。Media Reform Movement Comes of Age。People's Weekly World (US)，18(24)。  new window
34.Klandermans, Bert(1984)。Mobilization and Participation: Social-psychological Expansisons of Resource Mobilization Theory。American Sociological Review，49(5)，583-600。  new window
35.Nichols, John、McChesney, Robert W.(2002)。On the Verge in Vermont: Media Reform Movement Nears Critical Mass。Extra!。  new window
36.Hackett, Robert(2000)。Taking Back the Media: Notes on the Potential for a Communicative Democracy Movement。Studies in Political Economy，63，61-86。  new window
37.McChesney, R. W.、Nichols, J.(2002)。The Making of a Movement。The Nation，274(1)，11-17。  new window
38.Paek, Hye-Jin、潘忠黨、Sun, Ye、Abisaid, Joseph、Houden, Debra(2005)。The Third-person Perception as Social Judgment: An Exploration of Social Distance and Uncertainty in Perceived Effects of Political Attack Ads。Communication Research，32(2)，143-170。  new window
會議論文
1.Lee, C.、Yang, S.(1996)。Third-person Perception and Support for Censorship of Sexually Explicit Visual Content: A Korean Case。0。  new window
2.Lo, V. H.、Paddon, A. R.(1998)。The Third-person Perception and Support for Restrictions of Pornography: Some Methodological Problems。0。  new window
學位論文
1.洪裕程(2000)。運動 : 安身立命於無以為家(碩士論文)。國立東華大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Habermas, J.、McCarthy, T.(1987)。The theory of communicative action。Cambridge：Polity Press。  new window
2.Eyerman, Ron、Jamision, Andrew(1991)。Social Movements: A Cognitive Approach。University Park, Pennsylvania：Pennsylvania State University Press。  new window
3.胡幼偉(1998)。傳播訊息的第三人效果。台北：五南圖書出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.McAdam, Doug、McCarthy, John D.、Zald, Mayer N.(1996)。Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings。Cambridge University Press。  new window
5.邱皓政(2002)。量化研究統計分析：SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。臺北：五南。  延伸查詢new window
6.McChesney, Robert W.(2004)。The Problem of the Media: U.S. Communication Politics in the 21st Century。New York, NY：Monthly Review Press。  new window
7.Wimmer, Roger D.、Dominick, Joseph R.、李天任、藍莘(1995)。大眾媒體研究。亞太圖書出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.Melucci, Alberto(1989)。Nomads of the Present: Social Movements and Individual Needs in Contemporary Society。Philadelphia, PA：Temple University Press。  new window
9.Touraine, Alain、Godzich, Myrna(1988)。Return of the Actor: Social Theory in Postindustrial Society。Minneapolis, MN：University of Minnesota Press。  new window
10.McAdam, Doug(1982)。Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930-1970。University of Chicago Press。  new window
11.王振寰(1996)。誰統治台灣？轉型中的國家機器與權力結構。巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Turner, Ralph H.、Killian, Lewis M.(1957)。Collective Behavior。Collective Behavior。Englewood Cliffs, NJ。  new window
13.Castells, F.(1978)。The Social Democratic Image of Society。The Social Democratic Image of Society。London, UK。  new window
14.Herman, E. S.、Chomsky, N.(1988)。Manufacturing Consent。Manufacturing Consent。New York, NY。  new window
15.Starr, Jerold M.(2000)。Air Wars: The Fight to Reclaim Public Broadcasting。Air Wars: The Fight to Reclaim Public Broadcasting。Boston, MA。  new window
16.楊國樞(1989)。臺灣新興社會運動研討會總結報告。臺灣新興社會運動。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
17.Scott, Ben、McChesney, Robert W.(2006)。A Century of Radical Media Criticism in the USA。Radical Mass Media Criticism: A Cultural Genealogy。Montreal, Canada。  new window
其他
1.Johnson, Nicholas(2003)。The History of Media Reform: Scanning the Horizon，0。  new window
圖書論文
1.Gamson, William A.(1992)。The Social Psychology of Collective Action。Frontiers in Social Movement Theory。New Haven, CT：Yale University Press。  new window
2.洪永泰(2001)。抽樣。民意調查。台北：五南。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：672（臺灣：633，外國：39） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1473665 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67275133
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上