臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：解嚴前後臺灣都市政治的再檢視(1986~1992)：網絡觀點下的臺中市都市發展
書刊名：都市與計劃
作者：王光旭 引用關係／熊瑞梅 引用關係
作者(外文)：Wang, Guang-xu／Hsung, Ray-may
出版日期：2014
卷期：41:1
頁次：頁1-41
主題關鍵詞：政策網絡；社會網絡；都市政治；都市菁英；臺中都市發展；地方派系；Policy network；Social network；Urban politics；Urban elites；Taichung urban development；Local faction
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:496
  • 點閱點閱:177
本研究的重點在於透過網絡分析中結構對等的分析方法，並以台中市在解嚴前後的都市發展為案例，對過去台灣歷史轉折關鍵時期都市政治與發展的研究進行重新的梳理與對話。作者針對在1986到1992年間參與重要都市發展事件的78個都市菁英的四個網絡資料：都市事務討論網絡、信任關係網絡、技術諮商網絡、和資源動員網絡，整合成一個多重的網絡進行分析，以結構對等分析法找出四種社會網絡的隱藏（latent）結構位置，並深入討論都市菁英的權力結構與都市發展價值觀的差異。分析結果顯示與過去強調都市成長機器的研究結果有些許差異：一、當時的都市菁英不全然以都市成長意識為都市發展的主導方向，市政府的行政部門與市長間對於都市發展方向不見得一致；二、台中市都市發展網絡呈現了以市政府的行政部門與市長為核心的網絡結構，而學者專家在都市發展的意識型態與網絡中的位置與核心團體呈現對立的局面；三、從發展趨勢來看，自1986年起，台中市都市菁英的價值觀開始強調地方分權與接受民眾參與，台中市的都市政權在解嚴後愈來愈走向多元化與複雜化的治理機制。
This study analyzes the power distribution in urban politics before and after the lifting of martial law and explores the development values of urban elites through social network analysis of structural equivalence. For resource dependency analysis, this study used data from four policy networks (urban affair discussion, trust, technical advice, and resource exchange) that were collected from 78 urban elites and 8 critical urban development events in Taichung City. Analytical results show that (1) urban growth is not a dominant developmental direction for local elites in Taichung City. (2) The core of the urban development policy network is occupied by Block 2, the administrative sector in the Taichung City Government; the mayor is the most powerful block in urban development policy and scholars are isolated and located at the periphery of the policy network. (3) Finally, since actors in different positions accept the ideas of citizen participation and decentralization, the urban regime in Taichung City after the lift of martial law has become increasingly diverse and dynamic.
期刊論文
1.Laumann, E. O.、Marsden, P. V.、Galaskiewicz, J.(1978)。Community-elite influence structures: Extension of a network approach。American Journal of Sociology，83(3)，594-631。  new window
2.Wang, Guang-Xu(2011)。A Debate on Transforming Local Governance in the UK : Is Partnership A Better Way?。Journal of Politics and Law，4(1)，73-83。  new window
3.王光旭(20080900)。政策網絡的行動體系分析 : 以臺中工業區聯外道路案為例。政治科學論叢，37，151-210。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.王光旭(20051200)。都市計畫審議機制之制度分析：以臺中市為例。行政暨政策學報，41，35-79。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.熊瑞梅、王光旭(20120300)。政策網絡中的對偶互動及其解釋因素：以臺中市都市發展政策的菁英網絡為例，1986~1992。政治科學論叢，51，1-50。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Borgatti, S. P.、Everett, M. G.(1992)。Notions of position in social network analysis。Sociological Methodology，22，1-35。  new window
7.Friedkin, N. E.(1984)。Structural equivalence and cohesion explanations of social homogeneity。Sociological Methods and Research，12(3)，235-261。  new window
8.Hodge, G. A.、Greve, C.(2007)。Public-private partnerships: an international performance review。Public Administration Review，67(3)，545-558。  new window
9.Burt, R. S.(1978)。Cohesion versus structural equivalence as a basis for network subgroups。Sociological Methods and Research，7(2)，189-212。  new window
10.Laumann, E. O.、Marsden, P. V.(1982)。Microstructural Analysis in interorganizational systems。Social Networks，4(4)，329-348。  new window
11.Jessop, Bob(1997)。Capitalism and its future: Remarks on regulation, government and governance。Review of International Political Economy，4(3)，561-581。  new window
12.熊瑞梅(20010200)。都市事件行動體系的分析--以臺中市為例。國立臺灣大學社會學刊，29，59-110。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Kaboolian, L.(1998)。The New Public Management Challenging the Boundaries of the Management vs. Administration Debate。Public Administration Review，58(3)，189-193。  new window
14.White, Harrison C.、Boorman, Scott A.、Breiger, Ronald L.(1976)。Social structure from multiple networks: I Blockmodels of roles and positions。American Journal of Sociology，81(4)，730-780。  new window
15.Molotch, Harvey(1976)。The City as a Growth Machine: Toward a Political Economy of Place。American Journal of Sociology，82(2)，309-332。  new window
16.雷壹閑(1994)。透視全臺灣最肥的單位。財訊，142，80-83。  延伸查詢new window
17.雷壹閑(1994)。都委會、建築商是最佳拍檔。財訊，142，86-88。  延伸查詢new window
18.Laumann, E.、Marsden, P.(1979)。The Analysis of Oppositional Structures in Political Elite: Identifying Collective Actors。American Sociological Review，44，713-732。  new window
19.Kaufman, R. R.(1974)。The Patron-client Concept and Macro-politics and Problems。Comparative Studies in Society and History，16 (3)，284-308。  new window
會議論文
1.Gerber, E. R.、Henry, A.、Lubell, M.(2010)。The political logic of local collaboration in regional planning in California。The 2010 Duke Networks Conference。CD-Proceedings。  new window
2.熊瑞梅、邱瑜瑾(1996)。都市政治菁英的社會資源與社會圈：以臺中市為例。臺中：東海大學社會學系。47-102。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.熊瑞梅(1995)。台中市都市變遷：區位、政府及地方菁英影響力結構（II）--行動體系觀之分析。台北：行政院國家科學委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.熊瑞梅、東海大學社會學系［計畫執行］(1992)。快速成長的郊區之菁英影響力結構及居民社會資源 (計畫編號：NSC 81-0301-H029-01)。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.曾水亭(1988)。台灣的房地市場與民間資本：以國泰集團爲例(碩士論文)。國立台灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.王光旭(2009)。決策的社會鑲嵌性及其影響：臺灣中醫及牙醫健保總額支付委員會決策機制之分析(博士論文)。國立政治大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.林佳蓉(1999)。地方權力結構與空間政策--以台南市為例(碩士論文)。國立成功大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.邱瑜瑾(1996)。解嚴後臺中市都市發展形塑的社會機制(博士論文)。東海大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.賴志彰(1996)。投機城市的興起--戰後台中市都市空間轉化之研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Mollenkopf, John H.(1983)。The Contested City。Princeton University Press。  new window
2.Knoke, D.、Pappi, F. U.、Broadbent, J.、Tsujinaka, Y.(1996)。Comparing Policy Networks: Labor Politics in the U. S., Germany, and Japan。New York：Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.Healey, P.(2007)。Urban Complexity and Spatial Strategies: Towards a Relational Planning for Our Times。London：Routledge。  new window
4.Jessop, B.(1991)。State Theory: Putting Capitalist States in Their Place。University Park：The Pennsylvania State University Press。  new window
5.Nadel, S. F.(1957)。The Theory of Social Structure。New York：Free Press。  new window
6.Whitt, J. Allen(1982)。Urban Elites and Mass Transportation: The Dialectics of Power。Princeton University Press。  new window
7.Kettl, D. F.(1993)。Sharing Power: Public Government and Private Markets。Washington, D. C.：The Brookings Institution。  new window
8.Park, Robert E.、Everett, Cerrington Hughes(1952)。Human Communities: The City and Human Ecology。Free Press。  new window
9.羅家德(2005)。社會網分析講義。北京：社會科學文獻出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.Knoke, David、Kuklinski, James H.(1982)。Network analysis: Basic concepts。Sage Publications Ltd.。  new window
11.Scott, John P.(2000)。Social Network Analysis: A Handbook。Sage Publications。  new window
12.Wasserman, Stanley、Faust, Katherine(1994)。Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications。Cambridge University Press。  new window
13.Koppenjan, J. F. M.、Klijn, E. H.(2004)。Managing Uncertainties in Networks: A Network Approach to Problem Solving and Decision Making。Routledge。  new window
14.Stone, C. N.(1989)。Regime politics: Governing Atlanta 1946-1988。Lawrence, KA：University Press of Kansas。  new window
15.Galaskiewicz, J.(1979)。Exchange Networks and Community Politics。SAGE。  new window
16.Castells, Manuel、Sheridan, Alan(1977)。The Urban Question: A Marxist Approach。Cambridge, Mass：London：MIT Press：Edward Arnold。  new window
17.Laumann, Edward O.、Pappi, Franz Urban(1976)。Networks of Collective Action: A Perspective on Community Influence Systems。New York：Academic Press。  new window
18.Castells, Manuel(1983)。The City and the Grassroots。Berkeley, California：Los Angeles, California：University of California, Berkeley。  new window
19.Laumann, Edward O.、Knoke, David(1987)。The Organizational State: Social Choice in National Policy Domains。University of Wisconsin Press。  new window
20.陳東升(19950000)。金權城市：地方派系、財團與臺北都會發展的社會學分析。臺北：巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.Knoke, David、Yang, Song(2008)。Social Network Analysis。Sage。  new window
22.王振寰(1996)。誰統治台灣？轉型中的國家機器與權力結構。巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.Logan, John R.、Molotch, H.(1987)。Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place。University of California Press。  new window
24.文崇一(1989)。社區的權力結構。臺北：東大圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
25.Savitch, H. V.(1991)。Post-Industrial Cities-Politics and Planning in New York, Paris, and London。New Jersey：Princeton University Press。  new window
其他
1.Hanneman, R. A.，Riddle, M.(2005)。Introduction to social network methods (free introductory textbook on social network analysis)，http:// faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/nettext/， 2011/10/10。  new window
圖書論文
1.Erickson, B.(1988)。The relational base of attitudes。Social Structures: A Network Approach。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.Galaskiewicz, J.(1989)。Interorganizational networks mobilizing action at the metropolitan Level。Networks of Power: Organizational Actors at the National, Corporate, and Community。Hawthorne：Aldine de Gruyter。  new window
3.Stone, C. N.(1987)。The study of politics of urban development。The Politics of Urban Development。Lawrence：University of Kansas Press。  new window
4.Marsden, P. V.、Laumann, E. O.(1977)。Collective action in a community elite: Exchange, influence resources, and issue resolution。Power, Paradigms, and Community Research。London：Sage。  new window
5.Rhodes, R. A. W.、Marsh, David(1992)。Policy Networks in British Politics: A Critique of Existing Approaches。Policy Networks in British Government。New York：Oxford University Press。  new window
6.Krackhardt, D.(1994)。The strength of Strong Ties: The Importance of Philos in Organizations。Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action。Boston, MA。  new window
7.Kickert, Walter J. M.、Klijn, Erik-Hans、Koppenjan, Joop F. M.(1997)。Introduction: A management perspective on policy networks。Managing Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector。London：Sage Publications。  new window
8.Hawley, A. H.(1968)。Human Ecology。International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences。New York：Macmillan。  new window
9.Stoker, Gerry(1995)。Regime Theory and Urban Politics。Theories of Urban Politics。London：Sage Publications Ltd.。  new window
10.Whitt, J. A.(1989)。Organizational Ties and Urban Growth。Networks of Power: Organizational Actors at the National, Corporate and Community Levels。New York, NY：Aldine de Gruyter。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：951（臺灣：950，外國：1） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1586744 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67383174
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上