:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:我國大專院校資訊相關科系學生之資訊專業倫理另有概念探究
書刊名:資訊管理學報
作者:林建宏周倩 引用關係
作者(外文):Lin, Chien-hungChou, Chien
出版日期:2016
卷期:23:4
頁次:頁473-502
主題關鍵詞:資訊專業倫理大專院校資訊科系學生另有概念雙層次測驗Professional information ethicsTaiwan information science majorsMisunderstandingsTwo-tier tests
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:16
  • 點閱點閱:16
本研究旨在透過「資訊專業倫理另有概念雙層次測驗」440份有效回收問卷,探討資訊科系學生可能存在之另有概念。依據測驗結果,分析學生對於雙層次測驗之作答情況後,得以下研究結果:(1)資訊科系學生對於倫理思考之另有概念包括「透過社會共識進行思考」以及「偏重手段合理而忽略目的合理」等。(2)資訊科系學生對於法律概念思考具有之另有概念包括「法律誤用」、「著作權、隱私等法律觀念不健全」以及「保密議題的判斷依據不清」等。(3)資訊科系學生對於專業人士的權利與義務具有之另有概念包括「對產品的責任歸屬認同度不高」、「自我權益保障意識較高」以及「對公/私領域的界線劃分不甚清楚」等。本研究根據上述研究結果,對大專院校之資訊專業倫理課程規劃提出具體建議,供授課教師參考。
Purpose - The current study intends to investigate and categorize Taiwanese information science majors' misunderstandings regarding professional information ethics. Design/methodology/approach - Using a 14-item two-tier test developed by the researchers, the study collected valid responses from 440 Taiwanese information science majors. Findings - The results are as follows: (1) The students have misunderstandings in ethical thinking, such as the possession of social consensus-based thoughts and the focus of means rather than goals. (2) The students have misunderstandings in laws, such as law-misinterpretation, the lack of knowledge in copyright/privacy laws, and insufficient conceptions of confidentiality. (3) The students have misunderstandings in their rights and obligations, such as the lack of attribution of responsibility to the product, over-emphasis on their personal-related rights, and insufficient conceptions on distinction between the public domain and the private domain. Research limitations/implications - The current study applied convenience sampling, thus inherent bias may occur and the sample is not representative of the population being studied. Moreover, this research used Google forms to create the two-tier test, thus was unable to prevent the respondents from changing their previous answers while taking the test. Practical implications - According to the results, the researchers provided curriculum design implications for fostering ethical thinking, establishing the threshold concept of ethics-related laws and regulations, and identifying the empowerment of information professionals. Such concrete suggestions may benefit the design and development of information professional ethics curriculum in Taiwan's post-secondary education. Originality/value - The current study provides first-hand information which identifies the important content of professional ethics curriculum. Teachers with acknowledgement of possible misunderstandings may as well reconstruct and build up students' knowledge more effectively while lecturing. Moreover, the self-developed two-tier test on professional information ethics provides a useful and valuable instrument for further studies.
期刊論文
1.Payne, D.、Landry, B. J. L.(2005)。Similarities in business and IT professional ethics: The need for and development of a comprehensive code of ethics。Journal of Business Ethics,62(1),73-85。  new window
2.Smith, S.、Fryer-Edwards, K.、Diekema, D. S.、Braddock, C. H.(2004)。Finding effective strategies for teaching ethics: A comparison trial of two interventions。Academic Medicine,79(3),265-271。  new window
3.Nicoll, G.(2001)。A report of undergraduates' bonding misconceptions。International Journal of Science Education,23(7),707-730。  new window
4.許良榮(20030900)。中小學生對於金屬之分類的迷思概念研究。科學教育學刊,11(3),277-296。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Chou, C.、Chan, P. S.、Wu, H. C.(2007)。Using a two-tier test to assess students' understanding and alternative conceptions of cyber copyright laws。British Journal of Educational Technology,38(6),1072-1084。  new window
6.Tsai, C.-C.、Chou, C.(2002)。Diagnosing students' alternative conceptions in science。Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,18(2),157-165。  new window
7.Treagust, D. F.(1988)。Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students' misconceptions in science。International Journal of Science Education,10(2),159-169。  new window
