:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣性侵害犯罪加害人社區處遇之現況與檢討
書刊名:長庚人文社會學報
作者:沈勝昂葉怡伶劉寬宏
作者(外文):Shan, Sheng-angYeh, Yi-lingLiu, Kuan-hung
出版日期:2014
卷期:7:1
頁次:頁135-165
主題關鍵詞:性侵害加害人社區處遇Sexual offenderCommunity-based treatment
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:34
  • 點閱點閱:64
本文主要目的在探討我國性侵害犯罪之現況,並透過文獻深入探討性侵害加害人之心理與行為特質、我國性侵害社區處遇模式政策及實務上操作所遭遇之問題。並進一步參酌美國、加拿大與英國之社區處遇執行方式,做為國內操作性侵害社區處遇時需注意與改善之參考。整體而言,我國性侵害社區處遇主要有以下六大問題:一、社區處遇專業人員培訓與溝通合作協調之缺失。二、社區處遇之實施缺乏主導與統合之單位。三、性侵害加害人假釋處遇之「規定內容」無法嚴格落實。四、性侵害加害人未遵守「參與治療之約束」之處理並未嚴格執行。五、未落實社區處遇團隊成員之專業資格與組成。六、性侵害治療課程之差異性太高。並分別就社區處遇行政、專業與角色定位上提出具體建議:一、行政方面(一)「社區處遇計畫」之原則與實施之「標準化」與「科學化」。(二)「性侵害」專業課程與教育訓練制定之建立與強制要求。二、專業方面(一)各層次之治療方式,推動統一化的「合作治療」。(二)測謊訓練與介入之必要。三、社區處遇團隊角色功能與定位需進一步釐清。
The main purpose of this article was to explore the current policy and program of the community-based treatment for sexual offenders in Taiwan. A comparative literature review was conducted to understand the sexual offenders' psychological characteristics, behaviors, domestic model of the community-based treatment and related problems across America, Canada and UK. Based on the review, the authors make recommendations and criticism for future legislative solutions. The findings conclude that there're several problems of the community-based treatment in Taiwan: (a) the lack of training and communicative competence for community-based treatment professionals; (b) the lack of administrative and coordinated organization in community-based treatment; (c) the ineffective relationship between the parole for sexual offenders and the practice in community-based treatment; (d) sexual offenders who drop out of the treatment cannot be restrained by the regulation effectively; (e) community-based treatment professionals' qualifications falls short of their duty assignment; (f) the high heterogeneity of the treatment for sexual offenders. Based on the findings of this study, further suggestions were summarized as follows: (a) the principle and practice of community-based treatment should be standardized and scientific; (b) the professional training program should be reconstructed and those worked with sexual offenders should compel attendance; (c) cooperation should be integrated into all aspects of treatment; (d) polygraph training is necessary in this program; (e) the role and position of community-based treatment should be clarified.
期刊論文
1.謝文彥、許春金、施雅甄(2005)。臺灣暴力犯罪趨勢之研究。中央警察大學犯罪防治學報,7,1-41。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.沈勝昂、張秀鴛(2005)。性侵害犯罪加害人社區處遇的回顧與檢討。犯罪防治學報,6,177-197。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳若璋、林烘煜(2005)。預防再犯團體模式對性罪犯之療效評估與影響。中華輔導學報,22(1),1-31。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Beech, A.、D. Fish、D. Thornton(2003)。Risk Assessment of Sex Offender。Professional Psychology: Research and Practice,34(4),339-352。  new window
5.Kirsch, L. G.、Becker, J. V.(2006)。Sexual Offending: Theory of Problem, Theory of Change, and Implications for Treatment Effectiveness。Aggression and Violent Behavior,11,208-224。  new window
6.LeBel, T. P.、R. Burnett、S. Maruna、S. Bushway(2008)。The ‘Chicken and Egg’of Subjective and Social Factors in Desistance from Crime。European Journal of Criminology,5,131-159。  new window
7.Gwenda, M. W.、G. Randolph(2008)。The Quality of Community Reintegration Planning for Child Molesters: Effects on Sexual Recidivism。Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment,20,218-240。  new window
8.Scoones, C. D.、G. M. Willis、R. C. Grace(2012)。Beyond Static and Dynamic Risk Factors: The Incremental Validity of Release Planning for Predicting Sex Offender Recidivism。Journal of Interpersonal Violence,27(2),222-238。  new window
9.Serin, R. C.、Lloyd, C. D.(2009)。Examining the Process of Offender Change: The Transition to Crime Desistance。Psychology, Crime, and Law,15,347-364。  new window
10.Hanson, R. K.、Morton-Bourgon, K. E.(2005)。The Characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies。Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,73(6),1154-1163。  new window
11.Beech, A. R.、Ward, T.(2004)。The integration of etiology and risk in sexual offenders: A theoretical framework。Aggression and Violent Behavior,10,31-63。  new window
12.Hanson, R. Karl、Bussière, Monique T.(1998)。Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies。Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,66(2),348-362。  new window
13.沈勝昂、林明傑(20071200)。變與不變:性侵害再犯「穩定動態危險因子」與「急性動態危險因子」的關係。犯罪學期刊,10(2),1-11+13-31。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.陳若璋、劉志如、林烘煜(20070900)。比較強暴犯與兒童性侵害犯接受團體治療之療效評估。中華輔導學報,22,1-31。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Shen, S. A.、K.Y. Ding、M. F. Wu(2008)。The Comparisons among Treated, Non-Treated Sexual Offenders, and General Population in Taiwanese Samples: What they have learned from therapy?。10th International Conference of the International Association for the Treatment of Sexual Offenders (IATSO) Conference 2008。Cape Town, South Africa。  new window
研究報告
1.陳炯旭(2005)。本土性侵害加害者再犯危險評估量表之建立與驗證。  延伸查詢new window
2.林明傑、鄭瑞隆(2003)。性侵害犯罪加害人再犯危險評估量表之建立研究:靜態與動態危險因素之探測與整合。財團法人婦女權益促進發展基金會。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.陳炯旭(2007)。本土化性侵害加害者再犯危險評估量表之建立與驗證。桃園:行政院衛生署桃園療養院。  延伸查詢new window
2.Cumming, G.、M. Buell(1997)。Supervision of the Sex Offender。Brandon, Vermont:The Safer Society Press。  new window
3.Hanson, R. K.(2001)。Age and Sexual Recidivism: A Comparison of Rapist and Child Molesters (User Report No. 2001-10)。Ottawa:Department of the Solicitor General of Canada。  new window
4.Laws, D. R.、T. Ward(2011)。Desistance and Sexual Offending: Alternatives to Throwing away the Keys。New York:Guilford。  new window
5.Marshall, W. L.、D. R. Laws、H. E. Barbaree(1991)。Handbook of Sexual Assault: Issues, Theories, and Treatment of the Offender。New York:Plenum Press。  new window
6.沈勝昂(2009)。性侵害犯罪加害人動態再犯危險評估與操作手冊:理論與實證。桃園:中央警察大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.楊士隆(2004)。性侵害犯罪加害人再犯率及危險因子之研究。臺北:內政部性侵害犯罪防治委員會。  延伸查詢new window
8.Carich, M. S.、Mussack, S. E.(2001)。Handbook for Sexual Abuser Assessment and Treatment。Brandon, VT:The Safer Society Press。  new window
9.Harris, A. J. R.、Hanson, R. K.(2004)。Sex Offender Recidivism: A Simple Question (No. 2204-03)。Ottawa:Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness。  new window
其他
1.法務部(2005)。性侵害犯罪付保護管束加害人測謊實施辦法發布施行新聞稿,http://www.tps.moj.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=6657&ctNode=142&mp=002。  延伸查詢new window
2.Federal Bureau of Investigation(2012)。Crime in the United States 2000,http://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/crime-in-the-united-states-2000, 2012/03/15。  new window
圖書論文
1.Brake, S. C.、D. Shannon(1997)。Using pre-treatment to increase admission in sex offenders。The sex offender: New insights, treatment innovations and legal developments。Kingston, New Jersey:Civic Research Institute。  new window
2.Carich, M. S.、Gray, A.、Rombouts, S.、Stone, M.、Pithers, W. D.(2001)。Relapse Prevention and the Sexual Assault Cycle。Handbook for Sexual Abuser Assessment and Treatment。The Safer Society Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE