臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：華人強暴迷思概念與測量工具
書刊名：中華心理學刊
作者：黃軍義 引用關係／林旖旎
作者(外文)：Huang, Jiun-yih／Lin, Yii-nii
出版日期：2017
卷期：59:2
頁次：頁63-87
主題關鍵詞：他人取向；自省取向；家庭取向；貞潔取向；華人強暴迷思；Other-orientation；Reflection orientation；Family orientation；Chastity orientation；Chinese rape myths
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:328
  • 點閱點閱:66
強暴迷思的概念與測量具有在地性、變遷性，並與社會文化特色密切相關，因此不能僅移植西方的概念或使用西方的量表。本研究從傳統華人社會文化角度出發，提出華人的強暴迷思概念，並據以建立測量工具。華人重視家庭、關係、修身、德性、他人評價，故作者從這些面向思考並整合過去的研究經驗，提出華人家庭取向、貞潔取向、他人取向、與自省取向的強暴迷思特徵。本研究以無記名自陳式問卷調查法蒐集資料，研究對象包括5所公立、7所私立大學的學生，經剔除廢卷後得有效問卷969份。結果發現，上述華人強暴迷思的特徵中，家庭取向迷思可分為被害延伸與加害延伸兩項迷思，貞潔與他人取向迷思可合併為一個構念，而得到四項構念或分量表：被害延伸迷思、加害延伸迷思、貞潔與他人迷思、自省迷思。整體量表具備良好的內部一致性信度與組合信度，並具備構念效度、複合效度、與效標關聯效度。文末討論研究結果的理論意涵、實務應用、研究限制、與未來研究方向。
Rape myths related concepts and measurements are region-oriented, change-oriented, and are highly associated with sociocultural characteristics, as a result, western concepts and measurement scales may not apply to Chinese society. This study proposed concepts of rape myths from the Chinese point of view and established measurement tool suitable for Chinese society accordingly. Researchers of this study proposed family orientation, chastity orientation, other-orientation, and reflection orientation as the characteristics of Chinese rape myths based on Chinese traditional values and past research findings. The study collected data through anonymous self-report questionnaires surveying students of five public and seven private universities. The number of valid questionnaires was 969. The results of this study showed that the characteristic of family orientation could be further divided into rape victim extension and rapist extension. The characteristics of chastity orientation and other-orientation could be combined into one construct. The revised attributes of the measurement scale included four subscales: rape victim extension myths, rapist extension myths, chastity and other-oriented myths, and reflection myths. The resulted measurement scale was sufficient in internal consistency and composite reliability, and was validated through construct validity, cross-validation validity, and criteria-related validity. Theoretical implications, practical applications, research limitations, and directions for future research were also discussed in the study.
期刊論文
1.Aosved, A. C.、Long, P. J.(2006)。Co-occurrence of rape myth acceptance, sexism, racism, homophobia, ageism, classism, and religious intolerance。Sex Roles，55(7/8)，481-492。  new window
2.Chapleau, K. M.、Oswald, D. L.(2010)。Power, sex, and rape myth acceptance: Testing two models of rape proclivity。Journal of Sex Research，47(1)，66-78。  new window
3.Hammond, E. M.、Berry, M. A.、Rodriguez, D. N.(2011)。The influence of rape myth acceptance, sexual attitudes, and belief in a just world on attributions of responsibility in a date rape scenario。Legal & Criminological Psychology，16(2)，242-252。  new window
4.Lonsway, K. A.、Fitzgerald, L. F.(1995)。Attitudinal antecedents of rape myth acceptance: A theoretical and empirical reexamination。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，68(4)，704-711。  new window
5.McMahon, S.、Farmer, G. L.(2011)。An updated measure for assessing subtle rape myths。Social Work Research，35(2)，71-81。  new window
6.Newcombe, P. A.、van den Eynde, J.、Hafner, D.、Jolly, L.(2008)。Attributions of responsibility for rape: Differences across familiarity of situation, gender, and acceptance of rape myths。Journal of Applied Social Psychology，38(7)，1736-1754。  new window
7.Uji, M.、Shono, M.、Shikai, N.、Kitamura, T.(2007)。Rape myth scale: Factor structure and relationship with gender egalitarianism among Japanese professionals。Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences，61(4)，392-400。  new window
8.Feild, H. S.(1978)。Attitudes toward rape: A comparative analysis of police, rapists, crisis counselors, and citizens。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，36(2)，156-179。  new window
9.Ryan, K. M.(2011)。The relationship between rape myths and sexual scripts: The social construction of rape。Sex Roles，65(11/12)，774-782。  new window
10.Sussenbach, P.、Bohner, G.、Eyssel, F.(2012)。Schematic influences of rape myth acceptance on visual information processing: An eye-tracking approach。Journal of Experimental Social Psychology，48，660-668。  new window
11.Baugher, S. N.、Elhai, J. D.、Monroe, J. R.、Gray, M. J.(2010)。Rape myth acceptance, sexual trauma history, and posttraumatic stress disorder。Journal of Interpersonal Violence，25(11)，2036-2053。  new window
12.Foubert, J. D.、Brosi, M. W.、Bannon, R. S.(2011)。Pornography viewing among fraternity men: Effects on bystander intervention, rape myth acceptance and behavioral intent to commit sexual assault。Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity，18，212-231。  new window
13.Franiuk, R.、Shain, E. A.(2011)。Beyond Christianity: The status of women and rape myths。Sex Roles，65(11/12)，783-791。  new window
14.Grubb, Amy、Turner, Emily(2012)。Attribution of blame in rape cases: A review of the impact of rape myth acceptance, gender role conformity and substance use on victim blaming。Aggression and Violent Behavior，17，443-452。  new window
15.Kahlor, L.、Eastin, M. S.(2011)。Television's role in the culture of violence toward women: A study of television viewing and the cultivation of rape myth acceptance in the United States。Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media，55，215-231。  new window
16.Klein, C.、Kennedy, M. A.、Gorzalka, B. B.(2009)。Rape myth acceptance in men who completed the prostitution offender program of British Columbia。International Journal of Offender Therapy & Comparative Criminology，53，305-315。  new window
17.Drieschner, K.、Lange, A.(1999)。A review of cognitive factors in the etiology of rape: Theories, empirical studies, and implications。Clinical Psychology Review，19(1)，57-77。  new window
18.Basow, S. A.、Minieri, A.(2011)。"You owe me": Effects of date cost, who pays, participant gender, and rape myth beliefs on perceptions of rape。Journal of Interpersonal Violence，26(3)，479-497。  new window
19.Bohner, G.、Pina, A.、Viki, G. Tendayi、Siebler, F.(2010)。Using social norms to reduce men's rape proclivity: Perceived rape myth acceptance of out-groups may be more influential than that of in-groups。Psychology, Crime & Law，16(8)，671-693。  new window
20.Chapleau, Kristine M.、Oswald, Debra L.、Russell, Beenda L.(2008)。Male rape myths: The role of gender, violence, and sexism。Journal of Interpersonal Violence，23(5)，600-615。  new window
21.Haywood, H.、Swank, E.(2008)。Rape Myths Among Appalachian College Students。Violence and Victims，23(3)，373-389。  new window
22.Lee, J.、Kim, J.、Lim, H.(2010)。Rape myth acceptance among Korean college students: The roles of gender, attitudes toward women, and sexual double standard。Journal of Interpersonal Violence，25(7)，1200-1223。  new window
23.Ward, T.(2000)。Sexual offenders' cognitive distortions as implicit theories。Aggression and Violent Behavior，5，491-507。  new window
24.Wu, T. H.、Chang, C. C.、Chen, C. Y.、Wang, J. D.、Lin, C.-Y.(2015)。Further psychometric evaluation of the Self-Stigma Scale-Short: Measurement invariance across mental illness and gender。PLoS One，10(2)，1-12。  new window
25.Burt, Martha R.(1980)。Cultural myths and supports for rape。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，38(2)，217-230。  new window
26.Franiuk, R.、Seefelt, J. L.、Cepress, S. L.、Vandello, J. A.(2008)。Prevalence and effects of rape myths in print journalism: The Kobe Bryant Case。Violence Against Women，14(3)，287-309。  new window
27.Ross, Lee(1977)。The Intuitive Psychologist and his Shortcomings: Distortions in the Attribution Process。Advances in experimental Social Psychology，10，173-220。  new window
28.Lonsway, K. A.、Fitzgerald, L. F.(1994)。Rape myths: In review。Psychology of Women Quarterly，18(2)，133-164。  new window
29.Busching, R.、Lutz, J.(2016)。The impact of visual stereotypes on judgments about rape: A reverse-correlation approach。Swiss Journal of Psychology，75，133-140。  new window
30.Bohner, G.、Jarvis, C. I.、Eyssel, F.、Siebler, F.(2005)。The causal impact of rape myth acceptance on men's rape proclivity: comparing sexually coercive and noncoercive men。European Journal of Social Psychology，35，819-828。  new window
31.Gilmartin-Zena, P.(1987)。Attitudes toward rape: Student characteristics as predictors。Free Inquiry in Creative Sociology，15，175-182。  new window
32.Gerger, H.、Kley, H.、Bohner, G.、Siebler, F.(2007)。The acceptance of modem myths about sexual aggression scale: Development and validation in German and English。Aggressive Behavior，33，422-440。  new window
33.McMahon, S.(2010)。Rape myth beliefs and bystander attitudes among incoming college students。Journal of American College Health，59，3-11。  new window
34.Reed, K. M. P.、Hines, D. A.、Armstrong, J. L.、Cameron, A. Y.(2015)。Experimental evolution of a bystander prevention program for sexual assault and dating violence。Psychology of Violence，5，95-102。  new window
35.Polaschek, D. L. L.、Ward, T.(2002)。The implicit theories of rapists: What our questionnaires tell us。Aggression and Violent Behavior，7，385-406。  new window
36.Peterson, R. A.、Kim, Y.(2012)。On the relationship between coefficient alpha and composite reliability。Journal of Applied Psychology，98，194-198。  new window
37.Niemi, L.、Young, L.(2014)。Blaming the victim in the case of rape。Psychological Inquiry，25，230-233。  new window
38.Stewart, A. L.(2014)。The Men's Project: A sexual assault prevention program targeting college men。Psychology of Men & Masculinity，15，481-485。  new window
39.Seabrook, R. C.、Ward, L. M.、Giaccardi, S.(2016)。Why is fraternity membership associated with sexual assault? Exploring the roles of conformity to masculine norms, pressure to uphold masculinity, and objectification of women。Psychology of Men & Masculinity，19(1)，3-13。  new window
40.Shaw, J.、Campbell, R.、Cain, D.、Feeney, H.(2016)。Beyond surveys and scales: How rape myths manifest in sexual assault police records。Psychology of Violence。  new window
41.Velicer, W. F.、Huckel, L. H.、Hansen, C. E.(1989)。A measurement model for measuring attitudes toward violence。Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin，15，349-364。  new window
42.Tavrow, P.、Withers, M.、Obbuyi, A.、Omollo, V.、Wu, E.(2013)。Rape myth attitudes in rural Kenya: Toward the development of a culturally relevant attitude scale and "blame index"。Journal of Interpersonal Violent，28，2156-2178。  new window
43.Yeater, E. A.、Treat, T. A.、Viken, R. J.、McFall, R. M.(2010)。Cognitive processes underlying women's risk judgments: Associations with sexual victimization history and rape myth acceptance。Journal of Consulting Clinical Psychology，78，375-386。  new window
44.Payne, D. L.、Lonsway, K. A.、Fitzgerald, L. F.(1999)。Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois rape myth acceptance scale。Journal of Research in Personality，33(1)，27-68。  new window
45.黃軍義(20140300)。敵視女性態度、強暴迷思、與強暴行為。教育心理學報，45(3)，393-412。new window  延伸查詢new window
46.高旭繁、陸洛(20060400)。夫妻傳統性／現代性的契合與婚姻適應之關聯。本土心理學研究，25，47-100。new window  延伸查詢new window
47.陳若璋、劉志如、林烘煜(20070900)。比較強暴犯與兒童性侵害犯接受團體治療之療效評估。中華輔導學報，22，1-31。new window  延伸查詢new window
48.Chen, Fang Fang(2007)。Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invariance。Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal，14(3)，464-504。  new window
研究報告
1.黃光國(2010)。修養與義務：儒家關係主義的發展與應用 (計畫編號：100-2410-II-002-040-MY2)。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.呂明坤(1996)。強姦迷思對強姦犯罪影響之研究(碩士論文)。中央警察大學，桃園。  延伸查詢new window
2.林淑梨(2001)。併有與未併有反社會人格障礙之強暴犯在強暴相關認知差異之探討(碩士論文)。國立成功大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.方嘉珩(2008)。心理專業助人者的價值信念對性別角色態度與強暴迷思關係之調解作用研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.夏名慧(2009)。H-game使用動機、變態性態度與強暴迷思之初探性研究(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.向倩儀(2007)。網路色情對青少年強暴迷思態度的影響(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.卿盛瑛(2005)。性侵害加害者人格特質、家庭經驗、酒精使用、強暴迷思與性侵害之關係(碩士論文)。國立成功大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.林珮珊(2010)。網路論壇中的強暴討論串分析--以PTT的女性性版為例(碩士論文)。國立臺北大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.李維娜(2001)。性侵害犯罪加害人之認知扭曲研究(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
9.黃軍義(2000)。強姦行為之心理歷程的動態分析(博士論文)。國立臺灣大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.江宜靜(2009)。性侵害新聞中的強暴迷思與場域互動之影響(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
11.賴祥慶(2010)。表達性藝術活動融入高中性侵害預防教育對強暴迷思影響之研究(碩士論文)。玄奘大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.許烺光、徐隆德(1988)。中國人與美國人。巨流圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃軍義、陳若璋(1997)。強暴犯罪成因及相關問題之研究。台北：法務部。  延伸查詢new window
3.劉毓秀(19951001)。台灣婦女處境白皮書：1995年。台北：時報文化。  延伸查詢new window
4.Brownmiller, S.(1975)。Against our will: Man, women and rape。New York, NY：Simon & Schuster。  new window
5.McDaniel, E.(1994)。Understanding educational measurement。Madison, WI：WCB Brown & Benchmark。  new window
6.邱皓政(2004)。結構方程模式：LISREL的理論、技術與應用。臺北：雙葉書廊有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.余民寧(2006)。潛在變項模式：SIMPLIS的應用。高等教育。  延伸查詢new window
8.黃芳銘(2004)。社會科學統計方法學：結構方程模式。臺北市：五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
9.Kline, Rex B.(1998)。Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling。Guilford Press。  new window
10.邱皓政(2006)。量化研究與計量分析：SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。五南。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.楊國樞(2008)。華人自我的理論分析與實徵研究：社會取向與個人取向的觀點。中國人的自我：心理學的分析。臺北市：國立臺灣大學出版中心。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.葉光輝(20050000)。孝道的心理與行為。華人本土心理學。臺北：遠流。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.羅燦煐(1995)。熟識強暴的媒體建構--中國時報師大案及胡李案新聞報導之文本分析與比較。性、暴力、新聞眼。臺北：碩人。  延伸查詢new window
4.陸洛、楊國樞(2008)。當代華人的傳統與現代雙文化自我：其現身、組成與變遷。中國人的自我：心理學的分析。台北：台大出版中心。  延伸查詢new window
5.楊中芳(2008)。試論由國人的「自己」：理論與研究方向。中國人的自我：心理學的分析。台北：台大出版中心。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Lerner, M. J.(1970)。The desire for justice and reactions to victims。Altruism and helping behavior: Social Psychological Studies of Some Antecedents and Consequences。New York, NY：Academic Press。  new window
7.Koss, M. P.、Leonard, K.(1984)。Sexually aggressive men: Empirical findings and theoretical implications。Pornography and sexual aggression。Orlanda, FL：Academic Press。  new window
8.黃光國(2005)。華人關係主義的理論建構。華人本土心理學。臺北：遠流。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.楊國樞、葉明華(20050000)。家族主義與泛家族主義。華人本土心理學。臺北：遠流。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.黃光國(20050000)。華人的道德觀與正義觀。華人本土心理學。臺北：遠流。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.陸洛(2008)。人我關係之界定 : 「折衷自我」的現身。中國人的自我 : 心理學的分析。臺北：臺大出版中心。  延伸查詢new window
12.楊國樞(20050000)。華人社會取向的理論分析。華人本土心理學。臺北市：遠流。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：814（臺灣：641，外國：173） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1293556 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67094388
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上