8.Calluzzo, V. J.、Cante, C. J.(2004)。Ethics in Information Technology and Software Use。Journal of Business Ethics,51(3),301-312。  new window
9.任文瑗、陸啟超(20030400)。資訊倫理教育與侵權行為意圖之探討。資訊與教育,94,37-50。  延伸查詢new window
10.Jones, Thomas M.(1991)。Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model。Academy of Management Review,16(2),366-395。  new window
11.Oz, Effy(1993)。Ethical standards for computer professionals: a comparative analysis of four major codes。Journal of Business Ethics,12(9),709-726。  new window
12.Wu, H.-C.、Chou, C.、Ke, H.-R.、Wang, M.-H.(2010)。College students' misunderstandings about copyright laws for digital library resources。The Electronic Library,28(2),197-209。  new window
13.林建宏、周倩(2014)。我國大專院校資訊科系之資訊倫理相關課程開設現況研究。教育科學研究期刊,59(1),197-228。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.林建宏、周倩(2010)。我國大專院校開設資訊專業倫理課程情形之初探。TANet 2010臺灣網際網路研討會,(會議日期: 2010年10月27-29日)。臺南。  延伸查詢new window
2.徐木蘭、陳秀育、劉仲矩(1997)。資訊專業倫理內容分析法之研究。第八屆國際資訊管理學術研討會,(會議日期: 1997年5月29日)。臺北。497-504。  延伸查詢new window
3.Steneck, N. H.(1999)。Designing teaching and assessment tools for an integrated engineering ethics curriculum。29th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference,(會議日期: 1999, November 10-13)。Piscataway, NJ。11-17。  new window
學位論文
1.陳淑筠(2002)。國內學生自然科學迷思概念研究之後設研究(碩士論文)。臺東師範學院,臺東市。  延伸查詢new window
2.詹佩珊(2004)。中學生網路法律課程發展與評估(碩士論文)。國立交通大學,新竹市。  延伸查詢new window
3.張作為(2007)。論著作權於學術倫理之實踐與省思(碩士論文)。國立清華大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.劉俊庚(2002)。迷思概念與概念改變教學策略之文獻分析--以概念構圖和後設分析模式探討其意涵與影響(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.金文森、江政憲(2009)。工程倫理。臺北市:五南。  延伸查詢new window
2.張鐸(2004)。電腦與資訊倫理。臺北市:文魁。  延伸查詢new window
3.Fleddermann, C. B.、張一岑、許宏德(2008)。工程倫理。臺北市:全華。  延伸查詢new window
4.Baase, S.(2003)。A gift of fire: Social, legal, and ethical issues for computing。Upper Saddle River, NJ:Person Education。  new window
5.De George, R. T.(2003)。The ethics of information technology and business。Malden, MA:Blackwell Publication。  new window
6.Quinn, M. J.(2009)。Ethics for the information age。Boston, MA:Pearson Educations。  new window
7.Tavani, H. T.(2010)。Ethics and technology: Controversies, questions and strategies for ethical computing。Hoboken, New Jersey:Wiley。  new window
8.Spinello, R. A.(2006)。Cyberethics: Morality and law in cyberspace。Sudbury, MA:Jones and Bartlett Publisher。  new window
9.Johnson, Deborah G.(2001)。Computer ethics。Upper Saddle River, New Jersey:Prentice Hall。  new window
10.Mason, R. O.、Mason, F. M.、Culnan, M. J.(1995)。Ethics of information management。Sage Publications。  new window
11.林杏子(20020000)。資訊倫理。臺北市:華泰。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.李春旺(2009)。企業倫理。台北新店:正中書局。  延伸查詢new window
13.章忠信(2001)。著作權大哉問。臺中市:書泉出版社。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Association for Computing Machinery,IEEE Computer Society(2008)。Curriculum guidelines for undergraduate degree programs in information technology,https://www.acm.org//education/curricula/IT2008%20Curriculum.pdf。  new window
2.Association of Computing Machinery(1992)。ACM code of ethics and professional conduct,http://www.acm.org/about/code-of-ethics。  new window
3.Computer Ethics Institute(2008)。A moral compass for cyberspace,http://computerethicsinstitute.org/images/CEI2008Brochure.pdf。  new window
4.姜智逸(2008)。老闆可以隨意監看我的E-MAIL與MSN內容嗎,http://www.lawtw.com/article.php?template=article_content&area=free_browse&parent_path=,1,776,&job_id=137388&article_category_id=792&article_id=70015。  new window
5.簡榮宗(2004)。網站標錯價格的法律爭議,http://www.lawtw.com/article.php?template=article_content&parent_path=,1,4,&article_category_id= 15&job_id=58552&article_id=28277。  new window
6.AITP。Code of ethics & standards of conduct,http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.aitp.org/resource/resmgr/forms/code_of_ethics.pdf。  new window
7.ICCP(2011)。Code of ethics,http://iccp.org/members/coe。  new window
8.IEEE(2006)。IEEE Code of ethics,http://www.sfjohnson.com/acad/ethics/FourCodesOfEthics.pdf。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE