:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:都市青少年自然經驗發展特質之多個案研究
書刊名:環境教育研究
作者:曾鈺琪 引用關係王順美 引用關係
作者(外文):Tseng, Yu-chiWang, Shun-mei
出版日期:2013
卷期:10:1
頁次:頁65-98
主題關鍵詞:多個案研究自然經驗都市青少年Multiple case studyNature experiencesUrban adolescent
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:26
  • 點閱點閱:35
本文為探討都市青少年自然經驗發展特性之多個案研究,從發展心理學與環境心理學之角度,描述各階段自然經驗之主要內涵、分析相關影響因素,並詮釋各時期自然經驗所反映之個人內在身心發展特質與需求,以補充既有重要生命經驗研究較為缺乏的青少年資料。研究參與者是三位從國小到大學皆擁有持續且豐富自然經驗之都市青少年,受訪時平均年齡為18歲。研究結果發現,三位青少年的自然經驗發展可分為依賴期、啟蒙期、探索期與自主期等階段。各階段之自然經驗受到教育體制與學校資源、社會關係與社會互動、個人身心發展需求等因素影響,而呈現不同的樣態。其中在自然環境的選擇上,表現出從半自然環境到原始環境的變化趨勢,並隨著年齡增長而在活動形式上呈現出高度體能挑戰的偏好。其他有關自然欣賞能力、自然興趣培養、地方依附感發展之現象,則與國外學者所描述的環境經驗發展需求互有異同。本文依據研究成果提出環境教育之實務建議,並指出後續可行的研究方向。
This multiple case study aimed to describe different periods of nature experiences of three urban adolescents. We analyzed developmental features, related social and psychological factors that influenced contents of nature experiences in each period. The participants were three 18-year-old adolescents on average who had various and continuous nature experiences from childhood to the second year of university. We collected data from in-depth interviews, field notes of participatory observation, student journals and school curriculum documents. Afterwards, we used analytical skills of grounded theory to code interview transcripts and compared the result with other sorts of data. We found that adolescents' development of nature experiences could be divided into periods of dependence, enlightenment, exploration and independence. The school policies, parents support, social relationships, psychological need to interact with peers as well as personal interest in nature characterized each period. The result also showed that as the age increased, adolescents preferred wild nature and higher challenges in activities to tamed environments and safe activities. The comparisons were made with the existing studies and suggestions were proposed according to the results and discussions.
期刊論文
1.Arnold, C.、Warner, A.(2009)。Youth and environmental action: perspectives of young environmental leaders on their formative influences。The Journal of Environmental Education,40(3),27-36。  new window
2.Chawla, L.(1998)。Significant life experiences revisited: A review of research on sources of environmental sensitivity。Environmental Education Research,4(4),369-382。  new window
3.Chawla, L.(2009)。Growing up green: Becoming an agent of care for the natural world。Journal of Developmental Processes,4(1),6-23。  new window
4.Făgerstam, E.(2012)。Children and Young People's Experience of the Natural World: Teachers' Perceptions and Observations。Australian Journal of Environmental Education,28(1),1-16。  new window
5.Gough, S.(1999)。Significant life experiences (SLE) research: A view from somewhere。Environmental Education Research,5(4),353-363。  new window
6.Gray, T.、Martin, P.(2012)。The role and place of outdoor education in the Australian National Curriculum。Australian Journal of Outdoor Education,16(1),43-54。  new window
7.Sivek, D. J.(2002)。Environmental sensitivity among Wisconsin high school students。Environmental Education Research,8(2),155-170。  new window
8.Tanner, T.(1998)。On the origins of SLE research, questions, outstanding, and other research traditions。Environmental Education Research,4(4),419-423。  new window
9.Vadala, C. E.、Bixler, R. D.、James, J. J.(2007)。Childhood play and environmental interests: Panacea or snake oil。The Journal of Environmental Education,39(1),3-18。  new window
10.Payne, P.(1999)。The significance of experience in SLE research。Environmental Education Research,5(4),365-381。  new window
11.Chawla, L.(1998)。Life Paths into Effective Environmental Action。The Journal of Environmental Education,31(1),15-26。  new window
12.Chawla, Louise(1998)。Significant life experiences revisited: A review of research on sources of environmental sensitivity。The Journal of Environmental Education,29(3),11-21。  new window
13.許世璋(200512)。影響環境行動者養成的重要生命經驗研究--著重於城鄉間世代間之比較。科學教育學刊,13(4),441-463。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.許世璋、李曉珊(20041100)。影響三位花蓮環保團體領袖其環境行動養成之生命歷程探索。環境教育學刊,3,57-74。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.董貞吟、黃乾全、何文雀、伍連女、張桂禎(19981000)。國小學童環境觀與環境經驗之調查研究--臺灣地區城鄉之比較。師大學報. 科學教育類,43(2),55-73。  延伸查詢new window
16.Tanner, T.(1998)。Choosing the right subjects in significant life experiences research。Environmental Education Research,4(4),399-417。  new window
17.許世璋(20030600)。影響花蓮環保團體積極成員其環境行動養成之重要生命經驗研究。科學教育學刊,11(2),121-139。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Chawla, Louise(1998)。Research Methods to Investigate Significant Life Experiences: Review and Recommendations。Environmental Education Research,4(4),383-397。  new window
19.Chawla, Louise(2001)。Significant Life Experiences Revisited Once Again: Response to Vol. 5(4) "Five Critical Commentaries on Significant Life Experience Research in Environmental Education"。Environmental Education Research,7(4),451-461。  new window
20.Gough, Annette(1999)。Kids Don't Like Wearing the Same Jeans as their Mums and Dads: so Whose "Life" Should be in Significant life Experiences Research?。Environmental Education Research,5(4),383-394。  new window
21.Bögeholz, S.(2006)。Nature experience and its importance for environmental knowledge,values and action: recent German empirical contributions。Environmental Education Research,12(1),65-84。  new window
學位論文
1.黃至賢(2008)。國小學童課後進行環境活動之探討─以時間運用調查(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.行政院主計處(2009)。青少年狀況調査報告98年(99/8)。臺北市:行政院主計處。  延伸查詢new window
2.Clayton, S.、Myers, G.(2009)。Conservation psychology: Understanding and promoting human care for nature。Oxford, UK:Blackwell。  new window
3.Kellert, Stephen R.(2005)。Building for life: Designing and understanding the human-nature connection。Washington, DC:Island Press。  new window
4.Sobel, D.(1993)。Children's special places: exploring the role offorts, dens, and bush houses in middle childhood。Detroit, MI:Wayne State University Press。  new window
5.Sobel, D.(2008)。Children and Nature。Portland, ME:Stenhouse Publisher。  new window
6.Thomashow, M.(1996)。Ecological identity: Becoming a reflective environmentalist。Cambridge, MA:MIT Press。  new window
7.Erikson, E. H.(1993)。Identity: Youth and Crisis。New York:W. W. Norton & Company。  new window
8.Creswell, John W.(2013)。Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches。Sage Publications, Inc.。  new window
9.Maxwell, J. A.(2005)。Qualitative research design: An interactive approach。Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage。  new window
10.Strauss, Anselm、Corbin, Juliet(1998)。Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounder Theory。Sage。  new window
11.Yin, Robert Kuo-Zuir(2009)。Case Study Research: Design and Methods。Sage Publications。  new window
其他
1.行政院主計處(1999)。中華民國青少年狀況調査報告,http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/np.asp?ctNode=2842.html, 2013/08/10。  延伸查詢new window
2.行政院教育部(20130728)。教育部國民及學前教育署補助直轄市縣(市)政府辦理國民中小學校外教學要點,http://edu.law.moe.goY.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=FL046957&KeyWord=%E6%A0%A1 %E5%A4%96%E6%95%99%E5%AD%B8.html。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Chawla, L.(2012)。The development of conservation behaviors in childhood and youth。The Oxford Handbook of Environmental and Conservation Psychology。New York, NY:Oxford University Press。  new window
2.Kellert, S. R.(2002)。Experiencing nature: Affective, cognitive and evaluative development in children。Children and nature: Psychological, sociocultural, and evolutionary investigations。Cambridge, Massachusetts:MIT Press。  new window
3.Korpela, K.(2002)。Children's environment。Handbook of environmental psychology。New York:Wiley。  new window
4.Sward, L. L.、Marcinkowski, T.(1998)。Environmental sensitivity: A review of the research 1980-1998。Essential Readings in Environmental Education。Champaign, IL:Stipes Pub. Co.。  new window
5.Chawla, L.(1992)。Childhood place attachments。Place Attachment。New York:Plenum Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE